An important point here is that this type of rule can be instated fairly easily once you make it so that parents have to work so hard to just survive and feed their kids that they will be relieved to give them over to the state and be free of the burden. The self-righteous will applaud this maneuver because it will take kids away from "bad" parents. The state already does this, its called CPS, they have a stellar reputation... To get christian conservatives support they simply have to take kids away from Muslims for their dangerous ideas and maybe even the LGBTQ parents. Once this is enshrined into society they just have to spread the tentacles a little further.
To get christian conservatives support they simply have to take kids away from Muslims for their dangerous ideas and maybe even the LGBTQ parents.
From some things I've seen on Patriots, I actually believe that this is a viable strategy and likely on their docket because they'll fall for it hook, line and sinker.
They’ve done this pretty much in the Uk since Blair brought in the children’s act. “Child protection” is run by SJWs but all enforcement is so subjective dependent on the opinions of “professionals” that they can justify pretty much anything if they want grounds to remove kids. They can always find “evidence” and are expert in wording things ambiguously to imply negative connotations. Then once one “professional” says something no other “professional” will run the risk of disagreeing in case the future shows they got it wrong. They all cover their ass and children suffer. I’ve seen it happen more times than I could suffer so I stopped working in that arena
Page 2 Other more prominent totalitarians in academia are making similar arguments. Law Professor James Dwyer of William and Mary College, for instance, purports to “debunk” parental rights while arguing for the state to totally take over. “The reason that parent-child relationship exists is because the state confers legal parenthood on people through its paternity and maternity laws,” claimed Dwyer.
See also WEF Scientist Details Plan to End Public Meat Consumption to Fight ‘Climate Change’
The push to sideline parents also comes as more and more tax-funded “academics” advocate for the “right” of children to have sex with adults. As The Newman Report documented in 2020, this abhorrent position advocating for the legalization of child rape is being openly peddled in “research” and papers by a growing number of university luminaries mooching off taxpayers. It goes back decades.
But make no mistake: These deranged individuals can be extremely dangerous. In fact, throughout human history, people trying to separate children from parents have always had evil intentions. Whether motivated by perversion such as Alfred Kinsey or by totalitarian impulses like Hitler and Stalin, these would-be tyrants represent a mortal danger to children, families, and civilization itself.
Kianpour did not respond to questions sent by email and social media: “Do you have children? Did you have bad parents and a bad childhood? Can you give an estimate of how much money taxpayers have spent to support your academic pursuits? How do you respond to accusations that evildoers (perverts, totalitarians, etc) are typically those seeking to remove children from the protection of their parents?”
Kianpour’s unhinged ramblings are powerful evidence that it is time to fundamentally rethink taxpayer funding for the grotesque farce that is modern “academia.” Without a steady flow of money looted from productive citizens by governments, totalitarians and weirdos seeking access to others’ children would have to find a productive way to make a living. Now that would help safeguard society and children.
Ken Ham, Founder and CEO of Answers In Genesis, in his article, “Who ‘Owns’ Children?” wrote:
See also WEF Slammed for ‘Importing’ China’s Communist ‘Culture’ into West to Usher in ‘Great Reset’ Agenda
Who “owns” the children---parents or the government? In our day and age, many involved in western government believe it’s the government that owns kids. Many believe they know what is best for children and think they should get to dictate what children learn—and parents are just in the way of accomplishing the state’s goals. And that shouldn’t surprise us because how you answer the question of “Who owns the children?” depends on your starting point and the worldview you build that’s based on that starting point.
If you reject God and his Word, then anything goes---there’s no absolute standard on which to base your thinking. In this view, children are just biological machines, the product of millions of years of evolution. They aren’t given to parents—they are just a “choice” parents made.
But when we start with God’s Word, we learn that children are a gift from God---given to parents. He has given parents authority over their children and the responsibility of training, teaching, and raising children. They are not just “choices,” nor are they the government’s responsibility—children are parent’s responsibility because God gave children to their parents to train them up for Him.
