Way too long; didn’t watch. But, this is the kind of thing the MSM will love. They already took a run at linking Q and the Anons with Nazis to discredit us as noted in Q Post 4653.
Post 142 and 939 suggest Hitler was a puppet of the controlling families of the NWO. And, there are multiple posts linking the NWO with the Nazis.
Finally, I’m more inclined to believe the plan we talk about started with JFK. It did not exist in the 40’s, so no, AH was not part of our plan.
Don't be so scared of what MSM will say that you let them stop your quest for knowledge. Thats exactly what they want, and how they keep us in dark.
I dont know if AH was a good guy, or a bad guy, or a bad guy who turned against his handlers, but one thing is for sure - pretty much everything we have been told about him (and WW2 in general) is false. Ignore it at your own peril.
I appreciate the debate, please don’t take my comments to be combative, I’m just trying to get them typed out between honey do requests from my better half.
I’m not ignoring the truth, I’m saying based on various Q posts I’m am much more inclined to believe the truth is AH was an instrument of the NWO founding families
I’m not afraid of the MSM, I’m just showing Q pointed out that when he started linking AH to the NWO, the NWO suddenly started trying to link Anons to AH. Q referenced a few stories as proof the NWO-AH link talk was over the target.
My interpretation of the Q posts about AH, Nazism, and fascism is that the ideology lives on in the NWO backed political parties, primarily those on the left. But, as we all know, the Uniparty is real and even politicians masquerading as conservatives are under NWO influence.
I’ll also stick with the unproven, but plausible hypothesis that the nucleus of the Q team came to be under JFK.
Again, no question in my mind that AH was an instrument of NWO. And like all other puppets of theirs, he was manipulated and funded into his position by his handlers and at some point he seems to have gone against their plans.
This seems to be the pattern we observed again and again in history and perhaps why they wanted a permanent solution this time around.
Whether he got enlightened, whether he turned a good guy, whether he was incompetent and failed them or whether he went good own way for his own petty reasons - I have not been able to figure this out.
The only conclusion I have been able to make is that he gave a decisive now to their plans and perhaps set back their plans by half a century.
Absolutely. Nazis were the bad guys, we even got a history lesson right in front of our eyes with all the Nazis in Ukraine last year.
However, its important to make a distinction between Nazis and Hitler. I made another comment elaborating a bit, but I think Hitler had always been putting reins on the Nazis and in the end he thwarted the Nazi agenda, and hence he had to be eliminated and Nazis imported to US to take reins of the long game.
I also made the observation that Hitler, whether planned or unplanned, managed to get tons of Nazis destroyed when he invaded USSR (and at the same time managed to destroy tons of Commies and Khazarians as well).
I haven't watched it yet, but I definitely will.
JUST A THOUGHT - think of the adrenochrome possibilities in WWII era Poland with:
Auschwitz,
Maidanek,
Treblinka,
Sobibor,
Belzec,
Chelmno,
as well as the Einstazgruppen along the eastern front.
Lots of killing including children. I know - pretty morbid thought, but it makes sense especially with all the stuff the SS was into including the flying bells and alleged alien assistance.
Haven’t watched, but I’ve been wondering if JFK was part of the plan and it went sideways. Which would mean there was a plan of sorts prior. Just an idea.
I think JFK and Bobby knew the plans of the DS through their fathers business partners and I also think Joe thought his sons would cooperate and be a part of the plan but they both rebelled --- maybe had a conscience -- and decided to change things for the better. Didn't work out too well for them!
There has been a Plan since the dawn of man, literally. This fight is not called "Biblical" as a metaphor, but because it literally is the same fight from the Biblical times, just coming to its final conclusion.
An unknown hero and watchman on the wall. The same goes to Smedley Butler calling out the for profit war machine and fascist coup and silent takeover in the 30’s. Couldn’t tell you if a counter plan was in the works, but I can tell you that patriots knew of “their” plan before JFK came around.
Regarding "How were children named in Germany during this period?"
I know nothing about Germany. But I know that in Greece, the eldest boy is named after the paternal grandfather, the eldest girl is named after the paternal grandmother, the second born boy/girl named after the maternal parents. You have to have 3 kids of the same gender before you get to choose your own name for the kid. This is why in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" all the cousins were named Nick, Nicky and Diana.
Maybe Germany has similar customs? Maybe someone has a name which indicates who their grandparent was?
The book Magic of Money by Hajalmar Schaacht is also recommended reading for those digging into Hitler. Amongst other things, it sheds light on who funded Hitler, when did they drop him, what was Hitler's solution to Jews (allowing them to migrate to where ever they wanted, with all their assets repatriated in 2-3 years) and who vetoed it (The head rabbi in London) and why (They wanted Hitler to allow Jews to leave only to Israel and nowhere else). Additionally, this book sheds much light on the trickeries of central banks (even though the author, Hitler's Central Banker, does not present them as such, but rather states them as mundane inner workings of central banks).
Another good dig is Rudolph Hess and his mission to UK for a peace treaty and what happened to him.
Declaration of wars in WW2 is another red pill. Germany declares war on only one country in 1939. In return 15 countries declare war on Germany. So exactly who started the world war?
Having said all this, there is no doubt that the NWO is Nazi World Order. And we have seen Nazis are indeed the evil people we have always been told, as during the Ukraine war we say it play out in front of us.
Here is a very good first hand account of Nazis being flown into US by Col. Prouty - btw, he has tons of videos that are all highly informative, and mostly first hand accounts, since he had front row seat during the post WW2 years.
It would lead one to believe that Hitler, perhaps foiled the plans for Nazis, and hence had to be eliminated while Nazis were folded into the Western Empire to extend the plan of world domination by another 60 years.
And finally, looking at the demise of Hitler and his campaign into USSR, that historians have never been able to explain convincingly, was Hitler's invasion into USSR an act of ultimate sacrifice? Did Stalin and Hitler conspire to eliminate hundreds of thousands of Nazis and Commies at the same time? The fact that Stalin started purging the Cabal puppets after WW2, definitely adds credence to this claim.
