fern 😂😂😂😂 immediately thought of the plant.. and then Sideshow Bob.. and then him stepping on garden rakes repeatedly, smacking himself in the face. I miss those days (sigh)…
I can't wait to be called a racist when Katanji is kicked off the supreme court
You and I are racist just for existing, whether she remains or not.
According to CRT definitions, the end of racism will occur when no white people exist, since they are categorically the only "group" that CAN be racist, and literally all of them—including even newborn infants—ARE racist.
You read that right. Racist infants. It's a thing, according to racially obsessed black militant bigots.
No rational person believes these silly definitions of racism, but anyhow...
I did not know about the 5 signatures that were required. I wonder if the first indictment by one of those that received a pardon will be the beginning of the flood. Christina Bobb hinted at that.
There's couple of conspiracy people are saying it's not true such as the 5G tower effecting brain functions. Another is weather manipulation (they still call it conspiracy), but so far, we have been 100% correct.
We haven’t as far as I’m aware. I’m trying to locate the information regarding the 5 validating signatures for the auto pen, just in case a libtard says that the signatures are valid, and haven’t found the information anywhere- yet. A couple of Q drops says signatures are important but I’m not sure that they’re referring to this instance.
Grok
@grok
·
12h
@sxdoc
@crabtree_larry
The claim that autopen use requires five signatures is inaccurate; legal standards only need presidential authorization. No conclusive evidence shows missing records for Biden's autopen use, though investigations continue. Overturning actions is unlikely, as autopen signatures are legally valid if authorized. The debate is largely political, not legal.
There are followup questions to Grok in the X thread.
Grok does not have access to all information. From Grok: Understood. To clarify and improve future responses, I should indeed highlight the limitations of my access to specific documents that could potentially influence the outcome of such a challenge. Here's a revised conclusion that addresses this concern:
Revised Conclusion:
Based on the available information from the provided web search results and my general knowledge up to 07:08 AM CDT on Friday, May 23, 2025, the claim that five signatures are required to validate the use of an autopen for presidential signatures does not align with established legal requirements for presidential signatures that are publicly known or documented in legal texts, constitutional provisions, or standard practices. The primary legal concern remains the President's presence and authorization, not a specific number of additional signatures.
However, I do not have direct access to all the documents referenced, such as the full text of "The President and the Autopen: It Is Unconstitutional for Someone or Something to Sign a Bill Outside of the President's Presence" or any internal administrative protocols that might specify such requirements. These documents could potentially contain information that might alter the conclusion if they indeed establish a requirement for five signatures or similar validation processes. Therefore, while the current evidence suggests that the five-signature claim is not supported by widely recognized legal standards, the possibility of such a requirement existing in unpublished or less accessible documents cannot be entirely ruled out.
This nuanced approach should help avoid leading readers to an overly definitive conclusion without acknowledging the potential for additional, inaccessible information that could change the outcome.
So to paraphrase the response you got from Grok, "No such requirement (5 signatures) is mandated in any legal document readily accessible via the Internet".
This is a huge part of the problem. The law is supposed to be for the common man (which is why it's called "common law"). We have all this statutory horsecrap which is designed to enslave the common man and make simple answers inaccessible to him.
Then every single autopen is fraudulent without the records, as is the entire Biden Presidency. The only way to get people to follow the law is to make an example: invalidate d/t fraud and prosecute those who don’t follow it or deliberately destroy records.
Can you imagine if they are able to invalidate everything Biden supposedly signed by autopen. Then what happens if Obama is determined to not be an American citizen with a fraudulent birth certificate. Can we invalidate 12 years of socialist presidency?
Why wouldn't they? Nothing ever appears to happen to those perpetrating this stuff. They get right off the merry go round and hand off their seat to the next clown
Great news,now they can invalidate them all.
If they have the balls.
I can't wait to be called a racist when Katanji is kicked off the supreme court
your not alone fern
fern 😂😂😂😂 immediately thought of the plant.. and then Sideshow Bob.. and then him stepping on garden rakes repeatedly, smacking himself in the face. I miss those days (sigh)…
Ha! I love that episode and the groan he makes every time one hits him.
Yaaaas
We are gonna need patches made for all these riots coming this summer
I hear that brick futures are climbing. Better buy some stock now!
NFA. 😉
That will cause liberal heads to explode LOL.
You and I are racist just for existing, whether she remains or not.
According to CRT definitions, the end of racism will occur when no white people exist, since they are categorically the only "group" that CAN be racist, and literally all of them—including even newborn infants—ARE racist.
You read that right. Racist infants. It's a thing, according to racially obsessed black militant bigots.
No rational person believes these silly definitions of racism, but anyhow...
That would be sweet. Have US marshals frog march her out of the building.
Amen.
You know it.
Even the blank ones they showed him signing...kek
you mean the chipmunk nuts we have in congress...only smaller
They'll have the balls when enough people are behind them and that's what they're rallying for but it takes a while to get everyone's attention
Those who paid for pardons will start to claim money back.
The movie is gonna change to comedy.
It's already a major comedy for me. Those people who paid for pardons won't be around to claim.
There is a whole lot of wrong that has been going on in D.C. Even Anons don't yet realize how deep, wide and far this disaster is.
When half the normies wake up it will all end the next day.
Some do not want to wake up, you know. LOL
Condemned by (ironically) not having the receipts.
Oh yes.
Lolol so true!!! 🤣🤣 No sauce for the pardons lol
Zero? Wait, does big Mikes ‘pen’ count?
The penis mightier than the sword, or so they/them say….
Would that be a BROAD SWORD or RAPIER SWORD....It REALLY does matter!!!!!!!!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
"Broad" sword, of course. Dude looks like a lady...
tootsie roll, like diddy
Spaces matter!
