That's right thank you for reminding me , TUCKER wouldn't let her speak ,,, I haven't watched yet , my church has been running it on Friday nights but I've been working ,, I'm ordering dvd and can't wait ! Ty
The Left hate him because he speaks the truth..here: Gregg Allen Phillips (born October 13, 1960) is the former head of the Mississippi Department of Human Services and the author of a tweet, cited by U.S. President Donald Trump, which claims that between three and five million non-citizens voted in the 2016 elections. Wikipedia
As much as all patriots want to see 2020 election justice ASAP, imagine the effect it will have when all the hard evidence comes out leading up to 2022 midterms. The left can no longer say rigged election is fake news or a Russian narrative when massive arrests are going down with the perps singing loudly about their bosses. In light of all the riggers going down the elections themselves will also probably become secure which equals MASSIVE RED TSUNAMI!!!!!!!
"The sheriff of Yuma saw our movie, went berserk and has opened up an investigation in Yuma, Arizona and I believe there will be arrests very soon."
Alright. So we have a timeline. 2000 Mules was released at the beginning of May, and the Yuma County press release regarding the election fraud cases was announced about a week later.
So far so good. Here’s the press release from the investigators.
The Yuma County Sheriff’s Office (YCSO) and the Yuma County Recorder’s Office (YCRO) are working together to actively examine cases of voting fraud from the 2020 General Election and now a recent pattern of fraudulent voter registration forms leading up to the 2022 Primary Election. As of March 2022, YCSO has 16 voting/registration open cases. All relevant evidence is being formally documented by the Yuma County Recorder’s Office and further investigated by the Yuma County Sheriff’s Office.
Hold up. As of March?
So this investigation has been going on long before March, and even longer before May?
D’Souza specifically said the sheriff saw the movie, not a report, not just data. So was this a very, very unfinished movie that the sheriff saw much earlier than anyone else? Maybe he saw the story boards?
Well, who is this berserk sheriff? It says right at the top of the press release. Sheriff Leon Wilmot.
So if this sheriff both saw this unreleased movie and was disturbed enough by it to immediately open an investigation thanks to D’Souza’s hard work, why is he also publicly denying it?
“The Yuma County Sheriff’s Office has been working jointly with the Yuma County Recorder’s Office and the Arizona Attorney General’s Office extensively regarding allegations of voter misconduct for over a year,” Wilmot said. “
Over a year. Well before D’Souza could have had a viable movie to show Wilmot.
There’s always the possibility of “this is a super secret operation and plausible deniability is necessary.” Maybe making D’Souza look like a liar is part of the Plan.
But if that’s the case, then that means D’Souza’s role here is to look like someone who can’t even get the sheriff who can prove the value of his movie to lend any credibility to it. That seems strange for a movie specifically designed to wake people up.
TL;DR
Sheriff’s press, both officially released and in interviews, has suggested this case has been going on for months before the movie was released. D’Souza probably saw that the press release came out a week after his movie and made the assumption, but neither the sheriff nor anyone from his office is backing up that claim, and nothing from their office seems to support it.
In regards to your train of thought: I'm not interested in attempts to prove Dinesh a liar. I don't care. As far as I'm concerned that's a distraction. The man put together on his own dime a damning documentary that is red pilling people by the millions. We're on the same side.
Anybody concerned about the stolen election in a position of law enforcement in AZ, could of course have an open investigation - I would hope so. And frustrated with the lack of movement by the AG and others in state government. Then he sees the extent presented by geo location data and video footage in 2000 Mules, and yea, goes berzerk and starts investigating the claims in the movie and people involved in his own back yard. It's not like he's saying the sheriff went "What? There was election fraud? Now you tell me!"
What's the problem? There is none. Focus on the real target
Very true. He’s also putting a grand effort on this topic as well. Election fraud will unhinge the cabal. Not saying he’s cabal but overall, minions do what minions do.
Guys, before you argue this point, please remember how frustrated you get when people don’t even read your arguments simply because you are a Q person. And how you believe you are better than the average person at not falling for such fallacies.
Also remember that this is a research site that REQUIRES contrasting arguments to be legitimate, because without them, this becomes a pseudoreligious Q fan club, not a research site.