Hitler's invasion into Soviet Union THROUGH UKRAINE appeared to be an intentional demolition of Ukraine, Khazarian homeland, and the fake Jews there. It looks to me like Stalin conscripted and forced the most diehard Communists into battle into Ukraine to "Defend the Motherland" slaughtering many of his enemies in the process. Then when the Soviet Union invaded Europe they went THROUGH UKRAINE to demolish it again. Most likely this was intentional. Unknown if Hitler and Stalin were working together to eliminate mutual enemies, but it sure looks that way.
Not saying either of these guys were good guys. They were going directly at the cabal using brute force. A clearly bloody and expensive way to do it with lots and lots of collateral damage.
Depopulation can be used against the cabal as well. Unoccupied land after a certain period of time can legally be claimed by whoever occupies it (international law). Two complete depopulation events in Ukraine within quick succession likely removed all possible Khazarian legal claims to the land. This is why they needed to illegally steal it again in 1991 by fraudulently breaking off the Ukraine S.S.R. and creating a fake country with the help of the media, U.N., and intelligence agencies. Note that the destruction during WW2 likely undid all the "gifts" Lenin made to the Khazarians of Ukrainian land 1917-1922.
Agreed. Also if you compare the White Christian genocide under Trotsky in 1920's vs the Ukrainian genocide after Stalin took over. How Stalin managed to get Lenin's vote of confidence before his death is probably one of the most powerful WH operation (pure speculation). Without this, all of the worst nightmares that were planned for the world under the umbrella of USSR would have come true.
Unknown if Hitler and Stalin were working together to eliminate mutual enemies, but it sure looks that way.
Makes the fact that Hitler and Stalin lived in Vienna for a few years within a few blocks of each other and visited the same cafe - all the more notable.
"They wanted Hitler to allow Jews to leave only to Israel and nowhere else" What kind of insanity is allowed to be posted here? Israel didn't exist until AFTER the end of WWII. Perhaps you are referring to the region known as Palestine prior to creation of modern Israel?
Hess knew everything and was sent on a mission is why they - the western powers kept him Gagged - the sole inmate of Spandau for 46 years until he was murdered by British agents in 1989 after Gorbachev was putting calls out for his release.
I read a lengthy article some years back that tied everything together with witness statements that I will try to repost.
Good summary thanks, even though the Gorbachev part is new to me - but the timing fits. I get so mad whenever I read about Hess. Would love to read the article. Could be a powerful redpill regarding WW2 for older folks.
Thanks , I’ve just run a search for the article I pointed to but if you run search - Hess murdered there are now numerous independent articles on the Hess’s murder
Indeed. What amazes me is that the guy who left the wwar theatre in 1941 and spent the rest of the war imprisoned, and generally accepted to be 'crazy" was sentenced to life in prison.
So, I will write what I remember, but if you want the correct accurate story you gotta read the book I linked.
Hitler came up with a plan to allow Jews to leave Germany. They would leave with a certain percent of their assets, and the rest will be deposited with the bank in some scheme. For the next 2 or 3 years, they would be able to get a portion of the remaining assets every year, until they get the whole assets. Germany gets to keep the interest. Something like that. Its possible they would get back 90% instead of the whole 100%, but it was a very fair deal given the circumstances.
He proposes it to the president of the Reichsbank, his central banker, the author of the book. What does Schaacht do? He says he needs to get it approved by the president of the Central Bank of London.
This is where the redpill starts. He is able to get an immediate audience with the and flys out to meet him. Listening to the proposal the London bank president thinks this is pretty good deal, but he has to get it approved by the head Rabbi (I forget his name). Either one of them, or both of them meet with the Rabbi and ask for his approval. They are pretty flabbergasted when the Rabbi says that he cannot allow this as they don't want the jews immigrating to whereever they want. They are only allowed to leave to Israel.
That still doesn’t make any logical sense as to why the Bank of England (which I assume you mean) would need to approve anything and why Hitler wouldn’t do it anyway, just my opinion.
Jews needed an immigration visa into Palestine. Palestine was under League of Nations Mandate by the British. Hence, the need for a British issued immigration visum. And the Brits ended issuing immigration visa's to emigrating Jews in 1938, I belief.
And just as much there is AIPAC in America, there is a huge Jew-lobby in the UK. Hence the weight of the words of a London Rabbi.
But that doesn’t explain why Jews, facing a non-friendly (to say the least) government in Germany wouldn’t have happily migrated to a dozen other countries. Palestine/israel would have been far down the list. The idea that “a Rabbi” in London (especially considering that Judaism doesn’t have a central religious leader like the pope) seems to stretch credulity.
I am not so sure it was unfriendly. After the first window breaking called Crystal Nacht, which was a response to the Judean Boycott , emergency legislation was passed to stop it, otherwise the Haavara contract would not have been made.
There was even talk about using Madagascar as a Jewish Homeland as the previous deal with a Jewish Homeland in Palestine and TransJordan within the Arab League turned to nothing due to weak British action regarding the emergence of the Kingdom of Jordan.
So, I don't know. It may be considered hostile. On the other hand, having your own land and being boss there without Jew supremacy (Banking, News, Theater, Law, sciences, etc) is, based on the idea within that time frame of "every people have the right to choose their own destiny, not totally unreasonable.
And the Haavara deal was a deal that benefited both parties to the contract.
Of Kissinger it is said he fled Germany in 1938. The funny part is, emigration was positively viewed. And the details of the story show Kissinger went away with the blessing of the German Government. And they even worked with the Mossad precursor to achieve what was necessary.
The peace treaty of Versailles simply drew arbitrary lines on a map, in service of Empire building. And here we also find the root causes of dissension in many areas currently having to deal with political instability. It seems to me the IDEA, flowing from the sovereignty of every man and woman, that a people contain the highest form of sovereignty, and thus are perfectly set to choose their own destiny was not a bad idea.
