Agree. But they are doing the give give take method.
They give info. Then they ask you to do something. Example: Vote RFK.
How is this guy finding audience to talk about RFK? Through videos about Stocks and corruption. They want to steal Trump votes from every avenue possible.
I'm going to try to offer a friendlier (and probably less certain critique of RFK Jr.).
I greatly appreciate his crusade to educate the citizenry of the dangers of modern vaccines, especially the C19 jab. Whether that's "part of the plan" or whether that's due to his own vaccine-induced injury, I won't pretend to know.
RJK Jr. has some extremely left-wing positions on climate change and the 2nd Amendment, the latter of which is a deal breaker for me all on its own. It's notable that he's not talking about his gun and climate positions at all when campaigning.
As to whether he's a genuine blackhat, I'll again say that I won't pretend to know. He might be someone that's on the outside looking in, believes that DJT will be wrongly imprisoned before the election and sees an opportunity to swoop in and capture the presidency. Or he could be an asset trying to weaken DJT. I don't know.
If we get to October and DJT has not been incarcerated, it is my hope that RFK Jr. would gracefully bow out of the race for the sake of the country. I'd like to believe he's just a well-meaning man that's being driven by a sense of service at best, or a sense of vanity at worst. If he stays in the race to election day, my opinion of him will change substantially.
I also don't know who he hurts more. Some polls say it's DJT, others say it's President Mashed Potato Brains that would be hurt more. Anecdotally, I don't know many liberals these days that I would bother to say "hello" to, let alone have a political discussion with them.
I definitely would not agree that RFK voters are "The dumbest people of them all" as I view them the same way I viewed the Bernie voters back in 2016. I'm nauseated by many of the positions those two candidates hold, but I have to give their constituents credit in that at least these are people that recognize something is deeply wrong with Washington D.C.
This is vindication for me. I've been trying to tell people who like this guy that he's just regurgitating old DD from Superstonk for his market analysis and anon research from over the years for everything else. He never says ANYTHING NEW, HE JUST STEALS.
Folks, I cannot emphasize this enough: If they show their face while telling OLD INFORMATION, they are building a B R A N D. They're grifters riding off the coattails of others, passing off the hard work of other researchers as if they found it themselves. Instead of putting the information front and center, he throws himself into the spotlight (like many others) to make it seem like HE'S THE VOICE OF REASON. IT'S ALL BRANDING.
"Be careful who you follow." - Q
Not all who do it are grifters, but I would not be shocked if this dude has merch or something in mind he wants to bring up soon.
EDIT: ANOTHER HUGE RED FLAG: HE NEVER GIVES SOURCES! That is always a HUGE deal to me, and how I know he's just stealing others research (even though I've heard it and read it all years before he started trying to pass it off as his own). If he gave sources, he'd just be linking to the research he's regurgitating and would easily be called out for it.
Because he likes RFK JR he is deepstate? This is getting pathetic. Where is the evidence RFK is deep state. This is actual cult like behavior that the left does.
Where did I say that? I'm saying he's a grifter, IDGAF if he's deepstate or not. You're completely ignoring my argument, I'm saying he does nothing but steal others work and pass it off as his own WITHOUT PROVIDING SOURCES.
That's not providing a linkable source. Imagine trying to pass off a thesis paper with screenshots but no work cited page, that's what he does. He just points to stuff on the camera, usually because he's pointing at screenshots of stolen work. If he actually wanted people to look more into this stuff himself, he'd link to his sources. He doesn't want that though, he wants people looking at him and him alone, aka, branding himself. Every single time I see one of his videos posted here or on superstonk, it's always the same.
Actually he always gives sources, and tells his viewers to check his sources for themselves. If you think people on tiktok are posting walls of text for all their sources like wiki, than you really have nfi.
He has been redpilling on a wide range of Great Awakening related subjects long before he made anything about GME. He does it in an easily digestible engaging format, and is redpilling millions of normies.
