Irrelavent. It could be done at any time by any one if they just decide to do it (if someone thinks of it). He wouldn't be setting precident so it doesn't matter.
I'm with you. Fuck this shit. Thune is as RINO as RINO can be. And if all of you "go along to get along" and "WE don't want to do it first!" milquetoast conservatives want to take this tack...just look to the current situation in Virginia -- the Demtards took FULL power of the governorship, the AG slot (and THAT one is STILL an eyeopener), and have full control of the state legislature...after many of them ran on a "moderate" platform. But lo and behold, now those motherfuckers are going full tilt boogie, HAMMER DOWN in ramrodding their shitty fringe-left policies through -- but OMG, that wasn't how they campaigned last year!! Yeah, shocker. Do you ACTUALLY think they won't do this if they regain the majority in Congress after 2026???
I do NOT care if Kamala MIGHT have done it...I don't care to find out if Demtards WILL do it in the future if they have control (and OH, they will, boys and girls). I'm way too tired of John Thune's "well, my hands are tied!" shtick. We are going 80-90mph down the slippery slope...and people like Thune need to be booted the fuck out of the way. We are no longer in ordinary times...and we need to react that way, Midterms are only a little over six months away. Sure, I "trust the plan"...but we are RAPIDLY running out of time.
Well, you know, as the Senate Majority Leader and, of course, the Vice President, we have to think about the significance of what it means to lead in this moment, in this time, where the Senate is not just a body but a body of leaders who are leading on the issues that matter most to the American people. And when we talk about the priorities, the priorities that are priority one, two, and three, it's about ensuring that every voice is heard in the chamber, because the chamber is where the voices come together to echo the needs of the communities, the communities that are community-based and community-driven. We must pass legislation that legislates the future, a future where progress is progressive, and where we address the challenges by challenging ourselves to be better, because being better is what America is all about, isn't it?
Do it now!
the fact that Republicans recognize restraint doesnt mean at all that the Democrats would restrain themselves if given the opportunity to lead.
Democrats are vicious.
Maybe do it just for a month.
Thune 's best buddy Cornyn is rumored to be a beneficiary of that Senate "payouts to sex-abuse victims" fund...paid out to a dude. Sounds like a Thune bestie to me.
That rumor also seems to have gotten Cornyn to sound more open to the Save Act.
Funny how that works.
The bad guys probably have video of Thune with a little boy.
Nobody is attacking Charlie not even really the left. They are attacking Erika. I don’t think you know what you are talking about. Most people think Charlie was killed by Israel and Erika is an Israeli plant.
And it’s just cope “British assets” she has gotten exposed by tons of people on X, tik tok and instagram. Do “British assets” need to be deployed to show that Erika Kirk had to lie about having two boyfriends before meeting Charlie Kirk. How it was exposed she was on Summer House in the summer of 2018 visibly drinking while claiming she didn’t drink. One of those boyfriends Cabot Phillips now is a speaker at TPUSA. Who hires an ex boyfriend after their husband was shot?
This is just one example of many exposing her lying about her past
And before Charlie died, Charlie questioned Israel and if October 7th was a false flag. He did it on the Patrick Bet David. Then after his death we have Erika Kirk crying about anti semitism on CBS https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUhNiB6DPa5/?igsh=Zm9nanJuNHlrM3pp
And before Charlie died, Charlie questioned Israel and if October 7th was a false flag. He did it on the Patrick Bet David.
This is the most tell tale sign for me that people are being brainwashed into a narrative and not doing their basic research before consuming clips of videos and the propaganda.
You said elsewhere that you want to do a real debate with me. I would respectfully tell you that it is not me that you should worry about, but that you should be honest with yourself. Here is what I am gonna ask you to do (I did all these 3 things today, before posting this to you). I will give you the answers, but dont take my word for it, just like you shouldnt take the word of some influence on tiktok or youtube.
Do this exercise yourself and confirm for yourself that I am telling you the truth:
Read each and every tweet Charlie did between Aug 10th and Sep 10th - one whole month before his death, and tell me how many times he calls out the Jews or Israel.
Answer: ZERO
There is ONE tweet he did about Jews: "Jew hate has no place in civil society. It rots the brain, reject it."
Do you know however what was the one topic he was focused on beyond the standard maga, anti-woke, anti-dem topics ? The topic that most people pushing "Kirk Noticing" keep completely quiet about and even act as apologists: Calling out muslims.