The research process requires every facet of the argument to be examined by every side. I am participating faithfully in that process. It is not required to be a Q believer to be a Q researcher.
It's good practice, if we're going to go out and convince others. The argument was reasoned, even if a bit slidey. I answered, if you want to check the thread.
Sealioning (also spelled sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with persistent requests for evidence or repeated questions, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity. It may take the form of "incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate".
Is that how you find Ogre's posts? That he only asks questions and doesn't do any research himself?
The type of poster I hate is the one who nips at people's heels like a little yappy dog, following them all over the forum.
Read the thread, not just the last comment. I've had ample opportunity to view his comments over time, and this term seems consistent with his activities. More civil than most, and with more data than most, but his stuff on this thread was exactly that. The response to me was completely disingenuous. It's likely that he's on the click when commenting here, different from most users.
I’m sorry you feel that way, but there is a difference between sea-lioning and having a high standard for proof of the most major crime in US history.
If you want me to support the arrest and hanging of most of our government, media, and industry, and return power to a guy I’d rather not be in power, then I am not granting you a single benefit of the doubt. The consequences are simply too much.
I mean, consider it in the reverse. What standard of proof would you require to disown Q and accept that the world isn’t quite the way he and Trump described?
Would it be pretty high? Because you’ve invested and committed to the reality you’ve accepted based on the evidence you’ve seen?
I’m in the same boat. Everyone is when it comes to the Q stuff.
Luckily, we’re on a research site where we can consider all points of view in an attempt to understand truth about Q.
Don’t let people here trick you into thinking “not being convinced by an argument justifying mass executions” is the same thing as being a troll.
Otherwise, you’ll find yourself convinced that everyone who disagrees with you is being disingenuous, and there’s no faster way to destroy a research site than to allow that philosophy to fester.
Shoot I know I said I'd stop speaking with you but fyi I follow his posts because I like contrasting sources of information and find them as informative as any others here.
This is really good work, and I'm struggling through morning noise and activity to articulate a worthy response...
I won't discount what you're implying regarding D'Souza's inconsistencies. It's crazy here, and I have to go unfortunately.
But I will ask one, slightly rhetorical, question: Do you think it's conceivable D'Souza received information from the same source the sheriff recieved his information?
Follow up, which you briefly addressed yourself: In regards to super secret operations with plausible deniability, which are further complicated by a complicit, enemy controlled media, how does one tell the people the truth? How does one SHOW the people the truth?
Thanks for the digging. I really have to hang up and listen. Hopefully other pedes will chime in.
I can't help but worry about the fact that Dinesh is charging people to see this movie after what Q said about people who do exactly that. I've always like Dinesh, but this definitely gives me pause, even if it is great work. He's made some solid money already, why not release it free now? Who puts evidence of a crime behind a paywall?
But I will ask one, slightly rhetorical, question: Do you think it's conceivable D'Souza received information from the same source the sheriff recieved his information?
Absolutely!
But that's not what either of them claimed. D'Souza specifically said the sheriff was responding to his film. I don't see how that can be the truth.
Perhaps D'Souza didn't present his argument clearly, but that's... not a good trait for a guy trying to defend the way he's presented evidence of election fraud.
I don't really have any reason to give D'Souza a benefit of the doubt.
In regards to super secret operations with plausible deniability, which are further complicated by a complicit, enemy controlled media, how does one tell the people the truth? How does one SHOW the people the truth?
I've actually asked a variation of this question.
If there is no super secret operation with plausible deniability, how would you ever prove it to yourself? What in the Q narrative allows you to PROVE to yourself that you are wrong about it?
Every failure is interpreted as optics. Every apparent setback is making the enemy "expend ammo." Every idiot move or denial of Q by Important People is seen as "disinformation is necessary."
To respond to your question, ask yourself. Why does this site exist? HOW does this site exist?
If the Cabal can control everything, and this site still exists, then clearly there's a dissonant conclusion. Either they are controlling this site, or the internet is too big even for the Cabal to effectively control.
So put Frazzledrip on the internet. Let me see Clinton eating a child instead of just taking people's word for it. Let me actually see the TrueTheVote data instead of being told what it said in a movie. The MSM can suppress it all they want, but I watched D'Souza's movie on his own site.
