If memory serves, this speech or large chunks of it are verbatim repeated from a Ronald Reagan speech back in the 60s.
Ah yes I was correct. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/reagans/ronald-reagan/time-choosing-speech-october-27-1964
Here is a youtube video link from the original speech -- start at about the 24 minute mark if you are in a hurry.
Does the experiment require that you live in a density / displacement free zone?
Is this an accurate representation to your physical copy OP?
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112002102025&view=1up&seq=1
Found a second digital scan copy here too. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112077635172&view=1up&seq=1
Anyone else start reading this and immediately notice the single letter difference between. Dr. Gevorkian and the euthanasia Dr Kevorkian?
If it is backed by something physical, then it is good enough to have the currency be physical as well.
At this point, I'd be onboard with issuing coinage that is some quantity / percentage of gold or silver as currency.
Eating your greens has never been more dangerous. What a time to be alive.
Hey kids back in my day we suffered through being forced to eat all of our vegetables and greens and nobody ever dropped dead or OD'd on them. Today you have it so easy since we stopped serving vegetables to you after it became apparent your daily greens might just kill you from a fentanyl overdose.
Sure you are malnourished, but truth be told those vegetables today are barely giving you any significant amount of nutritional vitamin/ mineral content when compared to what you would have received from them back in 1960. So really you would have been malnourished anyway. Yay for industrialization of our food supply.
Ok... So that is disturbing.
Thanks for sharing I will be reading up on this now.
Ahh thanks OP for clarifying
It's difficult to believe this is anything more than posturing. Launching an ICBM to resupply a unit in an active far reaching conflict (because why would you blow an ICBM rocket missile if your unit was logistically in range of regular land, sea, and air supply lines.
It would also be risky to launch an ICBM toward an active far away theatre of battle. Sucha launch would trigger many early warning systems and depending on the target destination of the ICBM, it could even cause an opponents ( thinking of the worst) to preemptively launch an ICBM at Russia.
Overall it is an interesting what if, but I do not believe this would be a viable resupply method for a host of reasons.
It would be an interesting twist for the movie if RFK Jr ends up arrested and charged with crimes similar in nature (ie baseless stupid non crimes twisted into an indictment) to what Trump is facing.
Would probably finally get us to the 94-96% awake that kept being hinted at as the go ahead with the cleanup target. We should have been at the target by now, but the TDS infection is very entrenched for some people.
Your honor. The prosecution has all the evidence it needs to prosecute which is why we obtained indictments against the defendant.
Also your honor, we need to delay trial for 9 months for.... reasons.
No your honor we don't see delaying this trial for 9 months as a violation of CPL 30.30 because we intend to use the standard prosecutorial methods of pausing the 6 month clock repeatedly. Historic precedent already shows that our DAs have delayed trial for upwards of 3 years on some suspects even when they couldn't make bail and were therefore in general pop prison without conviction. So it is the opinion of this DA that 9 months should not be considered an imposition to the defendant here either.
I recall there being thunderstorms moving through the area which were visible on earlier screen shots for that short time lapse weather camera (lightning).
The rocket would not have been as loud or carried as far as what you see from Spacex or NASA. It was not meant to launch to LEO. Sub orbital launches require carrying less fuel, allows for smaller lighter launch vehicles, allows for smaller rocket engines, makes less sound which carries fewer miles, wouldn't in my opinion wake anybody up who was more than 10 miles away from launch site.
Not really a surprise, but all major river systems in the continental US are deep red zones on that map.
Imagine having a dozen mega cities cramming 350 million + among them ( Or whatever smaller number of population left after the vaccine culling and the other planned kill off events occur), and making sure your cities are away from direct access to natural sources of fresh water.
Civilization since the beginning has developed settlements on the shores of fresh water river or lake systems for a reason. This intentional departure from the obvious basic rules of success in human settlement will allow for millions more to be culled by declaring 1 - 2 week droughts in a target city and letting pandemonium among the residents take effect along with deaths from dehydration.
Then again they do have some yellow green in the land of 1000 lakes, so some settlements are not likely planned for water rationing....i wonder what class of people in their NWO planned satanic world would reside in those settlements.
