They've lied to us about virtually everything that we cannot easily verify for ourselves that gives the cabal an advantage over its serfs.
History, law, health, economics, science have all been massively perverted. My guess is that about 20% of what we've been taught in these areas is demonstrably true. There's usually a soft-middle of perhaps another 20% that contains half-truths, leaving the remaining 60% as blatant lies.
I often use anatomy and physiology as a good example. Gross anatomy/physiology is obviously true and accurate. Attempting to lie about any of this would be generally impossible as we can all easily verify that our arms are here, our stomach is there, bigger muscles are stronger, etc. etc.
Venturing into the half-truths realm, we get into ideas like "the heart is a pump" and pumps our blood. This is loosely true in one sense, as obviously no other organ can be doing this, but in the other, with a bit of thinking outside the box, you can begin to recognize that there's no way your heart is beating hard enough to PUMP blood all throughout the body. And this is because the heart is NOT a pump, but rather facilitates a very specialized and sophisticated type of vortex.
Likewise in the "half-truth" arena, we have the idea of a "heart attack" which everybody recognizes when the heart stops beating. This is quite true, but the fact that the heart stops beating has nothing to do with the heart itself. Conventional medicine largely blames heart attacks on "clogged arteries", yet even their gross anatomy textbooks demonstrate the heart is like an estuary with dozens of streams (veins/arteries) feeding it. This is quite purposeful and ensures that even if several arteries are currently under repair, others will always be able to pick up the slack to ensure blood keeps flowing. Furthermore, these instances of so-called "clogged arteries" in post-heart-attack patients are actually the exception, not the rule. Most of their large studies indicate more than half of these patients had zero "dangerously clogged arteries", or only "minor arterial buildup".
The truth is, a "heart attack" is the result of a temporary occlusion of the portion of the brain that controls the heart due to a temporarily bursting brain edema. Thus, we could more accurately call it a "brain attack". It has absolutely nothing to do with "clogged arteries", cholesterol, etc. All pure nonsense.
The greater 60% of lies come within the realm of fine/microscopic anatomy. For example, the cells organelles. A microbiologist in the 1970s/1980s showed how most of what the alleged cellular organelles were nothing more than air bubbles and staining artifacts. He was of course ridiculed by his peers, lost his grants and had his reputation smeared into oblivion. His findings were never refuted however. One particular organelle he showed was not real was the "endoplasmic reticulum (ER)", supposedly responsible for the highly complex DNA/RNA transcription process. Proof of the non-existence of the ER would throw all DNA and genetic research back into the stone ages. Further, the "MRNA vaccine" would then quickly be shown to be a complete fabrication on its face.
Anyway, hopefully you can see how the middle "half-truth" percentage would be difficult for the average person to verify and the 60%+ straight up lies part of the equation would be all but impossible to verify for anybody other than a highly trained specialist. And there's evidence galore out there that when one of these "highly trained specialists" strays from the plantation, they pay a heavy price.
It's human nature to "go along to get along" and "look the other way" when survival and the survival of their loved ones is on the line. And this is why there are only a rare few who speak out and hold their position after discovering these many half-truths and lies. Often in any particular field, you can count them on one hand.
History is actually much easier to whitewash. They simply buy up all the books that say anything other than the approved narrative, and/or discredit and ostracize anybody speaking against it.
Thus, if you want the truth, you'll have to go looking for it above and beyond the approved establishment "experts" and sources. It's out there and more available than ever before. Ask and you shall receive; seek and ye shall find!
Believe it or not, I'll actually have just such a newsletter soon, just pointing to my podcast. If you want, I'll ping you when it's up and running a few months.
"History is actually much easier to whitewash..." Every single letter of secession authored by each Confederate state, says they were butt-hurt over not being allowed to keep people as property. Each state just re-worded the complaint, and placed it in different parts of their letter. No one "white washed" that. It's not a narrative created in a book. You can read them yourself.
The confederate states didn't want to take on the debt to the crown, unknown and undisclosed to them at the time they joined the union. When the debt came due and Lincoln informed them of this "minor detail", which he was HIRED & SELECTED to do as a BAR attorney, with massive compound interest as compared to the original 6 million francs during the revolutionary war, 70-years later as per international bankruptcy rules (1789 -> 1859), they wanted no part of it and seceded. And BTW, the crown purchased the US debt originally owed to the French government. In an attempt to gain the "moral high ground", the British infiltrators (crown) then played the slavery card.
Also, 99% of southerners didn't own slaves. Only the "elite" 1% did. Funny how some things never change, eh?