Now, what about you? Is Q falsifiable for you? Have you left yourself any way to know if this Plan doesn't come to fruition or never actually existed? How would you know if all the stuff that you think is happening secretly actually isn't happening?
It could easily be true. Many investigations do not produce arrests, either for insufficient evidence or political will. If the movie supplied one new fact, or persuaded a prosecutor to authorize the case, the movie could be a direct cause of arrests from a previous investigation.
Same as how the "cold cases" TV show claims credit for cases with old non-prosecuted cases.
Sure, but where did your theory of this come from? It didn’t come from D’Souza. It didn’t come from the sheriff report. It didn’t come from any after-the-fact clarifications.
Isn’t this just hypothetical?
As far as I continue to see, D’Souza has insisted that the Yuma investigation is a result of his movie, and nobody else involved agrees.
Look, D’Souza’s job was to create a convincing argument that election fraud occurred. If that’s his job, why is it my responsibility, or your responsibility, or anyone’s responsibility to decipher what he really meant?
He’s the messaging guy! It’s his job to put out an accurate message. It’s not my job to clean up his messaging mistakes for him, and no normie on the planet is interested in doing that.
If he meant to say something else, he can clarify. Given the nature of his film, his credibility needs to be airtight.
If maintaining that airtight credibility requires me to assume hypothetical situations that might possibly make D’Souza only partially wrong, then the credibility is not airtight.
"So if this sheriff both saw this unreleased movie and was disturbed enough by it to immediately open an investigation thanks to D’Souza’s hard work, why is he also publicly denying it?"
Occam's razor would suggest he's feigning ignorance and or reliance on D'Souza's claims whilst knowing that it would ruin his credibility to acknowledge his investigation being connected in anyway with Dinesh's work.
The media would definitely have a field day if he acknowledged at all being connected to 2000 mules. It would also likely hurt his case.
Well, that's one possible explanation. But Occam's Razor requires the simplest explanation, and your theory still requires a huge number of people to be lying and Part of the Plan.
The other possibility is "D'Souza is trying to increase his own credibility by taking credit for something he had nothing to do with."
This only requires one person to lie on a podcast.
In the normieverse, this is generally going to be the simplest assumption. D'Souza has not really made much of a splash outside of the Q World, so if the point was to get normies to listen to him, I'm not sure that "optics" is the best game to play.
Clearly. But this has to be probably LIVE INVESTIGATION if it is any - got it ?
Had you EVER SEEN the situation where all about investigation is released to the public ? That would clearly be VERY,VERY unprofessional one...
If Q released info about arresting Hillary and others and if it is true and if they are kept free really - that would require using their arrogance to make them ignore it all. You think it is impossible ? Boy and the wolf...
And video is probably designed to wake up people,NOT for releasing data that shall remain confidential.
Yes,you have your doubts or propaganda,but as for now - it is still like Q is without 100% sure confirmation as it was.But "2000 mules" is not about confirming Q... Maybe some anons not understand it,but this film alone is not enough - ALONE. 100% sure confirmation might be only be when most important arrest would end. But we have MANY "accidental" things happening...
If for example anyone doubts about cabal's existence, especially conspiracy under signboard of WEF then this person is a blind fool. Too many other "conspiracy theories" are confirmed on our eyes man.Too many to ignore Q which become "meta-conspiracy theory". You may not believe in Q but it is 100% sure big things are currently happening. Q being true or fake - it is all related.
Year ago claims about elites wanting controlled "food crisis" were laughed. What all of you would say now ? What would you say in the coming months ? Midterms are in NOVEMBER, and we have only MAY. We will see Q or not we might see empty shelves in many countries - not only in USA.
And about food crisis of course we have "natural reasons" like "war" (very strange one...) , problems with supply lines etc. But explain me - are we "qtards" and other "conspiracy theoreticist" fucking prophets ? Prove me this is all "accident" and "random" so maybe we all should try some lotteries if you are right and we are all clairvoyants ok ?
Hey, this is a research site. Anyone is welcome to beat me to an analysis. There’s nothing magical about comparing dates. You guys do that all the time with deltas anyway.
