There is a reason women weren’t allowed to vote. Even after all the racism, they let black men vote before their own wives. Now we are all slowly realizing why.
I know a few conservative women from my admittedly conservative workplace in their 30s and 40s and they will say it themselves, women should not be trusted to vote responsibly. They are easily manipulated and think with emotions too often. We are truly devolving as a society.
I was going to say there are 4 justices who don't follow the Constitution and don't belong anywhere near a courtroom, unless they are being tried for a crime.
Like my neighbor lady. She feeds groundsquirrels and they overpopulate and encroach onto my property. Saw her acting weird the other day out front of my house so i asked her if she was picking up dog poop. Nope, she was moving an injured groundsquirrel onto my yard, after some stray cats tore it up in her yard…
All these women are completely useless NPC placeholders - imagine being a woman and favoring the destruction of girls' innocence, the presence of swinging dicks in their restrooms and locker rooms starting in prepubescence....our culture is hanging by a thread
And where was Adam when it came to protecting Eve, if she was the weaker of the two.
I don't even think the original sin was the worst of it. It was the shifting of blame from one to the other. First Adam blamed Eve even though he knew very well where the fruit was from. Eve blamed the serpent, and then to cover for them God shed the innocent blood of an animal.
I don't think that would have happened if each of them had owned up to their part in the whole thing. I'm not going to get philosophical with you or anyone. I am a Christian but I try not to look too deeply into the blood sacrifices of the bible. Just figured i would point it out. The point is they both denied responsibility for their actions, apparently something we've done since the beginning of time.
I don't consider her the weaker of the two, per se. More like, she was willing to blow up what they had going for them because she didn't use wisdom and discernment in the situation. She reacted emotionally, as women often do, and with greed. And Adam liked having a woman, so he overlooked and excused what she did, and therefore fell into line behind her and also sinned.
Look at all the women on youtube crying over how they wanted a divorce and now realize it was the worst mistake of their lives. Generally speaking, men will sacrifice their personal happiness for their families, while women will sacrifice their families for their personal happiness. Not much has changed.
Barrett, do you not have daughters at home? Do you want deranged men into their bathroom and locker room? Would you blame yourself if one on them were molested in those rooms by one of the deranged men? What are you thinking?
Are your bathrooms private or can a deranged man walk in? My wife is in a wheelchair, and if a deranged man walked into the bathroom while she is in there,
you can better believe I would have a say in the matter.
Barrett is completely stupid about this. Just imagine once Muslims start calling themselves Trans so they can go into bathrooms and locker rooms. Don't think it wont happen.
This vote was in 2024 are we just looking at things to be upset about? Also it was Gorsuch, Kagan, Jackson and Sotomayor that voted to keep it. I know you all want to hate on women so carry on.
This is why the “woman” question famously asked of Ketanji (and which she was unable to answer, no surprise) during her confirmation hearings was so important. How can you claim to support women’s rights if Title IX is intended to protect female athletes and female spaces, and yet allow “female-identifying” males into those spaces? Leftist nonsense is not only incoherent, but has destructive real-world consequences and hurts the very people they claim to protect
The SCOTUS is undoing the terrible injustice that Harris and Biden created when they changed Title IX. I do not want men in women's and girls' bathrooms, and surely do not want men competing against women, unless the women want to compete in men's sports.
I'd like to highlight the "compelled speech" aspect of this. This is very important precedent going forward. I am thinking in terms of religious laws. (you know me! :)
AI:
While the final rule text did not explicitly state "you must use a specific pronoun," critics pointed to Section 106.44(e)(2) — which defined harassment based on sex — as the source of the compelled speech concern. Specifically, the Department of Education’s accompanying "Dear Colleague Letter" and regulatory commentary indicated that intentionally and persistently using a student’s previous name or incorrect pronouns (known as "deadnaming" or "misgendering") could constitute harassment under Title IX if it created a hostile environment.
This interpretation led to the legal argument that the rule compelled individuals — students, faculty, or staff — to use specific pronouns or names that aligned with a transgender person’s gender identity, even if doing so violated their own beliefs. Opponents argued this amounted to compelled speech, forcing individuals to express a message with which they might disagree, in violation of the First Amendment.
In United States v. Kentucky (January 2025), the federal court agreed in part, ruling that the Department of Education exceeded its authority and that treating misgendering as harassment could compel speech in a way inconsistent with free speech protections. As a result, the court vacated the rule nationwide, and enforcement was halted.
Therefore, while no section explicitly said "you must use X pronoun," the application of Section 106.44(e)(2) — combined with official guidance — created the legal effect that led to the compelled speech ruling.
