I saw a premier of "2000 Mules" on 5/2 with a dozen people in my local patriot posse. Despite D'Souza having great intentions, the man is simply a lousy film-maker. I've seen all his movies and none of them have impressed me. "2000 Mules" is no different, despite hoping for a better movie this time around since it was such compelling subject matter.
Sadly, I give this film an "EPIC fail" rating. And at $20 per ticket, nobody on earth is going to see it besides die-hard Trump supporters who already know that the 2020 election was stolen. The vast majority of this film is people sitting around talking to one another - not showing the DATA and EVIDENCE (which was SUPPOSED to be the entire point of the movie).
There's precious little evidence shown in the whole movie beyond what's already revealed in the teaser trailers. Some of the ballot-stuffer mule video footage even looked like 're-enactments' because of the numerous camera angles and edits - instead of legit footage (and it's not even spelled out that it's a re-enactment - which hurts the credibility of the real footage shown). Very, very disappointed - although not at all surprised.
After the movie, our dozen patriots hung out in the lobby and discussed the movie. All of us were in complete agreement that this movie is a colossal missed opportunity. And even worse, with so much hype about it, expectations are likely even higher - and it doesn't deliver. At all. IMO, save your money.
Weird that poster is being bashed for giving a movie review, GLowie , Shill.. for giving the communtiy a review....is that is how we treat our frens?
I guess if you watch it and poster was totally wrong or misleading us then it makes sense to bash or even question intent
If it is really good then the movie will be watched and promoted by Patriots regardless of what RedPill says.
We all know that the movie will be ripped and shared for free within a few days of digital release......REview is not going to stop anyone who truly wants to see it.......Im going to watch it regardless.....
Right? But i checked his history and he seems legit and not a shill. Maybe he built it up too big in his head or just missed the point of it all. IDK but I'm watching it.
$20 is double the normal ticket price, so it was worth mentioning. The people I went to see it with all wished they'd spent it on cocktails instead. Nobody in our group was pleased about it after watching it. But maybe our expectations were too high, I dunno.
thank you so much, fellow traveler, your help in suppressing the message from these alt right nitwits is so much appreciated. when the great restart happens, you will be recognized by the party and you shall be justly rewarded.
nothing like participating in forum slide, eh comrade?
You’re evidently very keen to share this particular message of your great disappointment with 2,000 Mules:
https://poal.co/s/QStorm/532205
I thought it deserved its own post after replying to others promoting it. The ticket price is $20 and that's a lot for a movie that sucked. But feel free to go see it - nobody's stopping you. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. And having previously worked in the TV/film industry in L.A., I have a more trained eye than most people.
I don't know about that, but it's definitely not something that is going to earn him points and will instead do the opposite.
The phrasing in particular is condescending and arrogant.
I stopped reading at "[worked in] L.A."
That being said, I'm not 100% discounting ops opinion. We have seen PLENTY OF FAKE KRAKENS so I'll watch it and make up my own mind and if there are any actual krakens I will be moderately surprised.
I was asked a direct question in a reply regarding my opinion on a particular scene in the movie that I said looked like a re-enactment. Emphasis on "looked like." That is the reason I spelled out my "credentials" on the subject. Here is that exchange for your reference:
Dernoddle 5 points 1 day ago +11 / -6 You say "footage even looked like 're-enactments'" and then charge that they did not spell it out that they were re-enactments. Do you have proof that there were re-enactments, or is this just your opinion?
I was asked a direct question in a reply that asked me for my credentials to discern whether or not a scene in the movie was a re-enactment vs. legit video footage from a street camera. That is the reason I spelled out my "credentials" on the subject. Here is that exchange:
Dernoddle 5 points 1 day ago +11 / -6 You say "footage even looked like 're-enactments'" and then charge that they did not spell it out that they were re-enactments. Do you have proof that there were re-enactments, or is this just your opinion?
Sorry, but working in the industry is not a badge of honor, pedo.
Not everyone in the industry is a pedo - For example: There's Rob Schneider, Kevin Sorbo, and ...Okay, that's all I could think of.