You see, the family unit didn’t evolve. God created the family when he created marriage (Genesis 1:27 and 2:24) and told the first couple to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28). He entrusted children to parents to raise them in accord with the principles he has laid down for us in his Word (e.g., Psalm 127:3).
The same doomers who were 100% convinced vaccine passports would never go away will tell you that this is inevitable as well. No doubt they will try and maybe succeed in a few deep blue areas, but don't let the doom merchants get you panicked and emotional.
Well, at the least this will be a catalyst strong ennough to wake up the sheep glued to the television every night. Maybe...just maybe, they will step up to say enough...
Perhaps a digital ID so would be parents can't hide, then link the social credit score to an AI engine that scans all messages, social media posts and phone calls, and determines whether you are fit to be a child raiser approved by the state...
There's so much to unpack here.
First of all, this was not some plan written by a professor but an opinionated essay by a liberal PhD student. And what even is a "WEF professor?" Can't find anything supporting that label.
This whole story reads like fear porn, too. Pushing conservatives fear buttons is usually about taking away kids, guns or religion.
I would not recommend that website for future research, it looks about as trustworthy as realrawnews.
Honestly it's just annoying that so many of us can't do their due diligence. Can't even do a basic fact check of searching for the original source and seeing if the info lines up. It's a waste of time to have to do it for each post on this site honestly and I can't share anything before I haven't made sure it's not some LARP or realrawnews article or even worse, a telegram post with no source. And it's even more annoying to then see the comments of people who have done no basic fact checking either and are already sharing the article to their friends and families, making us all look dumb. Doesn't help that the mods regularly sticky & post unverified info themselves.
They need to get out of the communist NY City, and stop believing the lies of MSM. The Republic of States is still alive and includes about 35 states, that will Never allow the UN.WEF, communist OWG to dictate Illegal laws.
The headline leads with incorrect facts and no evidence provided, so I'd class it as clickbait. But like a lot of clickbaiters, they lead with bullshit and then shore it up with someone else's data.
Actually, even a casual review shows that the formatting (color scheme, fonts, layout) is highly suggestive of Clickbait site ThePeople'sVoice. The author is "jennifer lawrence". Hmmmm... Another of her articles "Author: Jennifer Lawrence" is "UN Says Bill Gates ‘Digital IDS’ Will Be Mandatory To Participate in Society"
So, what kind of operation will spread the same clickbait story, but use a different name and a different website as if a different thing? Someone who wants to hide and fool the readers.
Didn't read this entire post BUT want to say, not all parents DESERVE to be parents...so sometimes a step in the wrong direction is in the Right direction.
By all indications, Kainpour is NOT a professor. He is a graduate student and a PHD candidate. UCB might or might not be funded by WEF in small part of large, but there appears to be no viable easily found evidence that this is the case. Calling Kainpour a "WEF Professor" seems like bullsh*te intended to rankle your reactions and trigger you for clicks.
I found 3 authors listed with WEF who are faculty at UCB. Ifound a handful of people who graduated UCB who have connections with the WEF in some way, and a number of UCB pages and projects reference publications, etc, by the WEF.
But I can find no actual evidence that WEF funds UCB, whether via small grants or large support.
GIST: I don't really know how noteworthy this story is.
The WEF Professor lines appears to have no basis in any sort of fact, and seems to have been used simply for GRAB factor (aka clickbait type headline).
Facts show he is not a professor (at UCB or anywhere), he is some random PHD candidate graduate student.
There appears to be no evidence that he is connected with the WEF in any way, such that the title "WEF Professor" makes any sense or is ground in fact.
There is no direct evidence that the WEF is giving funds, large or small, to University of Colorado Boulder.
(that said, it is likely that WEF minions have infiltrated most major universities in the US and elsewhere, and they may well contribute to the UCB budget, but where is the evidence for this?)
Conclusion: You've been clickbaited.
In my opinion, any article that leads with trigger headlines like WEF blah blah but provides ZERO data and evidence backing up such HEADLINES and pronouncements, is only after one thing. Your clicks. Your reactions. Your blind acceptance.
