Julian Assange Plea deal reached. Feds will accept the 5 years spent fighting extradition in lieu of detention in the United States.
(www.cnbc.com)
Hot Summer Fire With Fire 🔥
Comments (55)
sorted by:
I got to remind everyone that Rudy met up with Assange when he was in the Ecuadorian embassy, We all assumed it was to negotiate a possible pardon but no pardon precipitated (that we know of) Not long after Assange is hauled off to prison.
The thought crossed through my mind that maybe Rudy & Julian were discussing more than just a pardon. Maybe they discussed the Q plan of when Julian will be released & what he will say at that time & all that. Maybe this is all part of a plan made when Trump was POTUS. Maybe. In fact, maybe Trump already pardoned him, secretly, but such that the pardon goes into effect later & is contingent on a few things.
And tbh, as happy as I am that he is alive, what are the chances? A lot more people with money wanted Julian Assange dead than those that wanted Epstein dead & it is 2nd nature for those bastards to bribe prison guards & hire prison mates to made a hit. Yet he is still with us, thank God! Julian Assange must have had white hat protection the entire time, maybe even the prison itself.
I am not buying this as it is reported. Taking a plea deal is going to be a HUGE blow to independent journalism. Infact, independent journalism will end with this as precedent.
That said, if there is indeed a plan for him to be free - that means we are very close to the precipice.
If Assange pleads guilty in the US, will you accept it then?
I don't think journalism will be affected. He wasn't charged because he published info.
Journalism survived this case.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/british-newspaper-editor-sentenced-for-phone-hacking-scandal
That case has nothing to do with real journalism. We are not talking about illegally hacking into people's data, but allowing carefully whetted whistleblowers who have exhausted official channels, to leak the bare minimum information necessary to wake the public up.
That's not what happened in this case.
And doesn't wikileaks by its own standards do zero vetting of whistleblowers? They say that the material is completely uploaded anonymously. So how could they vet who the who the people are??
They might try to verify the material and see if it looks like it's legit documents but, supposedly they have no idea who the people uploading the documents are.
Assange was charged with hacking. The doj said in the Manning case that Assange was not just a publisher who received the material and published it. They are saying that Assange actively helped Manning get the material. That's why this was a criminal case
He was charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion (i.e. hacking into a government computer),
He later was charged with conspiring with Manning to obtain national defense information.
A later Indictment said he participated in the lulzsec and Anonymous hacking cases.
A hacker who steals information is violating the law even if they are doing it as a form or protest or civil disobedience.
A journalist who receives that info can publish it and is protected is the US system.
However if the reporter helps in the hacking that is not journalism and they can be prosecuted.
Assange will have agreed to a "criminal information" statement that lists the facts of the case.
Let's see what that says.
You have completely gobbled up mainstream propaganda.
This ties up to Seth Rich, who was the person who uploaded the DNC emails to wikileaks and got murdered by MS-13 assets.
One of the reasons they desperately shut Assange down was to ensure he wont confirm the identity of the uploader.
Many people including Bill Binney who is ex-NSA and a whistleblower himself, confirmed from the timestampts that the files were not transmitted over the Internet but rather copied directly via a hard drive.
There is a lot you can dig here, and multiple Q posts as well.
Here is one to get started. You can search keywords yourself to dig further.
u/#q1009
Precisely!
What have you gobbled up ? Have you checked this stuff.
First There's nothing about the DNC in this case. This case goes back to 2010.
Second, I don't follow this part. It doesn't make any sense to me.
Assange can do that right now. He could have done that anytime over the past 8 years.
By the way the DOJ already put out an Indictment detailing how the files got to Wikileaks back in 2018.
Bill Binney did not confirm this. In fact, his examination COULD NOT have proven this point. Which Binney admitted. There was nothing in the analysis Benny did that could say how the files left the DNC. All he was examining was an archive. Looking at the metadata of the files of the archive, you can only tell when the archive was made.
For example, let's say you hired me to hack a government agency. Everyday in May I take out a small amount of file so I'm not detected.
Later on in June I zip up all the files into an archive and put the archive on a thumb drive before I hand it to you. The metadata would be about the June archive. It wouldn't tell you anything about how the files actually left the DNC. It was because of this reason that some of Binney's whistle-blowing colleagues did not sign on to the report he put out.
Another problem was Binny was actually looking at a fraudulent archive. Duncan Campbell, a friend of Binney's uncovered how the "Forensicator" archive Binney was looking at was faked.
The archive came from a conference when Guccifer 2 was supposed to speak. Instead a powerpoint was emailed with a link to an archive. The password came from the forensicator who claimed to be an American named Adam Carter but was a British guy named, Tim Leonard. He was running a disinfo campaign and was very successful.
He used two different archiving tools to create his ZIP file, one of which was an outdated version that that used local computer time rather than universal time codes. So it was very simple to change the clock on your computer and claim the files are set whenever you want them to be.
Another indication of the fraud was the timestamps actually only existed in this fraudulent archive, not in the Wikileaks files.
A lot of of the questions Q posed in that screenshot got answered a few months later.
Ah, I think you must be new to Lawfare.
You are kidding right? He hasn't even been able to communicate with anyone, let alone make public statements
Bill Binney's clip for points below.