Actually, I left the industry and L.A. in my 20s because it was full of nasty people.
I’ve seen just as many movies as you without working in the industry. STFU
But you're not watching movies with a "trained eye" so your opinion does not count./sarc
I’ve trained my eye to catch deception. I’ve also read 10-15 books on making movies.
The "/sarc" at the end was there to convey that I was being Sarcastic. My comment was intended to ridicule OP, not you. I once watched a movie about reading books about making movies, does that count?
In fairness, those are advertising supported media platforms. I prefer reviews from consumers. But mostly I'll make up my own mind.
I question the authenticity of the above post. It sounds like he is trying to persuade people not to view it in the hopes of a flop and not lending credibility to the voter fraud. I could be wrong. $20 per person is a lot at the theater. It is completely sold out in Cleveland, Ohio suburbs. You can wait until next week, gather neighbors and friends and pay $20 to watch at home.
Someone asked me for my credentials to discern whether or not a scene in the movie was a re-enactment vs. legit video footage from a street camera. That is the reason I spelled out my "credentials" on the subject. Here is that exchange:
Dernoddle 5 points 1 day ago +11 / -6 You say "footage even looked like 're-enactments'" and then charge that they did not spell it out that they were re-enactments. Do you have proof that there were re-enactments, or is this just your opinion?
This makes a lot of sense. I am thinking 2000 mules was another "Lindell Symposium". The chances of Election Fraud being officially exposed and fixed right now is ZERO. We are in Devolution folks, and until the devolution is over it makes no sense to fix elections. Election fraud can only be exposed after the declas and booms have happened.
IMO this post is glowing.
Go look at my other posts before you throw around accusations like that. We're on the same team. Here's a link to my other posts. I'll graciously accept your apology as an innocent mistake. https://greatawakening.win/u/RedPillQ17/?type=post
I was promoting Dinesh and this movie on 5/1 before I saw it and found out it sucked: https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hc3aUwDv/dinesh-dsouza-interview-re-2000-/
How about you earn a little cred here before tossing accusations around? I see you're a newbie of only 25 days on this board with 0 posts and only snarky comments to others. https://greatawakening.win/u/Dernoddle/
The Wisconsin gap up curve is the only thing I needed to see. T said it on the rally “they were all scanned at the same time?”
I have a degree in TV/Film production (Cum Laude grad), I used to work in the industry in Hollywood, and did work as a video editor for many years. So it is my professional and educated opinion that the first ballot mule "footage" shown in this movie was a re-enactment, and they didn't caption it to alert the audience that it was a re-enactment. My dozen non-industry laymen movie-going fellow attendees at this premier all thought the same thing too - not just me viewing it with my trained eye.
Before you accuse someone of being a "shill", why don't you take 2 minutes and review that person's other posts and comments. My post the other day was stickied here and had somewhere around 500 upvotes with no downvotes.
I was promoting this movie and Dinesh D'Souza's interview about it a mere 2 days ago. It sounded like it was going to be a lot better than it was, based on its potential and explosive evidence it was SUPPOSED to reveal.
Since you're so lazy, here's a link to my other post promoting the movie on 5/1: https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hc3aUwDv/dinesh-dsouza-interview-re-2000-/
And here's a list of my other posts: https://greatawakening.win/u/RedPillQ17/?type=post
I have no vested interest in whether or not you see the movie. Go spend your money on whatever you want. Was merely offering opinions about it from a dozen patriots who saw it on the first premier day. Make up your own mind and go see it for yourself - I don't care how you spend your $$.
Thanks for the honest review. I’m gonna save my money and watch it after it’s pirated and shared online. Don’t let the haters get you down fren.
You are getting shat on also because you came off a bit condescending. But I get it. Just want to say that what's most mind boggling to me, is the short term memory of these haters. As if they never saw a fake Kraken? WTF people. At this point there have been ONLY FAKE KRAKENS so wtf does anyone expect 2k Mules to be other than the next stupid fucking fake KRAKEN? TWO WEEKS!?!??!?!