You can do the trusting, but it appears I'm the first person in this thread to do the verifying on this particular claim. If you still want to trust it, you're welcome to do so.
What makes me laugh is thinking that this was the plan all along, why we had to wait so long into May for some arrests or whatever happened. I just have to imagine that while all these rich fucks are at the WEF convention in Sweden or whatever, all their underlings are flipping on them. That way, when they come back into the office they may notice people don't really think of them all too fondly when their crimes are exposed.
You are on a Q message board. Only those who took Q drops out of context or hear others who have done so, say this phrase. I myself have done this until I researched the drops carefully and corrected myself.
If you were a critical thinker, you would logically conclude that Q is not a cabal operation.
I only linked to what Q actually posted, you should then acknowledge that you were wrong and not post the "first arrest..." nonsense again.
You are the one who is angry. Projection is a leftist tactic.
If you were a critical thinker, you would logically conclude that Q is not a cabal operation. It makes ZERO sense to wake up the masses to the truth. The cabal would simply keep slowly raising the temperature of the pot to keep the frogs unaware. Not this crazy full out panicked steam roller that is going on now.
I only linked to actual Q drops of information. You are the one that is angry dooming.
About time!
Who is Gregg Phillips?
He was in 2000 mules , I think he worked with Dinesh to get a lot of the info
I sprinkled a little hopium into my coffee today as a flavoring. Thank you :)
Thank you!
Yes
He is half of the brains behind the operation. Catherine Engelbrecht is the other half.
That's right thank you for reminding me , TUCKER wouldn't let her speak ,,, I haven't watched yet , my church has been running it on Friday nights but I've been working ,, I'm ordering dvd and can't wait ! Ty
The Left hate him because he speaks the truth..here: Gregg Allen Phillips (born October 13, 1960) is the former head of the Mississippi Department of Human Services and the author of a tweet, cited by U.S. President Donald Trump, which claims that between three and five million non-citizens voted in the 2016 elections. Wikipedia
Thanks Pede!
Yeah brother..
I mean, would that be a shock? Lol
Yeah & Trump won nevertheless!
He was the face of the data group, OPSEC, that worked with True The Vote in the movie 2000 Mules.
In the movie he explained at great length how they correlated the many terabytes of information they purchased.
Bingo
I should have commited election fraud so I could give the insider scoop to GAW when I get raided.
As much as all patriots want to see 2020 election justice ASAP, imagine the effect it will have when all the hard evidence comes out leading up to 2022 midterms. The left can no longer say rigged election is fake news or a Russian narrative when massive arrests are going down with the perps singing loudly about their bosses. In light of all the riggers going down the elections themselves will also probably become secure which equals MASSIVE RED TSUNAMI!!!!!!!
People still wont be able to accept it
I dug into these raids a bit.
What he’s referring to is the Yuma County investigation that was announced a couple of weeks ago.
D’Souza specifically claimed on a podcast that this Yuma investigation was a direct result of his movie. 1 minute mark.
https://mobile.twitter.com/WhitlockJason/status/1526315725446688771?s=20&t=G0PMzHJOcENn1vC8F9ZRdQ
Alright. So we have a timeline. 2000 Mules was released at the beginning of May, and the Yuma County press release regarding the election fraud cases was announced about a week later.
So far so good. Here’s the press release from the investigators.
https://www.yumacountysheriff.org/pr-2022/PR-2022-30-Yuma-County-Voting-Fraud.pdf
Here’s the opening line from the release;
Hold up. As of March?
So this investigation has been going on long before March, and even longer before May?
D’Souza specifically said the sheriff saw the movie, not a report, not just data. So was this a very, very unfinished movie that the sheriff saw much earlier than anyone else? Maybe he saw the story boards?
Well, who is this berserk sheriff? It says right at the top of the press release. Sheriff Leon Wilmot.
So if this sheriff both saw this unreleased movie and was disturbed enough by it to immediately open an investigation thanks to D’Souza’s hard work, why is he also publicly denying it?
Over a year. Well before D’Souza could have had a viable movie to show Wilmot.
There’s always the possibility of “this is a super secret operation and plausible deniability is necessary.” Maybe making D’Souza look like a liar is part of the Plan.
