-
CONCLUSION: No Manipulation Detected.
-
NOTE: This doesn't mean it wasn't manipulated. It means at least with this software is was not detected.
-
I've downloaded the audio from https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/preview/mol/2024/01/23/4186753578982030593/636x382_MP4_4186753578982030593.mp4
EDIT: it appears the video link no longer works. Another link would have to be used for those that would like to test.
- I am using an audio authenticator forensics software from: https://github.com/Gabriel-Desharnais/audio-forensic-authentication
- This software does tampering detection: Digital audio tampering detection can be used to verify the authenticity of digital audio.
- I then ran this though the software and it did not detect anything noticeably altered.
Good to know, thanks for the effort!
No problem
He resigned didn’t he? Seems to authenticate it.
now we need to find out who it was that put this little monkey man up to doing this.......who are these powerful people...anons wanna know.....
I'm sure white hats know exactly who it was. All of the data is theirs.
He mentioned “the donor class”.
Russia Russia Russia? (((((sarcasm)))))
There was a discussion about this being in support of Ron Desanctus. Ken Griffin with Citadel Capital was Ron's main financial benefactor. Maybe he is one of the guys back East?
the donor class all has names........
Thank God she recorded it!
OP = Rock Star Patriot
Awesome awesome awesome autistics
Super-Nova Updoot
That guy was slimy.
Bigly
That clip doesn't appear to have audio to it anymore.
I wonder what happened?
found it here though : https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1749893378165391480
Disappointed to hear that she casually flings F-bombs; such a sign of low class! But was encouraged by her stand for what is right (unless this whole thing was staged).
I do too in private. I'm not perfect but thankfully The Lord loves me anyway.🙏❤️
It would be interesting if there was a linguist in this community that could analyze the speech patterns in this conversation. This would be the analysis of not what they said, but how they said it and the emotions behind the conversation.
I think most people can conclude that at points in the conversation Kari was confident, angry, irritated, dismissive, etc.. She didn’t hang up on Jeff, so there must be a longer relationship that she was keeping.
Jeff came across as pensive, scared, nervous, etc.. He was not speaking for him self, this wasn’t a conversation he wanted to have, and he may have even been concerned for himself and Kari. There is a lot more behind the insistence of his pushy sales pitch to Kari. I have been in conversations like this. The person delivering the message doesn’t own the message. Those are uncomfortable conversations. You have to wonder if he was instructed by a superior to not take “no” for an answer.
I am not defending Jeff in any way. One or both of these people knew the conversation was being recorded. Example: When Kari started throwing out numbers, she started with numbers that were high but not Crazy, then she jumped to $1 Billion, (way out of the bounds of a $ figure a political candidate would be paid to pause for 2 years). That was smart, at some point she knew others would be listening.
I believe there are AI based analytical tools which can do this but I don't know of anything specific.
You did a good analysis of it yourself! 👏🏻
Thanks!
Audio is still available here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/who-is-jeff-dewit-kari-lake-bribery-audio-recording-goes-viral-leaves-internet-baffled/ar-BB1haw2i
Dewit has apparently resigned.
Who recorded this
Arizona is the domino that will fall.
And the Dewit resignation.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5toT2yB/arizona-republican-chair-jeff-de/c/
Hey anon is this readily available software or is this because you are in a tech niche? I’m curious because with deep fakes and the world we live in this is a super handy tool you have.
Yeah, but he used it. Some SW is surprisingly durable.
This is available for anyone, link is in the description. :)
Now I am waiting for someone to sue her for not disclosing she was recording!
Arizona is a one-party consent state. As long as you consent, you can record the call.
Publishing the contents might be another matter, but she can't be sued for the original recording.
The coutersuit for inducement to bribery would be fun!
Think of all the people "back East" who wanted to pay her off being called to the witness stand.
LOL
People back East make me think of Rich Men north of Richmond
I was thinking that may be what took her so long to release the recording. Some states have laws that say as long as one of the parties knows they were being recorded, it's OK.
Edit: After I posted this, I saw ProudOfAmerica's comment on Arizona being a one-party consent state.
Big Mike & Barry invite Mr. DeWit to a Pool Party on 27Jan2024.
Who could doubt Kari??
So what's the difference between tempering and tampering?
One of them makes metal harder by heat-treating it, the other is tampering.
u/#catdance
One letter.
u/#catdance
Just a spelling mistake
kek. We know - just having a little fun. BTW - good analysis.
Cool. Yep just doing my part. Sometimes I get flack for it, sometimes I don't. Sadly it generally comes down to the conclusion. If it goes with our general bias, I get upvoted, if it goes against our collective bias, I usually get downvoted. Regardless, I will continue to push the truth even if it doesn't fit what we think is happening.