Some of the subjects he makes videos on inlcude: Pizzagate, Boeing whistleblower deaths, Epstein, Israel, Covid lies, Diddy lawsuit (pedo shaming), Blackrock etc etc.
He isnt declaring that he finds all the info himself, quite the opposite actually. He posted on Superstonk asking for crowd-sourcing information to create more videos and get the message out to a wider audience.
Heres a post he made which gives you more insight. He hates grifters/paytriots.
I agree with you on all of this- and I watched those grifts and learned- when I built my platform, I intentionally built it away from the GME community until it was successful and stood alone. Because if you’re relying on the GME community for your interaction and monetization- you are inherently grifting.
Instead- I was lucky enough to succeed at building a platform that is now self sustaining, and so now I’ve started making GME videos- because now I can GME pill one million regular people on TikTok that would have never heard of it otherwise- and apes can enjoy the content without me needing anything from them. not even the views or attention. I just make videos I believe in and want to make now. The brand is already built.
That’s the critical difference between my business model and, for example, gherk’s business model.
Still not seeing any direct sourcing of anything. "Go look it up yourself" is one thing, linking to it so people can discern exactly what he sees is what I'm asking for. Idk why this is so hard for people to understand.
So you disprove me saying he's a grifter by saying his grift is different since he owns up to it? And again, he doesn't hide that he just uses other people's research, and if that's the case, why doesn't he ever link to any of it in the comments or anything? Why is that so hard? If you ever try and prove anything, the first thing people want is sourcing, why am I the bad guy for calling him out for not doing that while he gleefully steals research that has the decency to source everything in the very research he steals. If he wants people to be GME pilled or red pilled on other topics, wouldn't it logically make sense to want to POINT PEOPLE IN THE DIRECTION OF MORE INFORMATION THEY CAN EXPAND THEIR KNOWLEDGE WITH? Why does he only want people listening to him? BECAUSE he wants all eyes on him! Whether he does anything nefarious with it or not is one thing, I'm just sick of the dishonest grifters stealing the limelight, acting like they do all this work, and NEVER POINTING PEOPLE IN THE DIRECTION OF MORE INFORMATION.
As for the vindication comment, I get that it's weird, I just get in arguments over this guy irl all the time trying to point this very thing out that he never sources anything and he's just trying to pass off others info as his own.
He shows his sources period. But ok you think he should make wiki citation style walls of text for all his tiktok videos. You could always contact him and tell him this.
I just hope he keeps spreading eye opening redpill videos full of crowd-sourced information to millions of normies. Or "stealing peoples research" as you call it.
And you seriously get in arguments with people irl about where he sTeALs his facts from!? You do that instead of being glad they are waking up, and pointing them in the direction of more (sToLeN) info to help them open their eyes? Thats not something to be proud of.
He shows his sources period. But ok you think he should make walls of text out of those sources for all his tiktok videos. You could always contact him and tell him this.
All I'm asking for is the link back to the superstonk DD, the Q research, news article, website, or the Twitter thread he got his info from. It would literally be one link to the already written and completed research that already has that source inside of it. This strawman about a wall of text doesn't negate my point at all.
And I agree he's doing a service by spreading the word, but he would be doing an even greater service by pointing people in a direction where they can do their own research by seeing THE ORIGINAL STUFF. By not linking back to it and trying to pass it off as his own, he does everyone a disservice.
The people I argue with about him irl are already awake. Again, from my previous comment:
I just get in arguments over this guy irl all the time trying to point this very thing out that he never sources anything and he's just trying to pass off other's info as his own.
The debate I'm having with you right now is the exact same debate I have with the already awake irl. He's doing both the researchers and the viewers a disservice by not linking back to the original and letting people see more for themselves.
I haven't backpedaled at all, he's literally a grifter branding himself with other people's work. If he linked to the original source with all the other DD people could be reading on top of what he covers, I wouldn't have a problem with him. He passes it off as his own while branding himself. IDK how many times I have to say that.
I get your point. It's true, making sources easy to link into is good. His content and commentary has value. Citing others work isn't stealing. Referring back to others work and content is part of the work, no?
