$5,000,000 to anyone who can prove it's fake.

Dr. Frank in his interview yesterday said they were acquired from the Space Force. You know they are legit because they can be corroborated by the IP addresses they contain. It would be an impossible task to falsify 37 terabytes of PCAP data.

Packet captures, typically, are captured outside the system - on the network. It can be anywhere between the two end points. I believe the white hats had the system under surveillence and packet captures were one aspect of it.

It is possible to becapturing on the device itself too. but it would typically require modifying the configuration and installed software - would by itself invalidates the machines. So I think there was some military level surveillence on the networks.

He knows its legit because he probably got it from the Q team.

If they were not legit captures, it would be very easy to prove they were fake, but correlating something in the packets - the origin, destination, time sequence etc.

Remember, not only do the captures show any foreign interference, it wouldn also be showing the sequence of events as it happened. So that can be correlated as well.

I don't have time to answer from scratch, but I'm hoping some copypasta from an old post of mine will help:

After reading a couple of somewhat negative comments that betrayed a lack of fundamental understanding, I wanted to offer some small clarification on Mike's video. Specifically, I want to address the concern that this just boils down to some anonymous guy's opinion. Nothing could be further from the truth. What Mike claims to have is 100% objective proof that is independent of any particular opinion or analysis. I will briefly try to explain.

There are a couple relevant technologies here that I would like to break down a little bit. I want to try to break this down for laypeople in a bit less technical wording. The first is networking communications between computers.

When data is transmitted across a network, like on the Internet, that data is broken up into what are called 'packets'. For now, let's just think of these as post cards like you would fill out and place in the mail. So if you want to send the Holy Bible to a friend, one (inefficient) way of doing so would be to copy the bible down onto post cards. Fit as much as you can on a post card, then mail that post card to the recipient. This would be very time-consuming, and the post cards might arrive out of order. Some might also be lost in the mail, so you might include a number on each card to identify the order. Then, if by the end there are missing numbers, you might re-write those cards and send the new copies to your recipient. Again, these post cards are analogous to network 'packets' as described in Mike's video.

But what if someone intercepts your mail and alters your post cards? Then your friend might have a copy of the Bible that has been altered, even to the point of conveying a different or opposite message at any or all points. This is a real problem, and it is also a problem for network packets. However, there is a long-established solution. Without that solution, secure online transactions from purchases to banking would all be impossible. So we all already know that technology exists to address this problem, but most of us do not understand it very well.

Sadly, it is quite a bit harder to explain in lay terms how the technology works to guarantee our 'post cards'/packets aren't altered as they are transmitted through the network, but I am going to try. The basic technology involves advanced mathematical encryption of the same sort your online bank would use. This mathematical solution involves a private key and a public key. In our analogy, both you, the sender, and your recipient would have both private and public keys. The private key would be kept secret, but the public key can be shared. These keys can be used to encrypt data such that only the intended recipient can read it. Even more importantly here, these keys can also be used to create a digital signature. This signature incorporates every detail of the network packets or your post cards in a cryptographic algorithm such that it can be proven with mathematical certainty whether or not the contents of the packet or post card has been altered in any way. This is still quite complicated, so let me give a simple example:

Let's say one of your post cards says, "#1346: For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16 (NIV)". Using a cryptographic signature, your recipient could verify that the message contents has not been altered with such precision that, if even the received message left out, altered, or added A SINGLE CHARACTER, the digital signature WOULD NOT MATCH and would thus prove with MATHEMATICAL CERTAINTY that the message had not been accurately transmitted. In the case of a computer network, that packet would be discarded and a new attempt would be made to send the correct packet with the correct contents.

So, putting this all together, it is as if the voting machines communicated via post cards in the mail to each other. Each post card is time and date stamped, marked for its proper order in the transmission, and every detail is digitally signed so that it can be proven with MATHEMATICAL CERTAINTY whether or not the data was altered between the sender and receiver. Mike claims to have EVERY SINGLE POST CARD FOR THE ENTIRE ELECTION, COMPLETE WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE! Furthermore, Mike has claimed elsewhere that proper, legal chain of custody was maintained with this data from the time of collection to the present. If both of these claims are true, that can be easily proven, confirmed, and verified. And it means that ANYONE who has the proper training/understanding to check the data will have no choice but to come to the exact same conclusion that his anonymous expert came to. The information IS NOT DEPENDENT ON AN EXPERT TESTIMONY! If this is not true, then digital commerce and online banking would be an impossibility.

