In celebration of Juneteenth, lets expose who brought the slaves to America
(twitter.com)
💊 RED PILL 💊
Comments (59)
sorted by:
Don't leave out who actually ran them down, caught them, and sold them to the slavers.
It's amazing how many people don't know the answer to this. Hell I was among them; to me it was a forgone conclusion until maybe 5 or so years ago.
As bad as buying a slave is, I still think it's far worse to capture someone and sell them into slavery. If reparations make sense at all then that's who should pay it, but I don't think it makes one iota of sense hundreds of years after the fact.
Jews also bought them in larger numbers than Whites.
There were also blacks who owned black slaves.
Anthony Johnson (around 1670) was a black man who owned black slaves, and got the British laws (in the American colonies) changed so that a slave could be owned for life. Previously, the maximum was 7 years.
So, the White British colonists had a law that anyone who was a slave could become free after 7 years. But it took a black man to challenge the law, and the result was that it was changed to enslavement for life.
7 is an odd number of years until you realize that 7 is a significant number in Judaism.
Thank you! I've told this story many times and I'm getting tired of typing it. It took a black man, himself a freed and wealthy former slave, to bring the African tradition of lifetime slavery to the English Colonies.
See: Anthony Johnson 1655
So Blacks caught the slaves and Jews sold them.
And Muslims also transported them.
When the colonists defeated the british the protection scheme was over for the colonial, now USA navy and USA shipping. The Muslims had a heyday attacking now vulnerable USA shipping. Soooo…the US Marines were created. Part of the navy, to defend against shipping piracy, a good chunk being Muslim. Uniform added leather neck pieces to help protect against Muslim swords…Marine’s nickname? Leathernecks!!!
Marine hymn??? To the shores of Tripoli…what was based in Tripoli? Muslim pirates. The US Navy and Marines took the fight to the pirates.
Muslims are still among the most prevalent slavers in the world.
Crazy the history missing from the woke common core …
Pass it on!!
Other black people in africa?
Mostly inter tribal warfare. Slaves were a big source of revenue that made tribal chiefs very rich. They achieved great power over their black people by selling another tribe's black people.
And that tribe has a ceremonial cloth that Pelosi and friends draped over their necks for that hideous kneeling photo. Commemorating the original slave traders. Morons.
Thanks, as I suspected.
And Arab slavers. The Arabs had a voracious appetite for slaves, particularly since so few of the ones who were caught would survive the journey north across the Sahara and the forced surgical castration. >90% died before getting to the slave markets on the N. African coast. The ones that lived were sold to various wealthy Arabs and later to the Ottomans, though the Ottomans seem to have had a much stronger preference for white slaves out of the Caucasus. The men were funneled into the army. The women were prized in the harems. They'd often command a price 10x higher than the African slaves who were seen as not intelligent enough to be useful as slaves.
But yes, other Africans were probably the biggest source. They'd go in and settle old ethnic scores. They'd raid villages, kill or capture as many as they could, rape the women as much as they thought they could get away with, and then sell them either to the Arabs or the Jewish Europeans on the coasts. Remember when Democrats in Congress famous decided to virtue signal and kneel for 8 min, 46 sec for George Floyd? They wore African cloths to help make the point. The cloth came from a tribe that was made extraordinarily wealthy by, you guessed it, enslaving and selling other Africans who they conquered. =D
It's key to remember that prior to the invention of quinine in the 1860s, Europeans didn't last long in Africa. They'd get malaria or other tropical diseases and die. It was notorious as the "Dark Continent" because European expeditions went in and never returned. They therefore, couldn't map it. On a map, the interior of the continent was dark/unknown. What they had, they got from rumors and stories told to them by Africans and Arabs who claimed to have been there. This is really important, because it makes absolutely clear that Europeans were NOT actively procuring the slaves at all.
Good stuff. Thank you.
Pedes with a lot of good history on this thread. I believe Mohammed was a straight up slaver and also pedophile, so there's that example too.
Muzzies.
Why are the Jew$ coming to the forefront as the bad guys for every thing wrong in this world? I thought being the darlings of God, they would be almost walking on water, yet time and time again they are shown to be bad people who only want to gain wealth, no matter who it harms. I suppose there must be two types of Jew$, the Kazarian and the true followers of God. Thus the Kazarians are the bad guys and they need to have the light of truth shined upon them. My synopsis is probably wrong and someone will correct it, but that is fine. I don't know too much about the Jewi$h society so any education would be a welcome aspect of my learning.
Most modern Jews have little or no ancient Israeli DNA. Synagogue of Satan. Ask- Why would a fair God give a certain race of humans a special pass, even though they denied his Son? He wouldn't. And if he was a racist, and he would, he certainly wouldn't extend it to their distant relatives with 5% Hebrew DNA. No. When the New Testament says Isreal it speaks of us. The Church. All who believe in Christ.
Israel are the people who are the GENETIC descendants of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob/Israel.
