186
posted ago by TheFuglyAmerican ago by TheFuglyAmerican +186 / -0

Senator Grassley's deadline for the FBI to release the information on the Hunter Biden investigation was August 8th 2022. There is no coincidence that the news cycle has been focused on the Trump raid.

Moreover, it is obvious that the FBI is black mailing not just Trump but all Senate Republicans to back off of Hunter or they will indict Trump.

Simple, in your face truth.

Comments (64)
sorted by:
38
Lonegunman65 38 points ago +38 / -0

How can they blackmail Trump when they have nothing on Trump?

21
LBTrumplican2 21 points ago +21 / -0

They're hoping the raid gave them what they wanted. Trump is clean. They got nothing.

23
Lonegunman65 23 points ago +23 / -0

Trump himself said “they even broke into my safe.” Then he mentioned that the safe was empty in an interview. The more this story develops the more I’m thinking the white hat’s goaded the DS/Dems into conducting the raid knowing full well the optics would look terrible for the DS/Dems and would wake up a lot of normies. Hell, even CNN is saying this is unprecedented!

9
inquimous 9 points ago +9 / -0

I have had a similar thought, that just as there was a corrupt group at the FBI running errands for the DS, there could be a subversive group of white hats. This raid didn't involve the media, no one got hurt, the occasion was used to make the FBI look bad instead of provide an opportunity for Dems to demand money and control-- like a false flag run by white hats for white hat goals.

2
ghostclown 2 points ago +2 / -0

A false false flag. I feel like I've been seeing these.

1
inquimous 1 point ago +1 / -0

This constant interpretation and speculation about reality is not helping.

1
ghostclown 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your interpretation is that speculation is not helping? Or are you speculating that there might be too much interpretation around here?

1
inquimous 1 point ago +1 / -0

My gut feeling is queasy from all the interpretation based on speculation.

3
Jacurutu99 3 points ago +3 / -0

Chuck Schumer, high estrogen variety, whom hates Trump and has cried and sobbed when "Trump was mean to me" now doesn't want to talk about the raid.

2
DrFatsides 2 points ago +2 / -0

Something that cracked me up yesterday was the. Daily Mail talking about the safe being in the basement of Mar A Lago. Mar A Lago has some bunkers but no basement because the water table is too high in that area of Florida. It gave me Pee Wee Herman / Alamo vibes 😁

1
Scorpion76 1 point ago +1 / -0

And then release some of the Hunter Biden crap in a few days time...........

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah but CNN is probably saying that with a slant that makes Trump sound guilty.

11
TheFuglyAmerican [S] 11 points ago +12 / -1

They didn't have anything on Trump for 2 impeachments either but they still did it. They don't need an actual crime they only need to indict him to keep him from running for office again.

On it's face, it appears to be a threat from the DOJ for Republicans to back off of Hunter Biden.

12
Lonegunman65 12 points ago +12 / -0

“…they only need to indict him to keep him from running for office again”

If I’m not mistaken, he actually has to be convicted of an offense in order to prevent him from running for office again. Not just accused of an offense.

2
TheFuglyAmerican [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

True but the indictment will likely come before the mid term elections, October surprise.

Here's what it will do, Trump is likely to announce his 2024 run right before the election to fire up Republicans get out and vote, essentially putting a last minute fire under the voters asses. If the DOJ announces an indictment 3 weeks before the election that would stop Trump from making the announcement and would keep him embroiled in his defense for months, at the very least delaying his announcement of running in 2024.

5
MisprisionIsEvil 5 points ago +5 / -0

An indictment will not stop Trump.

3
VetforTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Focus on what trump is doing with this instead of thi king the deep state has all the power. Even if they did this would be a colossal fuckup that a person with real power would not have needed to do.

1
FractalizingIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like your analytical thinking, even though I cannot say I agree with it, at this point.

3
CherokeePede 3 points ago +3 / -0

They didnt have anything on him when they impeached him either

3
Lonegunman65 3 points ago +3 / -0

As I’ve said before, they’ve been crawling up Trump’s ass with a microscope for at least 7 years now and if they haven’t come up with anything yet, there is nothing.

1
youknowthething76 1 point ago +1 / -0

More Russia Russia Russia nonsense fabricated evidence probably

1
suave200 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will plant something to accuse him of.

1
Lonegunman65 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve heard this theory as well because Trump’s lawyers weren’t allowed in MAL during the “search warrant”. However, I think Trump knew the raid was coming and they have contingencies for “planted evidence”.

12
manxom 12 points ago +12 / -0

as for arresting Trump.....

"please don't throw me in that briar patch. please. anything but that."

5
gb1787 5 points ago +5 / -0

Love me an Uncle Remus reference lol

9
Redpilled_Ex_Liberal 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm with you right up to the point of indict or blackmail Trump. They have no leverage against Trump.

-3
TheFuglyAmerican [S] -3 points ago +1 / -4

All they need is an indictment to screw up him running for a second term. They do not need an actual crime, an indictment and their lapdog media spin is all they need .

4
VetforTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

You guys are gonna be real surprised what this really is.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Attempting to arrest Trump is FAFO territory for many patriots.

Maybe they really are that stupid.

1
Redpilled_Ex_Liberal 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indicted for what though?

2
ancroidubh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably for being a ham sandwich.

1
TheFuglyAmerican [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

In late April, the source says, a federal grand jury began deliberating whether there was a violation of the Presidential Records Act or whether President Trump unlawfully possessed national security information. Through the grand jury process, the National Archives provided federal prosecutors with copies of the documents received from former President Trump in January 2022. The grand jury concluded that there had been a violation of the law, according to the Justice Department source.

