The Azure outage was indeed a Microsoft problem There were two issues: parts of Azure down, then Crowdstrike took a shitload of servers and clients down. Re-read the first sentence in the posting.
Ok, even so, this whole thing doesn't make a lot of sense to me. AI does not need to be in a public cloud, why would they risk that? Only reason I can think is they can't find someone to run some GPUs privately, which seems not correct.
Remember those videos of him on that white house "stage" that we never saw before his (p)Residency?? That looked fake AF, and could totally fit this narrative. I'd be cool with the hackers showing video of that stage with a bunch of AI zombies just to show the whole thing is fake
As hind sight is 20-20. You could say all of it is according to plan. The implementation of communist wish list was surely going to cause so much destruction that ChinaJoe was a one and done. If this AI is real, he may have been incapacitated for a long time. The debate was a masked actor designed to give the democrats the opportunity to continue the replacement plan.
So much crazy since the Kenyans arrival. Its hard to know what to believe.
Not much to prove here, its a plausible theory. Not all theories need proof, but all theories should require consideration. Sometimes in the heat of "proving" something, we lose sight of the real motive; preparing for what's to come. So is it the truth? Doesn't exactly matter. That doesn't mean we should stop researching, but it does mean we need to forego the fact that the "truth" will probably never be found out.
The vast majority of the time, these (chan?) posts are spot on & brilliant.
This one here? Eh......IDK......
Now, my thoughts below might not be 100% accurate because I'm not a cloud nor Cyber Security EXPERT, and I also don't now how sensitive / classified data is handled, but I know what I know, and I can tell you some basic tech fundamentals for damn certain.
The notion of there being ONE server inside a datacenter as absolutely massive as AZURE hosting this alleged "AI dataset & model for generating biden speech / video / etc" is preposterous. That's literaly not how the cloud works. Again; you COULD have >ONE< server dedicated to a specific task, but its exceedingly rare. That would usually be called a VPS - Virtual Private Server / private cloud.
Esp. in this case where the gov doesn't care at all about money / costs, and we're presuming they wanted high availability / reliability; there's no way they'd want this deep fake generating software / app / database running on only ONE server.
It's literally putting all your eggs in one basked; if that ONE server crashes, fails, needs to be updated & requires reboots it will go offline, if Microsoft or their ISP has any sort of hiccup, etc. etc. Millions of things that can happen to make computers & servers go down, even if only for a couple hours.
Think of your personal / home PC you are probably browsing these forums on;
If it requires a bunch of updates, you get to sit there & stare at it (or go do something else) while it updates, reboots, etc. Same exact thing with servers.
Which is why most clouds are always designed with clustering / high availability / failover, so that no one application; no one file lives only on ONE particular server.
It's just not how this works.
COULD You put stuff specifically on ONE server?
Yes of course....but again; unlikely, IMHO. You'd have at LEAST 2-3 for redundancy, reliability, backups, etc.
The whole entire purpose of using a cloud / datacenter, ESP. one as enormous as Microsoft Azure is....REDUNDANCY.
Backups upon backups (well, you BETTER be backing your shit up, and you damn well bet Microsoft is absolutely selling backup to the government!!!) and redundant servers upon redundant servers.
As with everything, this does cut both ways; the more servers you have your data on, the higher the risk of breach (kind of sort of theoretically).
If this was an "intrusion from a foreign actor" I believe the last thing you'd do is "push out an update that would enable them to track exiltrated data"
That doesn't make any sense.
It's kind of sort of like saying, "I lost my dog, so I just went & bought this Bluetooth / GPS tracker to help find him".......uh.........horse has already left the barn, bro.....
PLUS...... assuming this was some super secret server & production with presumably high level, powerful & well-known people making these decisions; you really think they'd agree to have crowdstrike - or anyone - rush to push ANYTHING to MILLIONS if not BILLIONS of PCs???
Like; they wouldn't be at all afraid of something exactly like this happening?? Of millions / billions of people suddenly becoming aware of this?
If there was some sort of "data exfiltration update" they could push out; a) that's called spyware, b) I don't think it would last terribly long until someone discovered it. Like someone on the chans.....
If this anon had any actual proof to backup their assertion - like something very fishy / tracking app or function built into these recent windows update, I'd be inclined to entertain the notion.
Until then, this sounds like 4chan circle jerk BS.
Makes total sense.
Now, is it true, and how would we prove it?
Ignoring Microsoft as causing computer problems...
.... is kind of like ignoring the vax as causing health problems.
Can anyone see the common denominator?
Yeah, Bill Gates modus operandi
Does the name rhyme with Shmill Shmates?
Grill Grates even
At Libs Leg
Most likely pissing all over it.
Hill Hates
Dill Dates
It wasn't a Microsoft problem aside from it affected their products. Like bad gas in a new car...
