There is actually very little known about the human subconscious... why it exists, how it exists, where did it come from, what does it do, and why do we even have one? Science knows but we are not taught one scientific fact and it is crucial to understanding us, human beings.
Here it is, please take note.
The human brain emits brain waves. For adults, Alpha, Beta & Gamma waves represent the adult's awake state where we are consciously aware. Delta waves are when we are asleep. In between awake and sleep is the Theta state of consciousness. This is where hypnotists can insert "hypnotic suggestions" (programming) where adults then act upon those suggestions in their awake states without being aware of why they are doing so.
Here is the key. Children from ages 1-7 are stuck in their Theta states when they are awake and conscious instead of Alpha, Beta and Gamma states when they are adults. This means everything they are exposed to is literally going directly into their consciousness exactly the same way "hypnotic suggestions" go into adults from a hypnotist... pure and constant programming.
This pool of exposure (1-7) in-turn becomes the adult subconscious when they are adults. This explains why you might react strangely to certain things as an adult and have no idea why you reacted that way. You are not consciously aware of your subconscious influence.Phobias are one example.
This explains why "the bad guys" are trying to influence children in pre-K schools, TV and movies. Also why they insert this same bad programming into what they see and hear online. It literally constructs a human subconscious in adults that is akin to installing malware into a computer. It influences your experience without even knowing it is there. It is the start of a generational "woke virus" ... or malware.
So, why isn't this taught to every parent on the planet? Indeed why? Once you understand this simple science then, as a parent, you will pay very close attention to what you expose your children to (Drag Queen Story hour comes to mind) and also be aware of your own parenting skills and actions you take daily in front of your children.
I hope this helps.
-The Human Primer
Read similar info in a Montessori book recently. Basically to be mindful of what you present to a child and be aware of what stage of development they're in and what kind of learning they need.
Specifically suggested to wait a bit before engaging in fantasy play, and that hit me like a load of bricks w/respect to the early age gender transition agenda.
Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny walk into a bar...
Also, the progressive introduction of violence throughout the lives of kids is worrying.
Especially through games. Some kids games may look cute, but ultimately they are about inflicting harm to win rewards. This concept should not enter a child’s mind.
Wile E. Coyote enters the chat.
As an electrical engineer, having worked on measuring ECGs 25 years ago, I think the word "emit" is not correct. You can not measure brain waves externally, in fact, it takes conductive gel and sensitive transducers connected to high Q amplifiers to measure these signals.
Other than that; yeah, almost anything that happens in classrooms is to diminish the individual and "socialize" the child into the herd of sheep.
Well, you are correct, other that photos of auras, sensitive tech (like EEG), are used to measure brain waves. EEG is the tech the studies were based upon to determine the awake states of children 1-7 is in theta ranges. However, consider that atoms are communicating at the quantum level and this occurs instantaneously, constantly, and ubiquitously. We are only yet at the forefront of determining exactly what this inter-atom communications actually is... although we have proven the communication is there and is definitely occurring.
"Atoms" are not communicating. Not even molecules. You can make an argument that cells communicate, by transmitting nerve impulses. But a single impulse means nothing, so the definition of communication is not yet fulfilled. The communication ("message received") happens at a higher level.
Not arguing cells communicate (although they do chemically), I am stating that atoms communicate. Many experiments prove the communications are there but we have yet to determine how it is occurring. A few examples.
... there are many other experiments proving the comms are occurring. We just aren't sure how. The common denominator to all the experiments is that they are all made of atoms and all atoms are 99.99% energy... the very fabric of all physical matter.
So, although you are correct in stating that science has not yet determined what this comms are... we have plenty of proof the comms exist.
There are no "comms" unless there is a message. This is information theory, per Claude Shannon. All you are talking about is physical interaction. To elevate that to the level of "communication" deletes the idea of "communicate what?" A book can fall off a shelf, make a thump, and the sound is conveyed across the room. Nobody is there. Are you calling that "communication"? Of what? To whom? The sun shines its light on us, day in and day out. Are you calling that "communication"? Of what? To whom? Plenty of natural processes occur, but they are not "communication."
Quantum entanglement is a fact of nature, not a "comm." So far, the physicists are very careful to deny that it is not instantaneous communication, as the experiments do not support that idea. (But I am intrigued by it.)
DNA experiment: I have no idea what you are describing, since you mingle "protons" and "photons" and it is not clear what is happening by the displacement of the DNA. If all you are doing is establishing a stable resonance, there is no mystery in its persistence.