Bookmark this one anons. Just in case sometime down the line we are "compelled" in other ways.
The government cannot compel speech, nor can it censor speech! MAGA
Holy hateful sausage party! Cmon now, im a female and i wouldnt vote for any of that trans shit and a gazillion other things. Last i checked Roberts has a weiner and has fucked us over on SC votes more times than i can count. Not to mention the bazillions of beta males who froth at trans rights. ACB is a closet lib, and the other 3 are idiots. A true conservative woman wouldnt go for this. Reducing things to an innie or an outtie for voting and decision making makes you sound like THEM.
I'm starting to like this Supreme Court a little more everyday in the beginning of the Trump Administration second time around they weren't doing anything they're starting to come around
You know what would make it even better? If they replaced the four women with four men.
From my comment above:
All these women are completely useless NPC placeholders - imagine being a woman and favoring the destruction of girls' innocence, the presence of swinging dicks in their restrooms and locker rooms starting in prepubescence....our culture is hanging by a thread
should have been a 9-0 decision....this is just common sense.
There is a reason women weren’t allowed to vote. Even after all the racism, they let black men vote before their own wives. Now we are all slowly realizing why.
I know a few conservative women from my admittedly conservative workplace in their 30s and 40s and they will say it themselves, women should not be trusted to vote responsibly. They are easily manipulated and think with emotions too often. We are truly devolving as a society.
Bullshit. Men have done more damage to this country than women ever did. Wake up, man
What horseshit. Like men didn't fick this country up. Give me a break. Who voted to enslave Americans in 1913? Men. Get a clue.
That's your argument? Pathetic.
I guess you can't argue with pure ignorance. I'm not even going to try. I seriously can't believe there's people like you on this board.
Gorsuch is a man. It was 5 4 Amy Coney Barrett voted to remove title 9
Came here to say this. Absolutely absurd that it's not 9-0. Clowns in the highest court.
I was going to say there are 4 justices who don't follow the Constitution and don't belong anywhere near a courtroom, unless they are being tried for a crime.
Another MAJOR LOSS for the Democrat Party and the LGBT movement altogether. Keep steamrolling them, over and over. Never stop.
“LGBT movement” sounds kinda weird.
lets call it a bowel movement instead?
It's the trans movement, but it identifies as an asshole.
I also like how they re-arrange the letters from GLB to LGB
why?
Let's call it the transfag movement.
They have all kinds of nasty words for normal people.
We have a license to call them transfags.
That's a word I made up.
Call them transfags and commies and fuktards.
I'm tired of people calling them lefties.
Amy Coney Barrett? She's a Catholic right. Notice it was all the women.
All the women voted for having trans men in their bathrooms and sports? I'm gobsmacked.
Like my neighbor lady. She feeds groundsquirrels and they overpopulate and encroach onto my property. Saw her acting weird the other day out front of my house so i asked her if she was picking up dog poop. Nope, she was moving an injured groundsquirrel onto my yard, after some stray cats tore it up in her yard…
me: oh, so you’re just gonna make me kill it?
her: wide eyes, cant believe what i just said
yes, she still has a BLM yard sign in her yard
This is the reason the founding fathers nope’d tf out of letting women vote
I'm so fucking surprised..
Repeal the 19th..
Wow, Amy Barrett is a dumpster fire
All these women are completely useless NPC placeholders - imagine being a woman and favoring the destruction of girls' innocence, the presence of swinging dicks in their restrooms and locker rooms starting in prepubescence....our culture is hanging by a thread
I harp on this with the liberals who are, by fate, stuck with me and must hear it.
Maybe they secretly fantasize about being raped. It is really strange.
Hasn't this been factually proven?
How do you partially enforce this? This is the most insane thing I've read today.
No It was Neil Gorsuch not Amy Coney Barrett who voted to keep it.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/scotus-strikes-down-biden-harris-title-ix-change-some-argued-would-let-men-womens-sports
It all started with Eve.
It all started with Eve, not Steve.
And where was Adam when it came to protecting Eve, if she was the weaker of the two. I don't even think the original sin was the worst of it. It was the shifting of blame from one to the other. First Adam blamed Eve even though he knew very well where the fruit was from. Eve blamed the serpent, and then to cover for them God shed the innocent blood of an animal. I don't think that would have happened if each of them had owned up to their part in the whole thing. I'm not going to get philosophical with you or anyone. I am a Christian but I try not to look too deeply into the blood sacrifices of the bible. Just figured i would point it out. The point is they both denied responsibility for their actions, apparently something we've done since the beginning of time.
