Charlie Kirk's Security Team WAS NOT PERMITTED BY THE UNIVERSITY To Use Their Security Drones To Watch The Perimeter Of The Campus- So DYOC...
(modernity.news)
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
Comments (48)
sorted by:
I have a 100% record in detecting when something is 'off' - and that's from over 50 years experience.
I don't always know when something is off, but when I do it has always turned out to be true - and by 'off' I mean not as it is presented/understood by most people at the time.
Sometimes it's obvious what is wrong about a situation, but other times it can take me days/weeks to discern the source of my unease, and with things that are outside my ability to investigate other people have to provide the details that eventually prove I'm right.
I'm telling you right now, something is 'off' about the Charlie Kirk story.
Indeed, J. Things didn't feel right from the start. Then anomalies started jumping out quickly:
#1 regarding the focus of this article, if TPUSA's drones were not allowed, WHOSE DRONES WERE THERE DURING THE EVENT?! @JG_CSTT has done an excellent job of documenting this fact.
#2 Why was a Hades ISR aircraft circling around Utah Lake (within range of the Utah University event) at close to stall speed during the entire event?
#3 Yet again, we have another assassin like Routh who has practically no social media presence. Inexplicable given his alleged age.
EDIT/ADDITION that I neglected to mention:
#4, I'm a gun nut. A .30-06 is an extremely powerful cartridge. If Charlie had been actually hit by this round, the damage would have been catastrophic. Any of you who have hunted with a .30-06 or the slightly less powerful but similar .308 has seen the effects of these rounds on game. I don't believe there's any possibility that Charlie was shot with the .30-06 rifle that's being claimed.
💯
There is virtually no place on the body that you could shoot an elk (or even a horse) with a 30-06 at ~140yds where it would NOT leave an exit wound.
By the very nature of the weight, shape, and velocity of a ('regular/ball') 30-06, it is "inherently armor piercing" at that range to all but high level plate body armor.
I agree.
💯%. Whatever the truth is, that claim is likely false. Saw a video yesterday claiming the bullet didn’t have enough flesh to mushroom. Not convinced. Most (though not all) 30-06 leave significant exit wounds, and the compression and torquing was really weird on top of that.
Agreed, AE. There's a disturbing video that @JG_CSTT that seems to show a low velocity steel ball being fired from behind Charlie Kirk. Still not sure what to make of it, though the reaction by Kirk is more aligned with that scenario than him being hit with a .30-06 bullet.
Though I swear I die a little bit inside every time I see one of these videos and do research on the assassination. Rather grim work :(
To be absent from the body is to be present with The LORD. It’s quite obvious that it was near-instantaneous.
Imagine having to witness one of the old ways of getting taken out…. This was infinitely better. We are in a very real sense only combing over landscaping, a crowd, and the former shell of the spirit of a man to try and find Justice.
If things continue to get more insane (which, I hope not but be ready because it seems likely), this could end up being good training.
That's what I keep telling myself. But I can't not feel sick every time I watch a video of his death. And quite frankly, I don't want that to change. I have faith in the Lord, I have faith that we carry on after we discard these containers. But I can't help but value life, and it hurts every time to see the man die.
I just want the damn truth which I am convinced we are not getting.
Your #2 could lead into this being a show.
Yep. I can't tell you exactly what's wrong, or why, but something stinks.
It was a satanic blood sacrifice. Once you analyze all the symbolism is makes sense.
And I'm convinced that this is how they did it, with no drones and no bullets necessary: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1968489707563549064.html
That looks pretty convincing as far as what might have caused the injury - but how could that have been planned? The directional component would be subject to variation - unless the forces involved would have killed him anyway but the neck injury was more immediate?
I've heard nothing about the effects of a detonation on the shoulder area, if that's what happened - and I don't know if the shock wave alone would be enough to kill someone, though it looked pretty substantial from the video.
I will say that it's not always necessary to kill someone to send the message. Just the fact that you were able to get to them and injure them is sometimes enough to shut things down. (Not here, but sometimes.)
Interesting. Puncture wound made by a mic clip. Is the fellow implying that the guy in the frames opposite Charlie as the microphone wire flies is directing what is happening from something in his shirt sleeve?