Heart & Computer experiment: This is a manifestation of foreknowledge, a paranormal phenomenon. No one knows the physical basis behind it. (This is a broad subject area. But seems to require the presence of a mind.)
Every thing is made of atoms, and atoms are 100% equivalent to energy. This is a truism, which leads to a "So what?" Energy is bashed around in normal existence, but this bashing around is not communication. Communication is the transference of information, and information is a signal whose reception reduces uncertainty. If there is no conscious recipient, there is no message received, and no communication. Where there is signal, there is always noise. You are not paying attention to the difference. Nature is full of noise. In some ways, nature would not exist as we know it, without this noise (e.g., kinetic theory of gases).
"There are no "comms" unless there is a message. This is information theory, per Claude Shannon. All you are talking about is physical interaction."
I am definitely NOT talking about physical interaction. What ever is occurring is outside of the 3D physical world. Re: entanglement. A message is indeed sent and responded to when one particle becomes "this" the other particle becomes "that" instantly. The particle doesn't know to change it's status unless it knows the other particle has changed... thus, "knowing", it had to receive that information of change. So it is communicated. We don't know how that occurs yet.
The DNA experiment is simple. As described. Photons were bouncing around inside a vacuum. DNA was placed in the vacuum and the photons line up in a stable S-curve. When they removed the DNA and sent it halfway across the globe... the photons remained in the S-curve pattern as though the DNA was still there. They were still communicating. How? We don't know yet.
About the "bashing" around energy. You are thinking solely in three dimensions. The comms being discussed here isn't happening in 3D. It is occurring outside of 3D. To understand this you must expand your thinking to include higher dimension where this communications are believed to be happening.
Particles don't know anything. A baseball does not know that when it is hit by a bat, it can fly through the air. It is a physical consequence. Same thing with quantum entanglement. The entanglement basically makes two particles into a common particle, and there is no message involved if that common particle reacts as one particle. The idea that they are separate particles is a mistaken way of understanding entanglement. There is no "other" particle.
As for the stable curve, did it ever occur to you that once a stable configuration is attained...it is actually "stable"? Inclined to be that way for the rest of remaining time. It is like I press my hand into the sand on the beach and form an image of my hand. And then when I take my hand away, I am to be amazed that the sand image is still there?
There is no belief involved in paranormal phenomena. They occur. We don't know why. We don't even know the causation. Did the computer choice cause the synapse event? Or did the synapse event cause the computer choice? Invoking higher spatial dimensions is just grabbing at magic. There is no indication that they exist in reality. And no reason for why they would be relevant.
You are not making any distinction between physical interactions and information transfer. The former exist in profusion without the latter (e.g., kinetic theory of gases), even though the latter requires the former. I don't mind a loose usage of information communication, but I am not accepting of any implication that this is a road to "secret messages" for human understanding. Communication is when you can pick up a microphone and speak to someone distant by electricity or radio. And the need for two-way communication is part of it. Messages are meaning, and meaning comes from intent. There is no satisfaction of intent by sending a message if you have no confirmation that it is being received. (The famous "open loop" problem.)
Slight change of subject, just for my own understanding of your understanding. Do you think that information can never be lost, or that information can be completely obliterated?
While I appreciate your rendering of these examples (events) by using simple, physical analogies, I don't think you are asking the right questions. So let me ask you a question: Do you believe there are other dimensions of existence? In other words, we are aware of our 3D existence through our senses... but do you believe there are equally viable existences in 4D, 5D, 12D? Or is this not one of your considerations?
If your answer is "yes" and you do believe these higher realms exist, is it not a fair assumption that these higher realms both interact and have a functional role in our 3D world? My questions are based on what these interactions and functional roles are. There is so much unexplained phenomena around the human existence that suggests something, somewhere, exists outside of our perceived spectrum of human senses. By way of example, the spectrum of frequencies and the human restrictions that limit our perceptions to a very small portion of these frequencies. Yes, we have tech to detect these out-of-band frequencies but the question remains, what else exists we are NOT detecting.
I don't post to prove I am right. I have zero investment in being right. Many institutions are asking profound questions about the human existence and are seeing some incredible results that are suggesting some profound explanations. I follow a lot of research done by "HealthMath" in Colorado. There are many such orgs around the world exploring "the unknown"... CERN is one such org. The challenging research done by Masaru Emoto. The research currently being done in the Quantum field, quite frankly, is really way over my head now. Yet, I still seek the answers.
