Part of me thinks Biden wants Kamala to lose. He’s a vindictive man by nature; plus, Jill hates Kamala.
A Trump win wouldn’t mean trouble for Biden. His mental state will get him out of any prosecutions, and he can pardon Hunter.
On the other hand, a Trump win will likely mean trouble for several people, some of whom also betrayed Biden… including Obama.
I remember this. The kids ran up to Biden and ask him to pose in the picture with them… and he didn’t even realize they were all wearing Trump gear.
Kids trolling 😂
I agree. And since it’s obvious that she is taking, or drinking, SOMETHING before many of her planned speeches, it’s doubtful she can resist taking, or drinking, SOMETHING prior to this debate.
Excellent!
Another great contribution from someone who brings so much to this forum. Thank you for posting this video! 💥🥰💥
Wow… this is very interesting! Or maybe “bombshell” is a better description!
I don’t have an X account so I can only see cut off portions of a screen shot showing the search results for his name. Is this an employed/password-protected database?
So, he was a Special Agent for the FBI??! Do you have any more info on this? Thank you!
Thanks for your contribution, Pale Rider. Idk how long the "Handshake" stage lasts, but we all went through the tadpole stage before we became frogs... and frens... 😄🐸🤩
Welcome!
So, she passionately defends the First Amendment...
I wonder how many hissy fits she has thrown when anyone’s “free speech” expressed even a disagreement with abortion, transgender, etc.?
Thank You! 🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸
Cameras don't "shoot and kill"... but armed agents, wearing plain clothes and with no visible identity, would shoot and kill (if necessary, of course...).
President Trump is unpredictable, uncontrollable, and cannot be bought.
Plus a few more items considered threats to the establishment:
~ Disclosure of damning information on:
(1) Obama, Biden, Clinton (and others)
(2) The FBI, CIA, DOJ
(Supposedly the real reason for the raid on Mar-a-Lago)
~ Michael Flynn’s knowledge of “where the bodies are buried” (i.e., the reason Flynn was framed by Obama and crew.)
~ Declassification of secrets meant (by the establishment) to remain secret.
~ Reorganization or replacement of the FBI and CIA.
~ Reduction of the size of the government, and possible relocation of the larger departments out of DC.
~ Deportation of millions of illegal aliens; closing the border; and finishing the wall.
~ Reinstatement of the major task forces Trump initiated for human trafficking and abuse of children. (Biden stopped)
~ Drill-Baby-Drill; plus stop all the “climate change related” mandates.
~ Peace instead of War
~ REVENGE (earned & deserved)
In his campaign speeches Trump is now emphasizing that he will not allow any vaccines to be mandated. That is a contradiction to being hardcore pro-vax, and definitely not what Big Pharma wants to hear.
I agree— there’s a lot going on that we don’t know yet.
Good post, OP.
Is it just me… or was that the weakest, less than half-ass endorsement ever made??
He only spent a few seconds on Trump, half of which was talking about his disagreements with him and said the people wanted to give Trump another shot. All the rest of the speech was about him.
This is suspiciously close to the date of his upcoming deposition (the 13th...I think).
Could it be a ploy by the DOJ to rescue him from answering most of the questions, or being deposed at all?
You're very welcome.
And speaking of the "evil" judge, this is Robert Gouveia's update on part of that case today:
"Expert Says Mar-a-Lago MASSIVELY UNDERVALUED (but Engoron Doesn't Care)"
President Trump has had a few wins, as well as a few setbacks, but other than NY, these big cases aren't even close to the trials.
There have been solid examples of bias by the judges and the District Attorneys, but they don't seem to care. I'm not an attorney; however, it seems the majority of legal opinions indicate the bias would certainly be grounds for President Trump to win on appeal.
The moron judge in NY has already decided he was guilty before the trial (no jury) so that's how it will probably end.... and then it will likely get overturned.
On the GA case, Jim Jordan (Judiciary Committee) is on Fani's fanny about colluding with the J6 committee, which is only one of her many issues.
The judge in Florida overruled Jack Smith who wanted to seal some documents and not turn over to Trump's attorneys. Those should be juicy...
One big setback was a court deciding Trump has no presidential immunity against J6 lawsuits, so there will likely be a barrage of people suing him for their emotional distress--blah, blah, blah. On the other hand, more J6 videos are now being released, plus additional people are coming forward with proof it was all a setup. The J6 public opinion tide is turning (in Trump's favor).
Speaking of J6, the "Select Committee" destroyed videotapes of depositions and other documents, which is the destruction of government records... and makes them look even more sleazy. I think that is also illegal, but they're Democrats so they have nothing to fear...
So far, President Trump has won in all of the states that were trying to keep him off the state ballots based on the 14th Amendment. Maybe this will take the wind out of the sails of most of the remaining states that hoped this was going to be the solution to take out Trump.
Several attorneys provide overviews of Trump's cases almost daily on YouTube, Rumble, and/or other places. Robert Gouveia (YT), Scott Goulet (YT), Robert Barnes (Rumble - VivaBarnes). I'm sure others do the same, but I don't visit many social media sites, so I'm stating 3 that I do follow.
Also, Julie Kelly is an investigative reporter who gives a lot of updates on Twitter. I'm not sure if she's an attorney, but she attends many court hearings and has a lot of good info on the J6 trials (and videotapes).
Hope this helps (from a non-attorney perspective). 😉
Awe… LOVE this!
Trump was also one of 17 Republican presidential candidates when he won the nomination.
Thanks for the list; adding Doc Rich.
If I recall correctly, Obama told President Trump that the two greatest threats to the country were China and Michael Flynn.
That, along with Flynn begin prosecuted on a bogus charge, doesn't compute with him playing on their team.
Trump will return to office; Flynn has previously said he will talk when the time is right; and alarm bells are going off.
Over the target...
I meant to respond to you directly but responded to the OP by accident; my comments are below.
It's a PAC formed by a group of RINOS; most notably, one of the founders was Kelly-Anne Conway's ex-hubby, George.
The purpose of the PAC was to preserve "democracy" (along with whatever else they needed to say to raise money); however, they seem to have only one target--Trump. Not surprising, the media loved the Lincoln Project, at least in their early years, and gave them plenty of press.
They came under fire for raising a ton of money but funneling most of it to companies owned by some of the founders. They also got attacked for big fundraising campaigns to defeat Trump supporters in various elections... but failing miserably.
There was a scandal involving one of their guys (a founder, I think) being accused of sexual harassment of numerous young men and teenagers.
Other than George, Rick Wilson was the most visible. Both of them are eat up with TDS, and their obsession has always been to bring him down. Big talkers-- sort of like Biden going after CornPop; or challenging someone to a fight... or pushups. And, also like Biden, they're losers full of hot air.
That's all I remember off the top of my brain... and they're not important enough to keep up with.
Along that topic, this is an interview with Judge Joe Brown:
Judge Joe Brown With An Interesting Story About Donald Trump
Joe Brown is asked if he believes Trump is a racist. After his initial response to the question, he just keeps on talking and throws in a few more tidbits I had never heard before.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rkmd5v7I5I
(Btw, this YouTube guy, Doc Rich, is a big Trump supporter. He has over a million subscribers; I suspect he has enlightened quite a few.)
Where's that hand on Ron's shoulder (photo at top) coming from... is he hugging himself???
I'm not an attorney either but considering the Trump rulings from mostly biased judges, this does seem to be a good decision... at least in regards to these judges.
If this ruling is such a "big deal" hopefully any potential new judges will be inclined to recuse themselves if they are biased.
Perhaps they had been sent there, with incentives, just to “vote.”