There's a great archived audio at the library of Congress of a man who fought in the Civil War as a teenager. The recording was made in the 1930s I believe. He said nobody thought they were fighting to keep slavery in the south, but instead he was under the impression they were fighting for "states rights" as the federal interlopers were trying to impose their "rules", mistakenly referred to as "laws" by the brainwashed masses, on the states, precisely as the founding-fathers had warned.
Any way you slice it, it's quite obvious southerners weren't sacrificing their families to protect something they had no vested interest in...in the first place.
The cotton gin was already created. There wasn't really gonna be a need for slavery anymore. So, yeah, maybe there were some who you know were but hurt by it. But the institution of slavery was still coming to an end. the Civil War was mostly a war over rent seeking by the North on the agricultural bread stuffs of the South.
Moving goalposts and hindsight. Each Confederate state only wrote a paragraph or two for secession, but 'I'll be damned' if they didn't all manage to fit in the whining about being denied people as property. 🤔 Such a mystery. kek
As you know, every lie contains a little truth. Fortunately for truth-seekers, the Confederate states managed to include their grievance and desire to own people in every single letter of secession, with only variance in the choice of words. Imagine the laziness required to believe revisionism after the Confederacy made their intentions so clear in such a small amount of writing.
"I suppose you're a Yankee." I suppose you're clinging to ad hominems and revisionist nonsense despite clear evidence because you're ashamed of your true heritage. Not to mention, restarting the Civil War in forums is typical Fed shill bullshit.
Everything historically was a grift. Even the “purchase” of both Aslaka and California were most likely done at the end of a executioners gun barrel.... turn it over, or else.
With every new post it becomes more apparent why this is taking so long. Not only do normies initially deny the truth so it takes much longer to get them to recognize it but there is just.so.much.to.digest. The deceit has been going on for a LOOooong time.
Yes,
It all had to do with States Rights and and changing organic law to corporate law. The south did not agree. Lincoln wanted slavery of the people to the federal government as DC became slaves to England, and was not concerned about Black Slavery. Actually most slaves were free’d in the south prior to the war.
The truth is not taught!
I was watching The Cartier Family reaction to something the other day. In their discussion, I was shocked to hear them say that Lincoln didn’t start the war to free the slaves. It was economic, about control, etc.
These kids have a huge audience. I wonder if the black community at large knows/believes this?
"...it had nothing to do with slaves..." Strange, then, that every single state in the Confederacy managed to include the denied ownership of people as a grievance. This isn't hidden knowledge. You can read the letters of secession yourself; they were written by the losers, not the winners. Maybe people are "waking up" a little too hard.
Cuz no one could write something, change the words a little, spread it around for disseminating (4 am talking points anyone?) and claim it’s legit cuz “they” put it in a history book.
"Cuz no one could write something, change the words a little," 🤦♂️ Riiiight, so pretty much, revisionist bullshit to the point that you can just write in your own imaginary take on everything. Lincoln was an AliEn iNvaDeR! Those plantation owners were pure angels!!! Which Southern state has DENIED their own Letter of secession??? NONE, of course. Get real.
Is the Constitution fake too??? How about the Bill of Rights? Maybe it is. Maybe I'm entitled to everything you own, including your person. Are you sure you want to play a game that dumb?
I was always told by those that woke me up that JFK and Lincoln because they were the only two presidents to try and remove the USA's ties to the world bank.
The implication that he was a "JEW" should have nothing to do with fact he shot Lincoln. He was a puppet of the NWO that used his patriotism to do their dirty work. The Rothschilds and other 12 bloodlines are power hungry, greedy satanic worshiping pedos. Being a "JEW" has nothing to do with it. Implication an entire race of people because of these satanic arseholes is what brought about the tragedies of WW2. It is like saying all "white" men are racist. Jus sayin!
Not only that, but the Confederacy wrote their letters of secession. Each Confederate state wrote one. Each letter contained the ownership of people as the intention and complained about the Federal government's restriction of their lol "private property" (people). Only the wording changed from letter to letter. No historian created a narrative; the Confederacy told us exactly what their problem was, in writing. Revisionism is a blue pill, 100%.
You haven't read enough. The South wanted to end slavery state by state as each state got good and ready. It actually was about states' rights. There was nothing in the Constitution about slavery. It was not a listed job of the federal government. They had no business invading the South over that.
Do you think those letters would have been preserved by the Yankees if the entire reason had been laid out? No. The Yankees won, and they wrote most of the history. And you believe it all, as flawed as it is.
"You haven't read enough. The South wanted to end slavery..." Ad hominem bullshit. I've read the letters of secession, which you apparently haven't read. If you had read them, perhaps you wouldn't be spreading lies about an alleged Confederate desire to end slavery; they DECLARED their desire to keep people as property and sent 258,000 of their own men to their graves in order to attempt securing it. Go back to Consume Product.