It is not a spiritual thing, per se.
That is why the jews claim they are GENETIC descendants of Israel.
But they lie.
Yes, Israel are the genetic descendants, but they are not jews.
Truth --
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0xjf2Nvw4zVW/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jHq1m3dGzWqH/
Lies (keep in mind, Ted Pike did not have the full story documented above, but he did show what the jews themselves have to say in their synagogue library books) --
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZelySZIwOV3l/
Conveniently, ancestry tests are now BANNED IN ISRAEL after Johns Hopkins found out their little secret.
Jews do not know God. Read Vatican Assassins.
Author?
I think we are looking at the Khazarian jew sect here. These are the evil ones and they have infiltrated in every facet of society to rule. Yes, slavery is evil... but I think what's even worse are the human trafficker ones who capture free humans and sell them into slavery.
The reason this is confusing to you is because you, just like the rest of us, have been told a lie. That lie is that the jews are the descendants of the Israelites of the Bible (God's Chosen People).
But the jews lied about that. They have a long history of being "name stealers," and Israelite/Hebrew is part of that history of stealing names. The jews are the Edomites (who themselves were a mixed race) from the Bible. The Jewish Encyclopedia admits this.
No, this is disinfo. People who promote this theory ignore one important question: Where did the Khazarians come from?
Answer: They were Edomites.
"The Other Israel" does a good job of digging into Jewish history, using the books of the synagogue --
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZelySZIwOV3l/
The real eye opener is to find out not only that the jews are not the Israelites of the Bible, but who the true Israelites are today.
"Israel's Fingerprints" --
Part 1:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0xjf2Nvw4zVW/
Part 2:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jHq1m3dGzWqH/
Good twin, bad twin absolutely seems to be the case, and to have been the case for a very long time.
The Israelites may have been enslaved in Egypt because some cousins of theirs, called the Hyksos, showed up and enslaved the Egyptians. Once the Egyptians broke free of it, they enslaved all the Israelites in response.
IS that what happened? Maybe. There are claims in that direction. A lot of people could have made that up, though. It’s very difficult to tell what’s made up and what’s not in this area…
God said that Jacob and Esau were "two nations" at war with each other, in the womb. He loved Jacob, and hated Esau.
"Nation" comes from "nacio," which is "of birth" (a genetic family tree -- related by blood, not spirit).
Jacob became Israel. The Israelites became the White Europeans.
Esau became Edom. The Edomites became the jews.
The jews lied about this, mixing things up to claim the opposite.
Two nations, at war with each other, since Jacob/Esau through to today.
Make sense, now?
Who was behind the degeneracy of 1920's Germany? Jews.
Who overthrew the White Russian nation, and tried to overthrow the White German nation? Jews.
Who ran the slave trade, and blamed it on the Whites? Jews.
Who is behind the degeneracy today of foreign, non-White invasion of ONLY White countries? Jews.
Who is behind the degeneracy today of Hollyweird (also, 1920's Germany)? Jews.
Who is behind the degeneracy today of LBGTQ (also, 1920's Germany)? Jews.
What did "Satan" mean in the original Hebrew? A little red guy with horns and a pitchfork? No, it means "Adversary." Adversary of who? Of the Israelites.
The protagonists of the Bible are the Israelites, and the antagonists are the mixed breed of Edomite/Canaanite/Kenite, which are today's jews.
We have been lied to about everything.
Starting with the history of the Bible.
Seems like a good line of thinking. Worth digging into.
edit - Lines up with my thoughts on it for sure in another comment. https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLAw6ZVx/x/c/4ZCZxBcKomk
"Starting with the history of the Bible"...Fren, that mage my eyebrow raise up a wee bit. Your responses within this thread make me believe you are a learned person who wants to educate folks. I'm willing to bite on some knowledge about the origins of the Bible. If you have a book or vid link I'd be interested in going down that rabbit hole. Thanks for your responses. They make me ponder aspects of life I've never considered. Plus, you are the second person, TODAY, that has said the Jews are behind slavery. That is Erie. Thanks, again.
The way I would put it is that the Bible was written in Hebrew (OT) and Greek (NT). I take it for granted that Moses wrote the first 5 books of the OT, for example, BUT ... many of the words and phrases have been mistranslated over the years.
Remember, the RCC for 1,000 years was the "official" view of what the Bible said, when most people could not read it. They couldn't even get their hands on the scrolls, unless they were monks living in a church. The average person had to rely on what the "expert" priests said it said.
Martin Luther was such a monumental figure because he found out that the Bible did NOT say what the RCC said it did, at least in important respects.
This is because (a) the RCC dogma was made up by the big wigs in the RCC, and (b) the translations were in some cases falsified.
Remember, it was heresy to say or write anything that contradicted the RCC doctrine, even if you could prove that the Bible said something different than the RCC doctrine.
The penalty for heresy was death.