It was the Kavenaugh "wrap up smear" if I remember correctly. Sorry I don't have a link.
Just remember their motto.
Bail-outs for me. Bail-ins for thee.
This should clear up any confusion going forward.
I don't believe the PUMA is a match for the blurry left picture. It should be obvious that the white bar accent on the side begins at the third lace step from the front of the shoe.
The white accent bar in the picture begins at the first lace step and is therefore too far forward on the shoe to be match for the PUMA.
Although I also suspect the entry picture shoe is different from the dead perp shoe picture, we probably need to stop suggesting its the PUMA because that's really low hanging fruit for others to point out the mismatch there and thus derail the more important argument about there being different shoes to begin with.
Yep. I guess if Rand doesn't back down from being a threat to the deep state, then we will hear next that his son's gf was blown up while driving down the highway with a secondary thermite device to melt the engine.
Reminds me of Harry Reid and his "accident" with exercise equipment.
Edit: nevermind I didn't check if that Trump tower had a helipad. It doesn't so this is not applicable.
Realistically, he could have someone fetch whatever he needed.
Welcome to solar weather / forcing interactions with earth weather.
They said the sea temperature had to be in the mid to high 80s to support a hurricane / cyclone strength storm....
They failed to account for alternative sources of energy also being able to power weather on our planet.
Yes, these types of schemes have been wildly successful at removing people from their money since Charles Ponzi in the 1920s.
They have yet to recover since 2001.
It's by design that they don't recover. This is the modern way to have in effect a tribute paying vassal state to whatever state holds financial power in the world.
It has been my opinion on the Social Security and Medicare programs that they will die or be cancelled at the hands of the late Gen X and early Millennials after people born prior have died of old age.
The programs are simply unsustainable and I would never try to justify burdening future generations with unbearable debt paying for the prior generations. With the current system, these programs will continue to be eroded by inflation as debt and reckless monetary policy destroy our fiat currency's purchasing power. They will be more and more effectively nullified as a value. By the time I reach retirement age, we will find the value prospect of these programs a net negative for everyone. Most earlier generation (older) folk I've discussed this with are determined to get something back out of it since they paid into it their entire life. I expect nothing of value out of it, so killing the program is a simple conclusion for me.
The timing of killing it will be a few years off yet. Maybe twenty years at most, but likely sooner than that with the current apparent path our nation is traveling.
I am supportive of the idea of ending child pornography and sexual exploitation of children.
The screenshot in his tweet doesn't have a bill number assigned yet and precious few details about how the law will actually work.
So going by his general statement of allowing parents to sue platforms that post said material, I am left wondering what that will look like.
It sounds like a civil case from how it is summarized in the tweet.
Will the bill address the evidentiary standards that will be in required to prove that the images are the child of those parents?
Or more simply put, how will the parents have to prove this case to win in court?
Will the child have to be put on the stand to testify thereby having to recall their abuse again and suffer cross examination by the defense? What if the child was drugged or too little to remember or non verbal when the abuse happened, how does the bill account for those situations in it's details?
How does this bill deal with our account for abusive parents who were responsible for the content being posted. They wouldn't sue the site they uploaded to because that would be self incriminating.
I thought a social media site that failed to remove child porn content (when made aware of said content because not removing it after being alerted to the illegal content would be acting in bad faith and basically make the media site an knowing accessory to distributing child porn) could already be prosecuted regardless of the Section 230 law. I don't mind at all that civil cases can be filed (I thought that was already possible and that case law of that already exists).
So I'm left looking for details to better understand what remedy this bill creates that isn't already available if current laws were actually enforced.
Now everybody just calm down.
Sotomayor can't perform the "pro quo" part if she recuses herself. It's just a friendly unspoken business arrangement. Biden's got hundreds of similar friendly business arrangements. Obama had his, Hillary had hers and Comey and Barr and Nancy and Mueller and on and on and on.
Obviously this is a pretty normal thing. Sotomayor is just earning her side gig money to make ends meet. Nothing to see here, move along... Just like the MSM keeps telling you, this malfeasance conspiracy theory is debunked, so just check any evidence you found at the door and move along while retraining your focus on the real issues that they advice you of.