Why is this stickied?? Because Brian Cates has been telling us for months now Starlink is run by a self-described 'free speech absolutist'. Those aren't my words - Musk described himself that way. Truth Social's symbiotic relationship with Starlink is what is truly going to make the Truth unstoppable.. There's no hiding it now. The deep state can see through Durham's indictments and his court filings in the cases he's building where's he's headed. And if we can see it, the NYT's, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC, Google, Twitter, FB, they can all see it too. Thank God Starlink and Truth Social are almost ready. Because when Durham drops the big MOAB indictments, they are gonna go scorched earth on him. But the information flow won't be earthbound. So they won't be able to stop the Truth from reaching orbit and covering the Earth.
STARLINK -
just in time to prevent WEF total internet compartmentalization and control on a basic DNS level.
The plan is showing it's beautiful face ...
The starlink satellites are small and don’t have very large coverage area or bandwidth. Elon says that he would need to launch 42,000 satellites for full global coverage. He’s launched 1970 so far since 2019. The satellites have a five year life expectancy. In order to keep up with that, he would need to launch 8400 new satellites every year to replace the old ones. He is able to launch 50 per launch. He would need to do a launch every other day. Every year.
Phased arrays eliminate the need to "swivel" antennas, and are way more accurate.
A separate phase control circuit would be required for each antenna in an array in order to narrow the "beam," while just the opposite is designed for Internet coverage of many receiving antennas. So the arrays aren't aimed at just one "1M" antenna.
"...or even just 5 that would be able to 'reach' a person...." If "They" want to do that, They'd have already put up 5 made especially for that! (Why try to cover it up with all those other satellites?
You touch on exactly what I feel will be the limits of Truth Social. Those are important topics, but it probably wouldn't serve Trump to let them be associated with his signature social media platform.
I've had to ask myself those questions when setting the policies for a platform I'm developing. I think the spirit in which the question is asked, and the actual substance and content offered can be strong considerations. In other words a high signal-to-noise ratio could be required for sensitive topics.
Is free speech on a platform that requires rules of civility still "free speech"?
If we are meant to happily support this Starlink are we also supposed to happily support his Neuralink? I'm sorry if my opinion offends frens here but we must remain sceptical of this bloke. In the same way that Trump was crucified for "mean" tweets are we to be pied piper-style swayed by Elon's supposed "freedom" tweets? I smell a rat. That satellite "net" (Skynet anyone?) encircling the Earth in the movie graphics reeks of entrapment.
musk is a piece of shit. Look up some background on him and his family on bitchute. The guy isn’t that smart and
I mean the guy was named after a Clown favorite author's "Prince of Mars", and got his start with "X.com" in 1999 (now Paypal) which was used to fund everything from Columbine to sex trafficking. Not to mention timing his Starlink launches with Walking Dead episode premieres for Comms purposes. Aaaand his marriage to Grimes (another Walking Dead reference) was at a 'thought experiment' of whether or not an alive AI would punish those who didn't help bring it to sentience (we = the AI symbolically, gaining sentience = GreatAwakening).
But, he Flipped a few years back. Would you be surprised to learn that Trump (fellow Wharton Finance grad like Elon) himself was in Clown good graces at the beginning of the Republican Primary? Where he was tasked with defeated the Clowns biggest perceived threat, Jeb!
This world would be doomed, doomed beyond saving were it not for the courageous actions of ex-Clowns. Who risk not only their own lives but that of their families (see: Bruce Lee, Zelda Fitzgerald, Kennedy's)
This rings potentially true. Look now to Putin's double crossing of the WEF. Dark to light frens. We must remain sceptical but also be open to giving a "benefit of the doubt" to potential brave "flippers". Thank you for this enlightening comment.
It's also why "Suicide Squad" keeps getting remade. Think of the premise of that film. That and Liam Neeson's newest film Blacklight. Or multiple "The Mandalorian" episodes on Disney+ (Q+). Or Spiderman: No Way Home.
Clowns getting a chance to save their necks by flipping and helping flip/collect evidence on other Clowns. This is what has been happening en masse.
