Just like many people instantly bought into Maxey’s claims about the 450 gb of new material he’s discovered on the laptop he got from Rudy G. , many people will also instantly buy into “there is no virus, 100,000 people across America entered into a massive conspiracy to poison us all with local water supplies”_
We’re in an INFORMATION WAR.
Psy-ops are being launched in your left and in your right.
Be careful who you follow.
GET RID OF ALL YOUR AUTHORITY FIGURES who appeal to your confirmation biases.
Research for yourself.
Don’t just instantly adopt some new claim some guy you never heard of two weeks ago presented to you.
The biggest danger MAGA has right now is that so many people have detached from reality they literally ready to believe anything.
You actually need MORE discernment and skepticism right now, not LESS.
Be your own authority.
(Brian Cates)
If there's one think Cates is good at, it's admonishing the movement when it goes off the rails.
He is making a very important point here.
He absolutely is...I Like him.
He is, and we should be digging into the new information carefully. Biochemically, the snake venom-monoclonal antibody-remdesivir relationships make total sense. But I don't know that snake venom is a stable dilution in water - wrapped in those famous little nano-lipids I think that it is possible in the absence of surfactants, so it would need to be added to supply after treatment.
Anyway, let's disregard the water thing completely as a distraction. Is there snake venom DNA in the 'virus' or its spike proteins, thus in the 'vaccines'? I think that part of the case was clearly made. Evidence of toxins modeled after snake venom were detected early on by various research groups and doctors around the world. Does remdesivir also act like a venom? Apparently it does. Do the same things that treat venom victims successfully treat covid victims? Yep again.
Thus I'm comfortable saying "venom is involved in the design of this latest poison." Method of distribution is TBD, but deeper dives into monoclonal antibodies, their development and production, should absolutely be done.
If they are poisoning the water, with this or anything else (and my pedes, they already have been with fluoride and toxins), then what do you do? You filter the best you can, you pick your bottled water Very Carefully, you move your family out of the cities and into cleaner environments, away from shedders and two-legged rats and grooming teachers, etc.
It was already common knowledge that fluoridated water isn't as purified and inferior to natural spring water. This all seems like a huge redirection to mix truth with lies.
Cates is the bomb. Love me some Cates.
FBI already has the originals. Maxey has copies that were made by the Mac repair dude. Anything Maxey releases is being done to try to force the FBI/DOJ to answer for their NOT pursuing criminal investigation of the Biden's, based on the contents of the laptop that they already have in their possession since Dec. 2019.
Here is Matt Gaetz asking the FBI where the laptop is during congressional hearing. Sorry for YT link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KfpZRaTkwY
Can you send me the link to the ruling or the docket report?
If I had to guess it's probably a chain of custody issue. Anyone could have tampered with it.
Yeah, I'm not a law pede, either. For chain of custody the fact it went Hunter -> Maxey -> law enforcement they could claim Maxey tampered with it even if he didn't. Just turning on a computer creates an event log. If there was a program set to auto run when the computer turned on or if the computer was connected to the internet at all, it or someone could have manipulated stuff.
I thought at one point Rudy Giuliani had it? Or maybe it was a copy? I don't think it went straight from Maxey to law enforcement. However, they might be able to tell if it was tampered with.
Forensic analysis should be able to show tampering, and it's hard to tamper with the photos and videos that are supposedly on it, and basically impossible to tamper in such a way that you couldn't see it.
Maxey has a copy, not the original, so chain of custody would only apply to the actual hard disk from HB's laptop. FBI have the originals so anything Maxey releases is just for public consumption and to put pressure on the FBI to explain why they have not done anything about the crimes described/depicted on the hard drive IN THEIR POSSESSION SINCE DEC. 2019.
It would be pretty tough to alter emails from years ago though. The emails also have financial information in them that can be corroborated by looking at financial records of Hunter AND the companies that were sending Hunter the money. Also the pictures are dated, have persons of interest in them (Hunter), and have other individuals that can corroborate.
THIS.
Also, there's more than one laptop, per Hunter himself. That dude is so messed up, he's been dropping computers for years. Feeble cries for help, narcing on himself.
