Imaging liberal, republican, and independent judges all trying their hardest, sincerely, to interpret the constitution with an originalist mindset. Sure, you would have differences of opinion with slightly different interpretation. And they would hope and strive for different things. But imagine them doing so in an honest fashion.
It'll never happen.
But if it did... If they really put their personal politics aside and just tried their grandest and damndest to uphold the constitution, THAT would be a court I could really get behind.
Imagine the wins that would flow from their pens to the people!
Does 3d12 fire damage per caster level, saving throw for half damage. And renders anyone deaf within a 30' Radius as it screeches REEEEEEE!! Whilst traveling through the air.
Material components are a syringe and an aborted fetus.
Many who mandated the experimental jab for the unwashed masses never took the experiment for themselves because they are exempt and the essential leader class.
Amazing how people misunderstand Native law so much in this country. The court case didn't curtail native sovereignty. It allows states and the feds to prosecute NON NATIVES who commit crime on native land. The DOJ has refused to charge violence non Natives committing crimes on Native land in over 60% of the cases. The SCOTUS case involved a violent offender who got a ~20 year state prison sentence. He then went to the feds to overturn the case and got way less time (<5 years).
So natives WANT states to have concurrent jursidiction over non natives commiting crimes at native land.
Can someone fill me in on the tribal sovereignty one?
I know absolutely nothing about the case or the issue; my only “modern” exposure to the sovereignty situation is watching Yellowstone, which obviously isn’t a good source of information, lol.
The Supreme court kept Miranda rights the same and refused to expand them. It did not weaken them. It just shows how dumb the left is.
To summarize, the court stated that if your Miranda rights are violated, your recourse is to petition the court to throw out the evidence related to the violations. The lawsuit wanted the court to allow individuals (such as police officers) to be sued for monetary judgements in a civil court for any violations which would be something new. The court basically said that throwing out the evidence related to the violation is your recourse.
The Supreme court kept Miranda rights the same and refused to expand them. It did not weaken them. It just shows how dumb the left is.
To summarize, the court stated that if your Miranda rights are violated, your recourse is to petition the court to throw out the evidence related to the violations. The lawsuit wanted the court to allow individuals (such as police officers) to be sued for monetary judgements in a civil court for any violations which would be something new. The court basically said that throwing out the evidence related to the violation is your recourse.
It's like the Illinois DNC putting out a commercial about how Bailey was too conservative for Illinois. It was a free ad for us. We laughed our butts off. The left really thinks they are the majority. The MSM, all the false polling for decades and a stolen election has convinced them they are the majority. Funny
Its nice of them to list all our winnings in one place!
I swear until I saw the hashtag I thought she was one of us.
Haha yeah.
Yeah #SCROTUS confused me until i saw #FuckSCOTUS. Mostly because of the GEQLQGY. I now realize the q geology was who they were replying to.
I call it SCROTUS, because they're useless black-robed tyrants.
Not useless if they're sending liberal freaks screaming off a cliff into the abyss.
Winning.
As long as it's consistent, correct application of the constitution, I'm fine.
The beautiful thing about that is, as long as they do this I will always be right, being a constitutionalist and all....
😎
Imaging liberal, republican, and independent judges all trying their hardest, sincerely, to interpret the constitution with an originalist mindset. Sure, you would have differences of opinion with slightly different interpretation. And they would hope and strive for different things. But imagine them doing so in an honest fashion.
It'll never happen.
But if it did... If they really put their personal politics aside and just tried their grandest and damndest to uphold the constitution, THAT would be a court I could really get behind.
Imagine the wins that would flow from their pens to the people!
Agreed. Even with Ernestintentions, we are flawed from the start.
Best advice I've heard in a while:
Once you go onto business with another person, things can and often do go south. Plan for it and be surprised when things go right.
Wheres the manditory covid vaccine that's destroying there liberal hearts lol?
Pun intended?
Yep. Liberal bleeding explosion hearts
Don’t be so heartless. You’re cold-hearted.
Sounds like a wizard spell in D&D.
"liberal bleeding exploding cardio projectile"
Does 3d12 fire damage per caster level, saving throw for half damage. And renders anyone deaf within a 30' Radius as it screeches REEEEEEE!! Whilst traveling through the air.
Material components are a syringe and an aborted fetus.
