3702 > The Senate must be unrestricted to conduct 'other' important business.
If [D]s knew Senate would not vote to convict - why proceed?
How long does a typical Senate impeachment trial take?
Can the Senate conduct 'other' business during this time?
No.
What 'value' might this have for [D]s?
Barr/Durham working in secret?
Senate working openly?
'Value' of public learning the truth prior to i_unseal?
Propaganda_push failing.
Transparency & Accountability is the only way forward to save the Republic.
This is not another 4-year election.
Game theory.
3862 > https://twitter.com/Strandjunker/status/1228333628955996161📁
re: delayed testimony
1. allow for public dissemination of critical facts [possible unseal(s)-declas] prior to world televised sit down.
Sometimes the necessary forum to update the American public is provided by those same people being investigated for….
Release to change strategy?
Watch what happens next!
All the public needs to see are 3 or 4 of these scumbags in island raping kids…. Anyone who went to the island reported after that, will automatically be associated as a pedo… we almost there boyz
My guess is that the FBI isn't done watching all the tapes yet. They are using the evidence as a blackmail tool to keep themselves alive, well and in power.
I hadn't thought about that. It makes total sense. They're squeezing as much as they can out of having them. When they do lose leverage, who knows what will happen.
It’s a female - actually Rachel Chandler. She has a “modeling agency” (with her boyfriend who’s the photographer”) and all their models look like trafficked minors that have been strung out on drugs and totally abused. She seems to be in neck deep with Epstein re: procuring victims for his ‘clients.’ Look into Rachel Chandler’s mother too - she’s another nefarious character.
Rachel Chandler is the person who posted a photo (on Instagram I think) of the infamous surveillance cameras TV monitor on a larger screen (I think it may have been camera 14 that showed a woman who looked a LOT like ‘crazy Nancy’).
That surveillance camera monitor pic was in one of the Q drops and had some horrific images in it, especially a bunch of naked people sitting on buckets around a long table with what looked like a body laying on top of the table.
RedpillQ17, wasn't Rachel Chandler the very young girl who was a favorite of BHO.......we saw pictures of this child who couldn't have been over 12 or13 with him while he was president.
Oh, I think you might be referring to a little girl (something like Mattie maybe?) who’s a victim. Rachel Chandler is (allegedly) a trafficker/perpetrator.
Sorry, I thought I had read on Q years ago that she was an Obama "pet" or favorite.....and then did the same thing that was done to her after she became of age.
Ok ... I know who that is. I've only come across info using 'Rachel'. I did wonder but in this matrix, it seems we'll never learn it all or a new person emerges with the next article or video. I didn't notice the 'Nancy' character so I'll zoom in next time on camera 14. Was the long table when Marina Abramovitch served a human shaped cake to celebrities and other elites?? Some days I have to shut down and not read this stuff or I will be no good to help any normies when they see the big reveal and want to go off the deep end!
Sure thing - no prob. So I’m not sure if it was camera 14 that showed what looked like Pelosi - it was a middle camera in the rows though. The camera monitor shows a side view of a short, large chested woman wearing white shorts (if I remember right) walking down a hallway.
Re: the long table, that scene looks like a body laying on a long table and a bunch of naked people sitting on buckets (you do NOT want to know why they’re using buckets to sit on) around the table. I don’t think that particular scene on the camera monitor has anything to do with Abromovitz though.
Dripping them out this way gives people a chance to digest the evil of these people. Clinton and Andrew seem to be the like the rock stars of perverts!
And a bunch of them also saw Sounds of Freedom, so if that hasn't translated to a huge outcry by now why would some additional names beyond a former President and a Prince of England move the meter?
So if the fbi had these tapes, did they get them when they raided little st James? If they did get them then, why were they not used to bring criminal charges against any perpetrators? Or are democrats full of crap when they say no man is above the law? We know the answers.
It seems the desired outcome of this operation was blackmail, so I would expect there are many, many tapes, etc. of some very high profile people. If and when we get to see them is the question.
There were many tapes and documents at Epstein's place in NYC. Photographed evidence. The FBI came in and took it all. Nobody knows what happened to the evidence found in Epstein's safes.
Do you really think they give two fucks about what Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton did or didn't do? America's Got Talent Fantasy League just started! And it's sportsball playoff time! WOOOOOO!
I guarantee you, if there was any involvement by PDJT it would have been released long ago. Also, the military would have known too and would not have asked him to run for president.