Note: this PHD student is of so little note. Yes, his ideas are satanic, idiotic and monstrous, but he's a nobody. So why focus any attention on him or this story?
We know these ideas are out there. If not, where have you been the last 15 years? So it's good I guess to raise awareness that these agendas are certainly out there, but this guy himself appears to be a sick university (graduate) student, and not much more.
So if that's Not proof of the clickbait nature of this, that it was published under a different name, at a different website, with eerily similar formatting, color scheme and fonts, etc, as the People Voice, then what is.
Marvellous, love it when these utter condescending arrogant fools sign their own termination letters. The more they expose themselves the quicker we can wake the sheep, nothing will do that faster than going after their own kids.
They have demonstrated that they don't give a fuck about poor trafficked children but when they come for theirs ...
An important point here is that this type of rule can be instated fairly easily once you make it so that parents have to work so hard to just survive and feed their kids that they will be relieved to give them over to the state and be free of the burden. The self-righteous will applaud this maneuver because it will take kids away from "bad" parents. The state already does this, its called CPS, they have a stellar reputation... To get christian conservatives support they simply have to take kids away from Muslims for their dangerous ideas and maybe even the LGBTQ parents. Once this is enshrined into society they just have to spread the tentacles a little further.
From some things I've seen on Patriots, I actually believe that this is a viable strategy and likely on their docket because they'll fall for it hook, line and sinker.
They’ve done this pretty much in the Uk since Blair brought in the children’s act. “Child protection” is run by SJWs but all enforcement is so subjective dependent on the opinions of “professionals” that they can justify pretty much anything if they want grounds to remove kids. They can always find “evidence” and are expert in wording things ambiguously to imply negative connotations. Then once one “professional” says something no other “professional” will run the risk of disagreeing in case the future shows they got it wrong. They all cover their ass and children suffer. I’ve seen it happen more times than I could suffer so I stopped working in that arena
. . . because the most violent, corrupt, and murderous institution on Earth NEEDS to be in charge of every single child.
Got it.
Page 2 Other more prominent totalitarians in academia are making similar arguments. Law Professor James Dwyer of William and Mary College, for instance, purports to “debunk” parental rights while arguing for the state to totally take over. “The reason that parent-child relationship exists is because the state confers legal parenthood on people through its paternity and maternity laws,” claimed Dwyer.
See also WEF Scientist Details Plan to End Public Meat Consumption to Fight ‘Climate Change’
The push to sideline parents also comes as more and more tax-funded “academics” advocate for the “right” of children to have sex with adults. As The Newman Report documented in 2020, this abhorrent position advocating for the legalization of child rape is being openly peddled in “research” and papers by a growing number of university luminaries mooching off taxpayers. It goes back decades.
But make no mistake: These deranged individuals can be extremely dangerous. In fact, throughout human history, people trying to separate children from parents have always had evil intentions. Whether motivated by perversion such as Alfred Kinsey or by totalitarian impulses like Hitler and Stalin, these would-be tyrants represent a mortal danger to children, families, and civilization itself.
Kianpour did not respond to questions sent by email and social media: “Do you have children? Did you have bad parents and a bad childhood? Can you give an estimate of how much money taxpayers have spent to support your academic pursuits? How do you respond to accusations that evildoers (perverts, totalitarians, etc) are typically those seeking to remove children from the protection of their parents?”
Kianpour’s unhinged ramblings are powerful evidence that it is time to fundamentally rethink taxpayer funding for the grotesque farce that is modern “academia.” Without a steady flow of money looted from productive citizens by governments, totalitarians and weirdos seeking access to others’ children would have to find a productive way to make a living. Now that would help safeguard society and children.
