However, our analysis proved that these numbers were extremely misleading due to the fact that of the 827 completed pregnancies, 700 / 86% of the women had received a dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the third trimester of pregnancy, meaning it was impossible for them to suffer a miscarriage due to the fact they can only occur prior to week 20 of a pregnancy.
This meant that just 127 women received either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the first / second trimester, with 104 of the woman sadly losing their baby.
Therefore the rate of incidence of miscarriage was 82%
You have to read the actual study to realize that 127 isn’t the denominator. Many more were still pregnant. The table they are getting those numbers from doesn’t make this clear.
“Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) were pregnancy losses and 712 (86.1%) were live births (mostly among participants vaccinated in the third trimester).”
Therefore the rate of incidence of miscarriage was 82%, not 12.6% as presented in the findings of the study, and the authors of the study have since admitted that they made a mistake, issuing a correction six months too late, because the study has been used to justify Covid-19 vaccination of pregnant women and new mothers around the world.
I’m on a message board for my birth month (it’s this summer) and everyone is in the first trimester. Let me tell you the members are dropping like flies in these early weeks, posting updates that they are bleeding, having confirmed miscarriages or there’s no heartbeat at their first ultrasound. It’s A LOT of women reporting this. I’d say way more than 10-15% which would be the natural loss rate.
Yes whenever there’s a thread asking about the jab most women are replying they have it. It’s A LOT of people. And they are all excited to get boosters. When me and a few others reply we don’t have it and include our opinion we get an official warning from the mods about ‘misinformation’.
“No denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions, because at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester. Furthermore, any risk estimate would need to account for gestational week–specific risk of spontaneous abortion.”
The problem is, and this is a HUGE problem, is that people are ignoring these warnings because someone pinky promised that this thing is safe for unborn babies. And its sad, because we could prevent so much of this by simply paying attention to what people are trying to tell us. There is logistically no way for us to know that the vaccine is safe for babies. Its literally impossible to guarantee that your unborn child will grow up to live a long healthy life with something that has been out less than a year. And just because you aren't surrounded by people suffering miscarriages does not mean they are not happening.
It's not 91%, it's 82% according to a correction in the math discussed in this thread. Still, this is too high, and people should pay for their crimes.
The original study references the United States, VAERS, and v-safe, not the UK, I think.
Discussion
"This U.S. surveillance review of the safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines during pregnancy and the periconception period indicates that some pregnant persons in the United States are choosing to be vaccinated against Covid-19 in all trimesters of pregnancy.
Solicited local and systemic reactions that were reported to the v-safe surveillance system were similar among persons who identified as pregnant and nonpregnant women.
Although not directly comparable, the proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (e.g., fetal loss, preterm birth, small size for gestational age, congenital anomalies, and neonatal death) among participants with completed pregnancies from the v-safe pregnancy registry appear to be similar to the published incidences in pregnant populations studied before the Covid-19 pandemic.
Many participants in the v-safe pregnancy registry were included in the phase 1a (highest) priority group for Covid-19 vaccination owing to their work as health care personnel.
V-safe participation is voluntary, and registration information is not uniformly available at all vaccination locations, although information about the surveillance system is included on the EUA fact sheets for health care providers and patients."
That’s if the data on who has been vaccinated is correct or not. If they can fudge the numbers for miscarriage, they can easily fudge the numbers on vaccination rates.
We have multiple studies now where they say “oopsie our bad” six months after they’ve been published in journals and used for decision making. I guarantee vaccination rates are being fudged for the agenda as well.
I agree with you there. I will say I do know one woman who miscarried after vaccination and another who gave birth to a child with a very serious electrical problem with his heart. I know another one who, thankfully, her daughter isn’t having issues as far as I know. But 2/3 of all the pregnant women I know have either miscarried or their children have had cardiovascular issues, and they both got the vaccine during pregnancy. Both also had healthy children and normal pregnancies before the pandemic.
Yes. Ignorance is no excuse. It's too bad we can't devise extra stupid ways of dispatching them, though. This board, I'm sure, would be bursting with creative suggestions.