But if that’s the case, then that means D’Souza’s role here is to look like someone who can’t even get the sheriff who can prove the value of his movie to lend any credibility to it. That seems strange for a movie specifically designed to wake people up.
TL;DR
Sheriff’s press, both officially released and in interviews, has suggested this case has been going on for months before the movie was released. D’Souza probably saw that the press release came out a week after his movie and made the assumption, but neither the sheriff nor anyone from his office is backing up that claim, and nothing from their office seems to support it.
In regards to your train of thought: I'm not interested in attempts to prove Dinesh a liar. I don't care. As far as I'm concerned that's a distraction. The man put together on his own dime a damning documentary that is red pilling people by the millions. We're on the same side.
Anybody concerned about the stolen election in a position of law enforcement in AZ, could of course have an open investigation - I would hope so. And frustrated with the lack of movement by the AG and others in state government. Then he sees the extent presented by geo location data and video footage in 2000 Mules, and yea, goes berzerk and starts investigating the claims in the movie and people involved in his own back yard. It's not like he's saying the sheriff went "What? There was election fraud? Now you tell me!"
What's the problem? There is none. Focus on the real target
Very true. He’s also putting a grand effort on this topic as well. Election fraud will unhinge the cabal. Not saying he’s cabal but overall, minions do what minions do.
Well, "this topic" is one of the main topics of Q discussions, and this is a Q research board, and I did research on this topic...
So... yeah. I put a "grand effort" into researching the topics that are discussed here.
As should everyone. :)
Hes a paid russian troll. Get him off here.
Guys, before you argue this point, please remember how frustrated you get when people don’t even read your arguments simply because you are a Q person. And how you believe you are better than the average person at not falling for such fallacies.
Also remember that this is a research site that REQUIRES contrasting arguments to be legitimate, because without them, this becomes a pseudoreligious Q fan club, not a research site.
The research process requires every facet of the argument to be examined by every side. I am participating faithfully in that process. It is not required to be a Q believer to be a Q researcher.
It's good practice, if we're going to go out and convince others. The argument was reasoned, even if a bit slidey. I answered, if you want to check the thread.
No, mostly only you, and partly because I promised the mods to do my best to keep things from blowing up all the time between you and me.
I am always happy to converse with others in good faith.
Thanks. I get the jist, and I'll not bother with him anymore. But help me out: what's "sea lion?" First time I heard that one.
Is that how you find Ogre's posts? That he only asks questions and doesn't do any research himself?
The type of poster I hate is the one who nips at people's heels like a little yappy dog, following them all over the forum.
Read the thread, not just the last comment. I've had ample opportunity to view his comments over time, and this term seems consistent with his activities. More civil than most, and with more data than most, but his stuff on this thread was exactly that. The response to me was completely disingenuous. It's likely that he's on the click when commenting here, different from most users.
I’m sorry you feel that way, but there is a difference between sea-lioning and having a high standard for proof of the most major crime in US history.
If you want me to support the arrest and hanging of most of our government, media, and industry, and return power to a guy I’d rather not be in power, then I am not granting you a single benefit of the doubt. The consequences are simply too much.
I mean, consider it in the reverse. What standard of proof would you require to disown Q and accept that the world isn’t quite the way he and Trump described?
Would it be pretty high? Because you’ve invested and committed to the reality you’ve accepted based on the evidence you’ve seen?
I’m in the same boat. Everyone is when it comes to the Q stuff.
Luckily, we’re on a research site where we can consider all points of view in an attempt to understand truth about Q.
Don’t let people here trick you into thinking “not being convinced by an argument justifying mass executions” is the same thing as being a troll.
Otherwise, you’ll find yourself convinced that everyone who disagrees with you is being disingenuous, and there’s no faster way to destroy a research site than to allow that philosophy to fester.
Shoot I know I said I'd stop speaking with you but fyi I follow his posts because I like contrasting sources of information and find them as informative as any others here.
And lol "always"
This is really good work, and I'm struggling through morning noise and activity to articulate a worthy response...
I won't discount what you're implying regarding D'Souza's inconsistencies. It's crazy here, and I have to go unfortunately.