I'm going to watch it and make up my own mind for sure... but.... I'm not expecting any fucking Krakens ever again. IF there is one? Great!
this is probably the statement that you should have made in the original post
Someone once said that you shouldn’t argue with an idiot; bystanders may get confused. Let it go friend - you are being gaslit!
Bro, grow the fuck up. Who the actual fuck cares except you and all the other shills for the movie. Yeah bro, shilling goes both ways.
Either there is damning evidence of election fraud or there isn't!
Some fucking rando watching the movie or not, is NOT GOING TO CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY!
Is this Siskel or Ebert?
Well I thought it was a documentary and not movie...so why judge it as a movie. It is assumed that the documentary is to enlighten the viewer to the mechanics of the steal...does it do that? I don't know I've yet to see it. If 2000Mules achieves the goal of informing how the steal happened then that is all it was supposed to do. Some Documentary's are "drier" then others providing the facts without the "flash". The people talking here are there to be listened to which I look forward hearing them out. Does it lack the jump cutting MTV era production standards and make it boring for you visually? As for the multiple angles you got to consider that the election was a sting and problems were expected and the drop boxes were turned into a trap. I understand that one drop in Yuma Az had six different cameras on it, I can not speak to the other drop boxes but I have known about the problems with Yuma drop box for some time.
As to the claim he's was a lousy film maker who knows but as a documentarian his work has lead to Obama railroading him for a 5yr prison sentence.
I guess if your going to call 2000Mules and any other work Dinesh has done a bad movie then so be it...but it's documentary and if it educates more then it entertains then the film achieves it's goal.
I did it have to be entertaining? Did the fact that you weren't entertained cloud your judgement? I suppose I'll have to watch it. But I never had an expectation to be entertained like some I guess.
Well if it's a documentary it should have openly stated that scene was a re-enactment (at least in the beginning credits). I agree with him. And who wants to pay to watch ppl sit and talk, and give no documented evidence? We can do that right here and elsewhere and pay nothing.
Thank you for saying that. To be clear though, I said in my OP that the opening mule scene in the movie "even looked like a re-enactment." I don't have 100% proof of that, nor did I claim to - I said that it LOOKED like a re-enactment. That's because of there being so many camera angles and edits in it - which made it suspicious - unlike the static camera angle footage of other mule drops shown. The guy sitting next to me at the theater blurted out loud, "That's a re-enactment. Is that even real footage?" before I did, and he has no background in movies or editing at all - it was that obvious and suspicious to us.
It's not if it's a documentary because it is...if it's an reenactment in opening credit's you object to, then you might have a problem with every third program on the History channel as well. Or not.
Two things are true however....
One...Every theater is sold out...so it appears plenty of people want see it
Two...(They) don't want to talk about it at all as they are too busy ignoring it to scream at the Supremes'...most likely by design.
We however have it all. The Normies however are just starting to play catch up. This documentary is part of the painful drip drip drip of information that the Cabal fears. Given the Cabals reactions Dinesh is achieving his goal. As for a lack of hard evidence right now ....question...have you heard of any mules being arrested? I haven't. I have read about others caught up in election fraud cases in 10 states but nothing about these mules being arrested...yet. I expect much of the smoking gun evidence you crave is being withheld for the mules future arrests. The legal proper chain of evidence that our courts rely on to convict someone can't be undone for a documentary.
The crime in question has no statute of limitation...and there is no need to show all of our hole cards yet.
But given the reactions I have seen to 2000 mules the documentary it does get the ball rolling and maybe that was all it was ever to do.
Well that's so true, all you said. I didn't like all the flack this patriot got for his review. What has happend to us??
It’s going to show the Democrats the flaws they need to patch up for this next election.
Good thing so many states won't be using a drop boxes next election there is nothing to prefect if they aren't used at all. So they'll know what did wrong but they won't be able to fix it in 23 states alone and more going forward so there is that. 😁
You DO realize that DOCUMENTARY is a CATEGORY of MOVIES.