Yes, which is why I'm asking why he doesn't do that. I enjoyed his content at first, even though I've known all he's doing is regurgitating others'work since I've literally heard the research he brings up already. Over time, though, I've grown weary of people like him who don't link to any sources whatsoever and pass it off as their own. If he didn't put his face and name front and center, I wouldn't have a problem with him. But by doing it, he's just branding himself. As Q said, anons do this work for free.
Brother, Q literally said anons do this work for free. I've been a part of this train waking people up around me and online for 10 years now, before Q even started. Sorry I don't have a tangible grift I can point to that'll satiate you. You're really fired up all because I pointed out someone is doing people a disservice, take a look in the mirror.
How about instead of letting anyone tell you what to think, or relying on anyone to come to the same conclusions, instead take in all information, prayerfully work to discern the truth, and figure out your own plan of action.
Ian could say he’s voting for Emperor Palpatine. What does that matter if his information is good and checks out?
Nah the “evidence” presented in this post isn’t valid. So cause the guy supports RFK he is automatically deepstate? Jesus this site is becoming the same version of leftists thinking everyone who opposes Biden is a Russian agent.
Can you actually explain why RFK would go on JRE, Theo Von and Andrew Schultz’s podcasts and be allowed to talk about vaccines, blackrock, vanguard and the CIA/FBI killing his family?
Ian has been clear that he is basically anti-corporate and anti-capitalist. He has some good points and does an entertaining show, but he is not in line with my beliefs. I don't have to agree with his views, I just hope he is helping to wake people up to the BS that is going on. People make up their own minds about what they think of capitalism and communism, he isn't going to change that for most people. Most of us have views and beliefs that are in common, but I am fairly certain none of us agree with everything that we all believe. You don't need 100% consensus on everything, just the really big and important things. The difference between good and evil is pretty much the deal breaker. Everything else can be discussed and debated calmly and intelligently.
The issue of economic systems is extremely divisive in discussions. Everyone has their own beliefs. Most don't agree on the details. Capitalism without checks and balances is as bad as communism and socialism. Ultimately, all the wealth is monopolized in each system by a few. Balancing the different systems is the most effective way to prevent the systems from turning into a shitshow. We have a balance, but it is being unbalanced and this will lead to failure. Finding the right balance is difficult and will probably always be adjusted a bit here and there to get the best outcome.
We've never had capitalism. we dont need a labelled society. We need individual liberties and honest money. We need to stop protecting criminals and large government dependency. And secret societies infiltrating key positions to aid other members through Oaths.
Did the mod willingly get the jab? And like to use retarded passive aggressive ways of censoring himself like writing "phuck" instead of just writing "fuck"?
It would be nice, but in reality we are dealing with millions of brianwashed sheep that would immediately shutdown and ignore all the other repills if he took such a direct approach.
Well… It’s still a free country, and I don’t think Ian Carol needs your permission on who he wants to vote for. I thought Voting was a personal choice, not for you to decide for him.🤷♀️
People can still do some good digging for truth even if they're not voting for Trump.
Why somebody WOULDN'T vote for Trump despite digging into what's going on IS a worthy inquiry though.
Sometimes the programing is too deep. RFK Jr. much better than Dems.
Exactly many of our fellow anons are reading into this way too hard
Splitting the vote has long been their tactic...........Boomerang Bitches
Agree. But they are doing the give give take method.
They give info. Then they ask you to do something. Example: Vote RFK.
How is this guy finding audience to talk about RFK? Through videos about Stocks and corruption. They want to steal Trump votes from every avenue possible.
What is your evidence RFK is a blackhat? Please tell me. I actually think RFK is taking a lot of Biden votes based on real life experience.
Dude Biden doesnt have voters. If RFK was a true patriot he would understand what Trump is doing and just support him and help unite the country.
Read Judges In The Bible.
Look at RFK jr's past. Not gonna make it.
