Google is not “Starting” to do anything. They have been doing this for years now. Member when you could search frazzledrip on google and it would give you the truth?
Sorry but what's wrong with skirting taxes? I wish everyone would do that.
People have been brainwashed to think paying taxes is a noble and patriotic duty, but it's just complying with our enslavement.
For some reason religious groups are hated for doing what they do to avoid taxes, but really, shouldn't we be hating on the government for imposing unlawful taxes in the first place?
There is a very real political impetus to start taxing churches because of clowns like Jim Baker. If that happens, full time preachers around the country will be paid less, and we can thank the megachurches and their rich preachers for that.
Most churches are organized as 501c3s which puts them under federal statutory jurisdiction and makes them legally a creation of the government. In order to maintain tax-exempt status, they must comply with the IRS rules for non-profits (no political speech, etc).
The way it's supposed to be according to the first amendment is to recognize God as superior to any manmade government, therefore the government cannot claim power over any religion to levy any tax whatsoever. It is not an exemption or special privilege - it's just the way it's supposed to be.
Those megachurches and celebrity preachers are just abusing the rigged system using their special exemptions and of course they are happy to keep their mouths shut on certain topics so they don't lose that exemption.
It's hilarious cause he built a vinyl fence to surround his "compound" from prying eyes...
I have no proof, and this is purely me speculating, but there might be something shady going on there at the studio complex, because there is a large secondary building that houses abused single mothers and their kids.
It could be totally innocent, but it just seems really odd.
. He named it after his wife Lory.
And I'm acquaintances with her brother and his daughter.
They have nothing to do with Lory, because they know something big, but they can't say what it is aside from they have no relationship with her.
Just a bunch of really strange things that add up to something major being covered up, but idk what the something is...
Because Google is one of the worst for manipulation and narrative control!
I use a simple experiment to show normies how much Google manipulates them.
First Google "Black couples" then hit the Image tab, get them to scroll through for a bit.
Then change the search term to "White couples" Image tab and scroll.
Compare the two. Some will default and decry you as a racist etc etc, but honestly it is just about showing how controlled the narrative is on Google. Color revolutions don't start by chance! It's why 99% of TV ads now will be either POC or mixed race, rarely all white couples or family's.
I don't use Google because they have been doing this for many years although it has gotten exponentially worse in the last 5 years as they think we haven't noticed their big ugly thumb on the scale. Boycott!!
In fact after considering this post, I'd probably go back and add to the supplemental comments at the end that just one villain is better than a small group like those I listed (even though there certainly are several) because it provides that much more focus in an incredibly far-reaching narrative like this one is geared up to be.
So if you had to pick one, I am going to go for Baker here even though it seemed like Yoel Roth was teed up to be the one in some of the previous drops.
And where does Baker lead us? As Christina Milius recently lamented to Bannon, "all roads lead back to Russiagate." That is unbelievable just to think about.
The first result is the correct "James Baker" person, you've even circled directly over it. The second result which you circled is Jim Bakker, but directly above that which you have included inside both circles is the "James Baker" that people are referring to when they say Jim. Also the Wikipedia results that are pulled automatically show both this Jim Bakker and the one you are referring to James Baker, when you get to actual website results the very first is James Baker. I don't like Google but this is a pretty weak claim.
Google is not “Starting” to do anything. They have been doing this for years now. Member when you could search frazzledrip on google and it would give you the truth?
My personal favorite is when autocomplete would only return one option for "Clinton Body..."
Shop (instead of count). LOL
This is stupid.
It's also a really common name. There are lots of people named Jimmy Carter as well.
Don’t dox yourself fren there are bad actors on this board
he is some qvc type program now, right? selling random things like qvc.
It's his church program, he sells stuff and skirts taxes by saying the items are "free" with a love gift of "$xxx"
Cheating the system with verbiage
Sorry but what's wrong with skirting taxes? I wish everyone would do that.
People have been brainwashed to think paying taxes is a noble and patriotic duty, but it's just complying with our enslavement.
For some reason religious groups are hated for doing what they do to avoid taxes, but really, shouldn't we be hating on the government for imposing unlawful taxes in the first place?
There is a very real political impetus to start taxing churches because of clowns like Jim Baker. If that happens, full time preachers around the country will be paid less, and we can thank the megachurches and their rich preachers for that.