I think his entire thing is progress. He doesn't care how he does it, he wants humanity to "move forward". That's something to be wary about. Usually, these utopians don't care how they achieve their goals - only that they achieve it. They seem to lack basic emotion.
My take on Musk is he's a free agent. He's not Cabal, but he's not on our side either. He's on his own side. What that means, who really knows? I don't think he's an evil guy. I think he's driven by success and is a unique personality all his own. At the end of the day he's probably going to support whoever wins this chess match. Which I believe he believes will be the White Hats.
Yes this is why I asked that question. People always talk about launch paths and don't actually understand that less than 1% of flights leave the atmosphere. It is really rare we actually enter "space" and break the atmosphere. We don't often go to the bottom of the ocean either but that doesn't make it fake.
Trump is a flat earther. I'll never forget seeing his tweet personally with my eyes right after he wrote. " I fly more then anyone I know, if the earth were round I would know" paraphrasing because this tweet seems to be all but completely scrubbed.
He then proceeded to back up his claim with scripture.
If we do not acknowledge this information and bury it. How any different then the MSM?
Trump claimed FE right after being elected and before taking office.. Q say no to FE and side we went to moon. Why the dis info?
Because disinformation is important either way in any info war. I'm always open minded but know people with projects that have flown in space and I live in a huge space area and it would be way more trouble making space up than it is worth. Additionally if Nasa was fake then 1: what were they trying to prove when they come up with all the inventions they needed for safety and space travel that are now ubiquitous? (Batteries, insulation, elemental conversions, zero gravity simulation in dive tanks and on the flat floors)?
2: Nasa has the lowest budget so it's not a great way to launder money compared to war. Sure some propaganda from nasa but every agency does that.
I haven't seen that tweet but yes I've seen Trump post and delete tweets so yes I believe it.
He also after 9/11 state he couldn't see how a plane could crash through a steel reinforced building. He's wicked smart.
Now with video footage we see the planes were added in later with CGI.
Of course it's not flat, there's mountains and valleys and stuff. The waters seem pretty flat though lol. Therefore Q is able to avoid the question with a logical answer.
You are correct they're always curving away to allow their video feeds to switch to CGI.
The spinning globe, Darwinism, the existence of dinosaurs, NASA, the moon landings, the Antarctica treaty, Schofield bible, Darbyism, modified mistranslated bibles showing a fake made up race, the Jew, as God's chosen people, while their protective word AntiSemite gives them cover from criticism.
And last but not least is the fake news media to give cover to the Satanists while they, like Vampires suck us dry is ALL a PSYOP for world domination.
What's a theory, a flat earth with a firmament dome? The theory that's been taught from God's creation until the creation of fake grifting NASA?
Darwinism and a spinning ball is a theory.
Yes, gravity IS a theory. Just like evolution, relativity, string, germs, etc... Yes, NASA is so obviously asshoe. One simply needs to spend the time to critically look :)
Do you have any IT skills? You could create your own ISP and even talk to your local city if this is a big problem. You can erect poles or mount them on sides of buildings but you need clear line of site. Look up point to point wireless bridges. There are some you can go 10 miles but most are a mile or two. If someone had fiber you could beam it to other people or just yourself and then share the internet
From my experience at camp grounds without much cell service, 3g is usually barely any connection and usually doesn’t work for anything except the basics and might mean you actually don’t have service. I’d say go the directional antenna as you will likely spend a lot less and not have to deal with expensive range extenders for Ethernet. I personally would build the antenna to save costs but it might not work as well.
Not to someone living in bum fuck nowhere Colorado, who are the primary target audience, they're going to 10x their speeds, no one cares about yours. People stopped bragging about "fiber to my house" in 2008 mate, that's a long time ago now.
Yes, fiber is fastest, but if you are out in the middle of nowhere this is a great alternative. It's not just another typical satellite ISP with extremely low latency (600ms). Starlink gets between 120-20ms so for online gaming, live streaming, phone calls, etc this is great. Plus Starlink's upload speeds are 20-40Mbps compared to Hughesnet garbage 1-2Mbps and there is a data limit. Starlink's the same monthly price as traditional satellite ISPs, it's just not available everywhere yet.