Today this is replaced by a Rules based international order. The rules are made by the power structures behind this idea, running roughshod over the question of sovereignty of the people.
I watch it. Sadly, they're completely lost in details and nonsense. They didn't mention central banking at all. You have no foundation to understand what happened in Hitler's Germany (or our world!), and his revolution without that knowledge.
Just think why Hollywood is so obsessed with making Hitler and Putin the ultimate villains. Not saying Hitler was/is good, but for distractions sake, it sure does benefit the cabal mightily when the whole world thinks that the Russians and Nazis are the forever enemy.
I think the error that is often made when looking into Hitler and the 3rd Reich is to.assume it was monolithic, like Communism. It was not. Germany from 1933 to 1945 was a loose coalition of Department/Faction/Military Leaders in constant competition with each other, and each looking to build their own fiefdoms, all presided over by Hitler, who ruled by suggestion and dictate rather than firm policy decisions.
David Irving has.suggested that the SS perpetrated the death camps largely without Hitlers knowledge, orchestrated by Himmler. He also suggests that.Himmler had to know about the 1944 bomb plot to kill Hitler (Operation Valkyrie).
Martin Bormann did call a meeting with the titans of German industry (Krupp, Siemens, AEG, IG Farben etc) at a hotel in 1943 (which he did not attend, but sent an aid) where he ordered wealth and IP be evacuated from Germany, as he felt the war was lost, and said that the war would be extended until this could be accomplished.
Himmler was talking to the OSS in Switzerland since about 1943 about surrender.
The book "OP JB " by Christopher Creighton insists British commandos extracted Bormann from Berlin in 1945, after Hitlers suicide.in the bunker.
I suspect Hitler was slowly co-opted and compromised by manipulation, drugs and other means until he was largely a symbolic figurehead from 1943-1945, with day-to-day decisions mostly being made by Martin Bormann.
It still remains to be understood how the Germans were.able to make such tremendous technical progress during the war-inventing Night Vision, Smart.bombs, cruise missiles- and according to recent research (Ranier Karlsch for.one) even building a nuclear weapon a year before the USA.
I think understanding the origin of some of this tech (in my opinion, recovered/reverse engineered ancient tech in some instances) and the massive intel agency cover-ups that had to result from the Allied doscovery of this tech at the end of the war- is key to making sense of what happened .
Hitler was supposedly obsessed with the ark of the covenant, the holy grail, the lance of longinus, alchemy, and Nazca lines. I have no doubt he unearthed or revived long lost technology.
Yeah, I don't care how hard people work to try to make it so, I'm never going to believe Hitler was anything but evil.
Just because liberals and the MSM are against Hitler doesn't automatically mean I need to support him. I swear, sometimes I think people just take the contrarian view to whatever liberals and the MSM say, without even thinking about it. Like, "If liberals believe this, it must be wrong, so I'll take the complete opposite opinion!"
It seems like a Hegelian dialectic situation. Anti-German ideas were intentionally spread through Germany by a cabal-controlled media and education system with the intention of diminishing the culture. Then the cabal propped up Hitler to say common sense stuff that resonated with normal Germans, so they hitched their wagon to him and all the evil stuff that came with the Nazis.
I could only watch half of it but it's already so disturbing I have to stop. I thought I know also. There's other supporting evidences. I will let you know if you need other evidences.
You apparently haven't felt the disgust of how badly you've been lied to. Accepting anything you previously knew as fact and not questioning literally everything you think you knew about secular history is simply emotional attachment to some idea you can't prove. When Everything we believe is a lie rhey consider themselves to have done their job.
Of course I'm disgusted about how much we've been lied to. But I understand the difference between healthy skepticism and outright paranoia. Just because we've been lied to about so much doesn't mean everything we've been told is a lie. That type of thinking is what gives us Flat Earthers.
Everything needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case scenario. Automatically believing everything you've been told is a lie is just as lazy as believing everything you've been told is the truth.
How about accepting the fact that since so many things we’ve been told have been lie you start from square one and just assume you don’t know anything about that topic at all before even mustering the gumption to argue with anyone about it? They’ve given you links and books to read on the topic that they feel justify this seemingly outlandish view (based on what you’ve always assumed was true because you never heard anything different), have you picked up any of those books yet or do you just want to keep badgering them with “That doesn’t make any sense!” They’ve told you several times they can’t do the topic justice in a short post here but where you can read about it yourself so stop annoying everyone already and go read the damn cited material already. Jesus. That doesn’t make anyone a flat fucking earther it just makes you unwilling to do any real work for yourself. What do you want them to do, type out the whole damn book for you right here? They told you where to find it, if you’re so curious go to a damn library or follow their link and see if you can answer your own damn questions.
I looked at the man from his Human Design body graph perspective, and compare it to his performances on camera, his book, the personal influence he had on other people, I come to view it as him being totally in synch with who he really is.
The argument you propose as being the main driver, I think is non-sequitur, and a logical fallacy. Of course, the argument is, if the MSN is advising you to take the jab, don't. But, if THAT is the only argument, such a person is just as dead as the zombies who stand in line to get jabbed.
So, that leaves us with your a priori position: NOTHING CAN GET ME NOT TO BELIEF HITLER WAS ANYTHING BUT EVIL.
Of course, it is a nice thing to have a profession of faith. I guess that particular Q-post is for you: Shocked will you be.
I am with you. I honestly think Hitler is fascinating. I think there were many respects in which he was incredibly intelligent amd obviously, a powerful speaker who knew how to command attention
But something deep inside, the same spiritual and gut feeling that tells me Q is real and much bigger than it seems, tells me in the end Hitler truly was evil.
I have no patience for skin color tribalism or the slickly produced lies that try to further those ideals (such as the Europa series)
Wtf? "Hitler flipped?!" He's still alive and what, gonna jump out and surprise us with some good guy shit now?
That's not what post 928 is about at all. Just read it.
Post 928 is about how Angela Merkel is the daughter of Hitler. She was the chancellor of Germany -or similar title - at the time of this post.