How odd is it that while we are having a Supreme Court case on abortion this information comes out. If they rule that abortion is illegal after 15 weeks then all these miscarriages are going to be considered murders. I’m on the edge of my seat.
Okay. So why is the DOJ not investigating and arresting those people that caused these murders of innocents? Will this just be swept under the rug? These agencies were supposedly initiated to keep citizens safe. They have betrayed that trust. So now, just like Congress, which no longer represents their constituents and needs to be disbanded, so does the CDC, FDA, NIH, Big Pharma, AMA, and AAP. Cut our relationships with the WHO and UN. If the DOJ and DHS can’t protect, we the citizens, then they too need to be wiped out. DHS has already proven they need to go as they as a government body don’t protect our borders, allow unvetted illegals to flood the border (while demanding different rules for citizens) and release those unvetted within our country without warning the communities (expecting local communities to feed, house, educate and provide medical care to individuals who break the law, while U.S. citizens struggle daily to pay for these same services. These illegals need to be put on a plane and flown directly to Washington D.C.’s doorstep.
And who needs to be held liable since the vax manufacturers are not? News media? Facebook/social media? They're pushing normies to blindly take this crap.
Right now, they're just getting that covid money... and if they're getting it from the drug manufacturers, why should they not be 100% complicit in the murders of these babies?
Had this thought today... if I researched this vax on any "normie" media, I wouldn't know ANY of the negatives other than it MIGHT, in some negligible amount of people, cause a heart condition.
The MSN has done a great job convincing people that speaking out against ANY vax makes you a "bad person" and an "anti vaxxer".
Honestly, before covid I wasn't. However, I was skeptical and figured some had nefarious things going on with them (hvp or whatever it is, flu, etc). Now, I wonder how many actually help more than hurt long term (ie, cancer, autism, etc).
kind of curious this is coming out with the whole roe v wade thing going on at supreme court... this people going to be held responsible for murder maybe?
It wasn't a "mistake." That implies an accident was made. This was intentional.
Whoopsie!
Their only mistake was getting caught. The rest is intentional.
They knew it was impossible. There's more planned, something.
The new study pointing out this error: https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf
You have to read the actual study to realize that 127 isn’t the denominator. Many more were still pregnant. The table they are getting those numbers from doesn’t make this clear.
“Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) were pregnancy losses and 712 (86.1%) were live births (mostly among participants vaccinated in the third trimester).”
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983?articleTools=true
How many vaccinated in the first trimester were still pregnant?
Table 3 is of interest here.
I pray for those two Israeli whores who control our CDC would fuck off back to Israel and stop trying to kill us all.
Don't these fucking people ever take a day off?
Make it stop, already. This is insane.
Welp there it is.
Its some sick fucking shit, isn't it?
It is disgusting that we have them admitting that they have done crimes. Where is the accountability?
What did the English do to William Wallace? Seems appropriate here.
I’m on a message board for my birth month (it’s this summer) and everyone is in the first trimester. Let me tell you the members are dropping like flies in these early weeks, posting updates that they are bleeding, having confirmed miscarriages or there’s no heartbeat at their first ultrasound. It’s A LOT of women reporting this. I’d say way more than 10-15% which would be the natural loss rate.
Are the board mrmbers disclosing their jab status?
Yes whenever there’s a thread asking about the jab most women are replying they have it. It’s A LOT of people. And they are all excited to get boosters. When me and a few others reply we don’t have it and include our opinion we get an official warning from the mods about ‘misinformation’.
Is anyone keeping a list of these people for the Great Reckoning?
God is.
I know 2 women jabbed in early pregnancy and miscarried.
this is not the first study to suggest this, including one by the New England Journal of Medicine.... https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/study-miscarriage-rate-covid-vaccine
Read the comments section. For example:
“No denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions, because at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester. Furthermore, any risk estimate would need to account for gestational week–specific risk of spontaneous abortion.”
https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/study-miscarriage-rate-covid-vaccine
shit, my bad. What about this one? https://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com/thirty-four-women-report-spontaneous-miscarriages-or-stillbirths-after-receiving-covid-vaccine
The problem is, and this is a HUGE problem, is that people are ignoring these warnings because someone pinky promised that this thing is safe for unborn babies. And its sad, because we could prevent so much of this by simply paying attention to what people are trying to tell us. There is logistically no way for us to know that the vaccine is safe for babies. Its literally impossible to guarantee that your unborn child will grow up to live a long healthy life with something that has been out less than a year. And just because you aren't surrounded by people suffering miscarriages does not mean they are not happening.
