The claim that we own GameStop was made from calculations done on the number of shares that are held by the public v. the total number of shares. That the Apes "own" GME is true, from the perspective of legally purchased shares, which was the explicitly stated context in which it was said.
Obviously there is still fuckery in the closing of short sales and hiding the orders in dark pool ETFs. That's really the whole point of everything that is still going on. That is implicit within everything I said.
Well, there goes that one guy's whole writeup, then.
That was just a tiny part of the first section of the write up. It has nothing to do with the primary thesis of the report.
The report linked is specifically about HOW the House has created the system where they always win. That is why it is frustrating that it was mischaracterized with a premise it didn't have.
Everything I said is still relevant and was and is correct in the context in which I said it. Worse, suggesting that the statement that "we own it" was a premise or important point misses pretty much everything I said. Stating that the report is "old DD," implying it is false or irrelevant also completely misses everything I said.
There is nothing worse than being mischaracterized. I feel like I've been attacked by Fake News. :)
People gripe about the price getting nuked, but from my perspective it just creates buying opportunities.
I'm loving seeing GME's price in the toilet because we just rolled to 2024 and now I can DRS a full $7000 at that suppressed price under a self-directed ROTH.
People gripe about the price getting nuked, but from my perspective it just creates buying opportunities
Back in April they published a hit-piece on Carl Icahn’s IEP, because he’s rumored to be a key player in the GME/BBBYQ situation. From mid $50 range to $17, and it has a $1 per quarter dividend.
Earning $4 per year on a $17 investment is too good to pass up.
I’m thinking of DRSing, but confused… On IEP investor relations website it says that Computershare is the transfer agent, but when I went to Computershare’s website IEP doesn’t come up in a search.
Careful, the enthusiasm for GME far outweighs the enthusiasm for GameStop itself. And when that happens, when those lines cross, it can get very dangerous for investors
Bitcoin cash sold but not yet purchased will cause it to skyrocket in value.. at least the ones people have the keys to.. Bitcoin's value is already too high for retail (real market) to control it.. Bitcoin Cash, on the other hand, is distributed much more evenly and the value is too low already for it to crash and stay crashed.
Not trying to be cute, dude, but, there are quite a lot of forks in that door. Bitcoin will be Bitcoin for now, but, these coins are 10 years from where the market will suddenly realize so they all compete Bitcoin
It's not about the name. Part of the takeover was the demonization of all opposing forks and the narrative that big blocks is destructive to decentralization which couldn't be further from the truth and yet to this day it is a verboten topic among bitcoiners.
If people go read the Bitcoin whitepaper today they are reading about Bitcoin Cash, not the software called BTC which has been radically altered.
No it's not. It's fundamental to the discussion because anyone adopting "Bitcoin" these days is falling victim to a fraud they don't understand thinking they are protecting their life savings but doing just the opposite because they don't know the real history of the tech.
Yes, that's what all blockchain upgrades are. Soft or hard forks. BTC and BCH are both forks of OG Bitcoin. But BCH works as originally intended by Satoshi, BTC does not.
There are a lot of conclusions here, frog, but I wouldn't mind if you dropped some bullet points with some explanations on your conclusions because this is mostly word salad.
If you go to bitcoincash.org, the paragraph under 'The History of Bitcoin Cash' makes the best point, imo. From my experience, 2016-2017 was crazy because so many random people in forums kept spamming the idea that a bunch of stuck transactions for Bitcoin was perfectly okay. The fact that the blockchain statistics showed more Bitcoin Cash being spread around than Bitcoin which was more concentrated, measuring by number of separate wallets with holdings, tells me that more people put faith in the idea of Bitcoin Cash and staying true to the original whitepaper. The dollar value discrepancy between both tells me that old money, which is purely threatened by crypto in general, would rather a crypto they have more control over (Bitcoin.. because they successfully crippled the protocol and removed original developers) to go up in value than the one that was created as a reaction to their move for control.
If you want me to write a research paper on Bitcoin Cash, no thanks.. but I still hold a bunch of different cryptos - including BTC and BCH - and BCH is the one I buy the most and hold the hardest.
People who have been buying small amounts of BTC and sending to a self custody wallet will be in for a shock when they attempt to sell at 1M and find that the fee to send to an exchange is almost half their net worth.