I wonder where those "letters of secession" actually originated. If real, perhaps the writers actually did have those feelings, but the general public couldn't have since they didn't own slaves. Most of the Confederate soldiers were fighting to defend their homeland from a Yankee invasion. That's a fact.
You seem too hardheaded to accept true information that differs from the "victors write the history" crap you were fed all your life.
I can't say this was bad necessarily, because the nation Lincoln created is stronger geopolitically than the Union he inherited, but the two are nothing alike.
Lincoln literally destroyed the nation created by the Founding Fathers and then turned the ruins into a federal state with an uncompromising all-powerful central government.
The very existence of the DS is possible only because of this.
On the other hand, you don't defeat the likes of the Imperial Japan or the Soviet Union without a strong and authoritarian federal center
Good or bad just isn't nuanced enough to describe America's first dictator
Even for ourselves, it is impossible to take in all of this information.
How much information that we take for granted is false or greatly slanted?
Original colonies? Revolutionary War? Louisiana Purchase? Founding Fathers? Civil War? Mexican American War? Spanish American War?
WW1 and WW2?
They've lied to us about virtually everything that we cannot easily verify for ourselves that gives the cabal an advantage over its serfs.
History, law, health, economics, science have all been massively perverted. My guess is that about 20% of what we've been taught in these areas is demonstrably true. There's usually a soft-middle of perhaps another 20% that contains half-truths, leaving the remaining 60% as blatant lies.
I often use anatomy and physiology as a good example. Gross anatomy/physiology is obviously true and accurate. Attempting to lie about any of this would be generally impossible as we can all easily verify that our arms are here, our stomach is there, bigger muscles are stronger, etc. etc.
Venturing into the half-truths realm, we get into ideas like "the heart is a pump" and pumps our blood. This is loosely true in one sense, as obviously no other organ can be doing this, but in the other, with a bit of thinking outside the box, you can begin to recognize that there's no way your heart is beating hard enough to PUMP blood all throughout the body. And this is because the heart is NOT a pump, but rather facilitates a very specialized and sophisticated type of vortex.
Likewise in the "half-truth" arena, we have the idea of a "heart attack" which everybody recognizes when the heart stops beating. This is quite true, but the fact that the heart stops beating has nothing to do with the heart itself. Conventional medicine largely blames heart attacks on "clogged arteries", yet even their gross anatomy textbooks demonstrate the heart is like an estuary with dozens of streams (veins/arteries) feeding it. This is quite purposeful and ensures that even if several arteries are currently under repair, others will always be able to pick up the slack to ensure blood keeps flowing. Furthermore, these instances of so-called "clogged arteries" in post-heart-attack patients are actually the exception, not the rule. Most of their large studies indicate more than half of these patients had zero "dangerously clogged arteries", or only "minor arterial buildup".
The truth is, a "heart attack" is the result of a temporary occlusion of the portion of the brain that controls the heart due to a temporarily bursting brain edema. Thus, we could more accurately call it a "brain attack". It has absolutely nothing to do with "clogged arteries", cholesterol, etc. All pure nonsense.
The greater 60% of lies come within the realm of fine/microscopic anatomy. For example, the cells organelles. A microbiologist in the 1970s/1980s showed how most of what the alleged cellular organelles were nothing more than air bubbles and staining artifacts. He was of course ridiculed by his peers, lost his grants and had his reputation smeared into oblivion. His findings were never refuted however. One particular organelle he showed was not real was the "endoplasmic reticulum (ER)", supposedly responsible for the highly complex DNA/RNA transcription process. Proof of the non-existence of the ER would throw all DNA and genetic research back into the stone ages. Further, the "MRNA vaccine" would then quickly be shown to be a complete fabrication on its face.
Anyway, hopefully you can see how the middle "half-truth" percentage would be difficult for the average person to verify and the 60%+ straight up lies part of the equation would be all but impossible to verify for anybody other than a highly trained specialist. And there's evidence galore out there that when one of these "highly trained specialists" strays from the plantation, they pay a heavy price.
It's human nature to "go along to get along" and "look the other way" when survival and the survival of their loved ones is on the line. And this is why there are only a rare few who speak out and hold their position after discovering these many half-truths and lies. Often in any particular field, you can count them on one hand.
History is actually much easier to whitewash. They simply buy up all the books that say anything other than the approved narrative, and/or discredit and ostracize anybody speaking against it.
