For starters . . . No conservative company should ever do business in Colorado again, and 2) No conservative should ever travel there for business, pleasure, vacation or whatever. Starve the fuckers.
Act 1: US Supreme Court says something like "You can't take his name off the ballot because he hasn't been found guilty of anything."
Act 2: The Dem's then 'manufacture a guilty verdict somewhere' and immediately claim that the US Supreme Court has already ruled that it is legitimate to remove his name from all ballots.
God Bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, most of all his security team and their families too, God Bless America and you the reader Too. 🙏
This is why the Supreme Court of Colorado's judement on this in unconstitutional.
First: The Republican Primary nomination process is actually a process of a private entity known as the RNC. Its like saying my not being elected to President of the 'Readers Book Club' is something the government should care about or be involved in.
Second: For the general election. Trump has not been convicted of any 14th Amendment violation.
Third: It is none of the state's business who is on the ballot except that those on the ballot followed the prescribed law as how to get on the state's ballot.
Excellent.
it is not DJT that Colorado has defrauded. It is the voters.
The People of Colorado are only allowed to chose from the options that the Servants of the People of Colorado say that they can choose from and they certainly cannot ever choose to fire the servants! That would constitute an Insurrection!
Nothing will come of this but a media circus (IMO).
The "judges" put an immediate stay on their own order until Jan 4th. They also said that this stay will be extended if Trump appeals.
The deadline to finalize who's on the ballot is Jan 5th.
What's the chances the Supreme Court rules on this (against Trump) in the next 2 weeks over the holidays?
I think the stay will remain in place on Jan 5th (waiting on SC), so Trump will be on the ballot. Just lots of gloating on the left, followed by salt in January.. lots of reeing and salt.
An extremely conservative coworker and friend of my husband moved to Colorado a few years back. He is constantly telling us to come visit and move there.
He talked to my husband the other day and told him if you want to see bright Sunshine come here.
He said it doesn't matter your politics you will live it here. I just look at my husband and roll my eyes.
Then this happened and I said here send this to your friend in Colorado.
Definitely not. Look, Pedes there is going to be a lot of hand-waving like this on various SM platforms, as well as GAW, but the amendment specifically states 'or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States'. Not county clerk, not President. Elected or not.
It would make zero sense for those writing this amendment to say 'no traitors can hold office, expect president, we're fine with that'.
This is simply going to come down to the fact that he has not been convicted of anything that would invoke the 14th. We will see whether SCOTUS will make that argument and toss the case, or be spineless and kick it back down to lower courts for "reasons".
You can quote irrelevant parts all you like, but that is not the part of disqualification.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.
The role of President is not an officer. An officer implies a greater position above them. There is no greater position above President.
In fact, that is a point that they could catch Biden, Kamala, Hillary, Obama all on. They all took oaths as a member of Congress and, in Hillary's case, as an officer. Therefore Obama would still be subject as well, because before President he had taken an oath for Congress.
The only thing being decided in the next Appellate court is whether they can invoke the 14th without a conviction - fuck I just realized it's not even that: without a CHARGE even. Not whether the 14th applies to/includes the office of the President.
That's one read on it. And yet, before the Colorado Supreme Court shenanigans, you would find many legal discussions about how, in fact, the President is not considered an officer of the United States.
To further cement that point, what are members of Congress? Holders of office. Why are they specified if there is no distinction?
actually you're probably right. if that amendment was written about army officers there is no reason to assume the president or any civilians are included
For starters . . . No conservative company should ever do business in Colorado again, and 2) No conservative should ever travel there for business, pleasure, vacation or whatever. Starve the fuckers.
Fuck that take it back before it becomes california
Prediction:
Act 1: US Supreme Court says something like "You can't take his name off the ballot because he hasn't been found guilty of anything."
Act 2: The Dem's then 'manufacture a guilty verdict somewhere' and immediately claim that the US Supreme Court has already ruled that it is legitimate to remove his name from all ballots.
It just seems too obvious...
God Bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, most of all his security team and their families too, God Bless America and you the reader Too. 🙏
This is why the Supreme Court of Colorado's judement on this in unconstitutional.
First: The Republican Primary nomination process is actually a process of a private entity known as the RNC. Its like saying my not being elected to President of the 'Readers Book Club' is something the government should care about or be involved in.
Second: For the general election. Trump has not been convicted of any 14th Amendment violation.