Many who mandated the experimental jab for the unwashed masses never took the experiment for themselves because they are exempt and the essential leader class.
Cuts a lot of our work down, doesn't it 🤣
Oh no! It's waterboarding itself with salty tear soaked mask.
HAH!
$20 says it has purple hair under that hat.
She/he/it is still wearing a muzzle.
They evolved into a new species. No more mouth. The mask is part of them.
"No more mouth."
If only this was true. Kek!
What's that last one? Cruz?
What case are they referring to that dismantled tribal sovereignty??
Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta.
It does not even realize the full impact of the rulings.
We are going to need bigger & more efficient salt mining tools frens
Pepe loves salted popcorn.
Amazing how people misunderstand Native law so much in this country. The court case didn't curtail native sovereignty. It allows states and the feds to prosecute NON NATIVES who commit crime on native land. The DOJ has refused to charge violence non Natives committing crimes on Native land in over 60% of the cases. The SCOTUS case involved a violent offender who got a ~20 year state prison sentence. He then went to the feds to overturn the case and got way less time (<5 years).
So natives WANT states to have concurrent jursidiction over non natives commiting crimes at native land.
So it actually protects the native population. Good.
Liberal meltdowns are delicious :)
Tuna Liberal Melt - downs
I’m sure she/it/they misconstrued things, so what’s the deal with the tribal sovereignty?
Feels good
What this Ted Cruz nonsense
Well the name fits. "Tiresome Dirt Witch" indeed.
Thanks for the list ditch witch
The witch can always switch where she/he/it ditch. What nation is friendly to witches?
👍🏻
Can someone fill me in on the tribal sovereignty one?
I know absolutely nothing about the case or the issue; my only “modern” exposure to the sovereignty situation is watching Yellowstone, which obviously isn’t a good source of information, lol.
LOL. Don't worry little liblingtons. Here's a brief list for you to be happy about, just off the top o' me gulliver:
STATES WHERE YOU'LL LIKELY STILL BE ABLE TO MURDER YOUR BABY
ME - MA - VT - NH - CT - RI - NY - NJ - DE - MD - [DC] - CA - OR - WA - HI - NM - AZ - MN - MI - IL - PA - VA - ??
In other words, HALF THE DAMN COUNTRY.
(I may be off by a couple either way, but you get the point.)
So quit your fucking crying, you sick demented bloodthirsty anti-human democrat perverts.
Parallel Universe
It’s funny that they think those are bad things…that’s like a greatest hits list. Pumps me up - these people are sick!
Where did they recently touch Miranda rights or voting rights?
The Supreme court kept Miranda rights the same and refused to expand them. It did not weaken them. It just shows how dumb the left is.
To summarize, the court stated that if your Miranda rights are violated, your recourse is to petition the court to throw out the evidence related to the violations. The lawsuit wanted the court to allow individuals (such as police officers) to be sued for monetary judgements in a civil court for any violations which would be something new. The court basically said that throwing out the evidence related to the violation is your recourse.
Here is more details on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crGHEU6lKZg
Thanks, appreciated.
Imagine if all this happened while Trump was in office? It had to be this way.
I love when they have there N95 mask on in there pic. What faggots.
how are miranda rights bad?
The Supreme court kept Miranda rights the same and refused to expand them. It did not weaken them. It just shows how dumb the left is.
To summarize, the court stated that if your Miranda rights are violated, your recourse is to petition the court to throw out the evidence related to the violations. The lawsuit wanted the court to allow individuals (such as police officers) to be sued for monetary judgements in a civil court for any violations which would be something new. The court basically said that throwing out the evidence related to the violation is your recourse.
Here is more details on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crGHEU6lKZg
Marvellous. Now take your mask off you dumb cnut
Saw the profile pic
So she is celebrating with us , right, right? LOL!
REEEEEEE harder, Commie loser.
So much winning!
Tribal Sovereignty still exists, not sure what this “enter pronoun here” is talking about.
The SC is finally making good decisions.
It's like the Illinois DNC putting out a commercial about how Bailey was too conservative for Illinois. It was a free ad for us. We laughed our butts off. The left really thinks they are the majority. The MSM, all the false polling for decades and a stolen election has convinced them they are the majority. Funny
Sucks being them 😆