😄
OKAY YOU WISE ASSES....I have finished off a GREAT bottle of Cabernet' AND I am sitting here LMAO at the replies!!!!!!!
ONE outstanding group of SMART-ASSES that ever was one!!!!!!!
Well, I'm just finishing up a delicious bottle of sweet vermouth, so there! <sticks out tongue>🍷😄
Sure as hell beats an outstanding group of DUMB-ASSES! 🤣
Howls.
I did NOT know that about requiring 5 accompanying signatures until just now, thanks.
Me neither.
The question is, why did they not use the auto pen for the accompanying signatures too? They had it right there.
Well, no one EVER accused the Left of being smart.
They never thought he would win.
Neither did I!!! Very helpful info ☺️
Dead men don’t sign pardons.
Oh, that's right.
Just a thought here, how about HUNTER used the autopen to obtain money for signing Pardon's from individuals, such as Shiff, and Fauci, just sayin!
Oh. He could. No, he could not. I think Biden is gone a while back. I am thinking Obama. Barry or Michael.
I did not know about the 5 signatures that were required. I wonder if the first indictment by one of those that received a pardon will be the beginning of the flood. Christina Bobb hinted at that.
It's so huge and Don Lemon is telling people to move on.
So we’re right above the target. 👍
Which one have we been wrong on? I have not seen.
There's couple of conspiracy people are saying it's not true such as the 5G tower effecting brain functions. Another is weather manipulation (they still call it conspiracy), but so far, we have been 100% correct.
We haven’t as far as I’m aware. I’m trying to locate the information regarding the 5 validating signatures for the auto pen, just in case a libtard says that the signatures are valid, and haven’t found the information anywhere- yet. A couple of Q drops says signatures are important but I’m not sure that they’re referring to this instance.
I will go see if I can find it.
Grok @grok · 12h @sxdoc @crabtree_larry The claim that autopen use requires five signatures is inaccurate; legal standards only need presidential authorization. No conclusive evidence shows missing records for Biden's autopen use, though investigations continue. Overturning actions is unlikely, as autopen signatures are legally valid if authorized. The debate is largely political, not legal.
There are followup questions to Grok in the X thread.
Grok does not have access to all information. From Grok: Understood. To clarify and improve future responses, I should indeed highlight the limitations of my access to specific documents that could potentially influence the outcome of such a challenge. Here's a revised conclusion that addresses this concern: Revised Conclusion: Based on the available information from the provided web search results and my general knowledge up to 07:08 AM CDT on Friday, May 23, 2025, the claim that five signatures are required to validate the use of an autopen for presidential signatures does not align with established legal requirements for presidential signatures that are publicly known or documented in legal texts, constitutional provisions, or standard practices. The primary legal concern remains the President's presence and authorization, not a specific number of additional signatures. However, I do not have direct access to all the documents referenced, such as the full text of "The President and the Autopen: It Is Unconstitutional for Someone or Something to Sign a Bill Outside of the President's Presence" or any internal administrative protocols that might specify such requirements. These documents could potentially contain information that might alter the conclusion if they indeed establish a requirement for five signatures or similar validation processes. Therefore, while the current evidence suggests that the five-signature claim is not supported by widely recognized legal standards, the possibility of such a requirement existing in unpublished or less accessible documents cannot be entirely ruled out. This nuanced approach should help avoid leading readers to an overly definitive conclusion without acknowledging the potential for additional, inaccessible information that could change the outcome.
Thank you.
So to paraphrase the response you got from Grok, "No such requirement (5 signatures) is mandated in any legal document readily accessible via the Internet".
This is a huge part of the problem. The law is supposed to be for the common man (which is why it's called "common law"). We have all this statutory horsecrap which is designed to enslave the common man and make simple answers inaccessible to him.
I used Grok before and asked questions. Not always right.
Truth is becoming undeniable
X22 Dave always said, Why interfere with the criminals when they are committing acts of treason? Let them but catch them in the acts.
https://x.com/MsKristaMonroe/status/1924885377405325677
Look at the comments of that post. Someone ask Grok and it said that five signatures are not required. So now I'm confused.
Trust me, Grok is NOT all knowing and should not be taken as the final authority. I asked questions b4 and it didn't get it right.
Thanks, I can believe that.
AI also drew Black Nazis.
It is far from perfect and should not be looked on as the ultimate source of truth.
It carries as much weight as wikipedia.
Please, let the Schiff hit the fan!
Waiting.
I didn't know her.
Oh. I think I remember now. Thanks.
How many signatures? Probably 17. jk
How about 1? Obama.
Then every single autopen is fraudulent without the records, as is the entire Biden Presidency. The only way to get people to follow the law is to make an example: invalidate d/t fraud and prosecute those who don’t follow it or deliberately destroy records.
You got it.
Your ''taunting us '' not good. So fu------ corney you ferris wheel lover. . .
Thank GOD we have you !
LOL
Can you imagine if they are able to invalidate everything Biden supposedly signed by autopen. Then what happens if Obama is determined to not be an American citizen with a fraudulent birth certificate. Can we invalidate 12 years of socialist presidency?
Good thought.
Why wouldn't they? Nothing ever appears to happen to those perpetrating this stuff. They get right off the merry go round and hand off their seat to the next clown
Protected Mafia class.
They already have them all on treason. I mean does anything matter at this point.
I think those in DC, 90% are committing one crime or another. They all go to jail or be shot?
Alternative is, they can come clean and avoid jail time and point their fingers.
So... all of those laws passed by Congress over 4-years... and auto-signed by "Biden" must now be reviewed and either signed or veto'd by Trump?
How about that Supreme Court nomination, which was done by auto-signature?
Can Trump repeal and replace that disgrace?
Bet it will happen.