So as evil as Dr Anthony Fauci is…
The thing that really has people upset is the abuse inflicted on beagle dogs.
But people can empathize with dogs better than with people.
People know dogs are good hearted, and loyal, and loving, etc
and yet dogs are dependent on people, and vulnerable to abuse.
So what Fauci did, was fund “research” where they abused these beagles in horrendous ways.
I want to get my facts straight, about the animal abuse, so bear with me as i fetch more info…
You: Give me a 5 paragraph summary of the alleged abuse of beagle dogs funded by Dr Anthony Fauci
ChatGPT 3.5
The controversy surrounding the alleged abuse of beagle dogs in research funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci revolves around reports that surfaced in 2021. These reports claimed that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), under Fauci's leadership, had funded research projects involving inhumane treatment of beagle puppies. The allegations included claims that these dogs were subjected to cruel experiments, such as being infested with parasites and enduring surgeries without proper anesthesia.
The controversy was fueled by documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, which indicated that NIAID had spent significant funds on these experiments. Critics argued that the research was unnecessary and excessively cruel, particularly pointing to reports that dogs' vocal cords were cut to prevent them from barking during the experiments. This sparked widespread outrage from animal rights activists, members of Congress, and the public, who demanded accountability and transparency regarding the use of taxpayer dollars for such research.
In response to the allegations, the NIAID defended the research by stating that the studies were crucial for developing treatments for diseases that affect both humans and animals. They maintained that all research was conducted in compliance with ethical guidelines and federal regulations designed to ensure animal welfare. Despite these assurances, the backlash persisted, with calls for an investigation into the practices and oversight of animal testing in federally funded research.
This issue also became a focal point for broader discussions about the ethics of animal testing in scientific research. Critics of animal testing argue that such practices are often inhumane and advocate for the use of alternative methods that do not involve animals. The controversy over the beagle experiments highlighted the ongoing debate about the balance between scientific advancement and ethical considerations in research practices.
Overall, the alleged abuse of beagle dogs in research funded by Dr. Fauci's institute has underscored the need for greater scrutiny and transparency in the conduct of animal testing. It has also sparked important conversations about the ethical implications of using animals in scientific studies and the necessity of finding more humane alternatives. The incident remains a significant point of contention and a catalyst for ongoing discussions about reforming animal research policies.
You: Give me more graphic details about the experiments these beagles were subject to. What kinds of parasites? What about cutting vocal cords so dogs wouldnt bark
ChatGPT 3.5
The controversy surrounding the beagle experiments funded by the NIAID, under Dr. Anthony Fauci's leadership, includes several graphic and distressing details. According to reports, these experiments involved the use of beagle puppies in research designed to test the efficacy of drugs against parasites.
One of the most shocking aspects of these experiments was the alleged infestation of the beagles with sand flies, which are known to carry diseases like leishmaniasis. The dogs were reportedly locked in mesh cages or had their heads enclosed in cages filled with infected sand flies, which would bite them, allowing the parasites to infect the dogs. This procedure was intended to study the effectiveness of potential treatments for these parasitic infections. The graphic nature of this method raised significant ethical concerns about the suffering inflicted on the animals.
Additionally, it was alleged that some of these beagle puppies underwent a procedure known as "cordectomy," in which their vocal cords were surgically removed or damaged to prevent them from barking. This practice, often referred to as "debarking," is highly controversial and is seen by many as a cruel method to silence the animals, thereby reducing the noise in the laboratory environment. Critics argued that this procedure inflicted unnecessary pain and distress on the dogs, compounding the ethical issues surrounding the research.
The reports also indicated that these beagles were subjected to prolonged periods of confinement and exposure to these parasites without adequate pain relief or anesthesia, further contributing to their suffering. The combination of invasive procedures, exposure to infectious diseases, and the inability to vocalize distress painted a grim picture of the conditions these animals endured.
These graphic details fueled the public outcry and calls for accountability, with animal rights organizations and lawmakers demanding a thorough investigation into the research practices and the ethical standards of the involved institutions. The controversy has highlighted the need for stricter regulations and oversight in animal research to prevent such inhumane treatment in the future.
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=Fauci&community=GreatAwakening
https://x.com/search?q=Fauci&src=typed_query&f=top
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/search/?q=Fauci&sort=new&restrict_sr=on
This is mainly because, most people, aside from children, are shit... but dogs are innocent, loving creatures for the most part. It's a sign of your humanity when you recognize evil preying on the innocent, regardless of species.
It’s so much worse than that.
In a word: SIDS.
Ah but “humanity is destroying the planet” so “children are inherently bad” and should be avoided, but dogs… everybody loves their furrrrbabbbbiiieees.
Fur. Babies.
Human children are wrong. Have dog children. “God” backwards is “dog”, after all. He made us in his image and told us to be fruitful, so have more dogs.
The programming is so absolutely demonically freaking evil.
