They can make pure left handed and pure right handed versions of chemicals now when before it was difficult to do, you'd normally get a mixture of the two.
Nature knows the difference between mirror images of molecules. Sometimes a molecule is biologically active in one of the two forms only.
For example, vitamin C comes in left and right hand forms but only the L form is biologically acitve.
This why evolution is impossible, proteins can only contain lefthanded amino acids then they have to be in right order, then they have to be folded in an exact 3-D way to be viable. That's just one protein & there are 30,000 in the human body. One scientist said the probability of one living cell forming spontaneously is 1 to the 10 to the 40,000 power.
It's a hard fight to overcome the indoctrination that been forced on people since Darwin.
Rom. 1: 18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who SUPPRESS THE TRUTH by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because GOD HAS MADE IT PLAIN TO THEM. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
The reason why is Darwin's philosophy was based on adaptations in an isolated environment. The problem is when you try to extend that philosophy into the molecular and cellular level it falls apart.
A good analogy is how languages can diverge over time due to separation due to geography.
But the root and core of the language is universal despite the geographic and geological separations.
Also, the DNA in the nucleus of a cell is the code for all proteins & operations to construct the organism. A different set must be added to construct a different species. The information in the DNA has degraded since the creation not evolved to a different kind.
4966
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 11/27/2022 20:06:20
What is coded in your DNA?
Who put it there?
As I recall from chemistry (1970's) enantiomers are what they are called, left and right forms of the molecule. A racemic mixture has equal amounts of each.
Yes it would be great to have the entirety written in dummy-speak, aka, 'tard-talk. For we simple folk. And I bet that would not be as easy to do as it sounds.
C'mon AE. If the scientists wrote it such that you could understand it, they'd be out of a job because you wouldn't need them to act as interpreter.
I am firmly convinced that this is what is going on. They do the same thing with college textbooks. If they plainly wrote what they meant, it would make learning all of this "technical" stuff so much easier. I believe this technique is known as, "baffling with bullshit."
Scientists don't need to pander to the non-scholars.
Biologists dont know jack shit about the words engineers say meanwhile they also dont know what the archeologists are talking about.
When you reach a high enough understanding, new words really help.
A process that needs 10 sentences to describe, can just be boiled into "convergent enantiomerization", and scientists know immediatwly what page everyones on.
It saves a lot of time for science and being a scientist today would be impossible without this upgraded language.
Think about it. When you were in school, how many textbooks did you ever actually read? They were only ever used for the questions at the end of the chapter. It was the teacher that taught you the concepts in plain English.
You could get rid of that teacher and the school, too, if you could only read the damn book.
The textbooks are controlled by two or three big corporations, too. Surprise, surprise.
Why not just use Borax in the soil? My family has used it for decades & it has worked well. Dad always added it to the soil with a mix of other stuff (16-16-16 If I recall correctly equal parts nitrogen, potassium, & phosphorus) & some water retaining volcanic stuff that I don't recall now, maybe verticulite?
Tilled some in every year with a turkey manuer Mulch mix & it did well enough for us.
How would two left handed bonds improve tlvs Borax & would it be more cost effective?
They take a common chemical with a boron carbon bond, then they can replace that bond with another common piece of molecule to it. And that attachment can now be toggled as left and right, instead of both and us having to deal with it.
This means that the rare chemical we make from the simple ones have a tremendously higher yeild (cheaper).
EXPONENTIALLY CHEAPER when considering you need multiple switchings of left and right to make a pharma-drug.
Also think of lefties and righties as plugs and the human body as a left-handed socket. The lefty plug will fit the left-handed socket, but the righty plug will not.
interesting scientific development post! I appreciate it in light of the comment you made about the possibility of development of safer fertilizers, and Aslan-on-the-Move comment about evolution impossibility vs. Creation.
See a um... knowin the laws of gravitivity and polarity, ontogengy be recapitulatin phylogeny every day of the week - twice on Sunday.
These molecules may result in excessive decalescence in your interstices. This is why I prefer a rump roast compared to an eye roast because all that rainbow oil slick rain puddle nonsense is for the birds.
Yeah I figured but what does that have to do with the theme of this group? Q the great awakening, new wins, dumb lefties, etc? Should we all start posting random new breakthroughs now?
What I take from this:
They can make pure left handed and pure right handed versions of chemicals now when before it was difficult to do, you'd normally get a mixture of the two.
Nature knows the difference between mirror images of molecules. Sometimes a molecule is biologically active in one of the two forms only.
For example, vitamin C comes in left and right hand forms but only the L form is biologically acitve.
This why evolution is impossible, proteins can only contain lefthanded amino acids then they have to be in right order, then they have to be folded in an exact 3-D way to be viable. That's just one protein & there are 30,000 in the human body. One scientist said the probability of one living cell forming spontaneously is 1 to the 10 to the 40,000 power.
It's a hard fight to overcome the indoctrination that been forced on people since Darwin.
Rom. 1: 18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who SUPPRESS THE TRUTH by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because GOD HAS MADE IT PLAIN TO THEM. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
The reason why is Darwin's philosophy was based on adaptations in an isolated environment. The problem is when you try to extend that philosophy into the molecular and cellular level it falls apart.
A good analogy is how languages can diverge over time due to separation due to geography.
But the root and core of the language is universal despite the geographic and geological separations.
Also, the DNA in the nucleus of a cell is the code for all proteins & operations to construct the organism. A different set must be added to construct a different species. The information in the DNA has degraded since the creation not evolved to a different kind.
