397
Comments (69)
sorted by:
48
Nurarihyon_no_MAGA 48 points ago +49 / -1

A 5% chance of death from a vaccine is WAY TOO HIGH for it to be considered safe and effective

68
6daysandrest 68 points ago +68 / -0

It wasn't 5% kill rate. It's that 100% of the VAERS deaths - deaths close enough to jab that they can't be ignored - were caused by 5% of the batches and those batches were deliberately spread around. This is proof that:

  1. the shots are not uniform.

  2. The manufacturers are deliberately manipulating the ingredients in the shots.

  3. The shots that they are altering are being deliberately distributed to red states.

  4. The shots they are altering are being distributed in a way that masks their lethal effects. No big kill clusters outside select clinics.

It's hard evidence of a malicious conspiracy.

31
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 31 points ago +33 / -2

You would be correct if there wasn't selection bias involved. Only 1% of cases are ever reported to VAERS. Most doctors don't even know what VAERS is. This means it's more likely that the same doctor/hospital is reporting multiple cases while others report none, which ends up to certain areas being over-represented in VAERS and more likely to have the same batch in their reports.

17
ImBillCurtis 17 points ago +18 / -1

Exactly. Selection bias, placebo, and reporting likelihood come into play. If you take everything present in their investigation as true and accurate, what you still have is people who can choose or not choose to report their adverse reactions. On top of that, you probably have a lot more bluepilled, compliant healthcare workers and administrators in the way of reporting SAEs in the D controlled areas.

8
MarleyGoat 8 points ago +8 / -0

It is true that a small percentage of adverse events are reported, and certain providers are reporting multiple cases. However, you need to consider that many different providers are reporting adverse events in multiple states all from the same lot. For example, Moderna lot 039K20A had 4993 adverse events reported in 48 states. That's at least 48 providers reporting on the same lot.

2
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 2 points ago +2 / -0

48 states all reporting information on the same lot is suspect in itself. How do 48 states all end up with the same lot, and in large enough quantities that it reaches a location in each state that is aware of VAERS and will report issues? If that's not an error of some kind, then this lot must be absolutely massive.

Without knowing whether certain lots are much bigger than other lots, or how many lots exist in total for each vaccine in the US, statistically speaking, the lots are not comparable, and it would be difficult to draw reliable conclusions from this data.

Your point is good that a single lot here looks to be problematic and in this case, selection bias due to reporting is probably not a concern. But we don't know percentage 4,993 is of the total for the lot, and if that's any different from other lots.

2
MarleyGoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. Without knowing the size of these lots it is impossible to draw a conclusion. After doing a little research on the VAERs database, I asked my elderly mother which vaccines she received(I couldn't stop her). Her 1st two shots were both from lots that had a high number of AE reports. Now I am thinking that the suspect lots were much larger than the "safe" lots.

1
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's probably the case, or perhaps something else about them, like they had more doses currently administered from that lot. The newest lot will probably always look to be the safest.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
SarMega 8 points ago +8 / -0

This. What we're seeing is very simple: Red states are the ones filling all the VAERS reports, and the reporters all administered a single lot number.

5
6daysandrest 5 points ago +5 / -0

A possible explanation but it doesn't address that the kill batches got spread around while other batches did not.

The thing about these shots, people are dying right away and getting reported and they're dying much later and the death blamed on something else. I think most shots are a slow kill mechanism and some are a potential fast kill mechanism. The slow kill shots go out to one region as a big batch while the fast kill shots get spread around.

I hate that this situation even exists.

2
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 2 points ago +2 / -0

The idea of a "kill batch" being spread around, while other batches don't seem to be as deadly has multiple problems with it.

As I mentioned earlier, the primary issue is reporting, if some batch goes to some place where there are high likelihood of reporting issues, and another doesn't, it will make the former look deadlier, even if they both have the same kill rate.

But there's other problems also. If one batch is 10 times the size of another batch, it might appear to be 10 times deadlier assuming there is consistency to the reporting of each.

To put it simply, we don't have enough data to draw any reliable conclusions regarding specific batches versus others. We do know overall that these vaccines are dangerous, and seem to be more dangerous and deadly than previous vaccines. But without knowing how many batches there are, the size of each one, where each one ended up going, what percentage of the batch remained in the US versus being shipped to other countries, reliable numbers on adverse affects and death, trying to draw statistical conclusions isn't feasible.

3
Newusertopumpmemes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point

9
Graceunderfire 9 points ago +9 / -0

This might be because Republicans are far more likely to report a vaccine injury.