That seems to be clearly what it is about. Plus it gets into other familial connections that Q indicates is a "truth would shock the world."
Anyways, just look up a meme of Angela Merkel with a Hitler moustache, the family resemblance is uncanny.
As per Nazi references in Q posts, a culmniation of various historical rabbit trails have led me to believe that ultimately we ARE at war with the descendants and the vestiges of the Nazi occult who escaped WW2 to Antartica with superior tech, or otherwise infiltrated our institutions via things like operation paperclip. Like on the news and history books we won the war, but behind the scenes they slid into generational power like Hydra in the Marvel movies.
As big of a moutful as my previous paragraph was, that is certainly a truth that would shock the world - that the Nazis WON and they've been steering history for the last few decades.
The History channel presented an entire series "Hunting Hitler" that investigated Hitler's flight to Argentina and his eventual death at age (approx.) 75. I have a copy of the videos.
The dots in the X thread don't really connect, but the idea that AH could've been controlled by the OSS is worth exploring. Hitler may have been evil, but he also was not the person history tells us. Watch film of him meeting members of the Reichstag parliament. He's socially awkward and deferential to them. He does not exhibit the body language of an ambitious psychopath.
I've reviewed much of the evidence of Hitler's alleged escape to Argentina. I've concluded that much of the Nazi's leadership and operations were relocated there, but there's no indisputable evidence Hitler himself was there. It's possible he was, but it's also possible he was snatched by WH. The narrative that's least believable is that he died in the bunker.
At the very least, they broach a very interesting hypothesis. However, Ludendorf being a bad guy? This sounds rather biased, which they said they would not do.
So, if one is to be really unbiased, and answer the question about control. ......
The first question is WHO was controlled by whom? When considering Hitler, listen to Rudolph Hess statement at Nurnberg first:
Why? Because he mentions behavioral changes in people after having had a certain drug. It was used by the commies to have people confess and cheer for the death sentence. He mentions that his guards and even his doctor showed these signs. Then he mentions other people who can testify as to that status in the case of Hitler AFTER 1941, when he left for England to try to limit the war.
Why is this relevant?
Body doubles, of course. If I recall correctly, there was already talk about Hitler being dead before the war. A German who worked as a merchant marine officer came to America with the goodies.
However, there were several assassination attempts after that, among which was Valkyrie. And in April of 45 the talk is about a bunker incident, where he kills himself and then is burned. The story left open ended.
Then Hitler is spotted in Bariloche and is supposed to have lived till 1975 or so.
What if he has been there since Hess went off to England? Or after the first assassination attempt?
Would that bring things under control AFTER the war?
For those not wanting to spend 3 hours .... skip to 02:42:42 en listen to the rundown.
Just know that these guys have put this all in the context of AI. They reference a book written in 1880, thereabouts, about an building an android.
So, how do you fuck up a plan? By getting certain people to turn on their masters .... and here is where Hitler comes in.
Did he turn and if so, when? They point to certain military decisions which were kinda strange.
For instance, the projection on Operation Barbarossa was that the Germans could sustain a mobile operation for 3 months, because of the oil situation, as Germany has to produce its carburants in a different manner. The only German source of oil was Romania. Venezuela was cut off.
Add to that the ridiculous long supply lines over an almost 6000 kilometer long front.
The op was predicated on an early start. However, the Italians screwed up the Greece theater and the Germans had to step in, delaying till june. Then within 6 months the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. This was simply a bad decision or maybe a pre-emptive decision as they would provoke it in a time of their choosing as US involvement in the Asian theater was inevitable.
The Archive at Kew contains lots of discussions between British, Dutch and American representatives relating to the persecution of the War in the Asian theater.
At any rate, it is quite a new way of looking at the same topic, hence, the need to keep emotions in check.
I would add to the conversation on this topic, the role of Admiral Canaris, the head of the Abwehr.
In 1940, after Dunkirk, the question became to take Gibraltar and seal of the Med. There were plans to drive simply through Spain. The problem in Spain is, there are a lot of hills and bad roads, of there were roads at all. (See Sardegna landing 1943)
So, Canaris whispered in Franco's ear to demand a lot of humanitarian Aid from Germany in such a size, it would undermine the German economy and the persecution of the war.
Of course, when taking into account the landing of Rudolph Hess in England in order to limit the scope of the war, plus the number of peace proposals Hitler submitted to end the hostilities and even going so far as to retreat behind the Rhine and pay reparations, the question becomes whether the direction of thought these guys from the video are in, is a viable direction. I think they are on to something and worthy to think about it when researching the Word War Two topic.
All I need to know is what "they" are trying to/doing to trump and how the same "they" DID it to hitler most likely, but there was no social media or internet to do some godspeed level deboonks with receipts.
https://rumble.com/v3zpyfn-check-your-emotions-at-the-door..html&start=2280
Twitter thread post https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1732257435740438588.html
Way too long; didn’t watch. But, this is the kind of thing the MSM will love. They already took a run at linking Q and the Anons with Nazis to discredit us as noted in Q Post 4653.
Post 142 and 939 suggest Hitler was a puppet of the controlling families of the NWO. And, there are multiple posts linking the NWO with the Nazis.
Finally, I’m more inclined to believe the plan we talk about started with JFK. It did not exist in the 40’s, so no, AH was not part of our plan.
Don't be so scared of what MSM will say that you let them stop your quest for knowledge. Thats exactly what they want, and how they keep us in dark.
I dont know if AH was a good guy, or a bad guy, or a bad guy who turned against his handlers, but one thing is for sure - pretty much everything we have been told about him (and WW2 in general) is false. Ignore it at your own peril.
I appreciate the debate, please don’t take my comments to be combative, I’m just trying to get them typed out between honey do requests from my better half.