They are NOT parallel, they are nested.
I think you got the message I was conveying overall...got any other concerns or do you just want to split hairs like I do? 🙃 But just one note from history Dinesh was once snubbed for an Oscar for the 2016 documentary guess what the name of one of the documentary's the academy nominated over his...I shit you not...
This is Not a Film
Hehehe sorry it makes me giggle.
I will still watch it regardless of this, to each his own ...
I'm willing to give the $20 to get Dinesh to continue with his efforts. I'll consider it a non-deductible campaign contribution. I truly think he's got the US's best interests at heart. I've never had any doubts on this.
I'm going to see it tomorrow, already paid. I've learned a long time ago not to judge anything or anyone by another person's perspective or opinion. I loved all of Dinesh's movies except the last one. Trump Card. I certainly believe that he is right with the fact that only people who already know and believe the election was stolen will go see it. And if it is as bad as he is saying then maybe that is better.
Good to know. Thank you for your analysis. We will skip. Actually that seems to be his MO across all his films. He never fully delivers and he never hits home. Controlled opposition would be an understatement. Thank you.
I'm starting to wonder the very same thing ("controlled opposition"). Either that or there's a Black Hat who's infiltrated his movie-making team. Big hype followed by poorly executed movies. Every single time. :-(
Steve Bannon, on the other hand - he knows how to deliver the goods! "Trump @ War" was spectacular!
I've met him. Nice guy, but like most on our side they are timid in conversation that goes "beyond" the mainstream, aka controlled talking points. I dont give AF about down votes on this subject. Our side needs to fully wake the fk up.
His movies have been outstanding.
I hear you, but I'm tired of the goods never being delivered from our end. Im tried of being beaten over the head from our own side cause they watch "Tucker". I haven't had cable in 7 years because I'm tired of the bs. So no. Im not going to watch what I assume will be a wishy washy documentary cause "they" would never allow it to be shown if it actually delivered the goods. If it blows through the deep state bs and instantly becomes a cult classic I will change my mind. Something that can actually happen on our side.
Being honest with myself I will probably end up watching within a month or so because there is nothing... nothing else to watch. And I will check out Reefer Madness too...1936? Thanks for the suggestion.
I’ve learned here, that you would will be called a shill/glowie very quickly when you say something against group-think. There is a core group of intelligent, discerning anons here. There is also a large, active population addicted to Hopium and attack anything that dims their echo. That is a problem. Those who do that need to step back and gain a wider perspective; avoid conformation-bias, aka “the echo chamber effect”. You only hurt yourself when you avoid to think beyond your on thoughts.
I have learned years ago, movies tend to be a disappointment in modern film. rather then get a full length film, I have now stuck to people reading the news as I work. Saltycracker tends to be the most genuine of my listening choices. good pacing and the pauses are either opening or shifting platforms during his cast. The director seems to have one idea and drag it out to meet feature length requirements. movie would be better condensed. could be a good 20min watch vs 1 1/4 hours space filler/ 10 min open close/ 15 mins of content/ 1/2 hour of scenery.
Also, Dinesh doesn’t set the ticket price. The local theater does. Someone who has worked in the industry should know that.
I paid the $20 for the home premiere, we’re having a watch party at our house.
Holy shit it just dawned on me... 2000 Mules was a head-fake, Roe v Wade and Elon tweets exponentially increasing based topics coming in hot!!
My opinion is this movie that is so important should have been free period. That being said most documentaries are reenactments they cant actually put out video of the real people without lawsuits.
Thanks for the great review, and you saved me money. I too have seen his other films and they were just allright, nothing spectacular that we didn't already know or have access to. Well at least you dozen patriots got together so I'm sure that was nice.
Despite D'Souza having great intentions, the man is simply a lousy film-maker. I've seen all his movies and none of them have impressed me
I saw his previous movies too and they were great. I busted my ass laughing at the "what are you in here for" question that his fellow inmates asked him.
OP is a shill.
I agree... Hillary's America was very well done.