So, one last time, let's try to go over a complete analogy. Let's say computers did not exist but mathematical cryptography for encryption and signing is possible. Let's say that all machines in the election were replaced with humans who communicated all election information via post cards which used cryptographic signing to ensure that all data maintained its accuracy. This would include communications like, "Take the votes we tallied since our last post card and add them to the running total for our state. Then add that to the running total for the nation." Some of these post cards might be from foreign actors saying things like, "Biden is falling too far behind in Michigan! Take 32,213 votes from Trump and re-assign those to Biden." Every post card is numbered so you can piece together the original number. Every post card has a data and time stamp, as well. And every post card is cryptographically signed in a way that allows the recipient to confirm whether or not the original message made it without being altered. You can think of this as a mathematical formula each person has. Each also has two very long strings of data corresponding to a private and public key. So when Person A wants to send an update to Person B, he first writes the message, then runs the message through a mathematical function/algorithm along with his secret key and his recipient's public key. The function/algorithm spits out exactly what he then writes on the final post card and sends to the recipient. Furthermore, each new post card includes a cryptographic hash pointing to the previous post card sent. This way, each new post card can be verifiably linked to the previous post card. And Mike has ALL of these post cards!

One final remark about the cryptographic signatures: these are sort of like the "Royal Seal" a king might have used in times past. Royal edicts would have a hot wax seal that the king would press his signet ring into on the assumption that no one can break the seal and put it back without the king's own ring which remains in his possession. Cryptographic signing is MUCH more secure than this!

And, finally, here are a few Wikipedia references to relevant technology discussed above for those who want to dive more deeply into the technical aspects:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_protocol_suite >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography

They have not said where they got the packets from.

Dr. Frank allude that they may of come from white hat hackers possibly the Space Force since the traffic went to space via Satellite transmission https://exposure.locals.com/post/930772/interview-w-dr-frank (About 7 minutes in or -39.00 on the timer)

In 2016, I worked in IT for a very large county. The IT department managed the servers for the board of elections. A day before the election I was in a meeting with the security officer and he panicked at what he saw on his screen. Then he showed me and explains. The network was being flooded with packets as a hack attempt to enter our system. I asked him where they were coming from and he said south east Asia. In other words China. I know this is legitimate as I saw it with my own eyes in 2016.

If they were taken in real time, when 'someone hit record' then the fact that he is broadcasting them means the 'someone' who got them was authorized to or there would be trouble in having something like this. My guess is that someone was the mil. and DT. And so he is auth to have them.

That gives me confidence theyre legit. No takers on the 5 milllion adds to that. My guess is Mike has a trusted role in this, part of a plan to save America.

Mike Lindell Presents: Absolutely 9-0

https://home.frankspeech.com/tv/video/mike-lindell-presents-absolutely-9-0

He begins the video talking about his sources—white hat hackers working for the government, etc. He also interviews one of the guys--disguised; it’s interesting.

Probably wireshark

Basically, Internet Protocol (IP) works like postcards in the regular mail. Each "card" has a to address, a from address, a datestamp and a message. Everything that uses IP is sent that way, including pictures and sounds.

A message that will not fit on to one card requires the use of many cards. They keep track of which cards are in the same message with Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).

Each one of those IP cards constitutes a "packet" so packet capture is like someone tapping in to the mail system and photocopying all the postcards. You can then knit them together to get the compete message.

Simply described. Every communication whether it is data or voice has to establish a connection. The call request, the answer of that request, the answer back to establish the circuit, the circuit establishement, the actual transmission is all time stamped and recorded. It also has the volume of data transmitted during that period of time.

So once you have this data (from the network routers) you can discover every connection. You know when, how much, and from where it came and where it went.

Did that help?

Regarding where Mike got the data... as far as I know, that hasn't been disclosed yet.

He mention that he got them but wouldn’t say from where. He said it doesn’t matter where I got them from just that we have them

Then this would be the information that was rumored after the election where the server was found in Germany that had all the data on it? This would be similar to that, or would be actually that data?

IF it is fake, seems like someone from dominion or in charge of the voting systems could make a cool $5 million if it's easily debunked..... which if it's fake would be obvious to them... Mike is a stand up dude and I'm sure if he and his team saw evidence to refute it, they would say so and give the 5 million.