So, it is reasonable to conclude that at least some of the translations were incorrect, if only to not get your head chopped off or burned at the stake.
There is a growing movement to go back to the original scriptures (at least, as much as possible) and check what those words said in the original languages, to compare and contrast with what we see in our English versions today.
One simple example is the debate over monogamy vs. polygyny (a specific version of polygamy where it is one man and two or more wives). In the Bible, there is only one man, OT & NT, who we know had only one wife. That was Uriah (and his life turned to shit -- lol).
Every other man had more than one wife, or we don't know for sure how many. There is something like 30-40 men who the Bible explicitly says had more than one wife: Moses, 2; Abraham, 3; Jacob 4; David 17, etc.
Those who insist that the Bible says only monogamy is acceptable often cite passages in the NT where it says a church elder, deacon or bishop should only have one wife. That is the English translation.
But when we check the Greek, the word used was "mia," which does not mean "one" in that context. It means "first." He should (still) have his "first" wife (even if he also has others).
This is a prohibition against divorce (of the first, or any wife), and not an admonition against having multiple wives. These were to be leaders of the local church, so they should be upstanding men, and divorce, though not a sin, is not ideal.
That changes the meaning, doesn't it?
There are numerous examples of this throughout.
By far, the biggest lie we have been told is that the jews of today are the ancestors of the Hebrews and Israelites ("God's Chosen People") of the Bible.
But we can clearly see that today's jews do not act anything like what we would expect God's Chosen to act. It doesn't make any sense.
Until ...
We realize that the Bible did not say the jews were the Israelites. "Jew" was an English word invented many centuries later, as the Bible was being translated into English.
Overall, the Bible is confusing to most people (myself included for most of my life). But when you realize much of its meaning has been altered, whether accidentally or intentionally, and you unravel it, the entire book not only makes sense, but it tells us what is going on today in our world.
Check out this vid on who the Israelites were, and who their descendents are today:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JvyYYCnnSexD/
Yep. I’m just looking for the dividing line.
It ain’t noses.
It's kind of as if the Ferengi owned the Earth, isn't it?
I've always suspected that is who the Ferengi were modeled after.
Gotdamned space Jews! 😡
Yup! 🖖🖖🖖
Rule of Acquisiton number 34 is definitely a Cabal Classic: “ War is good for business.”
There is a segment from the mid to late 90's of the Montel Williams Show where a man from the audience was trying to explain where the slaves came from and Montel deceptively pivoted away from the point that the guy was making: https://odysee.com/@Aufwachen1933:e/Status-Gab-Social:b6
With all due respect...I prefer Dr. Thomas Sowell's adaption. The exciting part is that it's all over UTube, and being presented by a couple dozen Black Podcasters. A whole generation of young Black folks are seeing the truth for the first time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyPWjjWs7-w
Had to go get some tires checked on my jeep yesterday. Granted ( nsfw) I'm a huge ga dawg fan and my vehicle shows that. A young black male, cursed at my ride. He said.. " roll tide mfer". I stopped immediately and said .. did you just cuss at my Jeep?
My step dad was with me. He said to the Owner, where did you find him, roll tide guy? My hand to God... the Owner said " everyone needs to own one" my mouth dropped to the floor. Dude fixing tire stopped dead, then laughed. I was mortified. Then the owner proceeds to say, " now I understand why they beat them"! Wtaf!
Never Never ever in my life have I! Old thinking, that's Not excepable! I enjoyed picking on him, being a Bama fan! We laughed. He made some comments about the game at Mercedes Benz with Dawgs and Clemson ( which, I grew up in a clemson loving family! Papa had tiger paws painted on his driveway!) Yes I am the black sheep.
looks around sir? Who are you talking to?
Meh, this is so yesterday...Besides I'll get downvotes if I do my "Juneteenth" joke again. Just play around with the spelling on the first syllable, you'll get it.
And then White Americans had a War, the Slaves escaped, sortof, but it still took a White Man, to fo to the Plantations and tell them to leave and go get jobs....
Odd how soo very few people know any of this....
Is that David Duke?
You'be been lied to (by the jewish media) about David Duke, too.
Why do you think the establishment bashes him, but never really says why?
I agree. I had my eyes opened up to him a few years ago. It is stunning how deeply they can embed a lie.
Was he not in the KKK?
I was fortunate to enjoy shaking his hand and engaging in a 10 minute private conversation with David Duke. About Joos of course. I was trying to make the point that why tell people that all Joos are bad if they don't understand the many points in this thread. People would waste their time attacking the kosher grocery. Duke's response: It doesn't matter, they're all the same. Hmm.
Not sure about Duke, don’t know much about him, but they definitely lied about another David - Koresh.
I think those people were on to something and they desperately want to keep us from looking there.
David Duke wrote a book named ‘Jewish Supremacism’ that is excellent.
Yes Hundro, it certainly is. Here is a better resolution and more detailed video of him discussing this issue.
So many parallels between this and today's media.