4K Drone footage of the Lahaina Maui Fire - Finally a good look at what happened there.
(youtu.be)
Lahaina, Maui Fires
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (180)
sorted by:
So, the mainstream narrative is that it was climate change, according to the book released on this day, August 10th, that this footage was taken. There was apparently a hurricane 200 miles away, but note that no unburned building at all has wind damage on its roof. Note the green gas bullet tank, unscathed, and the plastic playground equipment. Note the lack of burned bush or grass land, so where did the fire come from? How did it burn the boats? How are some buildings untouched and not even damaged from radiant heat from an incinerated adjacent building? This was a deliberate attack on America.
Yeah, the neighborhood sorta near the beginning of the video that has one house burned completely to ash and all the other houses are perfectly fine, nothing else around it burned, not even scorch marks on the house very close next door, is really bizarre. Like it was targeted.
Where are the sinks and toilets? Turned to white ash? Next to undamaged houses and trees.
It is so infiriating. I am glad im not suffering like the people there. I sure as hell would have enough rage to go camp out on undamaged lawns of undamaged mansions. Maybe i will help myself to their lifestyles
The houses that didn't burn down are now getting evicted, right? I wonder if they didn't burn down by accident rather than design? Like the wifi signal stopped transmitting the backdoor command for the smart meter to self-destruct.
Smart meter is an interesting theory.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2I3p8c7/theory-smart-meters-are-incendia/
You can have embers get blown pretty far in the wind that can ignite a house that skips over an area. It's bizarre, but still explainable.
It's a possible explanation, but the weirdest part to me is that houses are either gone or their fine. I don't see half burnt houses that would show a progression of fire spreading from one location to another.
I think a house burns down. Or it doesn’t. I can understand the flames missing some houses completely. You’ve seen it from every wildfire ever. But if a house does catch fire in those conditions, how would it extinguish itself half way through burning? You can’t be “a little bit pregnant.”
Yes true, but property lines remain intact. Look closely, the undamaged houses properties are still square. Almost like the embers skipped the entire property. I agree with you embers can skip, but what i see is bullshit. The wealthy burned down the poor to make their land larger.
Do the DEW
Did you read the thread about the smart meters and power surges? The area was required to upgrade to smart meters recently…
forgive the ignorance, please tell me how smart meters can cause fire?
Woah there asking a lot of questions!
It’s important to remember, this is The Great Awakening, the website, NOT “THE” Great Awakening.
Also worthy of noting, outside of the Chan’s, Q only directed us and stamped his approval on ONE platform, VOAT/QRV.
I miss VOAT. : (
I am not sure what to think about DEWs in regards to this event. Seems to be more along the lines of power lines as the cause. Too many missing pieces to the puzzel right now. More information will need to come out.
If DEWs used, i would be curious if any anomalies occurred coming from Antarctica. There was that therory that the research facilities out there had caused the earthquake in Christchurch New Zealand. Anomalies supposedly noticed right before the earthquake occurred.
I was in lower Manhattan that day. I had co-workers across the river from the twin towers who watched the 2nd jet hit the south tower. This ridiculous notion that there were no aircraft used on 9/11 needs to stop! 10s of thousands of people watched the 2nd jet hit the south tower. jeesh
And everyone here is missing the entire point.
Stop focusing on the "how", focus on the "why".
They intentionally seed all these theories to enforce the chaotic divide and we all turn our backs on the real issue- The reason they did it in the first place.
I had the same thoughts seeing that, It all looks a bit surreal but like you some bits stood out as odd. The plastic playframe, completely untouched. Houses intact but surrounded by burned down houses without so much as smoke damage to theirs. Some burned houses were surrounded by intact properties.
It raises even more questions for me, it just doesn't look natural.
This.
Looking it over, I took a few notes:
2:33: A small area of buildings across a water canal is burnt out, but the nearest burned structure is on the other side of the canal, 200 feet away (or so), with numerous buildings unscathed in between.
4:00: A Huge tree (Oak?) is not even singed sitting right next to a building that is not singed. Right next to the tree are cars with melted tires. What melted the tires? There is no apparent nearby fuel source for these cars to catch fire. There is a front view of this area at 8:04. Is this an Historic site? There is no roof on the building, which means it might have burnt off, but there is no signs of fire damage on the building, which suggests the roof was gone long before. It looks like an historic building (mission type).
There are several other examples throughout the video of melted cars/tires on the edge of destruction that are very suspicious. There are cars just out in the middle of nowhere, not next to a burnt structure, that are themselves burnt to a crisp. It takes a lot to melt a car (or even have it deform from the heat). It needs to be in an oven. Such an oven can conceivably be created in the middle of a street with buildings burning on both sides, but not on the edge of a street, or the middle of a parking lot, sitting next to unburnt trees.
The melted tires are themselves SUPER sus.
According to this fire fighter website:
How are they heated to that temperature when they are next to non-burning trees and 30 to 50+ feet away from any other possible heat source? The temperature needs to be sustained for several minutes. How is that temperature sustained for minutes, in the middle of nowhere, without a heat source, open to air?
If the temperature is hotter than the required lowest temp (750F), it doesn’t have to be sustained for as long. Indeed, if you give the input source enough energy like say, a super high powered microwave laser, you could ignite a car tire in seconds. Notably microwaves preferentially heat up metal, like aluminum wheels, or steel car frames. DEWs, if they exist, are almost certainly microwave lasers.
With regard to the rest, the lines of demarcation are interesting, but I’m not convinced there is anything overly suspicious. Having said that, the pattern of “spared” buildings to “completely fubar” buildings does seem at least possibly sus. Kinda like what it would look like if I were using a directed energy weapon and painting the ground, but missed a few spots and/or left a few spots out of the painting on purpose (like a UNESCO site?).
Of course it is entirely possible I am just seeing what I want to see there... Not that I really want to see that, but I am suspicious of that activity, and thus at least somewhat biased.
By far the most damning evidence of fuckery is melted tires in areas where there is no apparent fuel source.
Just want to add 1 tiny thing to your excellent list, which I didnt see in this video but in pics the other day, was the boats out in the water that were burnt too. What started them on fire when surrounded by water???
Blanketed with burning embers whipped up by the winds, perhaps?
I so desperately want a leftist to tell me climate change so i can ask them how did climate not burn the wealthy peoples houses.