It's not 91%, it's 82% according to a correction in the math discussed in this thread. Still, this is too high, and people should pay for their crimes.
That was my first thought too. 9 out of 10 people seems a little implausible to me.
why don't you take a moment to actually read the material?
That's 91% of the clot-shotted.
About two thirds of the country are still pure bloods.
As soon as people started getting the death shots,
miscarriages among them
*immediately
shot to the 70s% range.
That later went up into the low 80s,
now it's revealed to be in the 90s.
But you don't believe everyone's been paying attention and monitoring all these audits for accuracy, all this time?
The fact that MSM refuses to talk about it at all is a good indicator it's all true.
People are talking about it all over the world, and have been since the very first returns came back as at LEAST 70s % were having miscarriages.
The original study references the United States, VAERS, and v-safe, not the UK, I think.
Discussion
"This U.S. surveillance review of the safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines during pregnancy and the periconception period indicates that some pregnant persons in the United States are choosing to be vaccinated against Covid-19 in all trimesters of pregnancy.
Solicited local and systemic reactions that were reported to the v-safe surveillance system were similar among persons who identified as pregnant and nonpregnant women.
Although not directly comparable, the proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (e.g., fetal loss, preterm birth, small size for gestational age, congenital anomalies, and neonatal death) among participants with completed pregnancies from the v-safe pregnancy registry appear to be similar to the published incidences in pregnant populations studied before the Covid-19 pandemic.
Many participants in the v-safe pregnancy registry were included in the phase 1a (highest) priority group for Covid-19 vaccination owing to their work as health care personnel.
V-safe participation is voluntary, and registration information is not uniformly available at all vaccination locations, although information about the surveillance system is included on the EUA fact sheets for health care providers and patients."
This table on the same page won't render when copied here but this is who the v-safe people are.
Table 3
Characteristics of V-safe Pregnancy Registry Participants.*
CharacteristicPfizer–BioNTech VaccineModerna VaccineTotal
number (percent)
Total2136 (54.0)1822 (46.0)3958 (100)
Age at first vaccine dose†
20–24 yr17 (0.8)19 (1.0)36 (0.9)
25–34 yr1335 (62.5)1238 (67.9)2573 (65.0)
35–44 yr777 (36.4)560 (30.7)1337 (33.8)
45–54 yr7 (0.3)5 (0.3)12 (0.3)
Race and ethnic group‡
Non-Hispanic White1663 (77.9)1463 (80.3)3126 (79.0)
Hispanic164 (7.7)151 (8.3)315 (8.0)
Non-Hispanic Asian225 (10.5)138 (7.6)363 (9.2)
Non-Hispanic Black24 (1.1)26 (1.4)50 (1.3)
Non-Hispanic multiple races42 (2.0)30 (1.6)72 (1.8)
Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaskan Native5 (0.2)1 (0.1)6 (0.2)
Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander6 (0.3)3 (0.2)9 (0.2)
Missing data or participant declined to answer7 (0.3)10 (0.5)17 (0.4)
Timing of first eligible dose
Periconception: within 30 days before last menstrual period55 (2.6)37 (2.0)92 (2.3)
First trimester: <14 wk615 (28.8)517 (28.4)1132 (28.6)
Second trimester: ≥14 and <28 wk932 (43.6)782 (42.9)1714 (43.3)
Third trimester: ≥28 wk533 (25.0)486 (26.7)1019 (25.7)
Missing data1 (<0.1)01 (<0.1)
Covid-19 infection during pregnancy
No Covid-19 infection2084 (97.6)1779 (97.6)3863 (97.6)
Before vaccination32 (1.5)24 (1.3)56 (1.4)
≤14 days after first eligible dose of vaccination3 (0.1)7 (0.4)10 (0.3)
14 days after first eligible dose of vaccination9 (0.4)3 (0.2)12 (0.3)
That's the original study that was FAKED to HIDE the extremely high miscarriage rates.
Again: only a couple of months into the death-shot program the miscarriage numbers started OUT - at LEAST in the low 70s percent range.
If there were glaring errors in the real numbers someone among the hundreds of thousands reviewing them,
would have discovered them by now.
That’s if the data on who has been vaccinated is correct or not. If they can fudge the numbers for miscarriage, they can easily fudge the numbers on vaccination rates.
We have multiple studies now where they say “oopsie our bad” six months after they’ve been published in journals and used for decision making. I guarantee vaccination rates are being fudged for the agenda as well.
I agree with you there. I will say I do know one woman who miscarried after vaccination and another who gave birth to a child with a very serious electrical problem with his heart. I know another one who, thankfully, her daughter isn’t having issues as far as I know. But 2/3 of all the pregnant women I know have either miscarried or their children have had cardiovascular issues, and they both got the vaccine during pregnancy. Both also had healthy children and normal pregnancies before the pandemic.
Not necessarily. I don’t know anyone who is pregnant at this time.
That’s probably true ;-)
Yeah, more slutty friends :)
Yeah, that’s just what I need...more drama mamas!
did you really though? because it sure sounds like you didn't.
yes please.
I think there are lots of placebo vax out there right now. Can’t kill everyone off at once. Boosters will eventually do the job, little by little.
They prob got saline.
They can plead stupidity in front of a human rights tribunal when they're brought fourth to it. The day of the rope is coming for ALL these people.
Yes. Ignorance is no excuse. It's too bad we can't devise extra stupid ways of dispatching them, though. This board, I'm sure, would be bursting with creative suggestions.
How odd is it that while we are having a Supreme Court case on abortion this information comes out. If they rule that abortion is illegal after 15 weeks then all these miscarriages are going to be considered murders. I’m on the edge of my seat.
I've been waiting 50+ years, everyday more certain that it cannot possibly continue without everyone waking up to what is really going on.
Okay. So why is the DOJ not investigating and arresting those people that caused these murders of innocents? Will this just be swept under the rug? These agencies were supposedly initiated to keep citizens safe. They have betrayed that trust. So now, just like Congress, which no longer represents their constituents and needs to be disbanded, so does the CDC, FDA, NIH, Big Pharma, AMA, and AAP. Cut our relationships with the WHO and UN. If the DOJ and DHS can’t protect, we the citizens, then they too need to be wiped out. DHS has already proven they need to go as they as a government body don’t protect our borders, allow unvetted illegals to flood the border (while demanding different rules for citizens) and release those unvetted within our country without warning the communities (expecting local communities to feed, house, educate and provide medical care to individuals who break the law, while U.S. citizens struggle daily to pay for these same services. These illegals need to be put on a plane and flown directly to Washington D.C.’s doorstep.
And who needs to be held liable since the vax manufacturers are not? News media? Facebook/social media? They're pushing normies to blindly take this crap.
Right now, they're just getting that covid money... and if they're getting it from the drug manufacturers, why should they not be 100% complicit in the murders of these babies?
Things that need answers.
Had this thought today... if I researched this vax on any "normie" media, I wouldn't know ANY of the negatives other than it MIGHT, in some negligible amount of people, cause a heart condition.
The MSN has done a great job convincing people that speaking out against ANY vax makes you a "bad person" and an "anti vaxxer".
Honestly, before covid I wasn't. However, I was skeptical and figured some had nefarious things going on with them (hvp or whatever it is, flu, etc). Now, I wonder how many actually help more than hurt long term (ie, cancer, autism, etc).
kind of curious this is coming out with the whole roe v wade thing going on at supreme court... this people going to be held responsible for murder maybe?
Yet more mandates incoming...
Crimes against humanity!
Anyone dumb enough to vaccinate doesn’t deserve a child anyway