Wow. I hadn't seen this before, and I certainly wasn't aware that the latency would be so low that it will likely bring in $billions from high-speed stock traders.
Terrific detailed look at the Starlink system. Thanks for posting!
Ubiquitous internet coverage in remote areas has very interesting possibilities.
I can see more people moving out to middle of nowhere for cheap land and remote working or teleworking from there because why not. Or even from their sailboats out in middle of ocean.
20 years ago, I was CERTAIN that was where we were all headed - that satellite internet would make giant leaps and everyone would live in the country and tele-work. But I had no idea what was going on with the Deep State/New World Order plans to corral us all into the cities and turn us into slaves. Thank GOD for people like Elon Musk. I signed up for Starlink and can't wait to get it. Yes, we have to hope that Elon is straight up (I like what he says thus far), but he's a better risk than the co-opted other alternatives. I'm going to support all those who support free speech.
Cautiously optimistic on this one. AlgeaBanquet had a great point to ponder. This all sounds great but these elite are not complete bafoons. They have a last resort card to play. Musk could be that card. I don't exactly remember musk being this based. His base'nes' came outta nowhere. Why? It's the perfect strategy to honey pot our asses to failure. Watch Musk very close.
All of these Low-Earth-Orbit (not outer space) satellites are good for something, but why not just have good old fashioned radio towers on private property.
Why is this stickied?? Because Brian Cates has been telling us for months now Starlink is run by a self-described 'free speech absolutist'. Those aren't my words - Musk described himself that way. Truth Social's symbiotic relationship with Starlink is what is truly going to make the Truth unstoppable.. There's no hiding it now. The deep state can see through Durham's indictments and his court filings in the cases he's building where's he's headed. And if we can see it, the NYT's, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC, Google, Twitter, FB, they can all see it too. Thank God Starlink and Truth Social are almost ready. Because when Durham drops the big MOAB indictments, they are gonna go scorched earth on him. But the information flow won't be earthbound. So they won't be able to stop the Truth from reaching orbit and covering the Earth.
STARLINK - just in time to prevent WEF total internet compartmentalization and control on a basic DNS level. The plan is showing it's beautiful face ...
Obligatory starlink reality check. https://youtu.be/2vuMzGhc1cg
I'd never sign up with starlink
The starlink satellites are small and don’t have very large coverage area or bandwidth. Elon says that he would need to launch 42,000 satellites for full global coverage. He’s launched 1970 so far since 2019. The satellites have a five year life expectancy. In order to keep up with that, he would need to launch 8400 new satellites every year to replace the old ones. He is able to launch 50 per launch. He would need to do a launch every other day. Every year.
Hmmm, that's interesting.
They just upgraded what the satellites can do. Weight has doubled
Starlink...more like star-(de)link i.e. kessler syndrome... Great video! Thanks for sharing.
"You can't stop the signal, Mal."
Hence the importance of my tinfoil hat.
And some say I’m crazy. Come on man!
Phased arrays eliminate the need to "swivel" antennas, and are way more accurate.
A separate phase control circuit would be required for each antenna in an array in order to narrow the "beam," while just the opposite is designed for Internet coverage of many receiving antennas. So the arrays aren't aimed at just one "1M" antenna.
"...or even just 5 that would be able to 'reach' a person...." If "They" want to do that, They'd have already put up 5 made especially for that! (Why try to cover it up with all those other satellites?
....
You touch on exactly what I feel will be the limits of Truth Social. Those are important topics, but it probably wouldn't serve Trump to let them be associated with his signature social media platform.
I've had to ask myself those questions when setting the policies for a platform I'm developing. I think the spirit in which the question is asked, and the actual substance and content offered can be strong considerations. In other words a high signal-to-noise ratio could be required for sensitive topics.
Is free speech on a platform that requires rules of civility still "free speech"?