This is why is absolutely kills me when I see a parent ignoring or being needlessly aggressive with their child. I was out walking the other day, and this little girl, 3ish, has stopped her little scooter, using the brake on the back. She stopped right in front of me, got off, put her hands on her hips and triumphantly said "YES, look daddy I stopped using brake!" Her dad was some yards distant, but he was not looking or listening, so she repeated it. He didn't even look, didn't react. She says "daddy?" and he says "what!" she says "I stopped using brake look" and he just turned to the others he was walking with and made some unrelated comment about what they were talking about, football or some nonsense. The girl looked crestfallen, and got back on her scooter, notably less enthusiastic. I felt like saying "That was great you used the brake!" but of course, being English, it's just not the done thing, so I wandered on, but felt the pain of being ignored for her. Sure a small thing, he might notice the next time and respond, and maybe it's not a big deal, but still, I hate to see children ignored like that.
Next time, cultural mores be damned. o7.
When parents aren't worth piss.
The subliminals in cartoons are placed there intentionally. Notice how each generation act a certain way? How the culture keeps changing on a corporate model? And countries in the third world that don’t have exposure to American media really don’t have such rapid culture shifts
The past 4 years was a massive trauma based min control culture shift. An attempt anyways. Let’s see how orange man changes this.
This is actually very well known in multiple ancient cultures. Part of the reason they try to wipe out any traditional culture in every country.
Also rites of passage in preteen years.
One tribe i read about separates boys from girls at that age. They said it’s time for men to go into the world of men and for girls to go with the women into the world of women. Women and men see feel and understand differently. Feminism destroyed this nation. And no matter how they push, the wnba won’t be a thing.
It's pretty funny that they show WNBA games, and they try to avoid showing the crowds (because the stands are largely empty).
Daaaammnnn. That's interesting AF. I wonder if that's why nostalgia hits us as adults in a way we can't explain sometimes, [e.g. liminal spaces, games, movies, old family pics, etc]
I think that's why I love the U.S. west! I had a few family vacations out there as a child, and always loved the western movies. Now when I get a chance to go out west, I feel totally invigorated! (but when you live in NY, you feel invigorated whenever you leave :) )
Significant!!
I was suspicious of Mayor Diblasio wanting Pre Pre K. Meaning he wanted mothers to leave their child with the state starting at 2-3 years old.
Either the government raises children or parents, starting with mothers…. Raise the children.
Even proverbs talks about raising a child a certain way till 7 I think, then proverbs says that child will Never deviate for those ways all its life. We see this everywhere in society.
Don’t tell that to the typical western liberal woman.
Listen too the "spew" that's on the View, whose the daughter of WND, founder Joseph Farah, Alyssa Farah Griffin. All you can do is PRAY as Farah and her mother, that their "Prodigal" daughter returns, too her heavenly Father who loves her. Farah and his wife trained her, as God instructed, "Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it" Proverbs 22:6
Oh she’s that Farrah, she must be a spy for Trump.
Great Post!!!
A lot of folks asking for source. There is a lot of peer reviewed material which is extremely difficult to read. I am trying to find a good rendering of the material... it has been awhile. I have know this for some 20 years. I think it was either Dr. Joe Dispenza or Dr. Bruce Lipton. Bruce is an old friend of mine so it may have come from him. If I can find a good rending of the subject I will share it. Sorry, this is old information and I have forgotten where I learned it... was a long time ago.
and a side note, although I have done a deep dive into Scientology a while back (along with every other major religion), this is definitely not sourced to Scientology... just to clear that up/
I will keep looking but here is one video I found. Sorry, but I am quite busy this week.
https://mybrainrewired.com/rewire-the-brain/understanding-theta-waves-in-children/
In all my studies in this field, i have never heard this. It makes sense, though, so perhaps you could give us some sources on this info.
Unfortunately, this appears to be the basis of scientology.
Makes perfect sense and makes me hate them even more...💔🤬🙏
You're close. Think pyramid. What is so important about those early years....
It turns out that many parents are intellectual potatoes themselves, which is part of the problem. My ex-ex was a first grade teacher and a good one, but she commonly lamented over the cardboard brains they displayed in parent-teacher conferences. No conception that they had ANY responsibility for ANY part of their child's education, in scholastics or manners. When life got easier in the 60s, all the adults seemed to enjoy mental flabbiness. And afterward.
Classical education works to rewire the brain.
Rudolf Steiner (Waldorf schools) gave dozens of profound lectures on this back in the early 1900s. Your write-up reads like it was taken directly from them, varnished quite a bit so as to be "normie friendly".
What gender do you feel like today kids?
Thought provoking post fren, could you please provide some sauce or are these just your personal beliefs/assessments?
I'm afraid it's right out of scientology.
Cool. Thanks.