Another says: "You get paid in shekels, dude. Sit down 🤣"
Guess what Charlie DOES NOT do? He does not respond to this. Does not jump in to "Call out the Jews"
Watch the segment of Charlie Kirl on Patrick Bet David on Nov 13th 2024 starting at 24:18 (link is timestamped).
He talks about how he things Oct 7th was the end of Democrat party and how TikTok has been the biggest platform spreading anti-Israel sentiment to Gen Z and how they conquered that platform and reached billions of views.
Never once does he call out Israel or the Jews.
Now lets come to the video that YOU pointed to me. Charlie Kirk on Patrick Bet David on Oct 13th 2023 starting at 30:17.
This is the video where he asks "Was there a stand down order?" that is widely circulated implying he said Oct 7th was a false flag and was why he was killed. They make you think he did it just before his death, but this video was 2 full years before his death, and nowhere in it does he say it was a false flag.
But dont take my word for it. Watch the full video, or if you want, watch the section I linked (starting 30:17).
This is what he says:
I am actually very pro-Israel, I want to make it very clear.
There are other explanations (to the standdown order)
That Bibi was double crossed by someone under him
Or that Bibi had traitors working for him
Someone I know told me "Charlie, the same problem you have with the left, we have it here in Israel as well."
This is the essence: This is the closest thing to holocaust that any of us have lived through.
And throughout, he keeps lamenting the deaths of 1500 Jews on Oct 7th.
He NEVER ONCE has implied that it was a "FALSE FLAG". He clearly tells us that there is a deep state in Israel that tried to sabotage Bibi and it backfired (as he explained in the other video) and resulted in the end of Democrats.
Again, dont take my word for any of this. Verify it for yourself for it is your duty as an Anon to dig for the truth.
Please DO NOT REPLY to me until you have done all these 3 tasks, and when you do, be true to yourself first and foremost, and then tell me what you think.
Nobody is attacking Charlie not even really the left.
You feel this way because you are not looking at the bigger picture.
When you open up your mind and consider all alternatives as to why there is so much discrepancy surrounding Charlie's death from FBI and everyone else, and you realise that there are two equally possible alternatives:
FBI killed him
FBI put him in witness protection since someone else was trying to kill him
And when you see the people pushing only one of these alternatives as the ONLY POSSIBLE TRUTH, and demand to know "the truth about his death", you will realise:
Why they dont talk about the second alternative (because they know thats the real truth)
Why they keep "demanding the truth" (Because they want to know where he is and want to finish the job)
Why they keep pressuring his widow and smearing her insanely (Because they want her to slip up)
If someone wanted to critically analyse the entire situation you would heard them say "Guys, I can think of these two possibilities. Clearly we wont know which one it is, but its too important an issue to approach cavalierly. So, waith abundance of caution, assuming there is a chance that this is an FBI operation, lets wait and see what Trump administration does. We voted him in, and its only fair to give him his 4 years to see it through to the end."
I will address your remaining points in seperate comments.
If Charlie was still alive I wouldn’t be that shocked. But that doesn’t mean that Erika is innocent. And if you are correct that Erika is the successor than that is gonna need to be disclosed because nobody under the age of 40 believes that and it will fail. Erika is disposed by most people.
Erika is either a terrible actor for the white hats or guilty as fuck
Putting Vance in Thunes place would be trading an obvious RINO for a malevolent mole RINO. That would like replacing Pelosi with Booker nothing would change.
I just don't buy this. Constitutionally he can waltz in and assume the presiding chair. However - he doesn't even get a vote unless as a tie-breaker. Besides - once he gets up and leaves the Senate Majority Leader can just undo what was done, or even adjourn the Senate.
If this was attempted it would likely be political suicide. The left would immediately impeach JD in the house, and the Senate would convict him. There are a ton of RINOs that would absolutely see that as a huge power grab - in fact it would be a cross-branch constitutional crisis.
There is one other thing everyone is forgetting. The Senators could simply break quorum and leave. Like the Demons like to do in Texas.
Imagine if Kamala had done that.
Came to share this idea. Idk if I like this. Good for now, could be terrible in the future.
Irrelavent. It could be done at any time by any one if they just decide to do it (if someone thinks of it). He wouldn't be setting precident so it doesn't matter.
Correct. My point is, if Vance does it you can bet the farm the Dems will do it just out of spite.
We can't constantly be worrying about what the Dems might do if we do it first.
Good god, look at what they've done already! How much worse could it get??