What in his past is so concerning please educate me.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna22024587
WATCH VIDEO HERE: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/flashback-rfk-jr-endorsed-hillary-clinton-multiple-times-praised-her-character
ban on fossil fuel extracting. Supported democrats only over years. Not supporting trump.
Just do your own research. He called for anybody who doesnt believe in Climate change to be thrown in jail.
The guy is a nut job loser. NGMI
He said nothing that Trump hasnt said and more.
RFK voters are THE DUMBEST PEOPLE OF THEM ALL
Then how do you explain his criticism of the covid vaccines that were instrumental to the 16 year plan?
So the only time Ian Carroll mentions RFK seems to be in relation to his anti vax statements.
I dont see any evidence at all of him swaying people to vote RFK.
This is just the same as the 'Elon bad' mindless statements, which many engaged in here not that long ago.
I'm going to try to offer a friendlier (and probably less certain critique of RFK Jr.).
I greatly appreciate his crusade to educate the citizenry of the dangers of modern vaccines, especially the C19 jab. Whether that's "part of the plan" or whether that's due to his own vaccine-induced injury, I won't pretend to know.
RJK Jr. has some extremely left-wing positions on climate change and the 2nd Amendment, the latter of which is a deal breaker for me all on its own. It's notable that he's not talking about his gun and climate positions at all when campaigning.
As to whether he's a genuine blackhat, I'll again say that I won't pretend to know. He might be someone that's on the outside looking in, believes that DJT will be wrongly imprisoned before the election and sees an opportunity to swoop in and capture the presidency. Or he could be an asset trying to weaken DJT. I don't know.
If we get to October and DJT has not been incarcerated, it is my hope that RFK Jr. would gracefully bow out of the race for the sake of the country. I'd like to believe he's just a well-meaning man that's being driven by a sense of service at best, or a sense of vanity at worst. If he stays in the race to election day, my opinion of him will change substantially.
I also don't know who he hurts more. Some polls say it's DJT, others say it's President Mashed Potato Brains that would be hurt more. Anecdotally, I don't know many liberals these days that I would bother to say "hello" to, let alone have a political discussion with them.
I definitely would not agree that RFK voters are "The dumbest people of them all" as I view them the same way I viewed the Bernie voters back in 2016. I'm nauseated by many of the positions those two candidates hold, but I have to give their constituents credit in that at least these are people that recognize something is deeply wrong with Washington D.C.
Where did he ask for anyone to vote RFK? He just said how he was voting, from what I read.
which to followers is an implied endorsement.
EDIT 2: https://cancelthisclothingcompany.com/shop/ This is literally Ian's Tshirt shop, the same branding as his YouTube channel that can be found all linked in his Twitter Bio. GRADE A GRIFTER, CONFIRMED. Archive.org snapshot
This is vindication for me. I've been trying to tell people who like this guy that he's just regurgitating old DD from Superstonk for his market analysis and anon research from over the years for everything else. He never says ANYTHING NEW, HE JUST STEALS.
Folks, I cannot emphasize this enough: If they show their face while telling OLD INFORMATION, they are building a B R A N D. They're grifters riding off the coattails of others, passing off the hard work of other researchers as if they found it themselves. Instead of putting the information front and center, he throws himself into the spotlight (like many others) to make it seem like HE'S THE VOICE OF REASON. IT'S ALL BRANDING.
"Be careful who you follow." - Q
Not all who do it are grifters, but I would not be shocked if this dude has merch or something in mind he wants to bring up soon.
EDIT: ANOTHER HUGE RED FLAG: HE NEVER GIVES SOURCES! That is always a HUGE deal to me, and how I know he's just stealing others research (even though I've heard it and read it all years before he started trying to pass it off as his own). If he gave sources, he'd just be linking to the research he's regurgitating and would easily be called out for it.
Because he likes RFK JR he is deepstate? This is getting pathetic. Where is the evidence RFK is deep state. This is actual cult like behavior that the left does.
