ArmaLite
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
I used to play tournament paintball and could manually fire 11bps, just sayin'.
According to leftist you're a domestic terrorist.
One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.
This guy's good, too.
Wow, that's amazing, especially the reload !
I couldn't do it fast with a pistol, I had to alternate my index & ring finger on the trigger (a custom hair trigger).
Used to drive along practicing tapping the steering wheel. I once went through 700 rounds in a 5 minute game as a back stop (keeping the other team behind their barracades :) )
Jerry?
Because of the FAR lower recoil experienced with a PB weapon this is apples and oranges.
Personally I find the belt loop trick to be hilarious. Its useless in real combat. Can't aim for shit either way.
I'm much more afraid of someone with a 10 round mag that makes a clean heart/head shot with every round than I am of an idiot spraying a 30 round mag gangster/Jihadi style without aiming.
Totally.
Spraying barricades (in PB) is a suppression technique, you don't really get any hits, but it does allow your team to bunker the opposition fairly safely :)
Bump stock fingers KEK
Side note: Even if AR meant automatic rifle or assault rifle, even if the gun fires automatically and holds 100 round drums, the 2nd Amendment still covers it. Fuck these faggots
The leftists try to say the Second Amendment never meant we could have everything the government has, and then go on to say that in the 1700s, private citizens couldn't own cannons or warships. Yet, contrary to leftists' imagination, private individuals did own cannons and warships.
So today there are private citizens who own machine guns and tanks. There are others who own planes and helicopters. People can easily buy the materials to make bombs.
The Second Amendment gives us the right to have any weapon we can afford to buy or are able to construct.
It is worth reflecting on the fact that a Gatling gun is not an automatic-fire weapon. You have to crank it to load, fire, and extract successive rounds. One shot for each discrete advance of the crank. (Kind of like a double-action revolver.) Imagine the effect of one chambered in .45-70 Government (and there were).
The Gatling gun will fire round after round as long as you turn the crank. A machine gun just uses the gases from the rounds to "turn the crank."
Of course. But the point is that the Gatling gun is not "automatic." It will not fire continuously if a trigger is held back. (Of course, it has no trigger...just a crank.) It raises the question of whether it should be regulated as a fully automatic firearm.
Thanks for this post. However, especially in light of the recent past I am disinclined to even indulge an argument that assault weapons should be banned in the first place. The Second Amendment was envisioning a citizenry at war with the government. Why would there be a limit to what you could use to defend yourself from the massive arsenal available to the enemy?
You only have to look at what the second amendment was intended to protect and from whom, and the ones who are trying to take that protection away.
FTFY
AR-15 are sometimes not allowed for hunting...
Because they aren't powerful enough
Great info for red pilling or just plain old arguing!!
I think the AR-15 should be available in fully automatic function to every man women and child on Earth.
We're here today because we let them restrict machine guns back then. The people consented to infringement, embarrassingly.
I unloaded my Springfield 1911 .45acp in 1.55 sec. I had just gone knee deep in a yellow jacket nest though. Hit a few too. Ugly day. A straw in a Bendryl bottle with the odd vicoprofen for a bonus helped.
Bushmaster is the real OG, not something from Colt.
Why can’t we have “assault weapons” regardless?
I like this infographic but still feels like a concession.
AH…ArmaHeavy
I have "assault fists," an "assault ball bat," and an "assault car," among other things. Almost everything can be an "assault weapon."
Any black gun with a float tube and a retractable stock is an assault rifle according to leftist.
I think the key ingredient is the pistol grip. Without it, you just have an "ordinary" rifle. The loony left is known for its fixation on cosmetics.
Hell my AR (pre boating accident) was a pistol according to the ATF. How could it possibly be an assault rifle if it's a pistol?
Facts don't matter when the left is trying to gain more power and control.
There's no such thing as an "assault rifle."
Actually there is, though the term has a fairly specific military use: a rifle chambered for a medium-power cartridge and capable of full automatic fire. The archtypes of this category were the World War II German Sturmgewehr 44 and American M2 carbine. Submachine guns fired pistol ammunition. Fully-automatic rifles were originally full-size (e.g., the BAR and M-14).
shhhhhhh..... the media has the sheeple sound asleep... you're waking them with facts.... which is something foreign to all of the msm.