The detonation could have been set off from anywhere, really, just like those pagers in Lebanon one year ago. The person would not have to be anywhere near, as far as I know.
All death is.
Something sure is off. Rooftops uncovered?
Rooftops have been covered for decades and for smaller people attending political functions.
The butler roof was covered, until it wasn't because rogue SS agents said they were too hot and would come down and look out through the windows. The brand new SS girl who should not have been leading such an event, says okay sounds good and walks off with her little clipboard.
That was an inside job getting off the roof. And now we just have roofs uncovered naturally once again. One of Charlie's people said when they arrived they saw all of those roofs surrounding them. His coworker stated look at all of these uncovered roofs so many I'm uncomfortable about this. They should have been bold and canceled due to no use of drones either.
Roofs are always covered. They proved we have such an ADHD society no one can remember Butler?
I just saw this video which offers up some new talking points (warning - graphic)
https://youtu.be/MbaQadkqkzI
edit: This might offer an explanation as to why the ground was re-laid under where Charlie was shot - perhaps it showed a bullet impact?
While not directly related to your video, this video analyzes the audio only and is pretty interesting. I don’t know enough about the topic to say for sure it means anything but others here may be more informed on the topic.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UoCApd1PhmY&t=2s
(I’m pretty sure this one is not graphic but I’ve watched a lot of videos recently so best to just tread carefully with any link you click on this topic)
Thanks for this, it is definitely odd and lends weight to something that I thought when I first saw the video of Charlie being shot.
It was a satanic blood sacrifice. I break it down in my recent post.
On the latest episode of Tommy's Podcast, they talk about drones being there. That it was a drone that shot Charlie, and the plane that took off from Provo had done a fly by 3 hours prior to Charlie being shot and returned 20 minutes after.
They're suggesting the plane dropped to like 600ft and slowed to 120 knots and launched the drones we see in some of the videos, flew off, then returned and dropped to 300ft and slowed to 118 knots picking them back up.
Found the link: Video
Its about 25 min in they start talking about it
So the plot thickens...this was also mentioned in the article, where spectators noticed drone traffic...
Yea, apparently the plane is CIA, part of the HADES program, for surveillance and eventually launching drones. But if this all true then eventually has come.
Hades another satanic reference to this whole thing.
Q team/Space Force/etc would know if a ISR HADES CLOWN Aircraft was up circling and being ridiculous tho. That's why it's strange.
They would know. So then the question I would have to ask is did they allow things to go down, are Kash et al creating a narrative around this, because they need the DS etc to exhaust their different methods or something.
Similarly to the story behind Turing and the enigma machines. Do we announce to the world we cracked the machines, or do we allow things to go down so they don't change anything and we can can keep listening in on their communications..
It's why we dig. This has been quite the ride, but I'm ready for the train to stop for them (the bad guys). You'd figure by now it would all be wrapping up. Q told us it's an 8 year plan, and it ends July 2026. 1+7=8. It was always 8. Basically we are waiting for marker 9, the arrest that confirms future direction. (I don't believe we've gotten that just yet) "they will fight, but you are ready."
Arrest the entire university.
Arrest entire dept of Clowns. Anyone ask Ratcliffe why his dept offed a Trump political ally, allegedly?
I hope Erika sues them
Me too!
Set up all the way.
Wow! I have been wondering why the local rooftops were not monitored in light of the Trump assassination attempt. Even without drones, why was nobody at least keeping a constant eye on the roofs.
The security was non existent. This was easy to prevent.
He obviously has a good sized security detail, you can get a decently capable drone for very very cheap compared to the cost of everything he does.
I won’t go so far as to say that in and of itself is suspicious but seems weird to not have a drone guy in this day and age
I'm convinced that this is the explanation right here. He wasn't shot. There is no bullet. His microphone battery pack was intentionally detonated: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1968489707563549064.html
It is a CIA school.
There is clearly a drone being flown over the area while Charlie was speaking, it can be seen in some video footage from spectators.
But if the school said no drones, it's because they didn't want Charlie to see their roof shooter...