But I will ask one, slightly rhetorical, question: Do you think it's conceivable D'Souza received information from the same source the sheriff recieved his information?
Follow up, which you briefly addressed yourself: In regards to super secret operations with plausible deniability, which are further complicated by a complicit, enemy controlled media, how does one tell the people the truth? How does one SHOW the people the truth?
Thanks for the digging. I really have to hang up and listen. Hopefully other pedes will chime in.
WWG1WGA
I can't help but worry about the fact that Dinesh is charging people to see this movie after what Q said about people who do exactly that. I've always like Dinesh, but this definitely gives me pause, even if it is great work. He's made some solid money already, why not release it free now? Who puts evidence of a crime behind a paywall?
I appreciate the response. Here is mine.
Absolutely!
But that's not what either of them claimed. D'Souza specifically said the sheriff was responding to his film. I don't see how that can be the truth.
Perhaps D'Souza didn't present his argument clearly, but that's... not a good trait for a guy trying to defend the way he's presented evidence of election fraud.
I don't really have any reason to give D'Souza a benefit of the doubt.
I've actually asked a variation of this question.
If there is no super secret operation with plausible deniability, how would you ever prove it to yourself? What in the Q narrative allows you to PROVE to yourself that you are wrong about it?
Every failure is interpreted as optics. Every apparent setback is making the enemy "expend ammo." Every idiot move or denial of Q by Important People is seen as "disinformation is necessary."
To respond to your question, ask yourself. Why does this site exist? HOW does this site exist?
If the Cabal can control everything, and this site still exists, then clearly there's a dissonant conclusion. Either they are controlling this site, or the internet is too big even for the Cabal to effectively control.
So put Frazzledrip on the internet. Let me see Clinton eating a child instead of just taking people's word for it. Let me actually see the TrueTheVote data instead of being told what it said in a movie. The MSM can suppress it all they want, but I watched D'Souza's movie on his own site.
Now, what about you? Is Q falsifiable for you? Have you left yourself any way to know if this Plan doesn't come to fruition or never actually existed? How would you know if all the stuff that you think is happening secretly actually isn't happening?
It could easily be true. Many investigations do not produce arrests, either for insufficient evidence or political will. If the movie supplied one new fact, or persuaded a prosecutor to authorize the case, the movie could be a direct cause of arrests from a previous investigation.
Same as how the "cold cases" TV show claims credit for cases with old non-prosecuted cases.
Well, that’s sort of the Q mantra, isn’t it?
“It could easily be true.”
Sure, but where did your theory of this come from? It didn’t come from D’Souza. It didn’t come from the sheriff report. It didn’t come from any after-the-fact clarifications.
Isn’t this just hypothetical?
As far as I continue to see, D’Souza has insisted that the Yuma investigation is a result of his movie, and nobody else involved agrees.
Look, D’Souza’s job was to create a convincing argument that election fraud occurred. If that’s his job, why is it my responsibility, or your responsibility, or anyone’s responsibility to decipher what he really meant?
He’s the messaging guy! It’s his job to put out an accurate message. It’s not my job to clean up his messaging mistakes for him, and no normie on the planet is interested in doing that.
If he meant to say something else, he can clarify. Given the nature of his film, his credibility needs to be airtight.
If maintaining that airtight credibility requires me to assume hypothetical situations that might possibly make D’Souza only partially wrong, then the credibility is not airtight.
I’m not doing D’Souza’s work for him.
"So if this sheriff both saw this unreleased movie and was disturbed enough by it to immediately open an investigation thanks to D’Souza’s hard work, why is he also publicly denying it?"
Occam's razor would suggest he's feigning ignorance and or reliance on D'Souza's claims whilst knowing that it would ruin his credibility to acknowledge his investigation being connected in anyway with Dinesh's work.
The media would definitely have a field day if he acknowledged at all being connected to 2000 mules. It would also likely hurt his case.
Well, that's one possible explanation. But Occam's Razor requires the simplest explanation, and your theory still requires a huge number of people to be lying and Part of the Plan.
The other possibility is "D'Souza is trying to increase his own credibility by taking credit for something he had nothing to do with."
This only requires one person to lie on a podcast.