In the past week, the prosecutor in the case and local Assistant U.S. Attorney went to Florida magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart in West Palm Beach to seek approval for the search of Donald Trump's private residence. The affidavit to obtain the search warrant, the intelligence source says, contained abundant and persuasive detail that Trump continued to possess the relevant records in violation of federal law, and that investigators had sufficient information to prove that those records were located at Mar-a-Lago—including the detail that they were contained in a specific safe in a specific room.

https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-informer-told-fbi-what-docs-trump-was-hiding-where-1732283

1
brxn 1 point ago +1 / -0

So he possessed stuff that he declassified but what somehow unauthorized to declassify?

1
Scorpion76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you not think the reporting everywhere about the FBLie not allowing anyone, even DJT's attorney's in the rooms as they are searching is a factor the public will not forget!

Plus I bet Mar a Lago has some bad ass CCTV (which the FBLie wanted turned off but the staff refused) planted evidence won't stand up to scrutiny.

0
Thothbag 0 points ago +1 / -1

What's so special about an indictment? Plus the media is losing power and if optics are so important that an indictment plus the media is big then the fact they are increasing the IRS and raiding people with FBI is going to look worse

1
FFSLostMyPassword 1 point ago +1 / -0

Timing is everything. I'd GUESS it's all part of the plan

9
rouxleaux 9 points ago +9 / -0

I know it might be out there and I am sure someone has thought of this, but what if Trump ordered the raid. Perhaps to get the DS to seize docs and trick the DS into admitting them to the public. Or simply sowing more distrust in the FBI. Clearly this is not going in the DS favor right now. No one thinks this should be done to private citizens, hell killary did 100 K worse and got a slap on the wrist. The 2 tier justice system is out in the open red pilling loads of people.

2
SocratesKnowsNothing 2 points ago +2 / -0

makes little sense that if they found let's say Hunter's laptop that they'd then have to show the public or anyone else. they'd just keep it from everyone again.

I read somewhere that all of the material was declassified by Trump before he took it. if so and it can be proven it begs the question who really is in control of the country if Biden and his administration/regime couldn't figure that out. not to mention how ridiculously bad this looks for DS

1
rouxleaux 1 point ago +1 / -0

which makes me really think this is a white hat play

1
bublet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. Where can the DS and the Trump haters go now? If they open their mouths they will be either be saying they approve of the raid or they disapprove of their own organization. This is the perfect false flag and straight out of The Art of War. Orchestrate something so outrageous it's indefensible then leave no doubt it was performed by your enemy. The enemy knows that the door is now open for this same move to be used against them.

7
dty6 7 points ago +7 / -0

Okay, I agree with you, but think about this:

MAL got raided last Feb of 2022. It made the news cycle but quickly faded. MAL gets raided again. Now it's a big deal, and mostly bc Trump is beating the drum about it, which he didn't do before.

So I kind of wonder ... why is Trump making himself the distraction from the Grassley deadline?

Welcome any thoughtful comments 🙂

4
redboobblueboob 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you! I could have SWORN there was another raid earlier but everyone's acting like it's never happened before

Weird I bet you're right.

3
VetforTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Contrast the respons then and now and tell me the left didn't lose ground.

The faCt nobody cared before but us and now the world is exploding over it says it all.

Best measuring stick ever and the left already have a load of shit in their undies. This is another huge shovel full of dirt on Their Graves.

2
dty6 2 points ago +2 / -0

you're welcome! that's when they got the National Archive stuff ... and it might have been in May ... but what's weird is that Trump is making a big deal about it this time. So, where's the laptop?

7
Daniel152 7 points ago +7 / -0

May be true. They fabricate evidence all the time

7
GGRockz 7 points ago +7 / -0

You can't blackmail someone with nothing on him.

If they had anything on Trump they would have used it a long time ago.

4
HenryTheRed 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those Azlov Battalion lovers raided on 88.

3
Queef_Anon 3 points ago +3 / -0

POTUS is insulated against more than just physical harm.

2
ImGumbyDammit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds good to me, gotta go! My popcorn is burning.

2
ForgetMePls 2 points ago +2 / -0

They planted "evidence". Trump wasn't there, the attys where told to leave. It's obvious.

3
Aspie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Surveillance video.

1
dec3169 1 point ago +1 / -0

The FBI took boxes and didn't account for any of it - no itemized receipts. Trump doesn't have cameras in the FBI's cars or offices. If you don't know what they took who knows what they will slip into the boxes. Conversely anything they find in the boxes should be thrown out in court if it is found to be illegal because any lawyer can argue the gloves and blood were planted by the cops. Worked for OJ right?

1
Aspie 1 point ago +1 / -0

But Trump does know what they took. If anything else shows up later, you can prove it was added later.

1
eyeintheskyone 1 point ago +1 / -0

These people are stupid! Trap after trap they walk into! Ooosha, ooosha, they all fall down!

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indict trump for what? Evidence into court. Chain of custody, I think those fbi were working for trump whether they knew it or not and it may be Durhams own investigators bringing g in evidence under a chain of custody. U can't just hand it over.

1
youknowthething76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Makes sense

1
BeerMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

or they will indict Trump

Do it. Let the Truth have its day. I'm willing to bet they have nothing on Trump.

1
Jacurutu99 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is NO backing down. I don't negoiate with faggots. Many were tricked into revealing their true nature, and they don't get to tell me whether Hunter's laptop is un-prosecutable when there are crimes against a minor family member on it.

1
Thothbag 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then we continue unimpeded