Where did I say that? I'm saying he's a grifter, IDGAF if he's deepstate or not. You're completely ignoring my argument, I'm saying he does nothing but steal others work and pass it off as his own WITHOUT PROVIDING SOURCES.
I have watched plenty of his tik toks. He has the evidence in the background lmao.
That's not providing a linkable source. Imagine trying to pass off a thesis paper with screenshots but no work cited page, that's what he does. He just points to stuff on the camera, usually because he's pointing at screenshots of stolen work. If he actually wanted people to look more into this stuff himself, he'd link to his sources. He doesn't want that though, he wants people looking at him and him alone, aka, branding himself. Every single time I see one of his videos posted here or on superstonk, it's always the same.
Social media isn’t a PHD thesis paper Jesus Christ do you understand how tik tok works?
Yes, it has a description section and a comment section where you can post your sources.
Obvious moving of goalposts for your ridiculous "never gives sources" statement.
And so what? He puts the studies he sites in a screen shot in the background of his videos. Plenty of other truth tellers do the same thing.
If he was disinfo he is pretty bad at it. Sorry brother but I just think you are doing puritan stuff and we can agree to disagree.
I don’t think Ian Carroll is deep state until I get actual evidence he and/or RFK JR are.
I cant believe this got downvotes. Smh.
And further case in point, look at the reaction from myself and others to his TikTok ban argument. The moment he has to make his own case for something (since there was no research he could steal), he shows he knows absolutely nothing.
Was that meant for someone else, cause that makes absolutely no sense when discussing the argument at hand.
Yes it was my bad deleted it
Yep. Its irritating.
Not deep state just the , Enemy of my Enemy , a Truth Lover.
Like Kushner , JFK has reason to hate EVIL.
🦍🚀
Actually he always gives sources, and tells his viewers to check his sources for themselves. If you think people on tiktok are posting walls of text for all their sources like wiki, than you really have nfi.
Like this video: https://x.com/Cancelcloco/status/1760478419652055127
Or this video where he gives a masterclass on how MSM used their own sources to debunk pizzagate: https://x.com/Cancelcloco/status/1742672942318919682
He has been redpilling on a wide range of Great Awakening related subjects long before he made anything about GME. He does it in an easily digestible engaging format, and is redpilling millions of normies.
Some of the subjects he makes videos on inlcude: Pizzagate, Boeing whistleblower deaths, Epstein, Israel, Covid lies, Diddy lawsuit (pedo shaming), Blackrock etc etc.
He isnt declaring that he finds all the info himself, quite the opposite actually. He posted on Superstonk asking for crowd-sourcing information to create more videos and get the message out to a wider audience.
Heres a post he made which gives you more insight. He hates grifters/paytriots.
And using words like "this is vindication for me" tells me this is somehow personal for you...which is weird.
Still not seeing any direct sourcing of anything. "Go look it up yourself" is one thing, linking to it so people can discern exactly what he sees is what I'm asking for. Idk why this is so hard for people to understand.
So you disprove me saying he's a grifter by saying his grift is different since he owns up to it? And again, he doesn't hide that he just uses other people's research, and if that's the case, why doesn't he ever link to any of it in the comments or anything? Why is that so hard? If you ever try and prove anything, the first thing people want is sourcing, why am I the bad guy for calling him out for not doing that while he gleefully steals research that has the decency to source everything in the very research he steals. If he wants people to be GME pilled or red pilled on other topics, wouldn't it logically make sense to want to POINT PEOPLE IN THE DIRECTION OF MORE INFORMATION THEY CAN EXPAND THEIR KNOWLEDGE WITH? Why does he only want people listening to him? BECAUSE he wants all eyes on him! Whether he does anything nefarious with it or not is one thing, I'm just sick of the dishonest grifters stealing the limelight, acting like they do all this work, and NEVER POINTING PEOPLE IN THE DIRECTION OF MORE INFORMATION.
As for the vindication comment, I get that it's weird, I just get in arguments over this guy irl all the time trying to point this very thing out that he never sources anything and he's just trying to pass off others info as his own.