I'm with you. Fuck this shit. Thune is as RINO as RINO can be. And if all of you "go along to get along" and "WE don't want to do it first!" milquetoast conservatives want to take this tack...just look to the current situation in Virginia -- the Demtards took FULL power of the governorship, the AG slot (and THAT one is STILL an eyeopener), and have full control of the state legislature...after many of them ran on a "moderate" platform. But lo and behold, now those motherfuckers are going full tilt boogie, HAMMER DOWN in ramrodding their shitty fringe-left policies through -- but OMG, that wasn't how they campaigned last year!! Yeah, shocker. Do you ACTUALLY think they won't do this if they regain the majority in Congress after 2026???
I do NOT care if Kamala MIGHT have done it...I don't care to find out if Demtards WILL do it in the future if they have control (and OH, they will, boys and girls). I'm way too tired of John Thune's "well, my hands are tied!" shtick. We are going 80-90mph down the slippery slope...and people like Thune need to be booted the fuck out of the way. We are no longer in ordinary times...and we need to react that way, Midterms are only a little over six months away. Sure, I "trust the plan"...but we are RAPIDLY running out of time.
Is that a question you really want to ask? kek
The Dems are about to get nuked from orbit (metaphorically/organizationally speaking) if they aren’t able to cheat in elections.
“But not letting us cheat is cheating!”
The sitting president could be setting precedent. (Say that quickly and repeatedly).
Mike Lee and Glenn Beck answer this well https://x.com/glennbeck/status/2032134686265221513
This first rule of holding and maintaining power:
You have to use it.
Otherwise, the enemy will take advantage of you and use it on you when they're able.
The idea is out there. Use it to wound the enemy.
Well, you know, as the Senate Majority Leader and, of course, the Vice President, we have to think about the significance of what it means to lead in this moment, in this time, where the Senate is not just a body but a body of leaders who are leading on the issues that matter most to the American people. And when we talk about the priorities, the priorities that are priority one, two, and three, it's about ensuring that every voice is heard in the chamber, because the chamber is where the voices come together to echo the needs of the communities, the communities that are community-based and community-driven. We must pass legislation that legislates the future, a future where progress is progressive, and where we address the challenges by challenging ourselves to be better, because being better is what America is all about, isn't it?
Based on her track record on the border, then nothing would have been done in the Senate.
Do it now! the fact that Republicans recognize restraint doesnt mean at all that the Democrats would restrain themselves if given the opportunity to lead. Democrats are vicious. Maybe do it just for a month.
100%!!!!!
Why hasn't this already happened?
Thune 's best buddy Cornyn is rumored to be a beneficiary of that Senate "payouts to sex-abuse victims" fund...paid out to a dude. Sounds like a Thune bestie to me.
That rumor also seems to have gotten Cornyn to sound more open to the Save Act. Funny how that works.
The bad guys probably have video of Thune with a little boy.
YES YES YES Let’s make it happen. How awesome would that be.
VP used come in 2nd place as president which means they were sort of rivals. That's different than the way it works today so IDK if this still applies
I suggested this in a comment to another post a few weeks ago.
Transfer that the attack on Charlie and Erika is an attack on Trump’s succession.
That’s why it’s coming from the British assets and coming so furiously
Nobody is attacking Charlie not even really the left. They are attacking Erika. I don’t think you know what you are talking about. Most people think Charlie was killed by Israel and Erika is an Israeli plant.
And it’s just cope “British assets” she has gotten exposed by tons of people on X, tik tok and instagram. Do “British assets” need to be deployed to show that Erika Kirk had to lie about having two boyfriends before meeting Charlie Kirk. How it was exposed she was on Summer House in the summer of 2018 visibly drinking while claiming she didn’t drink. One of those boyfriends Cabot Phillips now is a speaker at TPUSA. Who hires an ex boyfriend after their husband was shot?
This is just one example of many exposing her lying about her past
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSfePnOjpvT/?igsh=MXM4c2N4eWZscDg1aw==
And before Charlie died, Charlie questioned Israel and if October 7th was a false flag. He did it on the Patrick Bet David. Then after his death we have Erika Kirk crying about anti semitism on CBS https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUhNiB6DPa5/?igsh=Zm9nanJuNHlrM3pp
And claiming Charlie would say Daddy’s home “Shabbat Shalom” https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSDkYcAjS8z/?igsh=M3k1cmk4bGZtbjlm
So an alleged devout Christian is saying Shabbat Shalom?
Erika comes from an elite background the devout Catholic girl next door trad wife is a psyop lie.
This is the most tell tale sign for me that people are being brainwashed into a narrative and not doing their basic research before consuming clips of videos and the propaganda.