I’m not ignoring the truth, I’m saying based on various Q posts I’m am much more inclined to believe the truth is AH was an instrument of the NWO founding families
I’m not afraid of the MSM, I’m just showing Q pointed out that when he started linking AH to the NWO, the NWO suddenly started trying to link Anons to AH. Q referenced a few stories as proof the NWO-AH link talk was over the target.
My interpretation of the Q posts about AH, Nazism, and fascism is that the ideology lives on in the NWO backed political parties, primarily those on the left. But, as we all know, the Uniparty is real and even politicians masquerading as conservatives are under NWO influence.
I’ll also stick with the unproven, but plausible hypothesis that the nucleus of the Q team came to be under JFK.
Again, no question in my mind that AH was an instrument of NWO. And like all other puppets of theirs, he was manipulated and funded into his position by his handlers and at some point he seems to have gone against their plans.
This seems to be the pattern we observed again and again in history and perhaps why they wanted a permanent solution this time around.
Whether he got enlightened, whether he turned a good guy, whether he was incompetent and failed them or whether he went good own way for his own petty reasons - I have not been able to figure this out.
The only conclusion I have been able to make is that he gave a decisive now to their plans and perhaps set back their plans by half a century.
Absolutely. Nazis were the bad guys, we even got a history lesson right in front of our eyes with all the Nazis in Ukraine last year.
However, its important to make a distinction between Nazis and Hitler. I made another comment elaborating a bit, but I think Hitler had always been putting reins on the Nazis and in the end he thwarted the Nazi agenda, and hence he had to be eliminated and Nazis imported to US to take reins of the long game.
I also made the observation that Hitler, whether planned or unplanned, managed to get tons of Nazis destroyed when he invaded USSR (and at the same time managed to destroy tons of Commies and Khazarians as well).
Merry Christmas, y'all and God† bless.
I haven't watched it yet, but I definitely will. JUST A THOUGHT - think of the adrenochrome possibilities in WWII era Poland with: Auschwitz, Maidanek, Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec, Chelmno, as well as the Einstazgruppen along the eastern front.
Lots of killing including children. I know - pretty morbid thought, but it makes sense especially with all the stuff the SS was into including the flying bells and alleged alien assistance.
Flying bells??? Can you expand fren
So much out there on this topic. Here's a decent starting point. Enjoy and God† bless.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfKC_XRRxvE
Haven’t watched, but I’ve been wondering if JFK was part of the plan and it went sideways. Which would mean there was a plan of sorts prior. Just an idea.
I think JFK and Bobby knew the plans of the DS through their fathers business partners and I also think Joe thought his sons would cooperate and be a part of the plan but they both rebelled --- maybe had a conscience -- and decided to change things for the better. Didn't work out too well for them!
Read “Winter Kills”. Really.
JFK Grave Site.... Aerial View
There has been a Plan since the dawn of man, literally. This fight is not called "Biblical" as a metaphor, but because it literally is the same fight from the Biblical times, just coming to its final conclusion.
What an interesting thing to say
https://archive.org/details/satan-prince-of-this-world-carr-1966/page/3/mode/1up
An unknown hero and watchman on the wall. The same goes to Smedley Butler calling out the for profit war machine and fascist coup and silent takeover in the 30’s. Couldn’t tell you if a counter plan was in the works, but I can tell you that patriots knew of “their” plan before JFK came around.
Didn’t q say NWO the N stands for Nazi?
u/#q936
Who cares about MSM. They lie amd make shit up anyway.
Your inclinations are no more worthy of the fact stamp than theirs is.
Hitler's fundamental, most basic philosophies as to how a government, society, and nation should operate were to a large extent correct.
That's only what we have been allowed to know.
Who wrote the history books? Why should we trust them? Bias?
The truth will indeed shock the world, and boy will it be a doozy!
Socialism/fascism is correct? Wow!
StormzAComing said nothing wrong.
Same with James Baker. Check this quote —
https://www.azquotes.com/quote/654907
.
Is this about Angela Merkel being related to Adolf Hitler.
Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were both part of the Khazarian Mafia.
You have white christian nations destroying/killing each other.
u/#q928
Regarding "How were children named in Germany during this period?"
I know nothing about Germany. But I know that in Greece, the eldest boy is named after the paternal grandfather, the eldest girl is named after the paternal grandmother, the second born boy/girl named after the maternal parents. You have to have 3 kids of the same gender before you get to choose your own name for the kid. This is why in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" all the cousins were named Nick, Nicky and Diana.
Maybe Germany has similar customs? Maybe someone has a name which indicates who their grandparent was?
Hitler's dads name was Alois. Alois' mother was Maria Anna Schiklgruber.
Some good resources for Anons who want to dig into Hitler. All of these are redpill material.
Hitler's suicide note is a very interesting read.
The book Magic of Money by Hajalmar Schaacht is also recommended reading for those digging into Hitler. Amongst other things, it sheds light on who funded Hitler, when did they drop him, what was Hitler's solution to Jews (allowing them to migrate to where ever they wanted, with all their assets repatriated in 2-3 years) and who vetoed it (The head rabbi in London) and why (They wanted Hitler to allow Jews to leave only to Israel and nowhere else). Additionally, this book sheds much light on the trickeries of central banks (even though the author, Hitler's Central Banker, does not present them as such, but rather states them as mundane inner workings of central banks).
Another good dig is Rudolph Hess and his mission to UK for a peace treaty and what happened to him.
Hitler's Speech to Reichstag in Sep 1939
Declaration of wars in WW2 is another red pill. Germany declares war on only one country in 1939. In return 15 countries declare war on Germany. So exactly who started the world war?
Having said all this, there is no doubt that the NWO is Nazi World Order. And we have seen Nazis are indeed the evil people we have always been told, as during the Ukraine war we say it play out in front of us.
Here is a very good first hand account of Nazis being flown into US by Col. Prouty - btw, he has tons of videos that are all highly informative, and mostly first hand accounts, since he had front row seat during the post WW2 years.
It would lead one to believe that Hitler, perhaps foiled the plans for Nazis, and hence had to be eliminated while Nazis were folded into the Western Empire to extend the plan of world domination by another 60 years.