The bull market in bitcoin brought us a 152% increase since last year, so far. Yes, it can drop but so can the market. My husband is the MBA and he understands the market. He said he will never put money i n the stock market.
Buy one.. hold it (with your own keys and not on an exchange).. there are not enough BCH for everyone.. just like BTC.. and BTC and BCH split from the original blockchain before segwit and other protocol compromises were introduced to BTC.. So once people stop trusting ETFs, they'll move their BCH to private wallets and the price will skyrocket because of the amount of fake BCH holdings. BCH will be a useful protocol because it's not artificially crippled and it will be especially useful if our corrupt centralized banking system finally blows itself up.
21 million total BCH.. billions of people.. millions more losing faith in the existing financial system every day..
BTC is not Bitcoin. Gensler caved under pressure but the ETFs are not selling Bitcoin to the public they are selling them BTC. But since 2017, so-called "exchanges" like Coinbase has been passing BTC as "Bitcoin". You all need to do your research and understand there is a major court case starting 5 February 2024 that will expose all of this to the public.
They do the same with stonks.
GameStop?
Yes and a bunch of others. The finitial criminal Ken Griffith has 65 billion of securities sold not yet purchesed.
Well, there goes that one guy's whole writeup, then.
Claiming that "we own it" (GameStop).
The claim that we own GameStop was made from calculations done on the number of shares that are held by the public v. the total number of shares. That the Apes "own" GME is true, from the perspective of legally purchased shares, which was the explicitly stated context in which it was said.
Obviously there is still fuckery in the closing of short sales and hiding the orders in dark pool ETFs. That's really the whole point of everything that is still going on. That is implicit within everything I said.
That was just a tiny part of the first section of the write up. It has nothing to do with the primary thesis of the report.
I lived in vegas for 8 years, the house has the odds stacked. Banks, stocks all of it.
The report linked is specifically about HOW the House has created the system where they always win. That is why it is frustrating that it was mischaracterized with a premise it didn't have.
That's some old superstonk DD.
here is the complet library if anyone has a week to read it.
https://fliphtml5.com/bookcase/kosyg
A guy claiming to be the author posts here. Goes by u/Slyver. Take it up with him.
So is it real or not? Did I waste my money buying one share of GME?
I doubt it, I have 800 in computershare myself.
But you just said they're all manipulated, including GameStop.
Which means it can't go TO THE MOON!, because they'd never let it.
So why hodl?
Everything I said is still relevant and was and is correct in the context in which I said it. Worse, suggesting that the statement that "we own it" was a premise or important point misses pretty much everything I said. Stating that the report is "old DD," implying it is false or irrelevant also completely misses everything I said.
There is nothing worse than being mischaracterized. I feel like I've been attacked by Fake News. :)
Chillout have some popcorn.
Hodl.
You are good dude. Thanks for sharing it. If they can get it easier than us it's no good.
Fail to deliver.
Bitcoin section starts at 9:40
But you should watch the whole thing to understand the scam of Wall Street.
Its called BRICS.
Mmm Physical Silver 💕
This is the way
Mmmmm Physical GOLD!!!!
Silver is heavily manipulated as well...
My reaction: Grow food, stash supplies, live simply, ignore the bullshit.
And then getting taken over by migrants or mobs of hungry people
If you're not interested in politics, it doesn't matter. Politics is interested in you
People gripe about the price getting nuked, but from my perspective it just creates buying opportunities.
I'm loving seeing GME's price in the toilet because we just rolled to 2024 and now I can DRS a full $7000 at that suppressed price under a self-directed ROTH.
Back in April they published a hit-piece on Carl Icahn’s IEP, because he’s rumored to be a key player in the GME/BBBYQ situation. From mid $50 range to $17, and it has a $1 per quarter dividend.
Earning $4 per year on a $17 investment is too good to pass up.
Yeah coincidentally I'm DRS'ing some of that as well. ;)
I’m thinking of DRSing, but confused… On IEP investor relations website it says that Computershare is the transfer agent, but when I went to Computershare’s website IEP doesn’t come up in a search.
I belive you can only transfer iep shares to computershare not buy them on their web site. Contact your broker, they know were to DRS your shares.
Thanks for the heads up. I’m going to grab some IEP on Tuesday.
Careful, the enthusiasm for GME far outweighs the enthusiasm for GameStop itself. And when that happens, when those lines cross, it can get very dangerous for investors
By the way, there is no Satoshi.
