Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

344
171,000,000 views after 12 hours. Twitter now pays for views. Did Tucker just make more than Fox paid him? (media.greatawakening.win) WWG1WGA
posted 106 days ago by Kayleighsbikeseat 106 days ago by Kayleighsbikeseat +344 / -0
50 comments download share
50 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (50)
sorted by:
▲ 31 ▼
– CQVFEFE 31 points 106 days ago +31 / -0

Plus all the millions of views on Rumble, by people like me who choose not to have a twitter account

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– 15th_dimension 17 points 106 days ago +17 / -0

i don't think twitter required an account to watch. i don't have an account either but i watched it on nitter

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– queue-anon 14 points 106 days ago +14 / -0

Correct. Works without an account.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CQVFEFE 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

Thanks anon.

So if I could ask a dumber than usual question....suppose I went to nitter.net. Then what's next to get to Tucker's channel?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– w4terfall 3 points 106 days ago +3 / -0

Search Tucker Carlson Twitter on any search engine, should be the first result that pops up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 15th_dimension 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

you can search users and posts on nitter, but usually i just copy the exact twitter link i want and then replace twitter with nitter and com with net.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– fazzman23 8 points 106 days ago +8 / -0

185 mil now on X

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Musician4Trump 11 points 106 days ago +11 / -0

I just checked and it’s at 193M now!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TieDyeTrump 6 points 106 days ago +6 / -0

222M now. This is breaking the Internet, truly

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– M1ALiberty 3 points 106 days ago +3 / -0

Up to 232.2 million now and rising.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RatRaceReferee 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

You should still have a play on Twitter, I bet you the fake media will disregard any other viewership number to make it seem less than it is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– Hodar 25 points 106 days ago +25 / -0

President Trump was quite calm, collected, contemplative, intellectual, and thoughtfully answered each question. This wasn't a campaign speech, this was an honest discussion, and was an impressive display of character.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TinkAnon 2 points 106 days ago +2 / -0

Yes, he was.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– GuerroRanchero 19 points 106 days ago +19 / -0

Haha, ''Is TV irrelevant? ''

😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃

....yes!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Kayleighsbikeseat [S] 7 points 106 days ago +7 / -0

Well, yes. You can stream stuff right to your big screen and watch when you want. Fuck the networks.
Also, John Rich has shown that record labels don’t mean shit.
Jim Caviezel and Angel Studios have shown that Hollywood don’t mean shit.
We, The People are the new boss and we don’t abide by the old rules.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Wtf_socialismreally 2 points 106 days ago +2 / -0

Honestly, Hollywood has become more about connections than about good products. It's all about them and their pet causes, and that's before you get into all the child abuses.

They end up getting their money whether you disagree with them or not (or so they believe for now) so they keep doing what they want instead of encouraging new talent with new ideas.

Honestly I think because of all of the scandalous things that happens in Hollywood, that's the reason why they don't bring in new blood with new perspectives anymore. They don't get people with creativity and independent thought because they risk more of their transgressions coming to light if they open their doors.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GuerroRanchero 2 points 106 days ago +2 / -0

Amen!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Tewdryg 14 points 106 days ago +14 / -0

My understanding is Tucker Carlson is still under contract with Fox News. He is still drawing a salary from them. Albeit, he is officially suspended and obligated by the non-compete clause, he still can freely speak as a private citizen. Fox News will not release him from the Terms and Conditions of the contract. This means he cannot be hired by another news outlet or compete with Fox News.

Tucker Carlson is doing these interviews without being paid..... More on that in minute. You're asking right now, how is it then that Tucker Carlson is having all these interviews? As a private citizen, Tucker has a First Amendment right to speak. This is how. And Fox News initially attempted to silence Tucker Carlson by sending him a Cease and Desist letter. However, the lawyers at Fox have realized there is nothing contractually Carlson signed that obligates him to do so. In fact, the contract may have a clause that specifically permits Tucker leeway in expressing his First Amendment rights. The significance of this for Tucker is extraordinary. It means that Fox News would in all probability loose in court if they pursued their case in court. Not only that, I suspect it would be very costly to the Murdoch's financially in the public setting.

Elon Musk has guaranteed Tucker Carlson his own private Twitter space. This is huge win-win for both Musk and Carlson. Other platforms like Rumble have putatively given Carlson his own space for doing the same. What is ingenious about what Tucker Carlson has done here, is that Fox News is actually paying for all of Tucker Carlson's First Amendment airtime and there's nothing they can do about it legally. With Tucker's right to Free Speech, it's a catch-22 for Fox News. They are damned if they do maintain the contract with Tucker and damned if they terminate the contract with Tucker Carlson. The bottom line is the Murdoch's are facing the better of the worse scenarios at this point in time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ShitComment 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

X pays its high profile users ad rev. Also, let's not forget Tuckers step mom was the heiress to the Swanson frozen food brand. He's loaded.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Kayleighsbikeseat [S] 10 points 106 days ago +10 / -0

Dear Diary, today I got stickied. Luckily we were in the shower.
-Ashley Biden

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ifififififokiedokie 7 points 106 days ago +7 / -0

200M now.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Robynnlh 5 points 106 days ago +5 / -0

Now it’s up to 185M views!!!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– fazzman23 2 points 106 days ago +2 / -0

do we have the Fox ratings?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Robynnlh 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

Just found this from CNN. 13.8 on average viewers for last nights debate.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/24/media/fox-news-gop-debate-ratings/index.html

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Robynnlh 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

Correction - 12.8M viewers, not 13.8

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Robynnlh 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

I haven’t seen the Fox ratings but I’ll do some digging.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 106 days ago +5 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Cpleb 2 points 106 days ago +2 / -0

I’ve never prayed so much for a person I don’t know personally

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deltadog 5 points 106 days ago +5 / -0

When I started watching the video it was at 91 million views. After Watching 188million views

+90 million in 40 minutes isn't bad

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Kayleighsbikeseat [S] 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

https://twitter.com/tuckercarlson/status/1694513603251241143?s=46&t=EOsj1YQq1bAADGxBbJPUdg

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TaQo 4 points 106 days ago +4 / -0

Interesting....They're trying to pad the RNC viewed numbers because they got slaughtered....

