5
GreenEyesOfTexas 5 points ago +5 / -0

RFK Jr.’s voice problem is caused by a condition known as spasmodic dysphonia, which he’s had for many years.

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

This was the process: After the kids were processed by Border Patrol, under Homeland Security (Mayorkas), they were turned over to Health and Human Services (Becerra). HHS was responsible for finding and vetting sponsors, as well as following up.

When being questioned in the various hearings, Mayorkas said that (his) Homeland Security is not responsible after the kids are turned over to HHS; and Becerra said that (his) HHS does attempt to vet the sponsors and then follow up, but sometimes the sponsors don’t answer the phone, etc. etc. (i.e., he has no good answers). So this is the point where all those kids fell into a black hole.

Since no one from the Biden administration has disputed the reported 300-350,000 lost kids, more than likely the number is much, much higher.

The lack of outrage (on both sides) is appalling. Until President Trump got started, there had been no action whatsoever to find these kids.

5
GreenEyesOfTexas 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm very sorry for your loss. I'm sure it must be bittersweet watching this celebration without your husband, but rest assured he knows... he knows. 🙏💖🙏

1
GreenEyesOfTexas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh the irony, since Hunter has a real little girl… with long blonde hair.

4
GreenEyesOfTexas 4 points ago +4 / -0

OMG… Both disgusting and heartbreaking.😭

And probably on Biden’s playlist… 😡

2
GreenEyesOfTexas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mayorkas came to our country; sought citizenship; received it; and then proceeded to give back with the ultimate in a big middle finger.

His “justice” should also include revoking that citizenship.

2
GreenEyesOfTexas 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only “whale” worth flipping would be Biden, but it’s doubtful there’s anything to flip since his plans for the open border are documented.

Plus, it has been established that Biden is not mentally capable to stand trial.

So, my vote is for your “Rot in prison and then in hell” recommendation.

5
GreenEyesOfTexas 5 points ago +5 / -0

Perhaps they had been sent there, with incentives, just to “vote.”

2
GreenEyesOfTexas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Part of me thinks Biden wants Kamala to lose. He’s a vindictive man by nature; plus, Jill hates Kamala.

A Trump win wouldn’t mean trouble for Biden. His mental state will get him out of any prosecutions, and he can pardon Hunter.

On the other hand, a Trump win will likely mean trouble for several people, some of whom also betrayed Biden… including Obama.

16
GreenEyesOfTexas 16 points ago +16 / -0

I remember this. The kids ran up to Biden and ask him to pose in the picture with them… and he didn’t even realize they were all wearing Trump gear.

Kids trolling 😂

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree. And since it’s obvious that she is taking, or drinking, SOMETHING before many of her planned speeches, it’s doubtful she can resist taking, or drinking, SOMETHING prior to this debate.

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excellent!

Another great contribution from someone who brings so much to this forum. Thank you for posting this video! 💥🥰💥

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow… this is very interesting! Or maybe “bombshell” is a better description!

I don’t have an X account so I can only see cut off portions of a screen shot showing the search results for his name. Is this an employed/password-protected database?

So, he was a Special Agent for the FBI??! Do you have any more info on this? Thank you!

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for your contribution, Pale Rider. Idk how long the "Handshake" stage lasts, but we all went through the tadpole stage before we became frogs... and frens... 😄🐸🤩

Welcome!

3
GreenEyesOfTexas 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, she passionately defends the First Amendment...

I wonder how many hissy fits she has thrown when anyone’s “free speech” expressed even a disagreement with abortion, transgender, etc.?

2
GreenEyesOfTexas 2 points ago +2 / -0

President Trump is unpredictable, uncontrollable, and cannot be bought.

Plus a few more items considered threats to the establishment:

~ Disclosure of damning information on:

(1) Obama, Biden, Clinton (and others)

(2) The FBI, CIA, DOJ

(Supposedly the real reason for the raid on Mar-a-Lago)

~ Michael Flynn’s knowledge of “where the bodies are buried” (i.e., the reason Flynn was framed by Obama and crew.)