Most churches are organized as 501c3s which puts them under federal statutory jurisdiction and makes them legally a creation of the government. In order to maintain tax-exempt status, they must comply with the IRS rules for non-profits (no political speech, etc).
The way it's supposed to be according to the first amendment is to recognize God as superior to any manmade government, therefore the government cannot claim power over any religion to levy any tax whatsoever. It is not an exemption or special privilege - it's just the way it's supposed to be.
Those megachurches and celebrity preachers are just abusing the rigged system using their special exemptions and of course they are happy to keep their mouths shut on certain topics so they don't lose that exemption.
you peaked my interest with the property tax thing.
ahh of course. crooks always find the loop holes
Indeed...
Look up "Jim's Buckets" on YouTube.
It's hilarious cause he built a vinyl fence to surround his "compound" from prying eyes...
I have no proof, and this is purely me speculating, but there might be something shady going on there at the studio complex, because there is a large secondary building that houses abused single mothers and their kids.
It could be totally innocent, but it just seems really odd. . He named it after his wife Lory.
And I'm acquaintances with her brother and his daughter.
They have nothing to do with Lory, because they know something big, but they can't say what it is aside from they have no relationship with her.
Just a bunch of really strange things that add up to something major being covered up, but idk what the something is...
Because Google is one of the worst for manipulation and narrative control!
I use a simple experiment to show normies how much Google manipulates them. First Google "Black couples" then hit the Image tab, get them to scroll through for a bit.
Then change the search term to "White couples" Image tab and scroll.
Compare the two. Some will default and decry you as a racist etc etc, but honestly it is just about showing how controlled the narrative is on Google. Color revolutions don't start by chance! It's why 99% of TV ads now will be either POC or mixed race, rarely all white couples or family's.
Just another division tactic.
They are getting desperate already and we haven’t even reached the Pizzagate DECLAS. We haven’t even reached the Covid DECLAS.
911 and JFK reveals are long overdue.
I don't use Google because they have been doing this for many years although it has gotten exponentially worse in the last 5 years as they think we haven't noticed their big ugly thumb on the scale. Boycott!!
Ditto that. I try not to even say the G word. I say search.
Yeah I generally don’t use google.
Sometimes for my ‘normie’ type searches to blend into the background.
Will Google be the next to fry?
This would be great, but I would love to see CNN and MSNBC in the fryer, too.
So in my comprehensive Twitter Files timeline & analysis post which I will now shamelessly attempt to gin up support for I mentioned in subheading D (which corresponds LOOSELY to Drop #4, I think) that they seemed to establish the story's villains. With any investigation or revelation, especially one that is this complicated involving government and business, it is MANDATORY to give the evil human faces for easier Normie consumption.
In fact after considering this post, I'd probably go back and add to the supplemental comments at the end that just one villain is better than a small group like those I listed (even though there certainly are several) because it provides that much more focus in an incredibly far-reaching narrative like this one is geared up to be.
So if you had to pick one, I am going to go for Baker here even though it seemed like Yoel Roth was teed up to be the one in some of the previous drops.
And where does Baker lead us? As Christina Milius recently lamented to Bannon, "all roads lead back to Russiagate." That is unbelievable just to think about.
Once more, here's the Timeline analysis. Don't know if I should be, but I am proud of it, hah.🤣 Godspeed all.
James Baker
starting?
My thoughts exactly.
Why is this still stickied for fucks sake. Spell the guys name correctly and it shows up
BTW, most people don't realize Bakker's name isn't spelled "Baker." Probably 90% of searches for "Jim Baker" really are for "Jim Bakker."
I did the same search in Yandex, and it didn't even show the alternatives that Google did. There was just a whole page of results for Jim Bakker.
Good find fren! Those who took enough clot shots, wouldn't quite get it though
The search was for James Baker. What returned was James Bakker.
At this point, you can assume Google is nothing more than a bunch of FEDS and is a 1000x worse than Twitter.
The first result is the correct "James Baker" person, you've even circled directly over it. The second result which you circled is Jim Bakker, but directly above that which you have included inside both circles is the "James Baker" that people are referring to when they say Jim. Also the Wikipedia results that are pulled automatically show both this Jim Bakker and the one you are referring to James Baker, when you get to actual website results the very first is James Baker. I don't like Google but this is a pretty weak claim.