So there’s usually a variety of reasons that can cause evidence to be inadmissible. IMO the evidence that’s going to be released is probably really damaging so the attorney is going to throw a bunch of things at it and see if anything sticks. Few thoughts.
When the laptop was turned over to the FBI, it wasn’t submitted into evidence. That’s a problem right there. It’s like charging a drug dealer for 20 lbs of cocaine but there’s no cocaine.
Chain of custody- given to Rudy then Maxey. Technically, someone could alter the laptop
Character evidence which makes the person look bad and taints a jury
Evidence protected by privilege - Biden fam, national security, non disclosures, etc.
That’s a fight for the attorneys and a decision by the judge. It’s really about what’s presented and what can be argued. Can really only make an educated guess without seeing it all!
There are more than one copy, however.
If something new is found and can be corroborated on say, the FBI's copy (I know not likely), that could swing it.
Absolutely, which is probably the reason for giving it to multiple sources.
Altered laptop could be forensicly proven true or not.
No more like, a drug dealer gets busted with a bunch of cocaine (laptop). The police (FBI) log evidence into the system/evidence room. The dealers attorney says, it’s not cocaine it’s baby powder. They go to the evidence room, it’s not there bc the cop never entered it. No way to prove one way or another. The cocaine is inadmissible.
Like another anon said, there were multiple copies but if it wasn’t entered into evidence then there’s no way to say someone didn’t tamper with it (add pictures etc).
I recall a discussion around Q crumbs regarding how evidence is entered into an investigation, active around the time Giuliani's office was raided. Also we have Gaetz entering a HD copy into Congressional record, must count for something even if not forensic. Who else has been raided that had a copy of the thing at the time?
If I were a Jan6 detainee, I would subpoena the heck out of the original whistleblowing shop owner, to get one clean copy of that thing into trial evidence.
That would be something but if they’re not allowing the hours of videos from inside doubt they’d allow the laptop!
It is possible because our entire government is controlled by crooked saranic tyrants who do what they want when they want. They say what they want us to hear and then they believe it.
Th only thing I can think of is it may have been obtained illegally. Were any of those who obtained evidence agents of the state at the time the got it without a warrant?
From what I've read, it's a matter of "chain of custody" of the laptop and said material on it.
I already dismissed the 450 GB claim. You can't generate 450 GB of "deleted" files from a 500 GB drive that's got 300 GB of visible files on it.
And I didn't watch the Stew Peters video beyond the point where the "doctor" was faking his choking back tears. I've seen better acting on Star Trek series one!
The Dr. has some seriously shifty eyes. Usually a tell for me.
Yea the Dr gave me some sketch vibes too. But I watched the whole thing just to give myself a fair chance at discernment. I think there’s some truth in there but it just seems like a massive disinfo campaign. Also what came of the massive worm clots from the dead bodies, also from Stewie.
I just thought it was weird how he had that grin on his face the whole time while talking.
yes.....what was it called in body language....dupers delight?
Some people grin out of nervousness. He said he was very nervous. Maybe that is why.
And he repeated everything over and over and over and over (saw the Patriot Street-fighter interview). Classic hypnosis/propaganda/programming techniques.
Well.... I'd have to say what's good about Stew is he'll talk to just about anyone.
What's bad about him is the same thing.
Those of us who followed Art Bell for years thought the same, you have to plough through all the dirt to find gold.
Anything to make the movement look bad. I'll wait and reserve my judgement for now.
Its possible, if some of the recovered files are compressed
Also, deleted stuff can be recovered too, layers down, so more can be recovered from a drive than its capacity by a lot if it hasn't been bit bleached or what have you.
Edit: Granted you would need the physical drive for this, not a copy of the current data.
No. Especially in a hard drive, you're limited to physical capacity. It is actually impossible to recover more than the total sum of a drive.
When you delete something on a PC, it (usually) goes to the recycle bin. When you delete it from the recycle bin, what happens is that the place where the file you deleted resides still exists; the data is still there. But in an ELI5 style explanation, it tells the PC that it's okay to overwrite the data.
Once that data is overwritten, it's gone. This is the function of a product like Bleach Bit, or..really any software.
The software overwrites the data that was stored there with blank data over and over again until all segments have been completely wiped.