Bitcoin cash sold but not yet purchased will cause it to skyrocket in value.. at least the ones people have the keys to.. Bitcoin's value is already too high for retail (real market) to control it.. Bitcoin Cash, on the other hand, is distributed much more evenly and the value is too low already for it to crash and stay crashed.
Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.
It's a fork.
Yes, it's the side of the fork that preserved the original design of Bitcoin as described in the whitepaper.
Not trying to be cute, dude, but, there are quite a lot of forks in that door. Bitcoin will be Bitcoin for now, but, these coins are 10 years from where the market will suddenly realize so they all compete Bitcoin
What does this even mean?
Right... But for all intents and purposes, when people talk about Bitcoin, they're not referring to BCH.
It's not about the name. Part of the takeover was the demonization of all opposing forks and the narrative that big blocks is destructive to decentralization which couldn't be further from the truth and yet to this day it is a verboten topic among bitcoiners.
If people go read the Bitcoin whitepaper today they are reading about Bitcoin Cash, not the software called BTC which has been radically altered.
Bud, you and I both know this, but it's moot to the conversation, and is just pedantic for no reason.
No it's not. It's fundamental to the discussion because anyone adopting "Bitcoin" these days is falling victim to a fraud they don't understand thinking they are protecting their life savings but doing just the opposite because they don't know the real history of the tech.
Yes, that's what all blockchain upgrades are. Soft or hard forks. BTC and BCH are both forks of OG Bitcoin. But BCH works as originally intended by Satoshi, BTC does not.
There are a lot of conclusions here, frog, but I wouldn't mind if you dropped some bullet points with some explanations on your conclusions because this is mostly word salad.
If you go to bitcoincash.org, the paragraph under 'The History of Bitcoin Cash' makes the best point, imo. From my experience, 2016-2017 was crazy because so many random people in forums kept spamming the idea that a bunch of stuck transactions for Bitcoin was perfectly okay. The fact that the blockchain statistics showed more Bitcoin Cash being spread around than Bitcoin which was more concentrated, measuring by number of separate wallets with holdings, tells me that more people put faith in the idea of Bitcoin Cash and staying true to the original whitepaper. The dollar value discrepancy between both tells me that old money, which is purely threatened by crypto in general, would rather a crypto they have more control over (Bitcoin.. because they successfully crippled the protocol and removed original developers) to go up in value than the one that was created as a reaction to their move for control.
If you want me to write a research paper on Bitcoin Cash, no thanks.. but I still hold a bunch of different cryptos - including BTC and BCH - and BCH is the one I buy the most and hold the hardest.
People who have been buying small amounts of BTC and sending to a self custody wallet will be in for a shock when they attempt to sell at 1M and find that the fee to send to an exchange is almost half their net worth.
So you're saying they're going to exchange the hardest asset ever created for a piece of toilet paper? Gtfo
Still get half which would show that Bitcoin outperformed the stock market by 17 million miles.
What good is it if it costs you more to use it than the thing you are buying?
The bull market in bitcoin brought us a 152% increase since last year, so far. Yes, it can drop but so can the market. My husband is the MBA and he understands the market. He said he will never put money i n the stock market.
Buy one.. hold it (with your own keys and not on an exchange).. there are not enough BCH for everyone.. just like BTC.. and BTC and BCH split from the original blockchain before segwit and other protocol compromises were introduced to BTC.. So once people stop trusting ETFs, they'll move their BCH to private wallets and the price will skyrocket because of the amount of fake BCH holdings. BCH will be a useful protocol because it's not artificially crippled and it will be especially useful if our corrupt centralized banking system finally blows itself up.
21 million total BCH.. billions of people.. millions more losing faith in the existing financial system every day..
I think I will go with the 3 coins that were made to move the money and are already ISO20022 compliant.
It's new. Give it time to build out.
the djb has a supercomputer thats so fast , im guessing that is can predict a run on stocs , im wondering where it is located?
cliffs?
LOL
BTC is not Bitcoin. Gensler caved under pressure but the ETFs are not selling Bitcoin to the public they are selling them BTC. But since 2017, so-called "exchanges" like Coinbase has been passing BTC as "Bitcoin". You all need to do your research and understand there is a major court case starting 5 February 2024 that will expose all of this to the public.
Sold for what? Not back into fiat I hope.
sold not yet purchased? hmmmm....