You said elsewhere that you want to do a real debate with me. I would respectfully tell you that it is not me that you should worry about, but that you should be honest with yourself. Here is what I am gonna ask you to do (I did all these 3 things today, before posting this to you). I will give you the answers, but dont take my word for it, just like you shouldnt take the word of some influence on tiktok or youtube.
Do this exercise yourself and confirm for yourself that I am telling you the truth:
Answer: ZERO
There is ONE tweet he did about Jews: "Jew hate has no place in civil society. It rots the brain, reject it."
Do you know however what was the one topic he was focused on beyond the standard maga, anti-woke, anti-dem topics ? The topic that most people pushing "Kirk Noticing" keep completely quiet about and even act as apologists: Calling out muslims.
Oh here is a TWEET with some FUN replies: https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1963710733415264565
One guy says: "Doesnt apply to Israel"
Another says: "You get paid in shekels, dude. Sit down 🤣"
Guess what Charlie DOES NOT do? He does not respond to this. Does not jump in to "Call out the Jews"
He talks about how he things Oct 7th was the end of Democrat party and how TikTok has been the biggest platform spreading anti-Israel sentiment to Gen Z and how they conquered that platform and reached billions of views.
Never once does he call out Israel or the Jews.
This is the video where he asks "Was there a stand down order?" that is widely circulated implying he said Oct 7th was a false flag and was why he was killed. They make you think he did it just before his death, but this video was 2 full years before his death, and nowhere in it does he say it was a false flag.
But dont take my word for it. Watch the full video, or if you want, watch the section I linked (starting 30:17).
This is what he says:
And throughout, he keeps lamenting the deaths of 1500 Jews on Oct 7th.
He NEVER ONCE has implied that it was a "FALSE FLAG". He clearly tells us that there is a deep state in Israel that tried to sabotage Bibi and it backfired (as he explained in the other video) and resulted in the end of Democrats.
Again, dont take my word for any of this. Verify it for yourself for it is your duty as an Anon to dig for the truth.
Please DO NOT REPLY to me until you have done all these 3 tasks, and when you do, be true to yourself first and foremost, and then tell me what you think.
You feel this way because you are not looking at the bigger picture.
When you open up your mind and consider all alternatives as to why there is so much discrepancy surrounding Charlie's death from FBI and everyone else, and you realise that there are two equally possible alternatives:
FBI killed him
FBI put him in witness protection since someone else was trying to kill him
And when you see the people pushing only one of these alternatives as the ONLY POSSIBLE TRUTH, and demand to know "the truth about his death", you will realise:
Why they dont talk about the second alternative (because they know thats the real truth)
Why they keep "demanding the truth" (Because they want to know where he is and want to finish the job)
Why they keep pressuring his widow and smearing her insanely (Because they want her to slip up)
If someone wanted to critically analyse the entire situation you would heard them say "Guys, I can think of these two possibilities. Clearly we wont know which one it is, but its too important an issue to approach cavalierly. So, waith abundance of caution, assuming there is a chance that this is an FBI operation, lets wait and see what Trump administration does. We voted him in, and its only fair to give him his 4 years to see it through to the end."
I will address your remaining points in seperate comments.
If Charlie was still alive I wouldn’t be that shocked. But that doesn’t mean that Erika is innocent. And if you are correct that Erika is the successor than that is gonna need to be disclosed because nobody under the age of 40 believes that and it will fail. Erika is disposed by most people.
Erika is either a terrible actor for the white hats or guilty as fuck
Honestly, at this late stage of the game, anything that can get Lurch to PEE OR GET OFF THE POT and let someone else do his job is a good thing.
That's right, I said, Good Thing. (Who's a good Thing? That's right. You are. Now come here, and I'll crack your knuckles for you.)
On the surface it sounds brilliant. I would like to hear Trump's thoughts about it.
How would something like this get enacted?What would happen to john?How long would it take to start
Putting Vance in Thunes place would be trading an obvious RINO for a malevolent mole RINO. That would like replacing Pelosi with Booker nothing would change.
I just don't buy this. Constitutionally he can waltz in and assume the presiding chair. However - he doesn't even get a vote unless as a tie-breaker. Besides - once he gets up and leaves the Senate Majority Leader can just undo what was done, or even adjourn the Senate.
If this was attempted it would likely be political suicide. The left would immediately impeach JD in the house, and the Senate would convict him. There are a ton of RINOs that would absolutely see that as a huge power grab - in fact it would be a cross-branch constitutional crisis.
There is one other thing everyone is forgetting. The Senators could simply break quorum and leave. Like the Demons like to do in Texas.
Hey, Vance. Don't be a Pence. You do want to be President some day, don't you?