Ken Ham, Founder and CEO of Answers In Genesis, in his article, “Who ‘Owns’ Children?” wrote:
See also WEF Slammed for ‘Importing’ China’s Communist ‘Culture’ into West to Usher in ‘Great Reset’ Agenda
Who “owns” the children---parents or the government? In our day and age, many involved in western government believe it’s the government that owns kids. Many believe they know what is best for children and think they should get to dictate what children learn—and parents are just in the way of accomplishing the state’s goals. And that shouldn’t surprise us because how you answer the question of “Who owns the children?” depends on your starting point and the worldview you build that’s based on that starting point.
If you reject God and his Word, then anything goes---there’s no absolute standard on which to base your thinking. In this view, children are just biological machines, the product of millions of years of evolution. They aren’t given to parents—they are just a “choice” parents made.
But when we start with God’s Word, we learn that children are a gift from God---given to parents. He has given parents authority over their children and the responsibility of training, teaching, and raising children. They are not just “choices,” nor are they the government’s responsibility—children are parent’s responsibility because God gave children to their parents to train them up for Him.
You see, the family unit didn’t evolve. God created the family when he created marriage (Genesis 1:27 and 2:24) and told the first couple to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28). He entrusted children to parents to raise them in accord with the principles he has laid down for us in his Word (e.g., Psalm 127:3).
2 of 2
Aslan, did you bother to verify the over-the-top nature of the headlines leading and justifying the entire article?
Asking for a friend...
What’s with the deleted comments that were upvoted
Good question.
They totally lost their minds, their are Billions who will stand up to this .
WEF professors will soon need a license from the people to breathe.
The same doomers who were 100% convinced vaccine passports would never go away will tell you that this is inevitable as well. No doubt they will try and maybe succeed in a few deep blue areas, but don't let the doom merchants get you panicked and emotional.
Well, at the least this will be a catalyst strong ennough to wake up the sheep glued to the television every night. Maybe...just maybe, they will step up to say enough...
u/#fart
How about you suck my balls, Mr. Garrison
How long before the government starts bulldozing Christian Churches? Will people wake up then?
Perhaps a digital ID so would be parents can't hide, then link the social credit score to an AI engine that scans all messages, social media posts and phone calls, and determines whether you are fit to be a child raiser approved by the state...
State administered birth control, via an implant, until you pass “the test”
There's so much to unpack here. First of all, this was not some plan written by a professor but an opinionated essay by a liberal PhD student. And what even is a "WEF professor?" Can't find anything supporting that label. This whole story reads like fear porn, too. Pushing conservatives fear buttons is usually about taking away kids, guns or religion. I would not recommend that website for future research, it looks about as trustworthy as realrawnews.
Honestly it's just annoying that so many of us can't do their due diligence. Can't even do a basic fact check of searching for the original source and seeing if the info lines up. It's a waste of time to have to do it for each post on this site honestly and I can't share anything before I haven't made sure it's not some LARP or realrawnews article or even worse, a telegram post with no source. And it's even more annoying to then see the comments of people who have done no basic fact checking either and are already sharing the article to their friends and families, making us all look dumb. Doesn't help that the mods regularly sticky & post unverified info themselves.
They need to get out of the communist NY City, and stop believing the lies of MSM. The Republic of States is still alive and includes about 35 states, that will Never allow the UN.WEF, communist OWG to dictate Illegal laws.
🖕
Come for my babies (who are adults) and find out whether I am fit to raise them. You will learn what the term "mama bear" means.
Is the article from A legit source? Parody website?
The headline leads with incorrect facts and no evidence provided, so I'd class it as clickbait. But like a lot of clickbaiters, they lead with bullshit and then shore it up with someone else's data.
Actually, even a casual review shows that the formatting (color scheme, fonts, layout) is highly suggestive of Clickbait site ThePeople'sVoice. The author is "jennifer lawrence". Hmmmm... Another of her articles "Author: Jennifer Lawrence" is "UN Says Bill Gates ‘Digital IDS’ Will Be Mandatory To Participate in Society"
https://highspeedjob.com/un-says-bill-gates-digital-ids-will-be-mandatory-to-participate-in-society/
But this is in fact a COPY/PASTE of an article at TPV written by Sean Adl-Tabatabai (The gay founder of TPV, Newspunch, etc).