Thus, if you want the truth, you'll have to go looking for it above and beyond the approved establishment "experts" and sources. It's out there and more available than ever before. Ask and you shall receive; seek and ye shall find!
Dude you know EXACTLY what's up! I wish to subscribe to your newsletter!
Believe it or not, I'll actually have just such a newsletter soon, just pointing to my podcast. If you want, I'll ping you when it's up and running a few months.
Thanks for the kudos!
Add me to this list!
Done!
Me, three please!
Done!
Thanks!
Ping it in a post please - if it's ok with sidebar rules - I'd like to read it also
I'll DM you when it's available. I don't want to be accused of "selling yourself paytriotism" by the mods.
I've saved your post and will let you know if a few months. Thanks for your interest!
Please hit up General Chat when it's available. o7.
o7!
Appreciate it
Ping me, too, please. Always interested to hear other view points on things we usually accept as “common truth”...
will do!
This is great to hear - add me please!
Done!
"History is actually much easier to whitewash..." Every single letter of secession authored by each Confederate state, says they were butt-hurt over not being allowed to keep people as property. Each state just re-worded the complaint, and placed it in different parts of their letter. No one "white washed" that. It's not a narrative created in a book. You can read them yourself.
The confederate states didn't want to take on the debt to the crown, unknown and undisclosed to them at the time they joined the union. When the debt came due and Lincoln informed them of this "minor detail", which he was HIRED & SELECTED to do as a BAR attorney, with massive compound interest as compared to the original 6 million francs during the revolutionary war, 70-years later as per international bankruptcy rules (1789 -> 1859), they wanted no part of it and seceded. And BTW, the crown purchased the US debt originally owed to the French government. In an attempt to gain the "moral high ground", the British infiltrators (crown) then played the slavery card.
Also, 99% of southerners didn't own slaves. Only the "elite" 1% did. Funny how some things never change, eh?
There's a great archived audio at the library of Congress of a man who fought in the Civil War as a teenager. The recording was made in the 1930s I believe. He said nobody thought they were fighting to keep slavery in the south, but instead he was under the impression they were fighting for "states rights" as the federal interlopers were trying to impose their "rules", mistakenly referred to as "laws" by the brainwashed masses, on the states, precisely as the founding-fathers had warned.
Any way you slice it, it's quite obvious southerners weren't sacrificing their families to protect something they had no vested interest in...in the first place.
The cotton gin was already created. There wasn't really gonna be a need for slavery anymore. So, yeah, maybe there were some who you know were but hurt by it. But the institution of slavery was still coming to an end. the Civil War was mostly a war over rent seeking by the North on the agricultural bread stuffs of the South.
Moving goalposts and hindsight. Each Confederate state only wrote a paragraph or two for secession, but 'I'll be damned' if they didn't all manage to fit in the whining about being denied people as property. 🤔 Such a mystery. kek
They gave us a nice little matrix to live in where the good guys always win.......
General rule of thumb: if it's a widely accepted or mainstream narrative, it is more likely than not to be false in at least some central aspect.
The most effective lie is the truth badly told.
If Linda Yaccarino doesn't like it, it's probably true
Mind explaining that one fren, I'm a young an0n here and would like to understand you're joke/reference please :)
Read and digest young anon
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=Yaccarino&community=GreatAwakening
Wow I feel dumb. I completely forgot that twitter has new ceo and elon stepped back. thank you for being understanding
She is fine, she had been proven to be under white hat… even if she does bad thing from now is just part of the plan …
That is to wake Sleepers up…
So we could focus other important tasks
As you know, every lie contains a little truth. Fortunately for truth-seekers, the Confederate states managed to include their grievance and desire to own people in every single letter of secession, with only variance in the choice of words. Imagine the laziness required to believe revisionism after the Confederacy made their intentions so clear in such a small amount of writing.
"I suppose you're a Yankee." I suppose you're clinging to ad hominems and revisionist nonsense despite clear evidence because you're ashamed of your true heritage. Not to mention, restarting the Civil War in forums is typical Fed shill bullshit.
Everything historically was a grift. Even the “purchase” of both Aslaka and California were most likely done at the end of a executioners gun barrel.... turn it over, or else.
With every new post it becomes more apparent why this is taking so long. Not only do normies initially deny the truth so it takes much longer to get them to recognize it but there is just.so.much.to.digest. The deceit has been going on for a LOOooong time.
For future reference:
Triple bracket comments result in bans.
Yes, It all had to do with States Rights and and changing organic law to corporate law. The south did not agree. Lincoln wanted slavery of the people to the federal government as DC became slaves to England, and was not concerned about Black Slavery. Actually most slaves were free’d in the south prior to the war. The truth is not taught!