Bill Binney confirmed that the files were copied from "local" to a USB drive, but there is no way to say what "local" was. Whether it was DNC or something else. Only thing you can say is that it was was not hacked remotely. Watch the clip to see what precisely Binney is "admitting"
Again, watch the clip, he explains exactly what "messing with the data" they are referring to.
Again, the analysis has nothing to do with DNC. He makes no claim it came from DNC. His claim is that its not a hack.
An archive, by definition, stores not just the files but all the metadata. So you can look at an archive and access not just the data, but all the attributes of the individual files, including the timestamps. This is a basic computer fact.
This scenario makes absolutely no sense. I am assuming you got it from a fact checking site.
First, no hacker is going to keep hacking daily to copy a few files, making it almost certain to leave tracks and get caught. Hackers would assume that they will be caught and try and copy as much data as they can before they are stopped.
Second, when you zip up all the files in an archive, the archive will store all the metadata of each file.
Third, even in the indictment no one is claiming that someone "hired" a hacker to do the hack and give it to them in a thumb drive.
Dude, you have absolutely no idea what is a basic computer fact and what is not. You can start your learning here and a specific example of ZIP file format
or the TAR file format
Damn you boys are good,i'm dumb as a box of rocks,but seems like i remember Binney saying he /NSA had a program of some kind that he created,cant member the name of it ,and he did say the download could no way come from a hack or out of the country ,he said it was directly downloaded from the server at that location with speed stamps to prove it,if i member correctly.inferring that it was SR.
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%233764&q2=
we are now moving to the final scenes of this movie
If Biden was really POTUS, would this have happened?
My thoughts exactly! This must have been all laid out before Trump left Washington so that much of the dirty work will be done before he comes back (for the sake of optics
Hold tight. I’m sure there’s an epilogue
i've always wondered if Assange was the 'Trump card'
This date should be a national fucking holiday (NFH) from here on out....
i pray he will be safe when released. wasn't he the one Killdog was wanting to drone strike?
Yes, she supposedly said that "jokingly" but she never jokes
sorry inspoken, i had to delete my response to this because i thought it was a response to my second post to MommaTried. it wouldn't have made sense to you with this first response.
we know Hilldog doesn't joke when talking about murdering someone.
She doesn't understand humor the way most people do. Of all the videos of her online, the only time she authentically laughed was when she was talking about how Gadhafi met his demise, God rest his soul. That is the only sort of 'humor' she understands, smh.
I think the reporting on this pretty dubious.
Drones are not used like that.
Did you see that video of the soldier running from a drone and he stops and it gets close to him and explodes?
https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLB44RLr/video-from-ukraine-this-is-the-w/
https://defiantamerica.com/video-from-ukraine-this-is-the-war-against-machines-we-thought-would-never-come-straight-out-of-a-terminator-movie/
The drone or soldier explodes?
The soldier is trying to get away, trying to surrender, and then goes to his knees and then lays down... the small drone descends over him and explodes, killing him.
It was a link on this board... many called it a war crime. There's no context. Some say Ukrainian soldier, some say Russian. Honestly, not sure it is real. But is sure as hell was disturbing. I'll try to find it.
Found it...
Here's the GAW article: https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLB44RLr/video-from-ukraine-this-is-the-w/
Here's the direct link to the page with the video: https://defiantamerica.com/video-from-ukraine-this-is-the-war-against-machines-we-thought-would-never-come-straight-out-of-a-terminator-movie/
The conservative website True Pundit cited anonymous “State Department sources” in a report on Sunday to claim that Clinton in 2010 suggested to some staff members that the U.S. “drone” Julian Assange of WikiLeaks, whose website had embarrassed the U.S. when it published diplomatic cables, among other documents.
“Can’t we just drone this guy?” the website claimed Clinton had said.
Q drop 1591
OMG!!! Q nailed it once again!!! Any idea who SR is?
Seth Rich
Oh, of course! Thank you fren So then, this must mean the resolution of Seth murder will come ... this week? wow
So Hillary will be in jail very soon. That must be why Trump had to go through that whole ordeal. It of course has to happen under Biden, if not people will blame Trump for going after his rivals
Yuge
https://www.theguardian.com/media/article/2024/jun/25/julian-assange-plea-deal-with-us-free-to-return-australia
u/#q1462
Wasn’t there something/someone referencing drops and connecting Assange to being released this June a little while back?
I love this
72hr rule.
This is amazing news and I said a little prayer of thanks to God this morning. The Deep State has destroyed this man. I’m glad he met Stella and has a family to return to. We know nothing happens by accident. Why do you suppose they let him go? Election time brownie points? He needs to heal for a while—eat well, get sunshine, take walks, be nurtured. And he needs to know millions have stuck by him and consider him a hero. Support any Go Fund Me campaigns and help this family heal.
Woohoo... finally
JA get set free and dies in an accident! He better have protection!
interesting timing
For somebody who's been in prison and solitary confinement for a lot of it, he sure looked like he's packed on some weight....
My guess in this is the flight he's on. Over 3 hours left to get to Bangkok. Then another flight to Australia.
https://www.flightradar24.com/VJT199/35d51855
He is not going directly to Australia. He's going to be in a US federal court in the Mariana Islands on the 26th.
Thanks for the correction that he's heading to Mariana Islands first.
Wondering what his reaction will be when he finally gets to Australia and sees what a shit hole it's become since c19...
omg. I hope they don't plan to bury him at the bottom of Mariana's trench!