Harris' Air Force Two Has No Serial Number -- You are watching a 'scripted' movie.
(media.greatawakening.win)
✈️ Planefags ✈️
Comments (49)
sorted by:
Whoa ..... so I googied airforce 2 images. Every single pic has a tail number. 90004. Both left and right side.
😂😂😂. Great post OP. I NEVER EVEN THOUGHT TO LOOK.
I've seen 90003 & 80002 also. So there appear to either be multiple planes or they've cycled a few out over the years.
I cannot find any photos or videos of a Harris plane with a registration number on it yet...
Take a look at the FAA regulation doc though. That is truly the icing on the cake for this dig.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-45
There is an exemption for displaying the registration number if you are making a movie.
Excellent dig merf! 👏
Yes indeed it most certainly is !
When it comes to AF1/AF2 The plane the Pres/vp is on becomes designated as af1 or af2 and they almost always fly with a decoy plane. This is to prevent air traffic fags from heading off af1 or af2 to ambush it.
Agree but the AF1/AF2 designation is separate from the registration number, aye?
Precisely, as that would leave planes open to targeting
What a great movie, too!
Numbers have meaning
No serial number (Harris):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaF7lHFDLxU (orlando, aug 1st 2023)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9DdAsQkghk (detroit, aug 7th 2024)
https://twitter.com/sfpelosi/status/1821292944995053822 (detroit, aug 7th 2024, jd vance)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjm3APyM64k (phoenix, aug 8th 2024)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN9y9U0dmtw (indianapolis, july 24 2024)
Has serial number (Pence): https://youtu.be/Eyc5OARJoN4?t=222 (nov 4 2017)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eyc5OARJoN4 (jul 29 2020)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIr0uz1Vyv4 (may 6 2019)
FAA regulations on registration markings--note the exception in 45.22:
14 CFR Part 45 - Identification and Registration Marking https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-45
This is especially insulting as white hats are implying it would be "inconsistent" if they put the Air Force Two registration number on the aircraft.
i.e. It would be unbelievable that she were VP.
u/#q4158
Very nice. Well done.
Send this to monkeywerx!
For extra credit here are some Biden landings w/registration number (90003).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfJh5ofcqiY (Cyprus, May 21st 2014)
https://youtu.be/I-B6iP_JcMw?t=7 (Sharm el-Sheik, Jul 24th 2015)
https://youtu.be/wR6cc_IOdbA?t=55 (Berlin, Jul 31st 2015)
Vance (N917XA):
https://youtu.be/ayL44nqN9jk?t=153
Cheney (80002/illegible/90003):
https://youtu.be/WPRl2vQy58I?t=19
https://youtu.be/WLhLg8T_yeU?t=16
https://youtu.be/5YDBosPBRko?t=44
Kamala is the only one I see that never has a registration number.
Also funny that Christine Pelosi (@sfpelosi) is using the term "bracket".
https://x.com/search?q=from%3Asfpelosi%20bracket&src=typed_query
Ok... that's a comm for DS
This is a big proof. There are only two reasons that these markings arent on display -- these people are operating outside the law or we are watching a movie.
The fact they do operate outside the law is well known even to normies but what would the advantage in this instance be for them?
Exactly! What would be the reasoning for (((them))) to do this. I can’t think of a single reason.
That's cool, and I hate to rain on it, but military planes can do whatever they want, in particular af1 and 2
are air force 1 and air force 2 required to display numbers on their tail? ChatGPT Yes, both Air Force One and Air Force Two are required to display tail numbers. These tail numbers are unique identifiers for the aircraft, just like any other U.S. military or government aircraft.
Air Force One: When the President of the United States is aboard, any Air Force aircraft he flies on is designated "Air Force One." However, the two most commonly used aircraft for this purpose are the Boeing VC-25A, which are modified Boeing 747-200Bs. These planes have the tail numbers 28000 and 29000.
Air Force Two: This designation is used when the Vice President of the United States is on board. The most commonly used aircraft for this purpose are the Boeing C-32A, which are modified Boeing 757-200s. These aircraft also have specific tail numbers, like 80001 through 80005.