The only way you can actually recover data is if this process hasn't happened yet.
Let me try to explain a little bit more clearly:
Let's say you have 5 slots -- A, B, C, D, E -- and you download a video file.
That video file may take up A, C and E. B and D are still open, but the number of slots don't change.
Now let's say you delete it, and then download another video file. That file may take up B and D.
In this case, the video file previously deleted could (most likely) be recovered because none of the slots have been overwritten with new data.
Then say you downloaded a third file. This file takes up A.
Now recovery is almost impossible, because A has been overwritten. There are functionally no further layers.
Reconstruction of a majority of the file may be possible by software designed to do it, by recovering C and E but the complete sum is not possible to recover because A no longer has any trace of data remaining in that slot.
The end result is, for average users, a corrupt file with missing or incomplete data to varying degrees. For law enforcement, they may be able to recover portions of the whole and display it but not always.
If a 500GB storage has a 500GB total capacity (because a 1GB does not equate to 1024 megabytes when it comes to drive manufacturers anymore, this is not likely but for the sake of this discussion it's easier) there is no way to recover more than 500GB of data.
Compression will "complicate" this, but not really. If it's compressed to 100GB, it is functionally 100GB. You will not be able to somehow recover this and 500GB of other files.
So ultimately, it depends on if those files were compressed on the PC or not. And considering that he took it and left it at a PC repair shop with sensitive data on it...
..It's unlikely that Hunter knew enough or cared enough to actually do this.
Only other possibility, and I swear it's been floated around already as a source of this supposed data, was access through the laptop to various cloud based storage, including Apple's.
In this case, you could "technically" retrieve more information than the sum of the laptop's storage, but it's also not technically from the laptop, and that wasn't really the argument here.
The last bit to this novel is a little bit of a bonus:
Windows also has a neat little bug (feature, of course) that essentially, with no better word to describe the process, uncreates a file. What this does in practice is remove traces of existence entirely, as if it was never created in the first place.
People tend to run into this issue with using undo and redo a lot and losing important files they're trying to back up.
When you use data recovery software, including big wig paid software with a good reputation, the file will not appear. Unlike a corrupt or incomplete file, an "uncreated" file will just simply not have an entry at all. It's possible that, in the cases of hard drives, this is recoverable by accessing the physical plates in a professional environment... but I haven't been able to see any instances of success using this method.
TL;DR novel: Data is limited by capacity, and the way deletion works only allows recovery up until that space is filled by other data. If a data problem arises for you with important data, immediately shut down and take it to a professional data recovery business. Data recovery is time sensitive (in that the more you use your PC, the more likely it will be overwritten) so don't play games with it
"Also, deleted stuff can be recovered too, layers down, so more can be recovered from a drive than its capacity by a lot if it hasn't been bit bleached or what have you"
Now, "what have you" would include multiple overwrites yes, but a) it's like 7-10 times before it's gone gone for that sector and b) missing info can be interpolated so not all sectors for a given file even need to be recovered (or what's there can be restored at least).
I think the extra data found is bunk, but I would mention that when data gets overwritten it is not gone gone. There are some pretty advanced forensic techniques where you can still recover data (depending on the hardware). In the typical hard drive, data is stored magnetically, and the onboard hardware determines if a bit is a 1 or 0 depending on that. However the physical pieces of iron being magnetized are not just an on/off, there is a threshold where a 0 becomes a 1. If a bit was previously a 0 and overwritten as a 1, that "1" is not as strongly magnetized as if it was originally a 1 and then written as a 1 again. That is the reason why programs like bleach bit will typically write to those sectors over and over again, they'll write all 1's then all 0's then randomly so the data cannot be recovered.
That technique is pretty limited though, and requires specialized hardware, and you'll still end up with fragmented data if you get anything at all. You def could not recover 300GB that way.
Yes, and it requires the original hard drive to recover. Image copies won't have any of the residual magnetic pieces.
This is all correct. There is one other caveat concerning the data on Hunters hard drive however. We do not know the actual quantity of data that was stored on his drive, because all we have seen is from copies.
