How exactly did Wikipedia produce this Charlie Kirk post this quickly?
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
I've been active on GAW for the past 2 hours since the Kirk news broke. Only 20 minutes ago (roughly 5pm ET), we found out of his unfortunate passing. Within that 20 minutes, wikipedia has been able to produce this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Charlie_Kirk
They put that together faster than several MSM sources could even report it.
Couldn't AI write something like this extremely quickly?
My son tried to correct some medical information on a Wikipedia page one time and went back and it was nearly instantaneously changed to the original even though studies had been conducted that were in conflict with the information. It was then I realized it was being run by AI.
Maybe, but wiki is strict with there articles, edits and posts. Check out the other I posted: https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0Gl14BN/more-wikipedia-fckery-regarding-/c/
That's def not AI. Look at how they vilified his wife/widow...
Yup.
Yes ... and alter the historical account of humanity while they're at it... carefully woven tales of donkeys inc building stone buildings and fires leveling cities because a cow knocked over a lantern...
Wikipedia is regulated by 🤡s. Why wouldn't it be? Just like everything else "public" like PBS, NPR
exactly what I was thinking, since I asked IA to create a outline for me, it was quick to outline a state budget. lol BUT, there were existing resources for AI to obtain information from.
I think the whole thing was planned. It's the only clear explanation of events. Couple this with the.most recent school shooting in (ahem) Evergreen Colorado, and it seems to me like [Evergreen] herself may be involved in some way, shape, or form.
It's clear that [they] are trying to force an armed and violent response on our part, judging by the reactions I've read on Instagram. Thousands upon thousands of people on a multitude of posts (more than usual) are now discussing a greater potential and desire for escalation now.
We are in dangerous waters now with this. Charlie's assassination has the air of an historic turning point, and not necessarily in a good way. I just hope that cooler heads will prevail. I'm not above taking things to the next level, but I do understand that that isn't what's necessarily needed at this point and it wouldn't be what he would want.
Not sure if you did that intentionally, but it certainly is apropos.
With 32 references sited; yeh, how the hell did they put that together so quickly.
When you know what the plan is in advance. The cabal plans to.
This was definitely coordinated. I received a permanent ban from 4chan /pol/ this morning when I did nothing wrong and there are tons of shills there saying this bigot got what he deserved. Getting raided and astroturfed by the glowies hard. There have been a lot of connection problems with greatawakening.win today too.
Last night Tulsi announced they are looking to prosecute Obama and now they are trying to start a civil war.
That is so very true.
I would imagine that Charlie would be a big target.
Absolutely. He had a security detail but even that can't stop a bullet unless they are around him. He did amazing things on campus's all across the country and I guess someone wanted to end that. Can't have a faithful Christian talking truth and swaying college kids.
In South America, [the Cabal] is really fond of taking out future presidential candidates before they get to a point where they might consider running for office…
I’m sure the Cabal shares their ideas across the globe. It’s sick.
Germans can probably point to this problem too...
RIGHT???! When I found it, I checked Fox and CNN and neither website had even yet reported that he was officially dead. Yet Wikipedia had this ready AND published.
They also have something derogatory on Kirk's wife wiki page. Gonna post that now.
There is definitely something off about this and to put up something bad about his wife at this time when many people will be looking at it is just plain wrong.
Did you see that one too?
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0Gl14BN/more-wikipedia-fckery-regarding-/c/
"Frantzve was married to conservative commentator Charlie Kirk whos looking up at us rn, "
"looking up at us rn"
First, they would never do the rn "right now" slang abbreviation
Second, "looking up at us" implies he's in hell?
Third, she's a grieving widow today, and already has a boyfriend.
Wikipedia is some seriously evil sh!t
Good Question. To be that detailed, it must have been written ahead of the assassination. Hmmmm...I smell a rat.
You can watch it happen in real time https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shooting_of_Charlie_Kirk&action=history&offset=&limit=500
Very cool.
Do you know if/how its possible to track this one?
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0Gl14BN/more-wikipedia-fckery-regarding-/c/
All wikipedia articles have their edit history available - just click 'View History' in the top right corner
Hope the history shows whoever posted that trash on his wife's page and something is done about it..
Isn't this a board for autists who dig up information quickly? I couldn't even get on gaw because it crashed. I don't see why a developing situation with a lot of people researching it couldn't have 20 people editing at the same time. I've been editing wikipedia for decades so it's not unusual to see this happen
Maybe. I just found it odd that the wiki page was up with that much detail before the likes of cnn and fox had even confirmed he was dead. Real America's voice was the only media provider pronouncing him dead when this wiki page went up. And at the same time, this was up: https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0Gl14BN/more-wikipedia-fckery-regarding-/c/
Both definitely seem very unusual to me.
You're not supposed to notice that.
"The shot came from approximately 200 yards (180 m) away." No one knows this yet. You can hear the gunshot the moment he's struck. With the canopy and the crowd coverage higher in the back, it's more likely the shooter was closer and at ground level.
Exactly. This wiki article came out at the same time we found out he had passed. There are too many details, too quickly, that they are trying to pass off as facts. None of the MSM outlets had any of this info that they could prove. They hadn't even reported of his passing yet. All speculative at the time. Yet this wiki article came out with "facts" which were/are still largely unknown.
They've probably got them set up and ready to go on ALL 'MAGA' at a button push. Like when Time had already done their 'Hillary won' issue.
Wikipedia is the PILE OF SHIT that INVADES search results for anything to the right of Marx with an unsolicited side banner proclaiming "Such and such is a far-right fake news conspiracy theorist disinformation blah blah cuntbatter". As far as I'm concerned the whole site needs memory-holing now.
I haven't looked but they most likely used AI
which means it could be largely fake and so could the references
Because the same (((people))) that dominate Wikipedia are likely the same ones behind the assassination.
How many more pages are already written?
part 2:
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0Gl14BN/more-wikipedia-fckery-regarding-/c/
It’s called AI dude. Not everything is a conspiracy..
Did AI do this one too?
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0Gl14BN/more-wikipedia-fckery-regarding-/c/
"Frantzve was married to conservative commentator Charlie Kirk whos looking up at us rn, "
"looking up at us rn" ?
No, that’s a leftist degenerate that is defacing his memorial and mocking his death.. Anyone can edit Wikipedia until mods lock problematic users out..
Ask Hasan.
More than 2 updates per minute:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shooting_of_Charlie_Kirk&action=history
This day is really a Turning Point.
Autism and ChatGPT
AI. They dont actually have people writing stuff.
did they have the high speed cameras again?
AI ? Maybe.
It's not that hard to produce that article, especially when multiple people are working on it, and who've been producing these kinds of articles live for decades.
What are they trying to distract us from?