I find it interesting that they don't have another puppet lined up to "save the day", so to speak. A chance for a big flashy election - "look how well democracy works!" "New Person will pull the country together!" etc etc. Pretend the last few years never happened and then start up the grift train again.
Instead, we're going with the "Zelenskyy is a dictator!" line. Either way, the average Ukranian person is going to get more of the same.
That is quite possibly the most oddly-written article I've read in some time. With the amount of repetition, it was as if it was written by a committee with no editor.
From the bottom of the page:
NBC News’ headline goes as follows: Man dies after hitting head during Israel and Palestinian rallies in California, officials say
It was a homicide—NBC knows this but pussyfooted around it for the sake of keeping a particular narrative intact. He fell because someone bashed him in the head, guys. That’s a homicide. He didn’t fall like in some Life Alert commercial, which your headline insinuates. It wasn’t an accident. What the hell is this?
The rest of the mainstream media have similar headlines on this topic!
Is this supposed to be a legitimate news article? Why the sudden editorializing in the second-to-last paragraph?
Her spirit cooking dinners are a ritual that involves one cutting your finger and the mixing of blood, sperm and breast milk.
It must take a fairly strong personality to convince supposedly well-educated adults to do something like that, especially getting them to think it will somehow give them "magical powers".
They're bound together not by being rational, thoughtful individuals but by being gullible idiots who'll fall for anything. And they think they should be the bosses of everyone else. "Tis to laugh!
This is why it's so hard to reach the unawakened normies, because they honestly don't comprehend what you're talking about. They know how they feel, and they don't go around doing horrible things, and they just assume everyone is like them.
That's the whole psychological trick right there. It's a tough one to talk people through. You want them to get a better view of human nature so they can arm themselves against it, but you have to destroy a sort of "innocence" that they have in order to make the point.
Oh, sure. I'll stop eating beef to "reduce my carbon footprint" the very day that the so-called "ruling classes" stop using jets for travel.
Yes, it's another piece of that programming that we have to break through - this idea that when you say "Israel" or "USA" that it means a majority of its citizens, when it actually means "some bastards who have control". We have seen how elections can be rigged, so it's not as if we can still rely on the concept of a majority voting these people in.
And that's not even going near the idea of extra-governmental forces, the people behind the curtain that no-one votes for but who somehow have a lot of say in what happens.
I miss the old Internet. Some parts I went to had some wildly creative people who were free to post whatever they wanted - a funny comment from someone could result in a meme or a song or a little animation created by someone else. Just fun little things that made you laugh or entertained you in some way.
Once the wokescolds took over (somewhere around 2012), it started to get boring as you've said. Content creators stopped putting out new things because you had no idea if it would be "acceptable" or not. And content that was considered "not acceptable" could get you cancelled in real life, so why stick your neck out?
I knew early on that there would be censorship of the political talk because Control Freaks couldn't handle people exchanging ideas freely. I just never thought that they'd come for the creative part as well.
Hahaha. Mainstream media trying to paint itself as the authority on when we should listen to authority.
I just get this strange feeling that if someone else on the "opposing" side tried something like this, she'd suddenly remember things like "Rules of Order", "decorum" and "acting like an adult" and shut it down.
If America was a Utopia - all problems solved, all potholes filled, all children fed - and there was money left over, then you could say that aid could be given to another country.
In the micro - what good would it do you to give most of your pay to charities, to the point where you're letting your own bills go unpaid? Eventually, you'd end up out of your apartment, then probably out of your job. You'd end up being one of the people who needs aid AND you would no longer be able to donate, so the charities would suffer as well.
People generally have more sense than that (self-preservation). The evil of collective government is to force that situation on people through taxation, even though it's self-destructive for countries as well.
A "wild" Card.
They outlawed subliminal messaging on the tube, but did they ever really stop it?
By the time people were really talking about subliminals (I'm thinking early 80s here), the marketing people and psychologists had moved on from the techniques they had been using. They just found better ways to shift minds without using the ultra-short visual insertions (which could be discovered by people slowing down film, etc) and the slightly sub-threshold audio stuff. They found more subtle and streamlined ways of hooking people.
(Wilson Bryan Key's books were my first real "rabbit hole" and I did a lot of reading on subliminals after I saw him interviewed on Tom Snyder's show.)
The "visibility limited" tag at the top really sells it.
What a bunch of frauds. Like they give a crap about some "peasant" dying.
There should also be severe restrictions on immigration when unemployment is high.
It makes no sense to bring in more people when the people who are already in the country don't have jobs.
I believe that the Deep State deliberately destroyed Black Christianity in America. Why? Because they were afraid of the strength of their faith.
I mean, they deliberately try to destroy Christianity everywhere, but I think they took special pains to pull black people away from that Rock. It gave them hope and a strong sense of community. Contrast and compare black culture from the 1960s (Motown, suits and ties, nice clothing, intact families, church) with today's "ratchet" culture.
African Christianity is strong but different. i don't know enough about it to understand why that is.
Could be a veiled reference to prolonged coke use. People have had to have special surgeries to replace their septum after they used cocaine for years because the harshness of the drug/cutting agents rotted out the cartilage.
Or he could be referring to prosthetics.
I usually check for a wedding ring but it appears that Biden doesn't wear one. Good catch on the suit.
Nice Chinese policy you've got there, Canada. This also will involve organ harvesting, correct?
There's something to that. This is a whole new thing we're stepping into and it's kind of the point that we're supposed to start using our own minds instead of being told what to do and what to think. Talking with others, comparing notes, sifting through whatever data we can get, making a sort of giant super-intelligent "brain".
Slipping into the old idea of "this person/group is the only one that has the only answers" will just hold the whole thing back.
.
If only it was going to look as exciting as the moon in that picture! Just once I'd like to see a hyped-up comet be something big. Not disaster-causing big, just a real sky-show.
It seems kind of hard to believe, but there are some of those people online who are convincing others that taking estrogen/testosterone will actually change you to the opposite sex. Instead of seeing them as hormones that will mess you up if you misuse them, they want to see them as "magic potions".
They aren't just trying to get us to believe their lies.They even have to lie to themselves or lie to each other in their community. It's really unfortunate that a lot of lonely and bored teenagers are getting caught up in this.
It was one of the things that the Nazis were supposedly experimenting with - "dumbing down" people by giving them fluoride. And then - 20 years after the end of the war - cities were putting it in our water, claiming it was good. And if you complained at the time, you were labelled as some sort of "crazed conspiracy theorist".
It's like a magic incantation for them.
Is anti-semitism actually illegal now? Which parts? Spoken - written - having a personal opinion that someone else doesn't agree with?
And what about spreading propaganda? Politician A speaks in the media for Palestine, Politician B speaks in the media for Israel - Which one is spreading propaganda? (The correct answer is "both").