He shows his sources period. But ok you think he should make wiki citation style walls of text for all his tiktok videos. You could always contact him and tell him this.
I just hope he keeps spreading eye opening redpill videos full of crowd-sourced information to millions of normies. Or "stealing peoples research" as you call it.
And you seriously get in arguments with people irl about where he sTeALs his facts from!? You do that instead of being glad they are waking up, and pointing them in the direction of more (sToLeN) info to help them open their eyes? Thats not something to be proud of.
All I'm asking for is the link back to the superstonk DD, the Q research, news article, website, or the Twitter thread he got his info from. It would literally be one link to the already written and completed research that already has that source inside of it. This strawman about a wall of text doesn't negate my point at all.
And I agree he's doing a service by spreading the word, but he would be doing an even greater service by pointing people in a direction where they can do their own research by seeing THE ORIGINAL STUFF. By not linking back to it and trying to pass it off as his own, he does everyone a disservice.
The people I argue with about him irl are already awake. Again, from my previous comment:
The debate I'm having with you right now is the exact same debate I have with the already awake irl. He's doing both the researchers and the viewers a disservice by not linking back to the original and letting people see more for themselves.
He doesnt try to pass off crowd-sourced info as his own. He shows his sources in the videos. He is not a grifter.
Youre just back-peddling from "He is a grifter" to "But he doesnt present his sources in an easily clickable format".
You should probably listen to your friends that seem to understand the concept of crowd-sourced information better than you.
I haven't backpedaled at all, he's literally a grifter branding himself with other people's work. If he linked to the original source with all the other DD people could be reading on top of what he covers, I wouldn't have a problem with him. He passes it off as his own while branding himself. IDK how many times I have to say that.
"hE WilL pRoBaBlY sTaRt sElLiNg mErCh" fucking lol on that one. If he tries to sell anything, then yes hes a grifter. But (spoiler alert) he wont.
I get your point. It's true, making sources easy to link into is good. His content and commentary has value. Citing others work isn't stealing. Referring back to others work and content is part of the work, no?
Yes, which is why I'm asking why he doesn't do that. I enjoyed his content at first, even though I've known all he's doing is regurgitating others'work since I've literally heard the research he brings up already. Over time, though, I've grown weary of people like him who don't link to any sources whatsoever and pass it off as their own. If he didn't put his face and name front and center, I wouldn't have a problem with him. But by doing it, he's just branding himself. As Q said, anons do this work for free.
He puts way more effort then you have or ever will into truth telling
Brother, Q literally said anons do this work for free. I've been a part of this train waking people up around me and online for 10 years now, before Q even started. Sorry I don't have a tangible grift I can point to that'll satiate you. You're really fired up all because I pointed out someone is doing people a disservice, take a look in the mirror.
100% agree with you for all the reasons you’ve stated. I thought these videos looked sus from the moment they started going viral.
This guy is waking up my libshit family to jizzrael, there are many angles to this that go way beyond what you can understand.
Anyone who wakes up my libshits to jews is based in my book, and RFK is based about vaccines.
This shit is so deep and complex and let's be real, we need all the help we can get.
Dont be gatekeeping redpillers ya boom boomers
Exactly. People on this site are being no different than woke leftists keeping puritan views.
Exactly this.
Reminds me of all the Elon hate from the same types a few months ago.
👆
Link:
https://twitter.com/Cancelcloco/status/1761552453064139252
Here’s a wild idea:
How about instead of letting anyone tell you what to think, or relying on anyone to come to the same conclusions, instead take in all information, prayerfully work to discern the truth, and figure out your own plan of action.
Ian could say he’s voting for Emperor Palpatine. What does that matter if his information is good and checks out?
epic! :)
Make these bastards REPENT!
Nah the “evidence” presented in this post isn’t valid. So cause the guy supports RFK he is automatically deepstate? Jesus this site is becoming the same version of leftists thinking everyone who opposes Biden is a Russian agent.