(None of these comments should be construed as being directed toward you, to be clear, but a commentary to what we’ve been programmed as a nation to see as innocent and our highest priority to nurture)
Most people are in fact not shit. I would suggest respectfully that you get some new people in your life
Oh yes they are. Jab stats alone verify it. As do the number of democrats that support human sacrifice. They're shit. They just don't know it yet. It's possible, through the grace of God that they finally see the light and stop being shit, but one can only hope and pray. Even I know I can be shit... and aren't too proud and self righteous to admit it. 💩💩💩
Then we'll have to disagree
Fauci channel
https://communities.win/c/Fauci
"Abuse," my ass. It was fucking torture!
And I support the same for fauci.
Your explanation of why people are upset is simply mistaken. The abuse of beagles is clear and unequivocal to everyone; there is still a sizable portion of people who, because of their blindness, want to believe that his advocacy during covid can be explained as an honest mistake. But no such excuse can explain the beagles: so everyone agrees on the beagles.
Ah, fair. Good point.
Basically, they didn’t preprogram for that action, yes?
Pretty much. If they were pit bulls instead of beagles it might be a different story.
Yeah. Chihuahuas, too.
when a small man runs his mouth
he has a chihuahua complex
As Elon posted, we are all beagles to Fauci!
Most Americans view dogs in the highest light. I know I do. I like few people. I love almost all dogs. They are amazing, loyal and full of unconditional love. To harm these creatures will bring me to violence every time....and many others.
I love all dogs, it's not their fault that their owners mistreat them or fail to take care in training them.
My dogs are all silent for example unless they're playing because I never left them outside to self train with neighborhood dogs.
Eye for an eye.
Vocal cord for vocal cords.
It's ironic that the vocal cords were cut so that the dogs complaints were silenced during the experiments. Mass censoring on social media essentially "cut our vocal cords" during the COVID experiment so the people could not be heard as they cried out.
Unfortunately, a lot of people like dogs more than humans. I get it, but we’re created completely different. Abuse against animals but especially dogs brings together close to ninety nine percent of humans.
"Unfortunately"...
That's because people hate people - because they remind each other how much of an asshole they really are, when they inadvertently recognize themselves in others.
Dogs for the most part, just reflect the positive...
I always knew I was different.
Guess this explains it. I like people more than dogs.
dogs are a mans best friend.
diamonds are a girls best friend.
I love my sparkly gems, but I’d give them all up just to have our Spot here with us 🙏🤍
I used to have a beagle. Really good dog. I would like to sodomize fauci with a prickly zucchini.
He’s into that I heard.
That’s because the globalist left has dehumanized all kinds of people, especially those in the womb.
you mean those clumps of cells?
Harming children in GODS eyes, But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea. Harming animals For what happens to the children of man and what happens to the beasts is the same; as one dies, so dies the other. They all have the same breath, and man has no advantage over the beasts, for all is vanity.
BLM
Beagle Lives Matter
Nice description of dogs and of why people so easily empathize with them.
I'll add my own frequent thought on dogs: they're hunters and carnivores, yet LOVE is really their master emotion . . . it really shows the importance of love in life, that nature / god places on Jesus' "new commandment" (from John 13:34) that we "love one another."
People have a choice about letting him dictate what they do. Animals have none.
Dear Mr. Fauci, I pray each day that my God will have Death waiting at your door step. My pray is like this DIE MOTHER FUCKER
die after he has been strapped to a table with sand fleas eating his eyes out and his vocal cords cut. then i'd be fine with him dying.
sigh.
I think the tactic here is to gently lead people into realizing just how evil Fauci is. It's easier for people to accept that he did horrible things to dogs because people already know that there's sick freaks out there who will torture animals. It's an easier pill to swallow and will make it easier to accept that Fauci did the same thing to humans. From there, the pill regarding him participating in a mass genocide plot would be easier to swallow.
It's sad that the suspension of disbelief has to be slowly overcome just for people to consider what has actually taken place.
Beagle Lives Matter
https://greatawakening.win/p/17tL1hscfF/beagle-lives-matter-/c/
Similar to no evil motherfucker assassinated! Most people assassinated were those who were trying to change the world for the better for their people! Think about one example!
Prove a man is a thief, then show he is a bank robber.
The metaphor “Prove a man is a thief, then show he is a bank robber” means that once you have established someone’s guilt or propensity for a smaller or less severe crime (being a thief), it becomes easier to convince others of their involvement in a larger or more serious crime (being a bank robber). Essentially, it suggests that proving a smaller wrongdoing can lay the groundwork for convincing people of a greater wrongdoing, leveraging the initial proof to establish a pattern or likelihood of further misconduct.
In broader terms, the metaphor can be applied to various situations where establishing a person’s fault or bad behavior in a minor case can lead to the assumption or acceptance of their guilt in more significant matters. It emphasizes the cumulative effect of evidence and how initial proof can influence the perception of subsequent allegations.
Yeah, I said all that but only used 13 words.
Sounds like people...