Via Google Search of "RNC debate view numbers"

How many people watch the debate on Fox? How many viewers did the GOP debate attract on Fox News? The debate was watched by an estimated 23.9 million viewers. 3. Did Donald Trump participate in the GOP debate?

Then the linked article says:

FAQs

  1. When did the GOP debate for the 2024 election cycle take place? It was held on August 23, 2023.

  2. How many viewers did the GOP debate attract on Fox News? The debate was watched by an estimated 50 million+ viewers.

  3. Did Donald Trump participate in the GOP debate? No, Trump opted out of the debate.

  4. How many views did Trump’s interview with Tucker Carlson on “X” attract? The interview drew more than 74 million views.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Numina23 2 points 106 days ago +2 / -0

They're lying, as usual.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TaQo 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

That's pretty much a given most of us seem to take for granted, if for no other reason than God didn't make us that way and you have to constantly remind yourself that these people are lying bastards...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Greatheart 3 points 106 days ago +3 / -0

Where can I find the current view count. Thanks

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Kayleighsbikeseat [S] 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

https://twitter.com/tuckercarlson/status/1694513603251241143?s=46&t=EOsj1YQq1bAADGxBbJPUdg

248 MM as of now

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MudFlood 2 points 106 days ago +2 / -0

You know the left will twist this so does anyone know how many views were from outside the US?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– schiff_for_brains 2 points 106 days ago +7 / -5

No. The internet pays a certain cost per 1000 views. With 170 million views, there’s 170,000 units of cost. The video is probably with under $2 million. Certainly not chump change.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– girouxc 8 points 106 days ago +9 / -1

The internet doesn’t pay anyone lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– normalstreet 5 points 106 days ago +5 / -0

Username checks out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ILearnedToCode 4 points 106 days ago +4 / -0

wut

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ImWaterjug 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

Very doubtful he got 2 million for it but I could be wrong, no clue the the CPM on X currently is for creators.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Zi0ns_walls 2 points 106 days ago +2 / -0

I see the libs are crying how its not an accurate viewer count as simply scrolling past counts as a view. In attempt to save face they pluck 'x' number out of thin air and say that is how many views it got.

Some newspapers admit that when the pre-recorded interview dropped nearly 100M started watching as if in anticipation of it's release.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– ravonaf 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

Tucker gets around 20 million a year from Fox. He's been there under this contract what? 6 years? That's over 100 million dollars. So no, I don't think he just made more from one video on Twitter than he's made with Fox.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Numina23 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

171.000.000, I see at 17!!!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– swampwarrior67 1 point 106 days ago +3 / -2

Those are not video views, they are tweet views. Anyone that scrolls by it counts.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TrogdorTheBurninat0r 4 points 106 days ago +4 / -0

assuming Twitter isn't feeding Trump interviews into liberal feeds than I would imagine 90-something percent of people stopped to watch at least some of it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Mister_Winston 3 points 106 days ago +3 / -0

Good point. I'm sure they have a hidden gauge for video views since it determines compensation for content creators. Tucker would have visibility to that number.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MAGA_Patriot_1776 2 points 106 days ago +2 / -0

Anyone that scrolls by Trump would stop and watch for sure. In this rare case, video views and tweet views are the same thing.

It's the night before his mugshot afterall.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 106 days ago +1 / -0

Welcome

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield - Together We Win

Rules

Q Supporters:
This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"

Follow the Law:
No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!

No Bad Behavior!
No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!

Civil Discussion ONLY:
They want you divided.
They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.
Divided you are weak [no collective power].
Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].

No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion:
Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.

Questions and Concerns: All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.

Expand your thinking:
Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!

No doomers, shills, or tards: THIS IS AN ELITE RESEARCH BOARD. If you can't use common sense you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding. Q said "We are saving Israel for last," and so are we. And if you're a tard, oh, man.

General Rules:

-Mods used to issue warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. We don't, anymore. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current. We try to keep an open mind, but... c'mon.

-Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum. No crap, off-topic memes

-HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait. Keep your comments high effort. No BS.

-No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, frogs!

-Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info trash, pls. Excessive, low-effort posting may earn users vacations!

-Keep it honest and accurate.

-Patriots.win / Q Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, this train still has no brakes.)

-Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their command of Q, sincerity, and respect to others.

Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING! (Hi, Mike! You LOSER!)

Resources

  • "River of Search" script:
  • GAW post formatting tips
  • Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)
  • Q post archives (qposts.online) others 1 2 3 4
  • QProofs.com
  • Learn to read the Q map
  • Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)
  • Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources
  • Trumps twitter archive
  • POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm
  • Pedosta and DNC dumps
  • GIFs & QPosts
  • Poll Post Format
  • SPY ON US! See: mod Logs
  • The Greatest Show on Earth!
  • New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?" DO NOT MISS THIS PODCAST!

Disclaimer

Posts and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the GreatAwakening.win or Patriots.win administration.

Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 9 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2023.48.01 - h6m8b (status)

Copyright © 2023.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy