I'm new here and I don't understand about the plane crash part. Are you saying that they crashed a $200m fighter plane deliberately to send some sort of message? Or that the story about the plane crash is fake? What would be the point? If they're trying to keep her death secret as it appears it might be then why crash planes to reveal publicly their secret plans to conceal her death? Or if they are sending an internal message to each other then the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world have no more efficient message of communicating with each other than slamming jet fighters into the ocean? I really don't get "comms". Could someone please explain?
The jet may or may not have crashed. The elite communicate (comms) openly in plain sight on public forums such as mass media, social media, and art. The communication is thinly vailed and some of our time here is spent trying to decode these communications in order to understand their plans and sometimes prevent the plans from being successful. Welcome to the information war fren.
The plane did crash and it was arranged by the cabal because creating an elaborate conspiracy to slam a $200 million dollar fighter plane into the ocean that at the very minimum would have required the active cooperation of large members of the UK defence forces because this was the best way to inform each other that Queen Elizabeth II had died. These people are the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world who have had experience lurking in the shadows for millennia and can control governments, the weather and create earthquakes but the best way to let each other know the latest news is not to use their well established network of agents or encrypted communications but fake plane crashes.
The plane didn't crash and it was an even more elaborate operation to create the appearance of a crash that could potentially be disproved later because the crash never occurred and the British military would be surplus one active operational fighter jet. This even harder to mount scenario was preferable to sending each other encrypted communications despite all their wealth, power, advanced technology and experience in clandestine operations.
A fighter jet based on an aircraft carrier named after Queen Elizabeth I crashed and had nothing to do with the supposed death of Queen Elizabeth II who has subsequently made a public appearance.
You still haven't answered the basic question I asked before: Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when surely simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?
Your reply about comms told me the "what" when I already know basically what comms are and I was asking for help with the "why". If that's the best support I can get from this community then surely I will need "luck" to understand.
If you want to "help" all you have to do is answer the basic question that I've asked twice now:
"Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?"
I've figured Lizzie Deuce was going to be tango uniform before we usher 2021 out the door. At the very least, married couples at that age don't live more than 18 months after their spouse bites it.
The question is - Are they predictable enough to use a D5 state funeral again?
I don’t remember off the top of my head the timeline for Prince Andrew’s case, but he’s back in hot water today because he got $2 million from a bank accused of money laundering through a corrupt political pal of his.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial is supposed to start on Nov. 29th. If ever you wanted to take the internet down in the UK—and the US—it would be when a) gnarly details about Maxwell and Andrew being involved in sex trafficking, blackmail, and the like all while the UK/MI6 connection to the Steele Dossier is being unveiled through Durham indictments.
Do I think it’ll happen this way in a couple of weeks? I wouldn’t bet my life on it. But we know that something is going to force them to take the internet down. If Operation London Bridge already calls for it in the case of QEII’s death, they could be postponing the announcement until they need the blackout to avoid the public knowing the truth. They can blame the blackout on protocol, and the sheep would never be the wiser.
trying to tell the world that taking the entire internet down is "just protocol" for when a monarch dies will open the door to more questions than answers. doesnt add up.
If it happens again, it can’t be coincidence/accident, which only leaves: controlled, or trolling. Which of those is more likely? What is gained by who for either option? ...very interdasting 👀
Combination of the F35 crash and referencing the HMS Queen Elizabeth followed by a news story that she had an official engagement with The Head Of Brit Military at Windsor as she had recovered from her back strain.
On the fourth repeat of the hourly bulletin all stories were the same but they dropped the words Queen Elizabeth from the F35 crash .
That sounds significant. I read an article earlier (one of the first to emerge) which said she was wearing ''a slick of dark maroon lipstick''. Coupled with the man she was 'meeting', could this be comms?
Same here, it wasn't in later articles, so it was either a comm or a mistake. Easy mistake to deny and correct, so nicely plausibly deniable for all involved if it was a comm. Dasting.
She was like 300 years old. Why hide it. Its a chance to change focus away from their other shit.
Royals have no money, they have no power, even announcing the death of rhe queen will likely result in cheering from most of rhe world. She turns out to be an evil old bitch
An interesting aside... that they have openly toyed about using a cgi queen in future. Channel 4 did a christmas speech usually done by the queen with a fake
Welp now you’ve done it.
I'm new here and I don't understand about the plane crash part. Are you saying that they crashed a $200m fighter plane deliberately to send some sort of message? Or that the story about the plane crash is fake? What would be the point? If they're trying to keep her death secret as it appears it might be then why crash planes to reveal publicly their secret plans to conceal her death? Or if they are sending an internal message to each other then the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world have no more efficient message of communicating with each other than slamming jet fighters into the ocean? I really don't get "comms". Could someone please explain?
The jet may or may not have crashed. The elite communicate (comms) openly in plain sight on public forums such as mass media, social media, and art. The communication is thinly vailed and some of our time here is spent trying to decode these communications in order to understand their plans and sometimes prevent the plans from being successful. Welcome to the information war fren.
So the scenarios are:
The plane did crash and it was arranged by the cabal because creating an elaborate conspiracy to slam a $200 million dollar fighter plane into the ocean that at the very minimum would have required the active cooperation of large members of the UK defence forces because this was the best way to inform each other that Queen Elizabeth II had died. These people are the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world who have had experience lurking in the shadows for millennia and can control governments, the weather and create earthquakes but the best way to let each other know the latest news is not to use their well established network of agents or encrypted communications but fake plane crashes.
The plane didn't crash and it was an even more elaborate operation to create the appearance of a crash that could potentially be disproved later because the crash never occurred and the British military would be surplus one active operational fighter jet. This even harder to mount scenario was preferable to sending each other encrypted communications despite all their wealth, power, advanced technology and experience in clandestine operations.
A fighter jet based on an aircraft carrier named after Queen Elizabeth I crashed and had nothing to do with the supposed death of Queen Elizabeth II who has subsequently made a public appearance.
You still haven't answered the basic question I asked before: Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when surely simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?
I'm really struggling to understand "comms".
I tried to help. Good luck.
Your reply about comms told me the "what" when I already know basically what comms are and I was asking for help with the "why". If that's the best support I can get from this community then surely I will need "luck" to understand.
If you want to "help" all you have to do is answer the basic question that I've asked twice now:
"Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?"
Ask them. And I no longer wish to help you.
I've figured Lizzie Deuce was going to be tango uniform before we usher 2021 out the door. At the very least, married couples at that age don't live more than 18 months after their spouse bites it.
The question is - Are they predictable enough to use a D5 state funeral again?
When she dies, Operation London Bridge calls for them taking down the internet.
I would not be surprised if they’re just waiting for Maxwell’s trial and Andrew’s response to Giuffre’s suit to hit the fan before they pull the plug
I don’t remember off the top of my head the timeline for Prince Andrew’s case, but he’s back in hot water today because he got $2 million from a bank accused of money laundering through a corrupt political pal of his.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial is supposed to start on Nov. 29th. If ever you wanted to take the internet down in the UK—and the US—it would be when a) gnarly details about Maxwell and Andrew being involved in sex trafficking, blackmail, and the like all while the UK/MI6 connection to the Steele Dossier is being unveiled through Durham indictments.
Do I think it’ll happen this way in a couple of weeks? I wouldn’t bet my life on it. But we know that something is going to force them to take the internet down. If Operation London Bridge already calls for it in the case of QEII’s death, they could be postponing the announcement until they need the blackout to avoid the public knowing the truth. They can blame the blackout on protocol, and the sheep would never be the wiser.
trying to tell the world that taking the entire internet down is "just protocol" for when a monarch dies will open the door to more questions than answers. doesnt add up.
Especially when the sheep rely on the internet for their entertainment. The IT people of their species will have a lot to say about it I’m sure.
It's a lot easier to say you're going to take down the internet than to do it
If it happens again, it can’t be coincidence/accident, which only leaves: controlled, or trolling. Which of those is more likely? What is gained by who for either option? ...very interdasting 👀
The Queen is dead. The Lizard inhabiting her body is still alive and well. and it knows its days are numbered.
Lol, I read Liztard :P
Vril are are real, change my mind.
I agree
Interesting radio news through this afternoon.
Combination of the F35 crash and referencing the HMS Queen Elizabeth followed by a news story that she had an official engagement with The Head Of Brit Military at Windsor as she had recovered from her back strain.
On the fourth repeat of the hourly bulletin all stories were the same but they dropped the words Queen Elizabeth from the F35 crash .
That sounds significant. I read an article earlier (one of the first to emerge) which said she was wearing ''a slick of dark maroon lipstick''. Coupled with the man she was 'meeting', could this be comms?
Slick of dark maroon? First thing I think of is blood.
Same here, it wasn't in later articles, so it was either a comm or a mistake. Easy mistake to deny and correct, so nicely plausibly deniable for all involved if it was a comm. Dasting.
Damnit we got another Ruth Ginsburg situation. Bitch is DEAD and they pretending she isn't.
She’s 1,000 years old. Whatever could give her back pain, is.
A fall.
Did she ever have to give a day of sex to a man ?
Ha ha Mary you young pup
She's 90 years old
All spines half that age have some degeneration visible on xray
When your 95, it's really easy to injure youself. Royalty or not.
She was like 300 years old. Why hide it. Its a chance to change focus away from their other shit.
Royals have no money, they have no power, even announcing the death of rhe queen will likely result in cheering from most of rhe world. She turns out to be an evil old bitch
My question is why would Charles leave if she's dead, wouldn't you want to be nearby for all the coming prompt and ceremonies?
Or away to avoid questions?
Away cause andrew gives much better television interviews!!
Away doing duties so he is known to be ready....
Didn't Elizabeth's father die while she was out on tour as well?
Yea
Maybe it's a thing these British monarchs do.
Well according to Reuters she's alive and smiling :).
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2021/11/smiling-queen-elizabeth-carries-out-first-in-person-engagement-since-hospital-stay.html
Until I see her holding today's paper, I'm not believing a damned thing. They kept RBG on ice for a year and a half.
They did and yes looks like MSM is covering something up. Good riddance I say. Bunch of leeches humanity can do without.
You should see what they did with Stephen Hawking! rabbit hole
Even if you saw her, it wouldn't be her
See how that works
London, DC, and Vatican are all connected.
Their all have the satanic obelisk
An interesting aside... that they have openly toyed about using a cgi queen in future. Channel 4 did a christmas speech usually done by the queen with a fake
Who will head the Committee of 300/the Olympians now? Will Prince Charlie do it?
She just met with the departing Chief of the Defence Staff, it’s available on Twitter. Long Live The Queen.
They’ve been practicing! Have you seen the deep fake of the QOE? https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2020/12/25/queen-elizabeth-deepfake.cnn
Adam Curry was predicting this too last week!
Wondering if she's been dead a while and had a double, or triple at this point if the double is getting up there.
I was thinking the same thing. Probably drop the news of the queens death to bury anything about Maxwell case that might make headlines.
u/#q97
u/#q3704