2
Pbman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Makes sense.

13
Libraritarian 13 points ago +13 / -0

But that's not what this means... this is about how a handful of specific individual batches of not vaccines from the manufacturers caused all the deaths.

2
I-AM-ANON 2 points ago +2 / -0

its a typo in the title. missing the word 'by' -- 'caused by 5%'

26
MarleyGoat 26 points ago +26 / -0

Its important to note that the batches with the most adverse reactions were sent to the most states. This made "bad batches" easier to conceal. If a single batch that caused 50 deaths was sent to one state, it would be quickly discovered.

14
COLNE68601 14 points ago +14 / -0

I came here to say this. They should not be able to spread lots out across the country to hide hot batches. There is absolutely no justification for it other than their desire to prevent detection.

6
MarleyGoat 6 points ago +6 / -0

I agree. I am wondering what the distribution network looks like and who decides what goes where.

2
SomeRandomGuy77 2 points ago +2 / -0

They should not be able to

As with everything (they) do, who is going to stop them? They don't get killed or incarcerated for what they do so why should they ever care.

20
JackieDaytona74 20 points ago +21 / -1

This is very interesting data. But let's remember, this data is a fragment of the big picture.

There were far, far more deaths caused by these "vaccines" than listed here.

One can also accidentally extrapolate from this data that the deaths are over, which is clearly not the case. I know folks around here understand that, but sending this to normies without proper context could lead them to believe that. Deaths will always be occurring from this shot because it's injecting and then asking the body to manufacture the most lethal element of the covid 19 virus every time (the spike protein) someone gets the shot or a booster.

24
Shalomtoyou 24 points ago +26 / -2

You raise an interesting point.

What if it's just that red states are more likely to report VAERS incidents than doctors in blue states?

14
JackieDaytona74 14 points ago +15 / -1

You raise an excellent point here. There's a lot of data and statements from doctors that the VAERS data represents at best 1% of the total vaccine injuries and deaths.

But looking at this specific batch data, your point is an excellent one in that it could completely skew the results.

I appreciate what the author of this article is trying to do, but it's such a small data set and it's vulnerable to the exact kinds of unknowns that you just adroitly referenced.

8
keeptherepublic100 8 points ago +8 / -0

Also I think many patriots are not taking the vax regardless of what state you live in. Also remember there are no blue states just blue counties(if that).

6
StayQool 6 points ago +6 / -0

You beat me to it!

I just made a similar comment before reading this. However, we came to the same conclusion independently.

12
yldngo 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is [them] trying to create an explanation that sounds more reasonable to the normies.... It is a desperate attempt to kill/enslave more people before it's figured out that it is a genocidal tool and not for anyone's health.

12
MEGAMAGAULTRA 12 points ago +12 / -0

Liberal logic:

  1. Kill red states population with vaccine
  2. Illegal immigrants shipped to red states
  3. Blue state
  4. Profit
  5. Repeat as needed.
3
WhoKnowsAnymore 3 points ago +3 / -0

Question is how the lower ranks within the pharmaceutical companies are going along with it. Have to imagine there’s good people in there…

11
DontTreadOnIT 11 points ago +11 / -0

The real percentage of deaths to jabs is likely far higher, at least in my state.

Their stats say nearly 50% of TN is vaxxed. I don't think the number is anywhere near that high.

3
FitOfficial 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah we're probably closer to 30-35% due to the elderly skew.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
ImBillCurtis 11 points ago +11 / -0

Here’s some Good info for pedes to share with their vaxxed/vax curious friends:

If you get so much a a rash, REPORT TO THE MANUFACTURER. By Federal Law, individual representatives of companies can be held criminally and civilly liable for failing to report. Every pharma company has 1 business day (but up to 3 calendar days) to report a suspected adverse event. Reporting to VAERS is okay, but if these companies were inundated with direct complaints it may actually get somewhere. It’s a LOT harder to falsify the potential hundreds of thousands of reports this way. And it implicates the pharma companies directly

9
swimkin 9 points ago +9 / -0

Guess what? They missed me! Not gonna get their jab no matter what.

8
Mutti2 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wonder which lots were in the truck that wrecked? Divine intervention perhaps?

7
pearlrevolver 7 points ago +7 / -0

Someone who's infiltrated Reddit should peddle this as a good thing! That way the lemmings expose themselves as 1. Eugenicists 2. Admitting the vax kills people.

7
Graceunderfire 7 points ago +7 / -0

Title example "which saintly genius managed to make this happen, all killer vaccines sent to red states"

3
pearlrevolver 3 points ago +3 / -0

Perfect.

7
PurgeTheTreasonous 7 points ago +7 / -0

Only problem with this data is it's less than 1% of the side effects reported + they don't consider you vaxxed until 14 days after the first injection. It's far worse & people will continue to die.

9
Graceunderfire 9 points ago +9 / -0

That "first nurse to take the shot" lady that fell over and died right on camera for us all to see saved many lives. I saw that and my heart hit my intestines, I started shouting from the rooftops the same day i believe.

6
TheRoyalRob 6 points ago +6 / -0

Me and my mom were talking about it today... how the fuck is it possible that through 2 sets of mutual friends, we know 2 people who have died after the vaccine, yet I don't know anyone who has died of covid.

5
DemonDMT 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is what Hitler dreamed of, a real health crisis (using bioweaponized airborne aids) to send a chill across the nation.. forcing everyone to take a vaccine, but selectively giving death/poison to Hitler's political enemies. This is Hitler's dream scenario.. because the state will say this is a natual pandemic from "nature" when it really was a lab released bio weapon to scare the masses, and the vaccines would make Hitler look like a "savior" all the while quietly killing his enemies. This is the 4th reich.

3
keeptherepublic100 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have said this for months. They are going to give lethal dose to everyone who keeps waiting. this should terrify everyone

7
MoLibertyson 7 points ago +7 / -0

Terrified to the point of retaliating? Like a self defense alibi? I'm only waiting for them to try. My lethal dose is jacketed and measured in grains.

3
Newusertopumpmemes 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think this is a way for pharma to get ahead of the story that's coming out about vaccine related deaths. They are doing damage control by saying it was just 5% of batches that were not refrigerated properly and will probably arrest the delivery drivers to deflect blame from BP.

3
AusStormWatcher 3 points ago +3 / -0

Desperation

3
DiveAndBait 3 points ago +3 / -0

If true, EVEN MORE EVIDENCE RED STATES SHOULD NOT TAKE THE VX

3
pattrn 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder what the reporting rate is in conservative states versus socialist states. If socialist states don't report any deaths, then you will see exactly this outcome.

3
StayQool 3 points ago +3 / -0

Couldn’t the VAERS data also look like clusters because few hospitals are recording the side effects? We know it’s not being uniformly recorded.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Percherons 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a hard time believing we are not in some kind of major civil backlash in this country. They have gutted the First Amendment, trying to take the Second and we are being taxed without representation, and how many are into child trafficking! They are thieves and bastards! I don’t have to say who they are, we all know!

2
Munchaussen 2 points ago +2 / -0

See The Plan.

2
BlowTorch 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m convinced that many dem voters who took the injection are not reporting anything to their Doctors or VAERS. Because of course it’s not the shot!

2
XOXOGG 2 points ago +2 / -0

OK. Devil's advocate here. Is it possible that is because red states are more likely to report than blue states??

Edited: I should have read the comments before commenting. I see there are many of us who believe some states aren't reporting to VAERS.

1
DemonDMT 1 point ago +2 / -1

is this not political terrorism in the highest order? This is like a bunch of terrorists sending anthrax in the mail but far more advanced since vaccine companies are involved. This is HUGE.

1
9Alp_CMa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I had a hunch this was the case when that overturned vax truck needed dod involvement. Super sus

1
ilovetrump4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just curious - are there any analyses that look at death rates by batch and county?

That might be more "interesting".

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DemonDMT 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is exactly why I'm not getting it, they will be selectively killing people who are unfavorable to the deep state, new world order system.

1
mayflowerpatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

deep blue oregon coast and I know of two deaths and several injuries here....

1
filthycasul 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm a little skeptical of this. how did they know exactly which batch each shot came from?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
filthycasul 1 point ago +1 / -0

oh that's a thing? well I guess I stand corrected :P

1
bakahed 1 point ago +1 / -0

What

By the way the page says adblocker detected

1
djmarcone 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure thats all just a coincidence.

(it's not)

1
Dogeagle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Political genocide?

1
kimd8744 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting that in the contract to purchase the vaccine was that Pfizer had full control over any donations of the vaccine and where it could go. Thought that was strange...

1
fponick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anybody got another way to see this? Site says it detected an Ad Blocker, but I have no Ad Blocker on. Thx.