I was watching The Cartier Family reaction to something the other day. In their discussion, I was shocked to hear them say that Lincoln didn’t start the war to free the slaves. It was economic, about control, etc.
These kids have a huge audience. I wonder if the black community at large knows/believes this?
"...it had nothing to do with slaves..." Strange, then, that every single state in the Confederacy managed to include the denied ownership of people as a grievance. This isn't hidden knowledge. You can read the letters of secession yourself; they were written by the losers, not the winners. Maybe people are "waking up" a little too hard.
For future reference:
Triple bracket comments result in bans.
Riiiight.
Cuz no one could write something, change the words a little, spread it around for disseminating (4 am talking points anyone?) and claim it’s legit cuz “they” put it in a history book.
Ur trying too hard.
"Cuz no one could write something, change the words a little," 🤦♂️ Riiiight, so pretty much, revisionist bullshit to the point that you can just write in your own imaginary take on everything. Lincoln was an AliEn iNvaDeR! Those plantation owners were pure angels!!! Which Southern state has DENIED their own Letter of secession??? NONE, of course. Get real.
Lol…you sound vaxxed.
Is the Constitution fake too??? How about the Bill of Rights? Maybe it is. Maybe I'm entitled to everything you own, including your person. Are you sure you want to play a game that dumb?
Here’s the book… https://ia803004.us.archive.org/19/items/secret-world-government_201906/secret-world-government.pdf
I was always told by those that woke me up that JFK and Lincoln because they were the only two presidents to try and remove the USA's ties to the world bank.
just a theory
https://archive.org/details/TheSecretWorldGovernment1925
What is the name of the book? The author?
The implication that he was a "JEW" should have nothing to do with fact he shot Lincoln. He was a puppet of the NWO that used his patriotism to do their dirty work. The Rothschilds and other 12 bloodlines are power hungry, greedy satanic worshiping pedos. Being a "JEW" has nothing to do with it. Implication an entire race of people because of these satanic arseholes is what brought about the tragedies of WW2. It is like saying all "white" men are racist. Jus sayin!
Not only that, but the Confederacy wrote their letters of secession. Each Confederate state wrote one. Each letter contained the ownership of people as the intention and complained about the Federal government's restriction of their lol "private property" (people). Only the wording changed from letter to letter. No historian created a narrative; the Confederacy told us exactly what their problem was, in writing. Revisionism is a blue pill, 100%.
Not only that but many of the slave owners were black themselves!
EDIT: I got a down vote from some arse for telling the truth!
*some of.
You haven't read enough. The South wanted to end slavery state by state as each state got good and ready. It actually was about states' rights. There was nothing in the Constitution about slavery. It was not a listed job of the federal government. They had no business invading the South over that.
Do you think those letters would have been preserved by the Yankees if the entire reason had been laid out? No. The Yankees won, and they wrote most of the history. And you believe it all, as flawed as it is.
"You haven't read enough. The South wanted to end slavery..." Ad hominem bullshit. I've read the letters of secession, which you apparently haven't read. If you had read them, perhaps you wouldn't be spreading lies about an alleged Confederate desire to end slavery; they DECLARED their desire to keep people as property and sent 258,000 of their own men to their graves in order to attempt securing it. Go back to Consume Product.
I wonder where those "letters of secession" actually originated. If real, perhaps the writers actually did have those feelings, but the general public couldn't have since they didn't own slaves. Most of the Confederate soldiers were fighting to defend their homeland from a Yankee invasion. That's a fact.
You seem too hardheaded to accept true information that differs from the "victors write the history" crap you were fed all your life.
John Wilkes booth was the first model/actor.
** “Why Everything You Think You Know About The Lincoln Assassination is Wrong”**
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/lincoln/
This is a long read (there are 12 parts) but well worth it.
How about Garfield?
Where would one find more about Booth’s Jewish ancestry?
in VERY VERY old history books
Thanks. Started looking around and found some.
people here (prob Fedbois) claim Lincoln was bad....and a Rotschild
Because Lincoln was the original fedboy.
I can't say this was bad necessarily, because the nation Lincoln created is stronger geopolitically than the Union he inherited, but the two are nothing alike.
Lincoln literally destroyed the nation created by the Founding Fathers and then turned the ruins into a federal state with an uncompromising all-powerful central government.
The very existence of the DS is possible only because of this.
On the other hand, you don't defeat the likes of the Imperial Japan or the Soviet Union without a strong and authoritarian federal center
Good or bad just isn't nuanced enough to describe America's first dictator
If it's through the Lincoln family, it's not true, as Lincoln's father wasn't a Lincoln. He was born well before his mother met his claimed father.