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/un-says-bill-gates-digital-ids-will-be-mandatory-to-participate-in-society/
So, what kind of operation will spread the same clickbait story, but use a different name and a different website as if a different thing? Someone who wants to hide and fool the readers.
I hope this answers your question.
Clickbait bullshite
u/aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve
It reminds me of a book called "The Giver."
This dude (the professor) is off his rocker and has Satan entrenched between his legs.
Didn't read this entire post BUT want to say, not all parents DESERVE to be parents...so sometimes a step in the wrong direction is in the Right direction.
Sure, but like with red flag laws there's a slippery slope, and this guy laid the cliff out for us to see.
That's a good point.
Woman's Rights - Gay Rights - You are Here-> (Trans Rights) - Pedo Rights - Zoophile Rights - Necrophile Rights
No deals!
Ask yourself if you trust the government making those decisions
He also thinks animals should have property rights.
Myth Busting....
By all indications, Kainpour is NOT a professor. He is a graduate student and a PHD candidate. UCB might or might not be funded by WEF in small part of large, but there appears to be no viable easily found evidence that this is the case. Calling Kainpour a "WEF Professor" seems like bullsh*te intended to rankle your reactions and trigger you for clicks.
https://www.connorkianpour.com/
https://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/people/graduate-students/connor-kianpour
Is University of Colorado Boulder funded by the World Economic forum?
I could not find any information that shows that UCB is 'funded' by the World Economic Forum.
Their operating budget statements do not indicate sources of funding (except for direct state funding).
https://www.boarddocs.com/co/cu/Board.nsf/files/BQPRXC6B73E1/$file/2.%20Boulder.pdf
The WEF website does not list them as a partner. (search for "Colorado" = 0 results)
https://www.weforum.org/partners/#search
I found 3 authors listed with WEF who are faculty at UCB. Ifound a handful of people who graduated UCB who have connections with the WEF in some way, and a number of UCB pages and projects reference publications, etc, by the WEF.
But I can find no actual evidence that WEF funds UCB, whether via small grants or large support.
GIST: I don't really know how noteworthy this story is.
The WEF Professor lines appears to have no basis in any sort of fact, and seems to have been used simply for GRAB factor (aka clickbait type headline).
Facts show he is not a professor (at UCB or anywhere), he is some random PHD candidate graduate student.
There appears to be no evidence that he is connected with the WEF in any way, such that the title "WEF Professor" makes any sense or is ground in fact.
There is no direct evidence that the WEF is giving funds, large or small, to University of Colorado Boulder.
(that said, it is likely that WEF minions have infiltrated most major universities in the US and elsewhere, and they may well contribute to the UCB budget, but where is the evidence for this?)
Conclusion: You've been clickbaited.
In my opinion, any article that leads with trigger headlines like WEF blah blah but provides ZERO data and evidence backing up such HEADLINES and pronouncements, is only after one thing. Your clicks. Your reactions. Your blind acceptance.
Note: this PHD student is of so little note. Yes, his ideas are satanic, idiotic and monstrous, but he's a nobody. So why focus any attention on him or this story?
We know these ideas are out there. If not, where have you been the last 15 years? So it's good I guess to raise awareness that these agendas are certainly out there, but this guy himself appears to be a sick university (graduate) student, and not much more.
Addendum: Yep. Further digging
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/wef-professor-says-parents-will-soon-need-a-license-to-raise-their-own-children/
So if that's Not proof of the clickbait nature of this, that it was published under a different name, at a different website, with eerily similar formatting, color scheme and fonts, etc, as the People Voice, then what is.
Jiminy Jackass is Delusionsl! Insane in the Membrane!
No, weffers will need to bend the knee or hang
Marvellous, love it when these utter condescending arrogant fools sign their own termination letters. The more they expose themselves the quicker we can wake the sheep, nothing will do that faster than going after their own kids. They have demonstrated that they don't give a fuck about poor trafficked children but when they come for theirs ...
That's pretty much where they want to take us.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VT2apoX90o