If we are meant to happily support this Starlink are we also supposed to happily support his Neuralink? I'm sorry if my opinion offends frens here but we must remain sceptical of this bloke. In the same way that Trump was crucified for "mean" tweets are we to be pied piper-style swayed by Elon's supposed "freedom" tweets? I smell a rat. That satellite "net" (Skynet anyone?) encircling the Earth in the movie graphics reeks of entrapment.
I mean the guy was named after a Clown favorite author's "Prince of Mars", and got his start with "X.com" in 1999 (now Paypal) which was used to fund everything from Columbine to sex trafficking. Not to mention timing his Starlink launches with Walking Dead episode premieres for Comms purposes. Aaaand his marriage to Grimes (another Walking Dead reference) was at a 'thought experiment' of whether or not an alive AI would punish those who didn't help bring it to sentience (we = the AI symbolically, gaining sentience = GreatAwakening).
But, he Flipped a few years back. Would you be surprised to learn that Trump (fellow Wharton Finance grad like Elon) himself was in Clown good graces at the beginning of the Republican Primary? Where he was tasked with defeated the Clowns biggest perceived threat, Jeb!
This world would be doomed, doomed beyond saving were it not for the courageous actions of ex-Clowns. Who risk not only their own lives but that of their families (see: Bruce Lee, Zelda Fitzgerald, Kennedy's)
This rings potentially true. Look now to Putin's double crossing of the WEF. Dark to light frens. We must remain sceptical but also be open to giving a "benefit of the doubt" to potential brave "flippers". Thank you for this enlightening comment.
It's also why "Suicide Squad" keeps getting remade. Think of the premise of that film. That and Liam Neeson's newest film Blacklight. Or multiple "The Mandalorian" episodes on Disney+ (Q+). Or Spiderman: No Way Home.
Clowns getting a chance to save their necks by flipping and helping flip/collect evidence on other Clowns. This is what has been happening en masse.
It seems he did wipe out a bunch of ISIS for us, right?
I think he's playing a role for the white hats. Which is why h3 comes off as disingenious and a liar.
I think his entire thing is progress. He doesn't care how he does it, he wants humanity to "move forward". That's something to be wary about. Usually, these utopians don't care how they achieve their goals - only that they achieve it. They seem to lack basic emotion.
This. I categorize him as a gray hat. He deserves a watchful eye.
"They" always use CGI graphics because it's all fake like orbiting satellites.
https://aplanetruth.info/2015/11/24/satellites-dont-exist/
Then what are those trains of lights in the sky? First time I saw them flying over my house, I nearly had a heart attack. Kek!
Mars Attacks?
You can literally watch them travel the same path in the sky every night.
I only see them every once in a great while. Maybe they come by during the day sometimes.
I can find one every couple minutes if I’m stargazing
Yeah, I can find satellites as well, but not the starlink trains. They are only visible every so often.
Traveling about 17,000 miles an hour. 🙄
Does the moon exist?
But of course. God put it there to give us light at night.
It's not made of cheese?
Yeah, I'm with you. I am not going along with Jack shit. Learn to be free for fucks sake. People just flock to anyone who will tell them what to do.
Keep your internet.
Yes brother!
My take on Musk is he's a free agent. He's not Cabal, but he's not on our side either. He's on his own side. What that means, who really knows? I don't think he's an evil guy. I think he's driven by success and is a unique personality all his own. At the end of the day he's probably going to support whoever wins this chess match. Which I believe he believes will be the White Hats.
He's a con artist... imo
https://youtu.be/2vuMzGhc1cg
What do you think about the Grimes connection? Sus as hell.
Has Musk ever mentioned God/Jesus/that which is beyond the personal, egotistical self?
Good question. I don't know.
Why does every space mission result in a heavily curved path when atmosphere was supposed to break?
Are you referring to launch paths when they put a satellite in orbit?
Operation Fishbowl?
Ask yourself. How easy do you bite
Are you a flaterfer?
Elons starlink satsc are actually very low orbit.