Example: If 500GB of data is shown to us on a copy of the drive, we cannot know how much space it used on the original drive because that data may have been compressed on the original, and not compressed (or compressed differently) on the copy of the drive. In that case, our estimations as to the maximum data the drive can hold could be inaccurate.
I worked for a company where someone left the company... their computer was turned back in.
I reformatted it, reinstalled an OS gave to someone else.
There was VERY important data on that hard drive. They sent it out someplace and they recovered it. It cost a LOT of money.
I never thought they'd get it back - I was surprised.
Me too. I thought they were wasting their money. Lol.
Years later at another job, disks that were to be recycled & trashed were all run through a degaussing(?) machine first, for a magnetic erase
Now you know “why” Killery smashed the electronics ... that makes “it” unrecoverable.
Most magnetic storage media actually has a memory beyond the standard 1/0 that the drive will report to you for a bit. That's why most "milspec" drive wipers do 7-8 passes of random data, because it clears that previous memory.
This is a pretty good video explaining the effect, and why multiple passes are required.
This is, of course, with the stipulation that I also doubt the ability to extract hundreds of gigabytes beyond the capacity of the drive.
Also true!
That was my immediate thought when he claimed he found 450GB worth of files. How big was the drive on that laptop?
There were references prior that it allowed access to cloud based storage, so it's likely not all of it was from the physical laptop.
I'm seeing more and more shills opening telegram accounts claiming to be someone with insider info but not decoding the map. Markers are the key . So yes, be careful who you follow.
So very factual.
There are so many was to get screwed up in things. The whirlwind will take any of us. We need to stay rooted in sanity & check stuff out.
...especially here.
That includes scrutinizing Brian Cates himself
After my initial "wholly shit" on the watch the water thing I see this seems to be a fraud and the "doctor" is acting. We're in a total info war and it's getting red hot.
Ahhhh Grasshoppa, words of wisdom come in a timely manner.
Confusion is the hallmark of the devil.
We use to be taught that, because it is true.
Pray for discernment.
God is helping us in these biblical times.
"GET RID OF ALL YOUR AUTHORITY FIGURES who appeal to your confirmation biases."
I like that one in particular. In other words, pay super close attention and be wary of people telling you what you want to hear.
This needs to be perma-stickied at the very top. It's the truest thing on here right now.
Are spike proteins the active ingredients of snake venom? They're the gain of function features on the virus and the active ingredients of the injections. But toxins are more lethal when inhaled, and much more lethal when injected, than they are swallowed because there is so much to dilute and break them down in our stomachs.
Unless it comes directly from Trump or the Bible I am always skeptical.
Fuck yes. Thank you Purkiss. You've calmed me down, dude. I was running around like a chicken with its head cut off this morning after I saw how EFFORTLESSLY so many in this movement bought into all the wild claims of this guy "Dr Ardis", just because Stu Peter's put together a Hollywood style documentary on Rumble 🤦♂️
https://thedrardisshow.com/shop-all/
The guy is a snake oil salesman. He's following the CIA playbook of mixing truth with lies. Thank you Brian Cates for being the voice of reason. I owe him an apology for thinking he was wrong for speaking out against Lin Wood last year.
👍👊
Reminds me of the time Jerome Corsi and Alex Jones tried to usurp Q.
So wait did maxey lie about the deleted material he found?
The real issue is, everything is on the table. The insanity is real. Anything g yiu can imagine they imagined first. No limits, nothing too bizarre or outrageous. Almost anything you can now conceive, they have been doing or Want to do.
It's difficult to dream up some crap and be wrong these days.
...exactly, game on and class is in session
Agree
Great advice 🙏
You are a frame in the wind that does not bend at all, no matter how much the wind picks up.
Question for techies. If you had a 1 TB hard drive and did an image of it, how large would the image be? If you compressed the data on a 1TB hard drive what size could it be compressed to?
Trump and Q. That’s about it. And maybe Durham. And maybe Patel.
Fuck Pompeo, barr, sessions, pence, kushner, ivanka, Flynn, and everybody else.
I don’t trust anybody!
this guy fucks👍🏼
And if it seems too good to be true, it is. Complete nonsense keeps getting sticky here just because people want it to be true.
That's your opinion.... Doesn't make it fact....
Doesn't make it not fact.