1
Drawdraw45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. Also I haven't trusted Jan at all since the jump. After she started doing more side interviews, the more questions I heard her answer. The more I noticed the lack of substance from her responses.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

This. Plus did you see him throw up the 666 hand symbol in a Steve Bannon interview? It wasn't a speaking hand gesture either. He just randomly threw it up in front of his face like all the other evil celebrity puppets do.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean I don't even think Flynn is on our side at this point. Definitely not worth following or listening to. Provides little to no public value. Not saying he can't be engaging in purposeful misinfo, but there's too many red flags surrounding him and his brother.

9
Drawdraw45 9 points ago +9 / -0

How old were you when the Rothschilds were heavily involved in the rotten inception of the modern day nation state of Israel?

4
Drawdraw45 4 points ago +4 / -0

This scripture itself was in reference to the old testament, and used to logically dispel the Jews reasoning to stone him.

The new testament wasn't assembled till long after Jesus was gone. We still don't know for certain who many of the authors of the various books were. We include letters from Paul to the churches as God ordained gospel, when he never walked with Jesus, and was no different than any of us in the modern times receiving the spirit and then giving guidance. Those letters were meant specifically to guide those early churches and have no business being followed as the unbreakable and infallible words of God.

Why did Jesus never reference a book that was coming? Why did he not reference this new scripture that would be assembled and adhered to as if directly given from God himself? Why didn't he oversee the process of creating such scriptures if "the word" is so holy and important. Why did the catholics play such a large role in what books ended up being New Testament Canon? Why did they go about slaughtering the early gnostics and burning anything they deemed not canon or blasphemous?

Why are such important things lost in translation? Everyone places such high value on "the word", and the word is supposed to be so holy and above the errors of man. And part of this stems from John 1 and the scriptures stating in the beginning was the word. However, the more ancient Greek translation is logos. And logos has a much deeper meaning than word. Words imply what is written before us, and mistakenly people envision the scriptures always being there. But in reality logos also means reason and plan. It is also the thought and divine reasoning of God that gives order to all existence.

Also why for English speakers was our most sacred scriptures ordered to be translated and left in the name of a demonologist? King James was a demonologist and very likely used the help of Sir Francis Bacon to translate the KJV version. Both very prominent Free Masons. And it is in their version where the reduction of the more in depth concept of logos to word happens.

I believe in Jesus, I believe that a large percentage of what we read in the Bible is truth. But I don't believe Jesus ever intended us to be waiting for his New Testament book he never spoke of to drop. Nor do I view it as the infallible word of God. That is a trap in of itself because you can find many logical inconsistencies that aren't aligned within it.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

This idiot saying that the military acting on their own is not in line with this country would have absolutely been a Tory. No you fucking dolt, this nation was founded on the overthrowing of a corrupt government. I do not trust Flynn one bit.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Except they claim that they were never in possession of such a document, nor was it ever on display there. Now they could be lying, but also ask yourself why a document such as this would have ever been on display there.

The other red flag word in this letter is Illuminati. Now I do know there is documented literature pointing to the existence of this order around that time era. But did Albert Pike ever reference them in any of his other 100% verifiable writings? I think it's all too convenient to be true, really comes off as a larp.

4
Drawdraw45 4 points ago +4 / -0

Stop posting this as if it is 100% verifiably true. Afaik there is no documented proof that this supposed letter by Pike ever existed. Also the letter is using the word Nazi in 1871, when that term wasn't even coined till around 1926. I'm not saying it's 100% bullshit, but should definitely be skeptical of its authenticity.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Was thinking the same thing. What are the supposed sources for these quotes? When and where did they originate? I know he supposedly wrote the book Morals and Dogma, is this where these quotes allegedly come from?

12
Drawdraw45 12 points ago +12 / -0

Respectfully disagree. If they are guilty of crimes of treason and have committed a fraction of the dark acts we suspect them of, then they need face justice to the fullest extent. However I still agree with OP that doesn't mean we can't pray for them to do the right thing and find salvation.

8
Drawdraw45 8 points ago +8 / -0

To add some more interestingness to this. The media is calling out Trump for listing his height and weight wrong for this arrest. It was listed as 6 ft 3, and 215 lbs. One article points out that this was nearly 30 lbs lighter than his last disclosed weight.

Which if you add 6 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 5, you get 17. Which interestingly in the mentioned Q post it says the picture will be the signifier, and the signifier will force the Q. Here we have Trump giving the signifier via his mugshot, and then also providing incorrect numbers for height and weight all to add up to 17. And as most of you know 17 is Q in the alphabet, so this seems to be an example of the signifier forcing the Q.

One of the articles calling out his incorrect weight: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.in/thelife/news/trump-says-hes-63-and-weighs-215-pounds-the-men-of-tiktok-are-proving-him-0/amp_articleshow/103073685.cms

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not saying that it will happen. But a simple reason would be that it wouldn't be a real war per se. As in we would be engaging in a war with no intention of winning. The result would be the defeat of the United States.

8
Drawdraw45 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ariel was also falsely posting that the Brazilian military is executing Lula officials. Regardless of who is behind the film, it's going a long way to redpill the normies on this matter.

5
Drawdraw45 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol why are you getting downvoted? Lack of reading comprehension I guess.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, and I bet you believe the Titanic was just a tragic accident as well.

11
Drawdraw45 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm not saying it's 100% that you're wrong. But god are you such a fucking shill. Every time I see your name, you're towing the mainstream story/explanation for nearly every topic. And you do it in such a assured almost condescending manner, as if you know your position is of absolute fact. You're basically the resident agent Smith of this forum.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›