~ Declassification of secrets meant (by the establishment) to remain secret.

~ Reorganization or replacement of the FBI and CIA.

~ Reduction of the size of the government, and possible relocation of the larger departments out of DC.

~ Deportation of millions of illegal aliens; closing the border; and finishing the wall.

~ Reinstatement of the major task forces Trump initiated for human trafficking and abuse of children. (Biden stopped)

~ Drill-Baby-Drill; plus stop all the “climate change related” mandates.

~ Peace instead of War

~ REVENGE (earned & deserved)

5
GreenEyesOfTexas 5 points ago +5 / -0

In his campaign speeches Trump is now emphasizing that he will not allow any vaccines to be mandated. That is a contradiction to being hardcore pro-vax, and definitely not what Big Pharma wants to hear.

I agree— there’s a lot going on that we don’t know yet.

Good post, OP.

2
GreenEyesOfTexas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it just me… or was that the weakest, less than half-ass endorsement ever made??

He only spent a few seconds on Trump, half of which was talking about his disagreements with him and said the people wanted to give Trump another shot. All the rest of the speech was about him.

1
GreenEyesOfTexas 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is suspiciously close to the date of his upcoming deposition (the 13th...I think).

Could it be a ploy by the DOJ to rescue him from answering most of the questions, or being deposed at all?

1
GreenEyesOfTexas 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're very welcome.

And speaking of the "evil" judge, this is Robert Gouveia's update on part of that case today:

"Expert Says Mar-a-Lago MASSIVELY UNDERVALUED (but Engoron Doesn't Care)"

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4-czWTTNfU]

4
GreenEyesOfTexas 4 points ago +4 / -0

President Trump has had a few wins, as well as a few setbacks, but other than NY, these big cases aren't even close to the trials.

There have been solid examples of bias by the judges and the District Attorneys, but they don't seem to care. I'm not an attorney; however, it seems the majority of legal opinions indicate the bias would certainly be grounds for President Trump to win on appeal.

The moron judge in NY has already decided he was guilty before the trial (no jury) so that's how it will probably end.... and then it will likely get overturned.

On the GA case, Jim Jordan (Judiciary Committee) is on Fani's fanny about colluding with the J6 committee, which is only one of her many issues.

The judge in Florida overruled Jack Smith who wanted to seal some documents and not turn over to Trump's attorneys. Those should be juicy...

One big setback was a court deciding Trump has no presidential immunity against J6 lawsuits, so there will likely be a barrage of people suing him for their emotional distress--blah, blah, blah. On the other hand, more J6 videos are now being released, plus additional people are coming forward with proof it was all a setup. The J6 public opinion tide is turning (in Trump's favor).

Speaking of J6, the "Select Committee" destroyed videotapes of depositions and other documents, which is the destruction of government records... and makes them look even more sleazy. I think that is also illegal, but they're Democrats so they have nothing to fear...

So far, President Trump has won in all of the states that were trying to keep him off the state ballots based on the 14th Amendment. Maybe this will take the wind out of the sails of most of the remaining states that hoped this was going to be the solution to take out Trump.

Several attorneys provide overviews of Trump's cases almost daily on YouTube, Rumble, and/or other places. Robert Gouveia (YT), Scott Goulet (YT), Robert Barnes (Rumble - VivaBarnes). I'm sure others do the same, but I don't visit many social media sites, so I'm stating 3 that I do follow.

Also, Julie Kelly is an investigative reporter who gives a lot of updates on Twitter. I'm not sure if she's an attorney, but she attends many court hearings and has a lot of good info on the J6 trials (and videotapes).

Hope this helps (from a non-attorney perspective). 😉

by MAGULQ
4
GreenEyesOfTexas 4 points ago +4 / -0

Awe… LOVE this!

view more: Next ›