She has recanted twice since then, essentially claiming to have been trying to get in some fame. Now, that means her claims against Branson, Clinton, and Andrew need to be tossed as well.
Obviously, one could claim the recants were due to fear of retribution. We’ll never truly know unless photos or video make an appearance.
As many here have expressed concern, I'm also thinking that by the time any footage of anything REAL gets leaked, the media will be able to brush it off as A.I. generated or modified video. A.I. generated ANYTHING is advancing SO FAST it is spooky! I just played with suno.ai yesterday. Give it a small prompt or write your own lyrics, and it will create a song in seconds with music and vocals... and some of them are actually very VERY good.
It is amazing! I tried to do a quick song, and it came out as good as any pop song these days! I think a lot of people are going to be looking for other jobs soon :)
I see she named Trump as having sex with her too. I dunno about this since it is just her saying she was told these things. I do not believe 45 would be involved.
Anyone else notice, that the unseals are increasing in severity as to what is involved......
Dec, 17 drops..
https://qanon.pub/#3717
https://qanon.pub/#3716
We are in the drip, drip, drip phase now
https://qanon.pub/#3702
Also relevant:
https://qanon.pub/#3862
Having trouble opening second two. What’s in them?
Relevant high-lights are mine
3702 > The Senate must be unrestricted to conduct 'other' important business. If [D]s knew Senate would not vote to convict - why proceed? How long does a typical Senate impeachment trial take? Can the Senate conduct 'other' business during this time? No. What 'value' might this have for [D]s? Barr/Durham working in secret? Senate working openly? 'Value' of public learning the truth prior to i_unseal? Propaganda_push failing. Transparency & Accountability is the only way forward to save the Republic. This is not another 4-year election. Game theory.
3862 > https://twitter.com/Strandjunker/status/1228333628955996161📁 re: delayed testimony 1. allow for public dissemination of critical facts [possible unseal(s)-declas] prior to world televised sit down. Sometimes the necessary forum to update the American public is provided by those same people being investigated for…. Release to change strategy? Watch what happens next!
Next? Oh boy?
All the public needs to see are 3 or 4 of these scumbags in island raping kids…. Anyone who went to the island reported after that, will automatically be associated as a pedo… we almost there boyz
Enough already do
My guess is that the FBI isn't done watching all the tapes yet. They are using the evidence as a blackmail tool to keep themselves alive, well and in power.
I hadn't thought about that. It makes total sense. They're squeezing as much as they can out of having them. When they do lose leverage, who knows what will happen.
They've seen them all by now, but they're not done because those sick fucks are now just replaying their favorites at this point.
You are correct.
hell they are probably watching them spanking the monkey
I keep waiting for Ray Chandler’s name to pop up. The “ I told you so’s” will be glorious
My bingo card has Jimmy Kimmel as the center square. ;)
Found Aaron Rodgers account!
I read it as Ray Charles and wondered what the hell I missed.
kek
😂
Do you mean Ray Epps?? The only Ray Chandler I can find is the early 1900's screen writer and novelist.
It’s a female - actually Rachel Chandler. She has a “modeling agency” (with her boyfriend who’s the photographer”) and all their models look like trafficked minors that have been strung out on drugs and totally abused. She seems to be in neck deep with Epstein re: procuring victims for his ‘clients.’ Look into Rachel Chandler’s mother too - she’s another nefarious character.
Rachel Chandler is the person who posted a photo (on Instagram I think) of the infamous surveillance cameras TV monitor on a larger screen (I think it may have been camera 14 that showed a woman who looked a LOT like ‘crazy Nancy’).
That surveillance camera monitor pic was in one of the Q drops and had some horrific images in it, especially a bunch of naked people sitting on buckets around a long table with what looked like a body laying on top of the table.
RedpillQ17, wasn't Rachel Chandler the very young girl who was a favorite of BHO.......we saw pictures of this child who couldn't have been over 12 or13 with him while he was president.
Oh, I think you might be referring to a little girl (something like Mattie maybe?) who’s a victim. Rachel Chandler is (allegedly) a trafficker/perpetrator.
Sorry, I thought I had read on Q years ago that she was an Obama "pet" or favorite.....and then did the same thing that was done to her after she became of age.