And finally, looking at the demise of Hitler and his campaign into USSR, that historians have never been able to explain convincingly, was Hitler's invasion into USSR an act of ultimate sacrifice? Did Stalin and Hitler conspire to eliminate hundreds of thousands of Nazis and Commies at the same time? The fact that Stalin started purging the Cabal puppets after WW2, definitely adds credence to this claim.
Hitler's invasion into Soviet Union THROUGH UKRAINE appeared to be an intentional demolition of Ukraine, Khazarian homeland, and the fake Jews there. It looks to me like Stalin conscripted and forced the most diehard Communists into battle into Ukraine to "Defend the Motherland" slaughtering many of his enemies in the process. Then when the Soviet Union invaded Europe they went THROUGH UKRAINE to demolish it again. Most likely this was intentional. Unknown if Hitler and Stalin were working together to eliminate mutual enemies, but it sure looks that way.
Not saying either of these guys were good guys. They were going directly at the cabal using brute force. A clearly bloody and expensive way to do it with lots and lots of collateral damage.
Depopulation can be used against the cabal as well. Unoccupied land after a certain period of time can legally be claimed by whoever occupies it (international law). Two complete depopulation events in Ukraine within quick succession likely removed all possible Khazarian legal claims to the land. This is why they needed to illegally steal it again in 1991 by fraudulently breaking off the Ukraine S.S.R. and creating a fake country with the help of the media, U.N., and intelligence agencies. Note that the destruction during WW2 likely undid all the "gifts" Lenin made to the Khazarians of Ukrainian land 1917-1922.
Agreed. Also if you compare the White Christian genocide under Trotsky in 1920's vs the Ukrainian genocide after Stalin took over. How Stalin managed to get Lenin's vote of confidence before his death is probably one of the most powerful WH operation (pure speculation). Without this, all of the worst nightmares that were planned for the world under the umbrella of USSR would have come true.
Makes the fact that Hitler and Stalin lived in Vienna for a few years within a few blocks of each other and visited the same cafe - all the more notable.
Ah ... Die Stammkneipe ....
It would certainly not surprise me.
"They wanted Hitler to allow Jews to leave only to Israel and nowhere else" What kind of insanity is allowed to be posted here? Israel didn't exist until AFTER the end of WWII. Perhaps you are referring to the region known as Palestine prior to creation of modern Israel?
Of course, I thought that much is obvious.
Hess knew everything and was sent on a mission is why they - the western powers kept him Gagged - the sole inmate of Spandau for 46 years until he was murdered by British agents in 1989 after Gorbachev was putting calls out for his release. I read a lengthy article some years back that tied everything together with witness statements that I will try to repost.
Good summary thanks, even though the Gorbachev part is new to me - but the timing fits. I get so mad whenever I read about Hess. Would love to read the article. Could be a powerful redpill regarding WW2 for older folks.
Thanks , I’ve just run a search for the article I pointed to but if you run search - Hess murdered there are now numerous independent articles on the Hess’s murder
Indeed. What amazes me is that the guy who left the wwar theatre in 1941 and spent the rest of the war imprisoned, and generally accepted to be 'crazy" was sentenced to life in prison.
How would a rabbi in London have the ability to “veto” an act by the nation of Germany?
So, I will write what I remember, but if you want the correct accurate story you gotta read the book I linked.
Hitler came up with a plan to allow Jews to leave Germany. They would leave with a certain percent of their assets, and the rest will be deposited with the bank in some scheme. For the next 2 or 3 years, they would be able to get a portion of the remaining assets every year, until they get the whole assets. Germany gets to keep the interest. Something like that. Its possible they would get back 90% instead of the whole 100%, but it was a very fair deal given the circumstances.
He proposes it to the president of the Reichsbank, his central banker, the author of the book. What does Schaacht do? He says he needs to get it approved by the president of the Central Bank of London.
This is where the redpill starts. He is able to get an immediate audience with the and flys out to meet him. Listening to the proposal the London bank president thinks this is pretty good deal, but he has to get it approved by the head Rabbi (I forget his name). Either one of them, or both of them meet with the Rabbi and ask for his approval. They are pretty flabbergasted when the Rabbi says that he cannot allow this as they don't want the jews immigrating to whereever they want. They are only allowed to leave to Israel.
That still doesn’t make any logical sense as to why the Bank of England (which I assume you mean) would need to approve anything and why Hitler wouldn’t do it anyway, just my opinion.
Jews needed an immigration visa into Palestine. Palestine was under League of Nations Mandate by the British. Hence, the need for a British issued immigration visum. And the Brits ended issuing immigration visa's to emigrating Jews in 1938, I belief.
And just as much there is AIPAC in America, there is a huge Jew-lobby in the UK. Hence the weight of the words of a London Rabbi.
But that doesn’t explain why Jews, facing a non-friendly (to say the least) government in Germany wouldn’t have happily migrated to a dozen other countries. Palestine/israel would have been far down the list. The idea that “a Rabbi” in London (especially considering that Judaism doesn’t have a central religious leader like the pope) seems to stretch credulity.
I am not so sure it was unfriendly. After the first window breaking called Crystal Nacht, which was a response to the Judean Boycott , emergency legislation was passed to stop it, otherwise the Haavara contract would not have been made.
There was even talk about using Madagascar as a Jewish Homeland as the previous deal with a Jewish Homeland in Palestine and TransJordan within the Arab League turned to nothing due to weak British action regarding the emergence of the Kingdom of Jordan.
So, I don't know. It may be considered hostile. On the other hand, having your own land and being boss there without Jew supremacy (Banking, News, Theater, Law, sciences, etc) is, based on the idea within that time frame of "every people have the right to choose their own destiny, not totally unreasonable.
And the Haavara deal was a deal that benefited both parties to the contract.
Of Kissinger it is said he fled Germany in 1938. The funny part is, emigration was positively viewed. And the details of the story show Kissinger went away with the blessing of the German Government. And they even worked with the Mossad precursor to achieve what was necessary.