These numbers are displayed on the aircraft's vertical stabilizer (tail fin) and are part of the standard identification for military and government aircraft.
Chat GPT isn't an argument.
Hey man, at least i did the bare minimum research to see if what you said is plausible. You just spouted out rubbish and then doubled down.
When did I double down?
I don't think I can help you. Figure it out.
It's a fair point, but what exactly is your argument? That Biden as Commander in Chief instructed Kamala to fly a plane without registration, in contrast to what has been done by all the VPs before her?
What do you figure the purpose is of that?
I don't have a point beyond what I explicitly stated. I can't get excited over the lack of a tail number on Air Force 2.
If this is being done by white hats (which it may very well be) , then ok fine, it just isn't very compelling to me.. I already know I'm watching a movie anyway from more compelling things that have occurred
Why didn't this come out sooner? Also, this would have explain why she never went anywhere on official VP/ State business.
u/Saigunx delivered the goods here:
https://www.twz.com/air-force-c-32-jets-are-going-incognito-under-new-security-policy
It's apparently been known for a while. Thing is the Biden administration hasn't been very prolific with their flying and their crowds have been minimal, so it's no surprise it went unnoticed.
https://www.twz.com/air-force-c-32-jets-are-going-incognito-under-new-security-policy
Interesting! And the comments are even more interesting.
Isn't AF2 just any plane that has the VP on board? And AF1 is any plane that has the President on board?
Correct but the fact that the POTUS or VP is flying doesn't remove the plane's registration number. See the other posts here that show Cheney/Biden/Pence flying as AF2 callsign on planes with various registration numbers.
"Air Mobility Command began removing tail numbers over a year ago for security purposes, including on Air Force One and Air Force Two."
Damn MERF you're ON IT today!!! Nice work!!!
(Well not ON the plane ...Tell evel knievel to get ON the plane...) 😂
It should be remembered that political campaigning is not official business of the Executive, so the airplane's appearance would fall under the provision of removing the registration number ("operated for the purpose of exhibition").
In that case it wouldn't be designated AF2 either, and since when did presidential candidates get a free plane to jet about in?
It would still be the Vice President flying under federal protection. The campaign may be footing the trip expenses. AF2 is only a call sign, so it is completely fluid.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/USAF_C-32A.jpg/640px-USAF_C-32A.jpg
The real one. 👁️🤔👁️
It's one of them. Seems to be several though. 80002, 90003, 90004. Possibly others.
True. There are several C-32s. Not sure how many are configured as AF-1, AF-2 capable.
Air Force C32 jets are going incognito
Seems like a new policy
While I'd love for you to be correct about the scripted moved, I don't believe it. And it also makes no sense for it to be a scripted movie.
Fren I don't know what to tell you other than to read the drops and widen the range of possibilities you're considering.
u/#q1450
u/#q813
u/#q1449
Yes. One more for our “Devolution” folder.
Video of the plain here: https://www.youtube.com/live/j9DdAsQkghk?feature=shared&t=239
Its called a BORT number and it is required to fly.
Great post! About the other topic of AI and Detroit, is somebody trying to sabotaging Trump campaign by having TruthSocial say nobody was there at Kam(b)ala Detroit event? Or does Trump intentionally do that to get people to start thinking about AI? ____ Why didn’t Trump simply focus on the registration number that isn’t there on the plane? __ Anyways, I think you’ve got the better post for the day.
All great questions. I don't know at this point. IMO sufficient pictures & video exist to indicate the event was real, and I think it's within the realm of plausibility to create such an event--even with Kamala's low approval ratings.
But Trump and the other posts on Truth have me wondering if we're experiencing another level of reveal as far as what's fake & real.
Great post.
Eagle eye anon!
Tippy-top work Tippy-top
I would think FAA regs would not permit that many people on the tarmac.
I verfied some of these also... 👍
Just search below term, or similar.
air force kamala vp plane 2024