Ok ... I know who that is. I've only come across info using 'Rachel'. I did wonder but in this matrix, it seems we'll never learn it all or a new person emerges with the next article or video. I didn't notice the 'Nancy' character so I'll zoom in next time on camera 14. Was the long table when Marina Abramovitch served a human shaped cake to celebrities and other elites?? Some days I have to shut down and not read this stuff or I will be no good to help any normies when they see the big reveal and want to go off the deep end!
Thanks Fren :)
Sure thing - no prob. So I’m not sure if it was camera 14 that showed what looked like Pelosi - it was a middle camera in the rows though. The camera monitor shows a side view of a short, large chested woman wearing white shorts (if I remember right) walking down a hallway.
Re: the long table, that scene looks like a body laying on a long table and a bunch of naked people sitting on buckets (you do NOT want to know why they’re using buckets to sit on) around the table. I don’t think that particular scene on the camera monitor has anything to do with Abromovitz though.
Hope that’s helpful.
its on the way .. I'd bet!
That would be hyuge proof.
Epstein did just like Heffner tape everything for blackmail. Those bunnies are speaking up now that he’s dead.
Agree…100% that the Playboy Mansion was Epstein Island 1.0
Plus recruiting using "modeling" jobs.
Dripping them out this way gives people a chance to digest the evil of these people. Clinton and Andrew seem to be the like the rock stars of perverts!
Did you hear any huge outcry from normies over the prior release(s)?
Nope but they are hearing about it.
And a bunch of them also saw Sounds of Freedom, so if that hasn't translated to a huge outcry by now why would some additional names beyond a former President and a Prince of England move the meter?
take this with a grain of salt - the chick is saying trump was involved as well.
She could be saying that about Trump in order to get more eyes on it
She has since recanted and also claimed to another magazine that she invented the tape thing.
I bet he was involved......as a chs that got Epstein arrested the first time
I noticed that too. And this is all, so far, hearsay. But it is certainly stirring the pot.
So if the fbi had these tapes, did they get them when they raided little st James? If they did get them then, why were they not used to bring criminal charges against any perpetrators? Or are democrats full of crap when they say no man is above the law? We know the answers.
It seems the desired outcome of this operation was blackmail, so I would expect there are many, many tapes, etc. of some very high profile people. If and when we get to see them is the question.
There were many tapes and documents at Epstein's place in NYC. Photographed evidence. The FBI came in and took it all. Nobody knows what happened to the evidence found in Epstein's safes.
No evidence, only Russian disinformation, trust us!
At some point someone will probably need to be made an example of by public release in order to keep the rest in line and on board.
We won't see them. They are in Israel.
When lefties tell you these docs implicate Trump, tell them that's great, let's investigate him and everyone. You'd be forcing them to take the bait.
Do you really think they give two fucks about what Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton did or didn't do? America's Got Talent Fantasy League just started! And it's sportsball playoff time! WOOOOOO!
Ransome also implicated Trump. Do we throw out all her claims or just that one?
I guarantee you, if there was any involvement by PDJT it would have been released long ago. Also, the military would have known too and would not have asked him to run for president.
This 100%. If he was involved, that would be a major liability. Military needed someone who couldn't be blackmailed or bought.
u/#correct
Instantly compromised.
I thought we were all caught up to the fact that Trump was probably a chs that helped get Epstein arrested the first time.
She has recanted twice since then, essentially claiming to have been trying to get in some fame. Now, that means her claims against Branson, Clinton, and Andrew need to be tossed as well.
Obviously, one could claim the recants were due to fear of retribution. We’ll never truly know unless photos or video make an appearance.
As many here have expressed concern, I'm also thinking that by the time any footage of anything REAL gets leaked, the media will be able to brush it off as A.I. generated or modified video. A.I. generated ANYTHING is advancing SO FAST it is spooky! I just played with suno.ai yesterday. Give it a small prompt or write your own lyrics, and it will create a song in seconds with music and vocals... and some of them are actually very VERY good.
It is amazing! I tried to do a quick song, and it came out as good as any pop song these days! I think a lot of people are going to be looking for other jobs soon :)
The music industry probably had access to that tech for years. That explains so much.
Obama has already seeded the deepfake video excuse. Luckily video is still very hard to fake properly.
There are many more ways to analyze video then a still image.
Depends on when the tapes were recorded. Analog vs digital.
I see she named Trump as having sex with her too. I dunno about this since it is just her saying she was told these things. I do not believe 45 would be involved.
🐇🐇🐇
Anyone else find it interesting that the last name of one of the person testifying in the latest drops is Ransome? And she recanted her testimony.