This.๐๐ป
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (163)
sorted by:
Either that, or keep those legs closed. You had the pleasure, now you should suffer the pain; not the child. It is NOT the fault of the child. YOU HAVE BEEN SPOILED TOO LONG; unless it was rape, incest or your life is in jeopardy. Other than that, don't blame the baby for something you did to yourself. I know it 'takes two to tango' but either don't give in or YOU TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for your own body by using some form of birth control. CASE CLOSED.
even in cases of rape and incest -- you can put that baby up for adoption or keep it.
agree with great power comes great responsibility. the power to grow a person is a pretty damn large bit of power.
Let's not forget that rape and incest pregnancies account for less than 1% of abortions. Less than 1%. Yet these are the reasons MOST summoned for keeping abortion legal.
Correct!
Exactly...very rare.
And they should be able to abort those. Would you want to keep a daily reminder of a rape around you? Or would it be better for your subconscious to do everything it can to keep it off your mind?
Put it up for adoption.
Adoption is the answer, not murder.
I think itโs incredibly awful to say that a woman raped has to still carry a baby to term. Pregnancy does a significant ordeal to a womanโs body.
It's a worse thing to say "Kill an innocent child" because the father was a piece of shit.
It's a bad thing to force a woman to keep a reminder of one of her worst days.
I actually have a friend who was raped and kept her beautiful daughter. She sees her as a blessing that came out of a bad situation.
Not all women will see that the same way.
I know, but it's a perspective that people might should consider, instead of only seeing the baby as a reminder of trauma.
Yeah we went through this already, there's "bad" and then there's "far worse", you're on the wrong side of it.
No, I don't think it's worse, especially considering the pregnancy can be terminated early, long before the fetus is viable. Not only would the woman have to live with the trauma of being raped (or even raped from a family member incest baby), which will be the case no matter what, but then suffer the physical affects from the pregnancy and raising a child that bears a resemblance to her rapist. Highly likely the woman would grow to resent the child, and the foster care system is historically not kind to children.
Absolutely would argue that's worse than an abortion. A woman should have the right to carry/raise a child that she is ready and willing to.
This is the wrong construct. A toddler is not viable unless someone cares for it.
Viability is a red herring. Donโt fall for it.
That's because you're a retard, you think "muh trauma" is worse than being murdered. The mother is not required to keep the child, she can put it up for adoption. Look, anyone sane can accept that carrying an unwanted child is going to be a rough time for the mother, however the pregnancy came about, however:
Murdering a child - is worse than being pregnant for 9 months in a manner you'd have rather not. This point is not disputable. Give the mother state funded counselling and monetary aid however it needs to be done. Just don't kill children. It's a simple premise.
She does have that right already lol, what you're really asking for and unable to type out is that women should have the right to arbitrarily murder their child because having it would be inconvenient. If it's some solace for you I believe rapists should be burned alive in the public square.
So now we have a woman being raped, and because of this the taxpayers not only have to pay for the childโs care, but the womanโs trauma as well having to carry her rapists baby?
A woman shouldnโt be forced to carry a child of rape, is what Iโm actually asking for
She is not being "forced" to DO anything, she is forbidden from murdering a child because she was a victim of a crime. You're conflating two different things in your head, which is understandable because all the messaging about this stuff is purposefully put into the muddy puddles.
Yes, lol, if the state forbids you from killing the child and you cannot work while carrying it then of course the state should foot the bill, as well as counselling, the state is de facto guardian of women's vaginas when out walking the streets so they and or the rapist are financially liable. There's nothing bizzare or surprising about this. You're aware that the state pays for prisoners in prisons and all manner of dumb shit like infinite aid to foreign countries right? Do you not see that you're now scrabbling at an economic argument over the principle argument which is - do not kill innocent children - ?
it's more awful to say that a child must be murdered to spare a woman from pregnancy, imho. you'd be surprised how many women make the choice to carry the child.
When you put it so simply, sure. But situations arenโt always that simple. I understand some women make the choice to carry the child, and thatโs their choice. My point is it should be a choice, and not forced.
this was where the the game started. do you know abortion was described early on as "safe but rare" ?
What part of "thou shall not kill" is confusing?
The sad part is if she gets raped and pregnant in the wrong state, her rapist may have access to her through custodial rights of the child he fathered. THAT needs to change.
If you believe abortion is murder and thus she has no right to end a life, then she has no right to end a life.
I don't believe abortion is murder, so that's part of where we're going to disagree.
yes that would be the line. just read about kathy barnette. amazing story.
Some random....She doesn't. Step 1. report the rape...get a pill. Problem solved.
The pill isnโt a fail safe. Thatโs part of the issue
I was referring to the day after pill given to a rape victim. I see no problem sending the issue back to the states since the decision was a huge over reach by the SC in 73.
Yes, I'm well aware of that. I'm telling you that it isn't a failsafe
Amen.
Are kids born to two relatives at significantly increased risk of cognitive and mental deficiencies?
My oldest brother was a product of incest. He has no cognitive issues but he has other physical issues. I donโt know if they are related to the incest or not.
I do know he would marry because he was fearful for any future children he might have.
if risk of idiocy justifies abortion than it might as well stay legal. plenty of other risk factors resulting in deficiencies.
โค๏ธ๐
Best birth control? An aspirin. You hold it between your knees.
โ Dear Abby
I heard it works with a nickel too.
Lmao brilliant
6 feet away to stop the spread! ๐
Whew! And wear a face mask. This way they'll never know if you're too ugly or not. Haha.
And in the case of rape, if proven undeniably, I happily support chemical castration (or not chemical) for said rapists. Guaranteed it will be less of a problem.
Yes
I strongly suspect abortions are related to population control. Blacks and Latino ? But Caucasians are bothering them much too... idk
It's 100% population control. No other species performs abortions. Margaret Sanger founded PP with the express purpose of curbing black population growth.
And Hillary Clinton was quoted as saying Margaret Sanger was her hero. These people are stupid.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/sec-clinton-stands-by-her-praise-of-eugenicist-margaret-sanger
I think it started out as population control and still is but now other โreasonsโ have been added to the bandwagon as well, ex. Black market for organs, body parts used for research, etc.
It is related but not all of it, the fixation with late term abortion is the onward sale and trafficking of neonatal tissues and organs.
Population control and harvesting parts and tissue. We're livestock.
goyim ?
Oy vey!
Insert "for two minutes" between condom and during. LOL.
I found our new leader.
Ever wonder how many of the relatively affluent pro-abortion protesters actually had an abortion? Or would have one?
I canโt recall ever seeing the primary targets of abortion providers protesting.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2015/08/13/proof-ben-carson-is-right-about-planned-parenthood-targeting-black-neighborhoods/
Someone near on of the protest should start handing out condoms.
Theres other options to prevent pregnancy, idk why the left are wailing ๐
They need to feel like they're in the handmaid's tale or something to make up for the fact they have no social life irl.
They have no logic this is like saying it to cardboard but hey we get it! ๐คฃ
Remove "I'm sorry". No apologizing
I'm sorry? Pfft, not.
Right?!?!?!?!
Gah, these people are dumb...
And libs complain about birth control costing too much. Bruh, you can get a full box of condoms at CVS for $5. And Planned Parenthood gives out birth control pills free of charge like they're candy!
Condom mandates NOW!
Wishful thinking
No need to start off with an apology with this sic F*s
Low effort clickbait.
Just expand the picture. Thisโd take less time.
Who sits at a computer?