Hmmmmmmm this is really big then.

I guess the next question would be, why are republican congress people attending this event and mass tweeting about it.... but I probably already know the answer to this.

how did Mike get his hands on them?

When your computer is on a home network, the packets are broadcast to everyone on the network. And each computer only looks for their ip address to see if the packets are intended for them.

However all computers on the network are getting the packets. So you only need a computer connected to a network to start logging and recording all of the data being sent on the network.

It looks like the voting machines were being connected to the internet, and using wifi. So any of the staff who knew about the wifi network and the wifi password could connect to the access point, and capture all of the packets being broadcast on the network.

And how does he know what he has are legit?

Probably because he has multiple people assisting in the packet capture. The staff at each one of the polling sites should be capturing packets from wifi on the client-side. And he might have whistle blowers from dominion capturing packets on the server side.

So the packets from the client-side and server-side should match up and validate each other. That should give you enough confirmed data-points that you know are correct, to validate the rest of the data.

Also if the packets are in real-time, it would be very hard to write a spoof program to inject realistic fake data into the packet capture to try and pretend like something else is happening.

To go along with that, does he have anyway of proving these are legit captures?

When information is sent over the network, it doesn't go straight from point a to point b. It get sent over a network, where the data bounces between different computers in different data centers before finally getting to the server.

For instance, even opening up google.com will probably be forwarded through 10 different computers before arriving at google. And all of this information is logged. The problem is that this raw log of information is pretty worthless, because there's so much data you wouldn't know what to look for.

But if you have the packet captures from the client and the server. You know which ip addresses, and what time they sent the information. And this should be stored in the logs of all of the different data centers that the packets pass through. And if they check their logs, they should be able to validate that, "yes, this traffic did pass through here". And it's likely that the Space Force, or NSA has access to these logs.

or is that what this is supposed to prove?

What it basically proves is foreign interference. You have a log of all of these different points all the way through election night of these voting machines that are connected to the internet.

So you'll likely have a record of all of the vote tallies as they are happening through the night. So the voting machines send packets to the dominion server for the current vote of { trump : 200k, biden 50k }, and then you have packets going to and from a foreign server that say { trump : -50k, biden : + 50k }.

And then in the next dominion server check you see { trump: 150k, biden :100k }. The information can be tracked to see when and how votes are being changed, depending on the totals they are reporting back. And when those change based on when the voting machine connected to a foreign server.

In a network information being sent between to IoT devices can be monitored using software potentially a MITM situation or various other methods meaning whatever information was being sent either to flip votes or what have you from the source it was sent from or to the destination it was sent to is all recorded

Source; Studying for CCNA 200-301 and soon to be network engineer.

I'm betting he got them from the military. I don't have much to bet with, but... So, comment below says Dr Frank tells us they're from the Space Force. Guess I won the bet. lol.

It can be external or internal. To know what you are looking for the packet normally has a header. I remember back in the day sniffing yahoo messenger and chat. Just to get the protocol so you could replicate the packet for your own program to make booters or bots.

The problem with the pcap narrative is that government would need to be involved/admit to it in order to legitimize the claim.

That being said, depending on what the data consists of, could reveal quite a bit. I would imagine a coder/hacker would probably have their own program/daemon with its own communication protocol, and this infiltration would be small and custom.

However if it was done the newage way, it'd be "let's backdoor Teamviewer in and use that" or that could already be a "feature" as Dominion has done tech support via remote desktop before. If it is some sort of VNC/Teamviewer/RDP connection, then if you can decypher and refeed that stream/protocol I would imagine you'd essentially be seeing a videotape replay of what they did on their remote control.

IIRC there was an article about "rogue" audit teams outside some of the polling centers with the ability to packet sniff the wifi connections and collect the data.

u/TheRoyalRob:

So lets say it isn't encrypted (or it is but key is known or shared by the network). What to do ? Simply you start some sniffer between communicating computers (let's say on some computer between,but that isn't only way) and you have packets captured.

It is all old story with Alice,Bob and Eve(sdopper)...

Nobody has even seen them. Mike is showing fucking pictures from some windows computer that is out of date on its updates. Its bad how unprofessional the claims seem to be. I was anticipating actual packet captures with actual data and headers etc. Instead we get some graphics that look like they have been created in Microsoft Paint with no supporting data. What a big nothingburger.