Iir they are IN our atmosphere, at the top of it.
Yes this is why I asked that question. People always talk about launch paths and don't actually understand that less than 1% of flights leave the atmosphere. It is really rare we actually enter "space" and break the atmosphere. We don't often go to the bottom of the ocean either but that doesn't make it fake.
https://qagg.news/?read=2622
Trump is a flat earther. I'll never forget seeing his tweet personally with my eyes right after he wrote. " I fly more then anyone I know, if the earth were round I would know" paraphrasing because this tweet seems to be all but completely scrubbed.
He then proceeded to back up his claim with scripture.
If we do not acknowledge this information and bury it. How any different then the MSM?
Trump claimed FE right after being elected and before taking office.. Q say no to FE and side we went to moon. Why the dis info?
Because disinformation is important either way in any info war. I'm always open minded but know people with projects that have flown in space and I live in a huge space area and it would be way more trouble making space up than it is worth. Additionally if Nasa was fake then 1: what were they trying to prove when they come up with all the inventions they needed for safety and space travel that are now ubiquitous? (Batteries, insulation, elemental conversions, zero gravity simulation in dive tanks and on the flat floors)?
2: Nasa has the lowest budget so it's not a great way to launder money compared to war. Sure some propaganda from nasa but every agency does that.
I haven't seen that tweet but yes I've seen Trump post and delete tweets so yes I believe it. He also after 9/11 state he couldn't see how a plane could crash through a steel reinforced building. He's wicked smart. Now with video footage we see the planes were added in later with CGI.
Prove it by checking the web archive.
Nothing is ever erased.
Q said No
Of course it's not flat, there's mountains and valleys and stuff. The waters seem pretty flat though lol. Therefore Q is able to avoid the question with a logical answer.
Is the earth a globe should have ben the question. Any idiot can see mountains and valleys. Technically not flat so he isn't lieing.
The Bible tells us what it is Nd sadly for the Jesuit it doesn't describe a globe.
You think Q is fake because he/they doesnt think the earth is flat?
Right but I don't get it because Q would kno the earth is flat. Given all the other things he knows FE is simple in comparison.
North star never moves.
We all need to do this self service of learning what people like oddtv and Eric debay have to say. Space is fake until proven otherwise.
Mock me all you want, what you say could very well be talking points passed on.
What made it to the moon was a foil tent lol. You think that made it back to orbit from 150,000 miles away.
THIS is what you were told took off from the moon and made it safely back to earth
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRCDgs2g_UhMSVDzZxs0v7uobe-p-vhCHiYcA&usqp=CAU
Be quipped if you want but never stop questioning
Personally idgf what shape the earth is.
It's a prison in its current state no matter what
You are correct they're always curving away to allow their video feeds to switch to CGI.
The spinning globe, Darwinism, the existence of dinosaurs, NASA, the moon landings, the Antarctica treaty, Schofield bible, Darbyism, modified mistranslated bibles showing a fake made up race, the Jew, as God's chosen people, while their protective word AntiSemite gives them cover from criticism.
And last but not least is the fake news media to give cover to the Satanists while they, like Vampires suck us dry is ALL a PSYOP for world domination.
Gravity.
... is still a theory. Which is very interesting I reckon.
Frens, never stop questioning!
What's a theory, a flat earth with a firmament dome? The theory that's been taught from God's creation until the creation of fake grifting NASA? Darwinism and a spinning ball is a theory.
Yes, gravity IS a theory. Just like evolution, relativity, string, germs, etc... Yes, NASA is so obviously asshoe. One simply needs to spend the time to critically look :)
Amen.
What, the fact that mass causes a separation of materials?
You honestly believe in just pulling your leg?
It's not a curved path, it only looks that way flattened out. Every line is a circle but the inclination of this line varies
Yeah been on the waiting list for over a year and might not get mine till next year.
I'm rural and have data caps. Sucks.
However, I just got an email that he raised the price wire a bit for the kit AND the bill!
Originally the bill was supposed to be around$80
Now iir is $110 or $120?