He said he wouldnt vote trump lol. He said in the SAME SENTENCE "the same as biden... then further down, how many children bombed is too many?"
Hes saying Trump AND biden are bombing children I Guess?
I am not jumping the gun on the evidence. The evidence is being presented. Let those with eyes see. And those with ears Listen.
That is not at all what hes saying. Not even close.
But he doesn’t really support RFK Jr. He’s just trying to influence people to vote for him instead of Trump. He’s an influencer psyop.
This mention of RFK was on a video he made about covid lies.
He is NOT telling people to vote RFK in any way shape or form.
Says who? Give me evidence?
It’s called discernment
Can you actually explain why RFK would go on JRE, Theo Von and Andrew Schultz’s podcasts and be allowed to talk about vaccines, blackrock, vanguard and the CIA/FBI killing his family?
1st-I’m not talking about RFK Jr. I’m talking about Ian Carroll
2nd-Your hard defense of Carroll is a little suspich.
Give me hard evidence
Ian has been clear that he is basically anti-corporate and anti-capitalist. He has some good points and does an entertaining show, but he is not in line with my beliefs. I don't have to agree with his views, I just hope he is helping to wake people up to the BS that is going on. People make up their own minds about what they think of capitalism and communism, he isn't going to change that for most people. Most of us have views and beliefs that are in common, but I am fairly certain none of us agree with everything that we all believe. You don't need 100% consensus on everything, just the really big and important things. The difference between good and evil is pretty much the deal breaker. Everything else can be discussed and debated calmly and intelligently.
What is anti capitalist? What are all these labels. He knows better.
The issue of economic systems is extremely divisive in discussions. Everyone has their own beliefs. Most don't agree on the details. Capitalism without checks and balances is as bad as communism and socialism. Ultimately, all the wealth is monopolized in each system by a few. Balancing the different systems is the most effective way to prevent the systems from turning into a shitshow. We have a balance, but it is being unbalanced and this will lead to failure. Finding the right balance is difficult and will probably always be adjusted a bit here and there to get the best outcome.
We've never had capitalism. we dont need a labelled society. We need individual liberties and honest money. We need to stop protecting criminals and large government dependency. And secret societies infiltrating key positions to aid other members through Oaths.
LO fucking L
@prolotario1 the Fed, ya “careful who you follow” 😂
I cant see the prolotario comments.
So is the prolotario glow-fag account saying to be careful of Ian Carroll?
Because If so, that should be all any anon needs to see whats really going on here.
lol exactly. What happened to this place? Lots of glow fags on here clearly. This was stickied 😂😂 what a farce
**I'll probably get a day or 2 ban again for calling faggot feds, faggots, but feds are faggots, sorry
You got banned for calling faggot Feds out?
Did the mod willingly get the jab? And like to use retarded passive aggressive ways of censoring himself like writing "phuck" instead of just writing "fuck"?
This is fucking dumb sorry. Just because someone supports RFK doesn’t mean they are deep state. He does really good breakdowns.
Unless you have actual evidence RFK is a black hat which I don’t believe.
this seems like a positive for us. an intentional one.
opinions by trump voters are often disregarded by the left, so this post has a chance of persuading people that trump voter's could not.
Or stop beating around the bush and just educate your audience about Trump and the plan. Provide calm and direct info as to not cause panic.
there are thousands and thousands doing just that. we wouldnt be nearly as effective if everyone took the exact same approach
That an extremely simple minded view.
It would be nice, but in reality we are dealing with millions of brianwashed sheep that would immediately shutdown and ignore all the other repills if he took such a direct approach.
Well… It’s still a free country, and I don’t think Ian Carol needs your permission on who he wants to vote for. I thought Voting was a personal choice, not for you to decide for him.🤷♀️
The shills have been out in force, lately. Has deportation been being neglected?
Not on GAW. But PDW is lost!
I literally had no idea who he was until this moment
Whether you like/agree/don’t/won’t what ever this says, smoke around Kennedy is getting pretty thick. Coincidences.