Third: It is none of the state's business who is on the ballot except that those on the ballot followed the prescribed law as how to get on the state's ballot.
As another commenter said elsewhere:
No convictions.
Only whimsies.
This is the linchpin for sure. Let's see if SCOTUS can man up and do the right thing. I'm hopeful about it the more I read.
Q didn't say "The only way is the Supreme Court."
True. This could be the Rubicon, but I'm not so sure.
I hope it is. I'm getting mighty sick of these ever-more-brazen-and-flagrantly-illegal obstacles put up by the DS.
Why are Colorado Courts so scared of a Trump Presidency?
Colorado was a blue state in 2020. They must be afraid of becoming a red state in 2024!
How many want to be in the jury of the tribunal for 4 “justices” that made this ruling?
Embarrassed I live in this State.
Excellent. it is not DJT that Colorado has defrauded. It is the voters. The People of Colorado are only allowed to chose from the options that the Servants of the People of Colorado say that they can choose from and they certainly cannot ever choose to fire the servants! That would constitute an Insurrection!
Nothing will come of this but a media circus (IMO).
The "judges" put an immediate stay on their own order until Jan 4th. They also said that this stay will be extended if Trump appeals.
The deadline to finalize who's on the ballot is Jan 5th.
What's the chances the Supreme Court rules on this (against Trump) in the next 2 weeks over the holidays?
I think the stay will remain in place on Jan 5th (waiting on SC), so Trump will be on the ballot. Just lots of gloating on the left, followed by salt in January.. lots of reeing and salt.
More than likely this is the case.
An extremely conservative coworker and friend of my husband moved to Colorado a few years back. He is constantly telling us to come visit and move there.
He talked to my husband the other day and told him if you want to see bright Sunshine come here.
He said it doesn't matter your politics you will live it here. I just look at my husband and roll my eyes.
Then this happened and I said here send this to your friend in Colorado.
Yea I really want to live there.
Good!
Sauce, btw: https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1737258405469757833
Every last one who is on these Posts, keeps Missing the finer points of the Colorado Supreme Court Ruling.....
It says that their Ruling has been STAYED....
It says that IF someone, Anyone, Petitions the Ruling to SCOTUS, then the CSC Stay becomes Permanent....
When, Trumps Lawyers Petition it to SCOTUS, the entire Ruling becomes USELESS, No Power, Of No Consequence....
Y'all just love the damned DRAMA way too much.....
The amendment specifically and intentionally excludes the President.
Definitely not. Look, Pedes there is going to be a lot of hand-waving like this on various SM platforms, as well as GAW, but the amendment specifically states 'or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States'. Not county clerk, not President. Elected or not.
It would make zero sense for those writing this amendment to say 'no traitors can hold office, expect president, we're fine with that'.
This is simply going to come down to the fact that he has not been convicted of anything that would invoke the 14th. We will see whether SCOTUS will make that argument and toss the case, or be spineless and kick it back down to lower courts for "reasons".
You can quote irrelevant parts all you like, but that is not the part of disqualification.
The role of President is not an officer. An officer implies a greater position above them. There is no greater position above President.
In fact, that is a point that they could catch Biden, Kamala, Hillary, Obama all on. They all took oaths as a member of Congress and, in Hillary's case, as an officer. Therefore Obama would still be subject as well, because before President he had taken an oath for Congress.
Is he literally the Chief Executive Officer of the Executive Branch?
This is a bad read my guy. An officer is ‘one who holds an office’, but there is zero reason for us to keep arguing about this,
Well, I guess we are taking it to court then aren't we?
The only thing being decided in the next Appellate court is whether they can invoke the 14th without a conviction - fuck I just realized it's not even that: without a CHARGE even. Not whether the 14th applies to/includes the office of the President.
Well, again we will see what arguments even get presented in the future. This isn't going to be the only fight related to this amendment.
officer in this context refers to an official office holder. the president is one of these. dumbass.
That's one read on it. And yet, before the Colorado Supreme Court shenanigans, you would find many legal discussions about how, in fact, the President is not considered an officer of the United States.
To further cement that point, what are members of Congress? Holders of office. Why are they specified if there is no distinction?
actually you're probably right. if that amendment was written about army officers there is no reason to assume the president or any civilians are included
this is dumb and a waste of time. holders of office are officers
Turns out the the ruling is a giant nothing burger. Stayed.
There was no insurrection so it’s an easy case to appeal.