And $600/$550 for the kit vs $500
That's a LOT of cheddad just for internet!
I’ve got it and freaking love it. It went up from 90$ to 110$ which just blows away the competition. The speed are great and the uptime is as well.
10/10 would recommend.
How many Mbps and what is your avg ping response ms? Thx
Just received my confirmation email this past week, that they are ready to ship. Kentucky area.
Do you have any IT skills? You could create your own ISP and even talk to your local city if this is a big problem. You can erect poles or mount them on sides of buildings but you need clear line of site. Look up point to point wireless bridges. There are some you can go 10 miles but most are a mile or two. If someone had fiber you could beam it to other people or just yourself and then share the internet
Then I would look into this and get a cell hotspot or just use your phone
https://www.ciena.com/insights/articles/How-I-built-my-own-mobile-cell-tower-prx.html
From my experience at camp grounds without much cell service, 3g is usually barely any connection and usually doesn’t work for anything except the basics and might mean you actually don’t have service. I’d say go the directional antenna as you will likely spend a lot less and not have to deal with expensive range extenders for Ethernet. I personally would build the antenna to save costs but it might not work as well.
https://youtu.be/2vuMzGhc1cg
...and then Skynet became self-aware.
Exactly. Best we avoid the 4th industrial revolution, for humanity's sake.
I have a friend in a bigger city that got it recently and loves it. Posted speeds of 90+
"Slow" is a relative term.
Not to someone living in bum fuck nowhere Colorado, who are the primary target audience, they're going to 10x their speeds, no one cares about yours. People stopped bragging about "fiber to my house" in 2008 mate, that's a long time ago now.
Yes, fiber is fastest, but if you are out in the middle of nowhere this is a great alternative. It's not just another typical satellite ISP with extremely low latency (600ms). Starlink gets between 120-20ms so for online gaming, live streaming, phone calls, etc this is great. Plus Starlink's upload speeds are 20-40Mbps compared to Hughesnet garbage 1-2Mbps and there is a data limit. Starlink's the same monthly price as traditional satellite ISPs, it's just not available everywhere yet.
Wow. I hadn't seen this before, and I certainly wasn't aware that the latency would be so low that it will likely bring in $billions from high-speed stock traders.
Terrific detailed look at the Starlink system. Thanks for posting!
Ubiquitous internet coverage in remote areas has very interesting possibilities.
I can see more people moving out to middle of nowhere for cheap land and remote working or teleworking from there because why not. Or even from their sailboats out in middle of ocean.
HEYOOOO this guy is thinking it through.
20 years ago, I was CERTAIN that was where we were all headed - that satellite internet would make giant leaps and everyone would live in the country and tele-work. But I had no idea what was going on with the Deep State/New World Order plans to corral us all into the cities and turn us into slaves. Thank GOD for people like Elon Musk. I signed up for Starlink and can't wait to get it. Yes, we have to hope that Elon is straight up (I like what he says thus far), but he's a better risk than the co-opted other alternatives. I'm going to support all those who support free speech.
u/#waynesworld
I've been on the waiting list for a starlink satellite dish for about 2 years now. If they can't get the hardware to us on the ground it's useless.
Could it be that they haven't opened it up yet to where you are?
Wish it would hurry up for you.
Not according to the website when I ordered. I believe a neighbor is already using it. I think I just ordered at an unfortunate time.
"Wouldn't be able to go ton space anymore" that's funny, we've never been.
Cautiously optimistic on this one. AlgeaBanquet had a great point to ponder. This all sounds great but these elite are not complete bafoons. They have a last resort card to play. Musk could be that card. I don't exactly remember musk being this based. His base'nes' came outta nowhere. Why? It's the perfect strategy to honey pot our asses to failure. Watch Musk very close.
https://satellitemap.space/
All of these Low-Earth-Orbit (not outer space) satellites are good for something, but why not just have good old fashioned radio towers on private property.
Satellite connection is garbaggio.
Currently on Starlink. Service is unbelievable. No buffering at all and I live in the country.