DonaldTrump-Was just advised that the Unselect Committee of political Thugs has withdrawn the Subpoena of me concerning the January 6th Protest
(media.greatawakening.win)
- N C S W I C -
Comments (65)
sorted by:
NEVER call Trump's bluff.
Can't wait until we get a peek at Schumer's tax returns. Or how about Chinese Snapping Turtle Mitch McConnell? Or Obama.
Crooked Hillary!
You can see hers from when she was a presidential candidate.
https://www.taxnotes.com/presidential-tax-returns
Why do people downvote important information like these. We have those Fed Boys over here after being laid off from Twitter.
Eh, they probably don't like something I said somewhere else and are just downvoting everything I post.
And some hyper sensitive Trump supporters don't like it when anyone points out that other presidents and presidential candidates released their tax returns voluntarily.
And some have been gleefully awaiting the day.where Trump strides into court demanding Obama's and Biden's tax returns and I just took that fantasy away from them.
And some may just be drunk and clicked on the wrong button.
🤷♀️
Its probably because, like a leftist, you take things like their fake tax returns at face value completely ignoring the obvious that the deep state covers for their own and creates false narratives around anyone they oppose. Everything you post is shill like.
Glad they didnt get the REAL trump tax returns. Trump is a genius obviously he knew theyd release them, so he faked them to expose thats what all politicians do!!!
thats it fren
This.
you prolly killed kenny on south park a time or two as well.
But that was only after I peed in their cornflakes, kicked their puppy, and called their Grammy a dirty whore. 🤷♀️
Such delicate little snowflakes.
quick question: can you explain the snowflake thing?
It's been noted in the past that the tax returns for Hillary, Obama, Biden, and all of them are career politicians' returns that are designed to look as nice as possible for public consumption, while Trump's returns are those of a businessman taking advantage of every " discount" offered. So the comparison is unfair.
Luckily for you, I fall into none of those categories as I don't normally downvote people even if they say something I disagree with or disprove points I make.
Not saying you were accusing me of anything; just that I didn't contribute to the shadow disagreement.
Your input is actually valid since it pertains to ongoing discussion about Presidential tax returns.
This is beside the fact that the only reason why the establishment is focused on Trump's tax returns is because it's a small piece of the bigger never-Trump puzzle that we've dealt with since 2016.
Anyway, thanks for your contributions to this thread, as living in an echo chamber is not a beneficial place for anyone.
I think people here know that. It is why we know these guys get uber wealthy while in public service, but you know what they will do, and have done now that they have them, with Trump vs what they do for all these other guys. So the less information they have, the better.
Dude, most people running for office are either already wealthy or are married to wealthy people.
Did you really not know that?
I, and most people here know that. What we note is the tremendous increase in wealth they experience.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I think I can answer that.
Yes.
When we get to it, McConnells treason will be easy to prove. Married to a Chinese whose father is tied to CCP, owns a shipping company whose ships are all Chinese built, shipping Chinese product and flagged in some obscure mid Pacific Island. He is eyes deep in treason.
You really think Schumer would ever let anyone see his taxes that he doesn't want to? Come on, man!
You can see Obama's tax returns from when he was in office and a Presidential candidate.
https://www.taxnotes.com/presidential-tax-returns
Schumer posted his once in 2017. It was on his .gov website at the time. I'm sure you could find it if you dug around.
It's customary to release your tax returns when you run for President. It's not a law, though.
Hmmm. Follows custom but not the law?
Something funky there....
Happy to hear, whatever the reason. I could really use more of these wins right about now.
OP you win Post of the Hour!!
thanks fren
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109594266191175004
Wow, wonder why they are backing off.
Great news!
If they aren’t disproven in court, then it’s easier to continue the lie. I think they might have learned their lesson from Mueller, who shut down Russian Collusion (for the most part) after two years. Without Mueller, Russian Collusion could have remained an open question indefinitely. I think this is also why they won’t bring charges against the people being held indefinitely for January 6th. If they have to charge them with mischief instead of insurrection, then there was no insurrection.
They had nothing else they could push, and they didn't want to give him a shot at counter punching. They would've been put on their asses, and they knew it. I may have to nothing more than them posturing and bluffing to keep it in the MSM narrative and now even that is failing.
NCSWIC!
Guess all the trumps the first arrest guys can ask the good idea fairy what is next.
Sad we won't get to see that though, the pure kek overload would've been legendary
Good now let those political prisoners out of jail you swamp creatures.
The Omnibus bill funded MORE $$$ to the FBI to arrest MORE people for J6.
I hope people here have figured out by now that Republicans are NOT our friends.
Yup stop giving money to the RNC. Only give it to individual candidates you like.
The Jan. 6 committee is defunct with the entry of the new Congress anyhow.
It never mattered anyhow. Executive Privilege is very well established in the courts. It would have dragged on for years if they had pushed the issue, and they would have lost.
Ho Lee Fook.
Sum Ting Wong
As if the Committee had any constitutional authority to compel a witness to give testimony anyway... who do these LEGISLATORS think they are, judges?
"Judges" are British nobles and have no authority in America.
Article III of the US Constitution is quite clear:
Yes, we have judges in this nation. Yes, they are legitimate under the Constitution. Yes, some "conspiracy theories" really are just nonsense.
They are British nobles. What do you think the "Bar Association" is? Why are they referred to as "Your Honor?" Who else had that kind of honorific? Royalty and nobility.
I'd love to see someone that has the balls to instead get down on a knee instead of "rising," and call them a real honorific: "Your Majesty," "Your Highness," "My Lord," "Sire," "My Liege." Should make for some really good exposure.
👌
Soverign Citizen?
I think resident is a better term to use. A resident of X state, a sovereign man/woman, not changed or enslaved by government.
Gotcha. So basically, you get to benefit from the products and services of a government, but not have any responsibility to help support it or be constrained by the laws that govern it.
Neat.
I truly did not get how much this "win" meant to so many people.
I put this on about the same level as my old elementary school sending me a letter that they were going to forgive the $3.50 I owed them from 1989 for the copy of "If You Give A Mouse A Cookie" I lost.
But holy shit. You guys must reeeeaaaaaally have been sweating it, worrying that Trump was going to get thrown in jail for ignoring that subpoena from the J6 crew. I have not seen such joy over such a non-event in my entire life.
Ok, I take it all back. Shit, I'll even play along.
Yeah! You take that DS! You're not going to get your pervy hands all over our Trump in the showers! Uh uh!
Trump showed them! Wooohooo!!Woo-hoo!!! Yippeee!!Yippee!!! And so forth and so on.
Which subpoena is he talking about, exactly? Because they've already turned in their final report on J6.
In fact, I thought they had disbanded already. And I can't remember reading anything about them going to court over any j6 subpoena of him.
So unless I'm missing something really big, this is non-news. Basically just wrapping things up from the J6 investigation. What I mean is, I wouldn't go crowing about this to that annoying family member that hates Trump. It's not some huge win.
the j6 unselect thugs referred unjust charges to the doj against Trump did they not?
They sent their report to the DOJ with recommendations for what charges they think should be brought against him.
But that's all they are, recommendations. They have no authority to make the DOJ bring those charges against him.
And so far, Trump has not been charged with anything. And likely he will never be.
Either way, the subpoena was to testify in front of the J6 committee, which is done.
That's what referred means there....
Just to drive the nail in, obviously....
The hangings need to be free. Sell tickets for pictures like Disney.
I dunno, if enough people tune in for the right price, the border wall could get built.