The Azure outage was indeed a Microsoft problem There were two issues: parts of Azure down, then Crowdstrike took a shitload of servers and clients down. Re-read the first sentence in the posting.
Ok, even so, this whole thing doesn't make a lot of sense to me. AI does not need to be in a public cloud, why would they risk that? Only reason I can think is they can't find someone to run some GPUs privately, which seems not correct.
Like bad gas in a new car... ---- without a fuel-water separator
Like cornflake without the milk
Corn Pop.
Yea, but that new car is a Ford Pinto.
Can we put out an open request on behalf on the American people for the hackers to put out a brief Biden video of him someplace weird?
Remember those videos of him on that white house "stage" that we never saw before his (p)Residency?? That looked fake AF, and could totally fit this narrative. I'd be cool with the hackers showing video of that stage with a bunch of AI zombies just to show the whole thing is fake
That would indeed be epic
ice cream cone in each hand. goes to lick one, and it falls off. goes to lick the other, and it falls off. he says, "C'mon, man!"
KEK!!
Skate-boarding Biden would be my suggestion.
Surfing with Zuck!
Or... drinking adrenochrome on little st james... right zuck?
Pepe farms remembers...
Ask the hacker(s)?
Imagebord site full of autists and nerds, but they have a politically incorrect community where they do their research. Quite amazing sometimes
The chans are where Q posted starting in October 2017. There is 4chan, 8chan, and 8kun.
Any chance the hackers were white hats?
I have the same question.
Good idea!
As hind sight is 20-20. You could say all of it is according to plan. The implementation of communist wish list was surely going to cause so much destruction that ChinaJoe was a one and done. If this AI is real, he may have been incapacitated for a long time. The debate was a masked actor designed to give the democrats the opportunity to continue the replacement plan.
So much crazy since the Kenyans arrival. Its hard to know what to believe.
Ok then who tf was Trump debating then?
Does NOT make total sense
Not much to prove here, its a plausible theory. Not all theories need proof, but all theories should require consideration. Sometimes in the heat of "proving" something, we lose sight of the real motive; preparing for what's to come. So is it the truth? Doesn't exactly matter. That doesn't mean we should stop researching, but it does mean we need to forego the fact that the "truth" will probably never be found out.
Uh...... IDK.
The vast majority of the time, these (chan?) posts are spot on & brilliant. This one here? Eh......IDK......
Now, my thoughts below might not be 100% accurate because I'm not a cloud nor Cyber Security EXPERT, and I also don't now how sensitive / classified data is handled, but I know what I know, and I can tell you some basic tech fundamentals for damn certain.
Esp. in this case where the gov doesn't care at all about money / costs, and we're presuming they wanted high availability / reliability; there's no way they'd want this deep fake generating software / app / database running on only ONE server.
It's literally putting all your eggs in one basked; if that ONE server crashes, fails, needs to be updated & requires reboots it will go offline, if Microsoft or their ISP has any sort of hiccup, etc. etc. Millions of things that can happen to make computers & servers go down, even if only for a couple hours.
Think of your personal / home PC you are probably browsing these forums on; If it requires a bunch of updates, you get to sit there & stare at it (or go do something else) while it updates, reboots, etc. Same exact thing with servers. Which is why most clouds are always designed with clustering / high availability / failover, so that no one application; no one file lives only on ONE particular server.
It's just not how this works.
COULD You put stuff specifically on ONE server? Yes of course....but again; unlikely, IMHO. You'd have at LEAST 2-3 for redundancy, reliability, backups, etc.
As with everything, this does cut both ways; the more servers you have your data on, the higher the risk of breach (kind of sort of theoretically).
It's kind of sort of like saying, "I lost my dog, so I just went & bought this Bluetooth / GPS tracker to help find him".......uh.........horse has already left the barn, bro.....
PLUS...... assuming this was some super secret server & production with presumably high level, powerful & well-known people making these decisions; you really think they'd agree to have crowdstrike - or anyone - rush to push ANYTHING to MILLIONS if not BILLIONS of PCs???
Like; they wouldn't be at all afraid of something exactly like this happening?? Of millions / billions of people suddenly becoming aware of this?
If there was some sort of "data exfiltration update" they could push out; a) that's called spyware, b) I don't think it would last terribly long until someone discovered it. Like someone on the chans.....
If this anon had any actual proof to backup their assertion - like something very fishy / tracking app or function built into these recent windows update, I'd be inclined to entertain the notion.
Until then, this sounds like 4chan circle jerk BS.
Source: 20+ years I.T. pro.
Sorry not sorry....
Except that they rushed a bad driver. It’s clear to me that wasn’t an accident. Def an inside job or hacker inserted bad code into that “driver”.