In the normieverse, this is generally going to be the simplest assumption. D'Souza has not really made much of a splash outside of the Q World, so if the point was to get normies to listen to him, I'm not sure that "optics" is the best game to play.
Or, it could be there was an ongoing investigation, and the movie caused more suspects to come to light.
Could be. Also not what D’Souza said happened.
Clearly. But this has to be probably LIVE INVESTIGATION if it is any - got it ?
Had you EVER SEEN the situation where all about investigation is released to the public ? That would clearly be VERY,VERY unprofessional one...
If Q released info about arresting Hillary and others and if it is true and if they are kept free really - that would require using their arrogance to make them ignore it all. You think it is impossible ? Boy and the wolf...
And video is probably designed to wake up people,NOT for releasing data that shall remain confidential.
Yes,you have your doubts or propaganda,but as for now - it is still like Q is without 100% sure confirmation as it was.But "2000 mules" is not about confirming Q... Maybe some anons not understand it,but this film alone is not enough - ALONE. 100% sure confirmation might be only be when most important arrest would end. But we have MANY "accidental" things happening...
If for example anyone doubts about cabal's existence, especially conspiracy under signboard of WEF then this person is a blind fool. Too many other "conspiracy theories" are confirmed on our eyes man.Too many to ignore Q which become "meta-conspiracy theory". You may not believe in Q but it is 100% sure big things are currently happening. Q being true or fake - it is all related.
Year ago claims about elites wanting controlled "food crisis" were laughed. What all of you would say now ? What would you say in the coming months ? Midterms are in NOVEMBER, and we have only MAY. We will see Q or not we might see empty shelves in many countries - not only in USA.
And about food crisis of course we have "natural reasons" like "war" (very strange one...) , problems with supply lines etc. But explain me - are we "qtards" and other "conspiracy theoreticist" fucking prophets ? Prove me this is all "accident" and "random" so maybe we all should try some lotteries if you are right and we are all clairvoyants ok ?
So glad you are here to break these things down for us, since we cannot think for ourselves and must look to your small mind for guidance.
j/k...but your people on reddit do be like that.
Hey, this is a research site. Anyone is welcome to beat me to an analysis. There’s nothing magical about comparing dates. You guys do that all the time with deltas anyway.
The difference is, you do not seek truth.
Oh, sure I do.
"Trust, but verify."
You can do the trusting, but it appears I'm the first person in this thread to do the verifying on this particular claim. If you still want to trust it, you're welcome to do so.
I've only seen this retruth by General Flynn, is there any solid articles to back up this claim? I cannot find any.
Kari Lake has indicated it's true.
#PAIN #NCSWIC #TheGreatAwakening !
Link: https://t.me/RealGenFlynn/2645
What makes me laugh is thinking that this was the plan all along, why we had to wait so long into May for some arrests or whatever happened. I just have to imagine that while all these rich fucks are at the WEF convention in Sweden or whatever, all their underlings are flipping on them. That way, when they come back into the office they may notice people don't really think of them all too fondly when their crimes are exposed.
I've waited over 6 years to get this game going.
Release the hounds.
IS that the real Flynn account tho?
⭐️⭐️⭐️ NOT LONG NOW! ⭐️⭐️⭐️
…. BEAUTIFUL BLACK SKY ….
good police work takes time
Q never said that.
Didn't say he did.
You are on a Q message board. Only those who took Q drops out of context or hear others who have done so, say this phrase. I myself have done this until I researched the drops carefully and corrected myself.
https://qagg.news/?q=first+arrest
https://qagg.news/?q=shock+the+world
https://qagg.news/?q=first+arrest+will+shock+the+world
If you were a critical thinker, you would logically conclude that Q is not a cabal operation. I only linked to what Q actually posted, you should then acknowledge that you were wrong and not post the "first arrest..." nonsense again.
You are the one who is angry. Projection is a leftist tactic.
If you were a critical thinker, you would logically conclude that Q is not a cabal operation. It makes ZERO sense to wake up the masses to the truth. The cabal would simply keep slowly raising the temperature of the pot to keep the frogs unaware. Not this crazy full out panicked steam roller that is going on now. I only linked to actual Q drops of information. You are the one that is angry dooming.