The peace treaty of Versailles simply drew arbitrary lines on a map, in service of Empire building. And here we also find the root causes of dissension in many areas currently having to deal with political instability. It seems to me the IDEA, flowing from the sovereignty of every man and woman, that a people contain the highest form of sovereignty, and thus are perfectly set to choose their own destiny was not a bad idea.
Today this is replaced by a Rules based international order. The rules are made by the power structures behind this idea, running roughshod over the question of sovereignty of the people.
Wait so what if Q is a medbed prolonged Adolf! Woah. "You won't believe who you are talking to."
Pretty frisky comment for a throwaway :)
I watch it. Sadly, they're completely lost in details and nonsense. They didn't mention central banking at all. You have no foundation to understand what happened in Hitler's Germany (or our world!), and his revolution without that knowledge.
Just think why Hollywood is so obsessed with making Hitler and Putin the ultimate villains. Not saying Hitler was/is good, but for distractions sake, it sure does benefit the cabal mightily when the whole world thinks that the Russians and Nazis are the forever enemy.
See 1942 Atlantic Treaty. See 1933 declaration of war against Germany by Judea. (read carefully).
I think the error that is often made when looking into Hitler and the 3rd Reich is to.assume it was monolithic, like Communism. It was not. Germany from 1933 to 1945 was a loose coalition of Department/Faction/Military Leaders in constant competition with each other, and each looking to build their own fiefdoms, all presided over by Hitler, who ruled by suggestion and dictate rather than firm policy decisions.
David Irving has.suggested that the SS perpetrated the death camps largely without Hitlers knowledge, orchestrated by Himmler. He also suggests that.Himmler had to know about the 1944 bomb plot to kill Hitler (Operation Valkyrie).
Martin Bormann did call a meeting with the titans of German industry (Krupp, Siemens, AEG, IG Farben etc) at a hotel in 1943 (which he did not attend, but sent an aid) where he ordered wealth and IP be evacuated from Germany, as he felt the war was lost, and said that the war would be extended until this could be accomplished.
Himmler was talking to the OSS in Switzerland since about 1943 about surrender.
The book "OP JB " by Christopher Creighton insists British commandos extracted Bormann from Berlin in 1945, after Hitlers suicide.in the bunker.
I suspect Hitler was slowly co-opted and compromised by manipulation, drugs and other means until he was largely a symbolic figurehead from 1943-1945, with day-to-day decisions mostly being made by Martin Bormann.
It still remains to be understood how the Germans were.able to make such tremendous technical progress during the war-inventing Night Vision, Smart.bombs, cruise missiles- and according to recent research (Ranier Karlsch for.one) even building a nuclear weapon a year before the USA.
I think understanding the origin of some of this tech (in my opinion, recovered/reverse engineered ancient tech in some instances) and the massive intel agency cover-ups that had to result from the Allied doscovery of this tech at the end of the war- is key to making sense of what happened .
Hitler was supposedly obsessed with the ark of the covenant, the holy grail, the lance of longinus, alchemy, and Nazca lines. I have no doubt he unearthed or revived long lost technology.
Yeah, I don't care how hard people work to try to make it so, I'm never going to believe Hitler was anything but evil.
Just because liberals and the MSM are against Hitler doesn't automatically mean I need to support him. I swear, sometimes I think people just take the contrarian view to whatever liberals and the MSM say, without even thinking about it. Like, "If liberals believe this, it must be wrong, so I'll take the complete opposite opinion!"
It seems like a Hegelian dialectic situation. Anti-German ideas were intentionally spread through Germany by a cabal-controlled media and education system with the intention of diminishing the culture. Then the cabal propped up Hitler to say common sense stuff that resonated with normal Germans, so they hitched their wagon to him and all the evil stuff that came with the Nazis.
Have you seen this? https://archive.org/details/adolfhitlerthegreateststorynevertoldfull6hoursdocumentary_201909
I could only watch half of it but it's already so disturbing I have to stop. I thought I know also. There's other supporting evidences. I will let you know if you need other evidences.
You apparently haven't felt the disgust of how badly you've been lied to. Accepting anything you previously knew as fact and not questioning literally everything you think you knew about secular history is simply emotional attachment to some idea you can't prove. When Everything we believe is a lie rhey consider themselves to have done their job.
Don't get sand up your nose.
Of course I'm disgusted about how much we've been lied to. But I understand the difference between healthy skepticism and outright paranoia. Just because we've been lied to about so much doesn't mean everything we've been told is a lie. That type of thinking is what gives us Flat Earthers.
Everything needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case scenario. Automatically believing everything you've been told is a lie is just as lazy as believing everything you've been told is the truth.
How about accepting the fact that since so many things we’ve been told have been lie you start from square one and just assume you don’t know anything about that topic at all before even mustering the gumption to argue with anyone about it? They’ve given you links and books to read on the topic that they feel justify this seemingly outlandish view (based on what you’ve always assumed was true because you never heard anything different), have you picked up any of those books yet or do you just want to keep badgering them with “That doesn’t make any sense!” They’ve told you several times they can’t do the topic justice in a short post here but where you can read about it yourself so stop annoying everyone already and go read the damn cited material already. Jesus. That doesn’t make anyone a flat fucking earther it just makes you unwilling to do any real work for yourself. What do you want them to do, type out the whole damn book for you right here? They told you where to find it, if you’re so curious go to a damn library or follow their link and see if you can answer your own damn questions.
That is of course your choice.
I looked at the man from his Human Design body graph perspective, and compare it to his performances on camera, his book, the personal influence he had on other people, I come to view it as him being totally in synch with who he really is.
The argument you propose as being the main driver, I think is non-sequitur, and a logical fallacy. Of course, the argument is, if the MSN is advising you to take the jab, don't. But, if THAT is the only argument, such a person is just as dead as the zombies who stand in line to get jabbed.