What makes me suspicious of this post is the confident assertion that all Dinish’s movies suck. Because that simply is NOT the case.
It's just my opinion, nothing more. I could have had too high of hopes for this movie, but that was based on how super hyped the trailers/teasers were.
I haven't seen it myself, and I don't plan to unless it is hosted somewhere online. I've always said I'm not a fan of something like this being sold to the public. It takes away credibility, and makes the whole thing look shady.
The fact of the matter is, there are thousands of people trying to make a buck off of people like us that want to find out what really happened in 2020. In my opinion, making a film was probably the dumbest thing Souza could of done. I'm not saying he can't be trusted but most of his information is behind a paywall and that just makes me raise an eyebrow.
I don't mean to piss off any fans of the guy, I'm just asking the question. Why make people pay a fee for this stuff?
That's what I would have thought as well. Maybe they did and law enforcement / DA's / courts all just turned a blind eye. They had such an incredible opportunity to name names - of these 2000 mules and all the non-profit Soros-funded orgs that were paying the mules.
They had the non-profit org names and addresses because they were notated in the ballot mule route maps as their ballot pick-up locations before taking them to all the ballot drop boxes. And they must have had the cell phone owners' names since they bought the cell phone ping data and could match up their drop box visits with the associated videos.
Yet they didn't go there. They didn't call out ANY of these monsters when they had the chance.
I agree 100%! Thanks for the honest review about the film. Saved me some money!!
Im gonna pass on the film. They had their chance to turn in evidence to the courts.
True the vote brought claims of fraud to the courts. The courts wanted proof of fraud, True the vote couldn’t provide them proof
You know this place exists because almost our entire government is corrupt, right??
Read the title again. You came to that conclusion all on your own. They voiced their opinion. I appreciate them giving an honest review. I much prefer that over these other pay-triots trying to suck money from everyone.
$20 a ticket is significant and if his opinions are even close to truth then this is probably just ANOTHER person trying to profit from this movement. Didnt q say to watch out for people trying to profit?
And me, i could give two shits about this movie or any loud mouth tweet about election fraud. We all know about the fraud, normies might have believed it if something was done about it 2 years ago. All my normie friends wanted to believe the fraud but its taken so long now that they all think republicans are just sore losers and wont stop whining about losing.
LOL @ handshake account calling GA.W a fed site. HAHAHAHAHA, the only fed on this site are 1. paid shills, 2. those who come here to collect data on who's a "bigot" and 3. feds (more generic - federal workers) who aren't working under a 3 letter agency to subvert democracy (not directly at least) [Look, just trying to be honest here], like myself, who actually are patriots, looking for real information / sauce.
The problem i see after having read all of the comments is that both sides are dug in. Both are making errors:
Anti-Watchers (those against watching based on OP's review) are seemingly blindingly accepting of the OP's review. No questions, just, ok, don't watch, message received. That looks really bad, like fed-actor level bad.
Pro-Watchers (those against the OP's review / recommendation) are acting like, shut up and take my money Dinesh, and "you're all just paid shills" to be fair, they might have a point.
There are a few (like me) that are saying reasonable things, like, "Hey, I get it, we've all been burned before, let's judge it ourselves or wait til we hear more than 1 opinion. The other thing I want to caution about, this is along the lines of Q and the cyber symposium. Supposing the "plan" is in action, as it appears to be, then wouldn't you argue that Dinesh, like Mike Lindell have been throttled by Trump (Trump accentuates the good people and bad, they both get the spotlight). So let's redirect our thoughts of good vs. bad or worth it vs. not worth it, and turn towards purpose?
Like anything out there, one person's opinion is basically useless on an event, we need many eyes. I'm not advocating to make Dinesh wealthy, nor am I advocating stealing. I'm only advocating for more eyes to make a clearer distinction, however that happens.
They tried. No one would do anything about it and actually started to come after them. Listen to them here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-charlie-kirk-show/id1460600818?i=1000556504385
I don’t know why you can’t understand that the courts are lying. I’ve seen the videos. They have the evidence.