1
DontTreadOnIT [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please keep super-short comments like this in the General Chat sticky.

5
DontTreadOnIT 5 points ago +5 / -0

Great post. I believe the drops from Oct - Nov 2020 were really talking about the 2024 election. Don't think we can nail things down to a particular day or week though. The DS will have a choice in the timing and manner of [their] destruction.

23
DontTreadOnIT 23 points ago +23 / -0

This is a great assessment of where we currently are within the PLAN. Everyone who has been paying attention has these questions on their mind. I feel certain that Nov 5 is the beginning of the end. There will not be another cabal-controlled Presidency. Anons thought posts like these were about the 2020 election, but it was always going to be 2024:

u/#q4946

u/#q4945

Maybe [they] try to postpone the election, and maybe that triggers military intervention of some kind. Or maybe [they] do what they typically do, slither into the cracks and drag this thing out by undermining Trump's second term of RETRIBUTION and JUSTICE.

In the end it it's just a matter of how the DS chooses to be destroyed. Trump and the patriots have counter-measures for any path the DS takes.

6
DontTreadOnIT 6 points ago +6 / -0

The National Security Agency (NSA) is bracing for a possible quantum computing advancement by global adversaries, potentially jeopardizing global economic security and enabling foes to access top-secret communication systems. NSA's Director of Research, Gil Herrera, emphasized the gravity of such a breakthrough, which could compromise encryption systems currently safeguarding financial transactions and sensitive communications, including those related to nuclear weapons.

3
DontTreadOnIT 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great video, thanks for sharing. The ship didn't seem to slow down or speed up due to the black smoke, so maybe it was an engine malfunction after all. Very interested to see what the crew says happened.

1
DontTreadOnIT [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can also just go here https://qalerts.app/?n= and click "today"

1
DontTreadOnIT [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please post short questions like this in the General Chat sticky.

6
DontTreadOnIT 6 points ago +6 / -0

Agreed, the smoke is because of the engines running at max rpm.

The lights going on and off could have been an attempt by the crew to regain control of the ship, after being hacked.

0
DontTreadOnIT [M] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Please use existing threads on the bridge collapse.

1
DontTreadOnIT 1 point ago +1 / -0

'We lost a lot of people at Normandy, so it wasn't a win.'

The things doomtards say...

1
DontTreadOnIT [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Removed - image is likely altered

8
DontTreadOnIT 8 points ago +8 / -0

The ATF documents obtained by Judicial Watch run 88 pages, which includes a number of screenshots from a text group chat of various ATF officials on January 6 called the “January 7 Intel Chain.” The first thing we notice about the group chat in question is how nearly every single name is redacted—not an uncommon feature, to be sure—in FOIAd documents from three-letter agencies. Ashan Benedict’s name, interestingly, is one of the very few that is not redacted. Note that on January 6, 2021, Benedict was a senior ATF official as the Special Agent in Charge for all of Washington, D.C. (hence his presence in the FOIA documents).

Interestingly, the text chain in the FOIA docs begins right at the decisive time of 12:47 p.m. on January 6, a mere 7 minutes after Karlin Younger claims she stumbled upon the first “RNC pipe bomb” in a back alley by the Capitol Hill Club and a mere 5 minutes before the first “Ray Epps” breach of the West Perimeter of the Capitol near the peace monument—a breach whose fed-saturated and questionable elements we chronicle in exhaustive detail in our now classic Ray Epps series.

1
DontTreadOnIT [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Post removed - off topic

6
DontTreadOnIT 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let me guess, they suggest fluoridated bottled water?

3
DontTreadOnIT 3 points ago +3 / -0

Q-clearance Tony knew exactly what "plausible deniability" meant, that's why he mentioned it in the hearing yesterday.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›