So, that leaves us with your a priori position: NOTHING CAN GET ME NOT TO BELIEF HITLER WAS ANYTHING BUT EVIL.
Of course, it is a nice thing to have a profession of faith. I guess that particular Q-post is for you: Shocked will you be.
I am with you. I honestly think Hitler is fascinating. I think there were many respects in which he was incredibly intelligent amd obviously, a powerful speaker who knew how to command attention
But something deep inside, the same spiritual and gut feeling that tells me Q is real and much bigger than it seems, tells me in the end Hitler truly was evil.
I have no patience for skin color tribalism or the slickly produced lies that try to further those ideals (such as the Europa series)
Wtf? "Hitler flipped?!" He's still alive and what, gonna jump out and surprise us with some good guy shit now?
That's not what post 928 is about at all. Just read it.
Post 928 is about how Angela Merkel is the daughter of Hitler. She was the chancellor of Germany -or similar title - at the time of this post.
That seems to be clearly what it is about. Plus it gets into other familial connections that Q indicates is a "truth would shock the world."
Anyways, just look up a meme of Angela Merkel with a Hitler moustache, the family resemblance is uncanny.
As per Nazi references in Q posts, a culmniation of various historical rabbit trails have led me to believe that ultimately we ARE at war with the descendants and the vestiges of the Nazi occult who escaped WW2 to Antartica with superior tech, or otherwise infiltrated our institutions via things like operation paperclip. Like on the news and history books we won the war, but behind the scenes they slid into generational power like Hydra in the Marvel movies.
As big of a moutful as my previous paragraph was, that is certainly a truth that would shock the world - that the Nazis WON and they've been steering history for the last few decades.
The History channel presented an entire series "Hunting Hitler" that investigated Hitler's flight to Argentina and his eventual death at age (approx.) 75. I have a copy of the videos.
Long post to miss the mark.
Bait?
Archive of a WWII dump:
https://archive.is/D5y1W
Watch Europa the last battle. Try to debunk it. You won't.
o/
Europa will shatter your known reality but it will open your mind.
The dots in the X thread don't really connect, but the idea that AH could've been controlled by the OSS is worth exploring. Hitler may have been evil, but he also was not the person history tells us. Watch film of him meeting members of the Reichstag parliament. He's socially awkward and deferential to them. He does not exhibit the body language of an ambitious psychopath.
I've reviewed much of the evidence of Hitler's alleged escape to Argentina. I've concluded that much of the Nazi's leadership and operations were relocated there, but there's no indisputable evidence Hitler himself was there. It's possible he was, but it's also possible he was snatched by WH. The narrative that's least believable is that he died in the bunker.
At the very least, they broach a very interesting hypothesis. However, Ludendorf being a bad guy? This sounds rather biased, which they said they would not do.
So, if one is to be really unbiased, and answer the question about control. ......
The first question is WHO was controlled by whom? When considering Hitler, listen to Rudolph Hess statement at Nurnberg first:
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=ckenwBxoP4c
Why? Because he mentions behavioral changes in people after having had a certain drug. It was used by the commies to have people confess and cheer for the death sentence. He mentions that his guards and even his doctor showed these signs. Then he mentions other people who can testify as to that status in the case of Hitler AFTER 1941, when he left for England to try to limit the war.
Why is this relevant?
Body doubles, of course. If I recall correctly, there was already talk about Hitler being dead before the war. A German who worked as a merchant marine officer came to America with the goodies.
However, there were several assassination attempts after that, among which was Valkyrie. And in April of 45 the talk is about a bunker incident, where he kills himself and then is burned. The story left open ended.
Then Hitler is spotted in Bariloche and is supposed to have lived till 1975 or so.
What if he has been there since Hess went off to England? Or after the first assassination attempt?
Would that bring things under control AFTER the war?
the 11.3 thing is an interesting take but I need a tldr version of stuff like this.
maybe a whats-the-main-point post...
For those not wanting to spend 3 hours .... skip to 02:42:42 en listen to the rundown.
Just know that these guys have put this all in the context of AI. They reference a book written in 1880, thereabouts, about an building an android.
So, how do you fuck up a plan? By getting certain people to turn on their masters .... and here is where Hitler comes in.
Did he turn and if so, when? They point to certain military decisions which were kinda strange.
For instance, the projection on Operation Barbarossa was that the Germans could sustain a mobile operation for 3 months, because of the oil situation, as Germany has to produce its carburants in a different manner. The only German source of oil was Romania. Venezuela was cut off.
Add to that the ridiculous long supply lines over an almost 6000 kilometer long front.
The op was predicated on an early start. However, the Italians screwed up the Greece theater and the Germans had to step in, delaying till june. Then within 6 months the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. This was simply a bad decision or maybe a pre-emptive decision as they would provoke it in a time of their choosing as US involvement in the Asian theater was inevitable.
The Archive at Kew contains lots of discussions between British, Dutch and American representatives relating to the persecution of the War in the Asian theater.
At any rate, it is quite a new way of looking at the same topic, hence, the need to keep emotions in check.
I would add to the conversation on this topic, the role of Admiral Canaris, the head of the Abwehr.
In 1940, after Dunkirk, the question became to take Gibraltar and seal of the Med. There were plans to drive simply through Spain. The problem in Spain is, there are a lot of hills and bad roads, of there were roads at all. (See Sardegna landing 1943)
So, Canaris whispered in Franco's ear to demand a lot of humanitarian Aid from Germany in such a size, it would undermine the German economy and the persecution of the war.
Of course, when taking into account the landing of Rudolph Hess in England in order to limit the scope of the war, plus the number of peace proposals Hitler submitted to end the hostilities and even going so far as to retreat behind the Rhine and pay reparations, the question becomes whether the direction of thought these guys from the video are in, is a viable direction. I think they are on to something and worthy to think about it when researching the Word War Two topic.
All I need to know is what "they" are trying to/doing to trump and how the same "they" DID it to hitler most likely, but there was no social media or internet to do some godspeed level deboonks with receipts.