I don't consider her the weaker of the two, per se. More like, she was willing to blow up what they had going for them because she didn't use wisdom and discernment in the situation. She reacted emotionally, as women often do, and with greed. And Adam liked having a woman, so he overlooked and excused what she did, and therefore fell into line behind her and also sinned.
Look at all the women on youtube crying over how they wanted a divorce and now realize it was the worst mistake of their lives. Generally speaking, men will sacrifice their personal happiness for their families, while women will sacrifice their families for their personal happiness. Not much has changed.
Well Eve tempted Adam with an apple…
But i’m not going for that!
The Fact of this being a 5 - 4 decision is galling... Somebodies need some articles of particulars filed against them.
too close for comfort. Could have went the other way
Barrett, do you not have daughters at home? Do you want deranged men into their bathroom and locker room? Would you blame yourself if one on them were molested in those rooms by one of the deranged men? What are you thinking? Are your bathrooms private or can a deranged man walk in? My wife is in a wheelchair, and if a deranged man walked into the bathroom while she is in there, you can better believe I would have a say in the matter.
Barrett is completely stupid about this. Just imagine once Muslims start calling themselves Trans so they can go into bathrooms and locker rooms. Don't think it wont happen.
👌🙏🏻
Refers to a 2024 ruling. Still very cool, but not breaking news.
smh
This vote was in 2024 are we just looking at things to be upset about? Also it was Gorsuch, Kagan, Jackson and Sotomayor that voted to keep it. I know you all want to hate on women so carry on.
5-4 and all 4 were women smh.
Can we repeal the 19th already? Allowing women to vote has completely rotted American culture and society and I'm tired of being quiet about it.
No it was three women and Neil Gorsuch
This is why the “woman” question famously asked of Ketanji (and which she was unable to answer, no surprise) during her confirmation hearings was so important. How can you claim to support women’s rights if Title IX is intended to protect female athletes and female spaces, and yet allow “female-identifying” males into those spaces? Leftist nonsense is not only incoherent, but has destructive real-world consequences and hurts the very people they claim to protect
The SCOTUS is undoing the terrible injustice that Harris and Biden created when they changed Title IX. I do not want men in women's and girls' bathrooms, and surely do not want men competing against women, unless the women want to compete in men's sports.
I'd like to highlight the "compelled speech" aspect of this. This is very important precedent going forward. I am thinking in terms of religious laws. (you know me! :)
AI:
While the final rule text did not explicitly state "you must use a specific pronoun," critics pointed to Section 106.44(e)(2) — which defined harassment based on sex — as the source of the compelled speech concern. Specifically, the Department of Education’s accompanying "Dear Colleague Letter" and regulatory commentary indicated that intentionally and persistently using a student’s previous name or incorrect pronouns (known as "deadnaming" or "misgendering") could constitute harassment under Title IX if it created a hostile environment.
This interpretation led to the legal argument that the rule compelled individuals — students, faculty, or staff — to use specific pronouns or names that aligned with a transgender person’s gender identity, even if doing so violated their own beliefs. Opponents argued this amounted to compelled speech, forcing individuals to express a message with which they might disagree, in violation of the First Amendment.
In United States v. Kentucky (January 2025), the federal court agreed in part, ruling that the Department of Education exceeded its authority and that treating misgendering as harassment could compel speech in a way inconsistent with free speech protections. As a result, the court vacated the rule nationwide, and enforcement was halted. Therefore, while no section explicitly said "you must use X pronoun," the application of Section 106.44(e)(2) — combined with official guidance — created the legal effect that led to the compelled speech ruling.
Bookmark this one anons. Just in case sometime down the line we are "compelled" in other ways.
The government cannot compel speech, nor can it censor speech! MAGA
Repeal the 19th.
Holy hateful sausage party! Cmon now, im a female and i wouldnt vote for any of that trans shit and a gazillion other things. Last i checked Roberts has a weiner and has fucked us over on SC votes more times than i can count. Not to mention the bazillions of beta males who froth at trans rights. ACB is a closet lib, and the other 3 are idiots. A true conservative woman wouldnt go for this. Reducing things to an innie or an outtie for voting and decision making makes you sound like THEM.
Whew! Good news!
I'm starting to like this Supreme Court a little more everyday in the beginning of the Trump Administration second time around they weren't doing anything they're starting to come around
From my comment above:
I think you're right the women even Amy Coney Barrett they don't think right
that wise latina isnt impressing you?