Trump guilty on all accounts
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
Welp there it is
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (284)
sorted by:
Meh, this is not a shock. I figure by the end of next week or two weeks, it will be all reversed. Now watch how high his popularity goes
They will appeal and it will probably be pushed until after the election that Trump wins in a landslide ! LFG !
He can be put in prison until his appeal comes through... that is the issue.
No worries - he doesn’t have to campaign now…
Let's pretend you're a transgendered fag. Let's pretend the US military launches a coup d'etat. Are you (as a retarded fag suffering from severe TDS) more likely to "fight the power" if Trump is in prison?
Ew, why do I have to pretend to be a transgendered fag for? You could have just said blue hair liberal..
u/#bullshit
kinda surprised that pissant judge didn't take him into custody pending sentencing. I don't put anything past those marxist dems.
If he thought he could get away with it, he would.
FEMA camps for the rest of America ?
NO. IT takes months. Many months.
I guess i could, and may very well take a long time. I tell you the one thing that changed now. Precedent is a mother fucker :)
Yes Biden, Obama, Clintons, Bush etc all have a lot of legal protections because of their former positions. When they stripped Trump of them, they also stripped themselves.
And they REALLY are that stupid.....
That’s right. Can’t wait, military is the only way.
Yes, but this only works if Trump goes away to prison. Otherwise, if it all gets reversed, then the same can be expected for Biden, Obama’s, Bush’s, Cheney’s, etc., plus the left would loose their shit and claim he’s a dictator. Kinda how we’re saying the DOJ is weaponized against Trump.
Another, aspect of this... if and when this all comes down on their heads. It won’t be televised as much as we want to see prosecutions in the public sphere, especially at GITMO. It can’t, it’ll be conducted behind closed doors and we will never be informed of the outcomes. We can’t be witnesses, because a portion of the population will only ever look at our side as being dictators if it’s televised.
So, in the end expect a lot of “no name” and Bush Sr. type funerals.
Almost like there's a Plan...
This is true in theory...however, if you think anyone is going after the left the way they have gone after Trump, you have go to be smoking something really good! Never happen because our side are...for lack of a better term...PUSSIES!
Precedent only becomes precedent, once there is follow up/subsequent action. Until there’s corresponding action, calling it precedent before it actually is, is not accurate/guarantee.
Yes, but if you precede the precedent before it becomes a precedent, does this mean Trump preceded the precedent by being a president?? (Humor, the best medicine...)
Exactly. Look at all these times that we've claimed a precedent was set:
1.Trump's first impeachment
2.Trump's second impeachment
3.The fraud trial with Letitia James
5.The presidential immunity ruling
When Trump was arrested
All the times Trump was indicted
The Supreme Court rejecting his request to prevent his tax returns from being investigated
Every time he was subpoenaed to testify for various committees
Having search warrants for his home
All of those examples are just what I found after doing a search here for "precedent" and scrolling through the results. I'm sure there are plenty more that I'm missing.
But where have any of these events been used as a precedent against anyone else?
Has Biden been impeached? Then impeached again? Has he or any of the other former presidents gone on trial for fraud or felonies? Have any of them been arrested for anything? Found guilty in a court of law? Been indicted for anything?
But any time Trump has some sort of legal problem happen, everyone starts up with the "It sets a precedent!" stuff.
It's obviously so politically motived. Stormy Daniels isn't even that hot. I can't believe any sane jury would think that President Trump would waste time with her.
is it an interesting that NYC is 87% blue, and that the lawyers for 45, are supposed to vet the jurors as well as the other side, and when they agree a juror is selected, according to MSNBC. A great amount of jurors were getting their news from the New York Post and MSNBC, kind of makes you think how these people got on the jury, was there not a Q quote, the first arrest will be the one that makes the dominoes fall over or something like that?
We are at the end of the trial. So the arrest happened long ago.
There was no peep walk in handcuffs, but when Trump turned himself in that is an arrest. So he's been arrested 4 times already.
Don’t care- still voting Trump
Is there an echo in here? We get it, paraphrasing is not allowed.
Where did this quote originate? Does anyone know?
This must be the most misquoted statement in recent history.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here.
Are you talking about the civil fraud case from earlier this year?
You seem to think it odd that a place where 87% of the population is liberal would have a jury full of liberals. Do you think liberals should have been banned from being on the jury somehow?
It's not getting overturned.
Scotus probably won't even hear it.
He'll still win but that's a very tenuous situation about to pop off
Curious why you think it won't get overturned? Seems to be substantial reversible error. Seems to be the consensus view on both sides of the aisle. It seems that Ramos v. Louisiana indicates that the jury instructions were errant.
It absolutely should get overturned. Of course it shouldn't have been brought in the first place.
That's my point. There's no recourse in a corrupt system
It will probably take longer than that to appeal. I'm not trying to doom here but by the time this gets overturned on appeal it might be too late. Congress will try to pass a law that convicted felons can't run for president. Then they'll put Nimrata on the ballot.
That wont work…has to be a constitutional amendment.
Correct. Current requirements in the Constitution to be eligible to be President - 35yo +, Lived in US for last 14 yrs +, and natural-born citizen.
CONgress can't change that without a Constitutional Amendment.
What's stopping Congress from doing exactly that?
Research the amendment ratification process and then count votes.
The way Congress works mostly. They would never have the votes to ratify something like that in this Congress.
Well number 1 Dems dont control the house but assuming they got one through, The states have to ratify it by 2/3 vote….so the states. The states are stopping Congress.
Yep. Neocons want that just as badly as Democrat Communists.
Wrong handshake.