4966
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 11/27/2022 20:06:20
What is coded in your DNA? Who put it there?
This is another reason why atheists are retarded. They ignore math and probabilities.
We did not come from a bio soup.So retarded.
If you're familiar with the Fibonacci Sequence, then you can see the magnificence of God's Design in everything...✨
lotta complexity lotta time lotta evolution
Not enough time. You would need infinite time. Evolution impossible.
My god can do anything.
Oh is that what it says? That uh.. kindof makes sense. I think. Thanks!?
As I recall from chemistry (1970's) enantiomers are what they are called, left and right forms of the molecule. A racemic mixture has equal amounts of each.
I was under the impression that the human body can handle certain compounds while other things in nature could utilize their mirror image.
You lost me at the first word. kek
Yes it would be great to have the entirety written in dummy-speak, aka, 'tard-talk. For we simple folk. And I bet that would not be as easy to do as it sounds.
Microcircumscipturential nanopaeticulatoryoncromological dyotenthsenetoidal biournecularely lentricularized monopiezosynthetic coprucoundulatory gynecomastularized polykevinsorbosynthetic recrantrecated myesthulo-multioptipupiloptometric dishwashunfracted biredacted monopolyuniryofibrous dishwasher detergent
I ONLY SPEAK ENGLISH SORRY
I think I speak for all non-nano-chemists here when I say pls maek this one moar stupider right quick ples so can unnerstandt. 😁
C'mon AE. If the scientists wrote it such that you could understand it, they'd be out of a job because you wouldn't need them to act as interpreter.
I am firmly convinced that this is what is going on. They do the same thing with college textbooks. If they plainly wrote what they meant, it would make learning all of this "technical" stuff so much easier. I believe this technique is known as, "baffling with bullshit."
👆
There’s a similar term for that with regard to “Upselling”, but I can’t remember it at the moment.
Kek!
Scientists don't need to pander to the non-scholars.
Biologists dont know jack shit about the words engineers say meanwhile they also dont know what the archeologists are talking about.
When you reach a high enough understanding, new words really help. A process that needs 10 sentences to describe, can just be boiled into "convergent enantiomerization", and scientists know immediatwly what page everyones on.
It saves a lot of time for science and being a scientist today would be impossible without this upgraded language.
😂😂😂. As a retired Scientist I can confirm
Think about it. When you were in school, how many textbooks did you ever actually read? They were only ever used for the questions at the end of the chapter. It was the teacher that taught you the concepts in plain English.
You could get rid of that teacher and the school, too, if you could only read the damn book.
The textbooks are controlled by two or three big corporations, too. Surprise, surprise.
u/#topkek
I just bumped into this and keked.
Kek.
Reminds me of this classic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXJKdh1KZ0w&t=1s
Rockwell Retro Encabulator
Kek!
u/#kek u/#covfefe
There is much disappoint that it made it in there twice.
Shame! Shame! Admonished! Let us never speak of this again.
ELI5 please.
Yes like in borosilicate glass. Boron is boron, and boron silicate is boron put into a crystal lattice along with other atoms.
Why not just use Borax in the soil? My family has used it for decades & it has worked well. Dad always added it to the soil with a mix of other stuff (16-16-16 If I recall correctly equal parts nitrogen, potassium, & phosphorus) & some water retaining volcanic stuff that I don't recall now, maybe verticulite?
Tilled some in every year with a turkey manuer Mulch mix & it did well enough for us.
How would two left handed bonds improve tlvs Borax & would it be more cost effective?
They take a common chemical with a boron carbon bond, then they can replace that bond with another common piece of molecule to it. And that attachment can now be toggled as left and right, instead of both and us having to deal with it.
This means that the rare chemical we make from the simple ones have a tremendously higher yeild (cheaper). EXPONENTIALLY CHEAPER when considering you need multiple switchings of left and right to make a pharma-drug.
Boron has been almost fully depleted from the soil. Is there a connection here?
So they got a method to take a mix of lefties and righties and convert them all to righties with maybe 4-6% leftover?
Ah, this is even moar stupiderer for guddest ecksplanayshun! Thx u bigly!
Also think of lefties and righties as plugs and the human body as a left-handed socket. The lefty plug will fit the left-handed socket, but the righty plug will not.
“You can’t mount the driver’s side door panel on the passenger door.”
With a dremel tool and a whole pot of rubber cement, you sure can!
Don't forget the JB Weld!
👍🏼
Just savoring all the winning today, fren!
Still trusting God’s version over anything else. No lab products please.
Organic Medicinal Chemistry flashback!!
interesting scientific development post! I appreciate it in light of the comment you made about the possibility of development of safer fertilizers, and Aslan-on-the-Move comment about evolution impossibility vs. Creation.
Nobody does it like molten boron!
…..Mmm hmmm…ahkayyyy
See a um... knowin the laws of gravitivity and polarity, ontogengy be recapitulatin phylogeny every day of the week - twice on Sunday.
These molecules may result in excessive decalescence in your interstices. This is why I prefer a rump roast compared to an eye roast because all that rainbow oil slick rain puddle nonsense is for the birds.
?
Doesn't this seem kind of obvious?
Does Fauchi know about this?
Nobody else in this thread has the guts to ask the question so I will: WTF is this all about?
got a sticky!
Yeah I figured but what does that have to do with the theme of this group? Q the great awakening, new wins, dumb lefties, etc? Should we all start posting random new breakthroughs now?