Because they all pretended that it wasn't a factor. They made a BIG DEAL out of McNoName having been born in Panama, pretending they were carefully vetting presidential candidates. It was a distraction as they slid Obama past the vetting process. Same thing with Kamala. NEITHER of her parents were US citizens when she was born. She is NOT qualified to be either president nor vice-president. It's like it has now been established that natural born citizenship is no longer a qualifier for president.

"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Classic communism.

No, we need an America we CAN have faith in. And more Americans, especially the D variety that we can have faith in.

How about a body double with a hyperrealistic mask? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e-aH9DJLtc

So, could this be a hyperreal face mask? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e-aH9DJLtc

So, when the small elite want to govern everyone, they have to remove the people's internal restraints that allow them to govern themselves.

What makes anyone think they were voted in. What, like in Arizona?

As understood by the Founders and as applied to the U.S. Constitution, the term “natural born citizen” derived its meaning less from English Common Law, than from Vattel’s “The Law of Nations.”

They knew from reading Vattel that a “natural born citizen” had a different standard from just “citizen,” for he or she was a child born in the country to two citizen parents (Vattel, Section 212 in original French and English translation).

That is the definition of a “natural born citizen,” as recognized by numerous U.S. Supreme Court and lower court decisions (The Venus, 12U.S. 253(1814), Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242 (1830), Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856), Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) , Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F. Cas. 582 (C.C.W.D. Ark 1879), United States v. Ward, 42 F. 320 (1890); Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), Ludlam, Excutrix, & c., v. Ludlam, 26 N.Y. 356 (1863) and more) and the framers of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the 14th Amendment, the Naturalization Act of 1795, 1798, 1802, 1885, and our modern 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401.

https://joemiller.us/2016/01/the-difference-between-a-u-s-citizen-and-a-natural-born-citizen/

IMHO this reads like propaganda.

Nah, that doesn't sound like a testosterone injury, it sounds like a vax injury.

His alleged father was not American. Hence, not a natural-born citizen. According to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution, a candidate for the Presidency must be a “natural born citizen,” that is, a second generation American, a U.S. citizen, whose parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth.

Lloyd.@thatisfalse1 5h This was a violent racial attack on a lone white woman by a mob of black males. This needs to be called out and condemned by all decent people.

How do you say, "We're taking cars away, without saying we're taking cars away?" Mandate EV.

Thomas Sowell started out as a marxist.

I know this trans thing is being pushed on us, but consider what might be accelerating it. People want to identify with those who are privileged, have better opportunities, have more cultural moxie. For the last few decades women's "empowerment" has been pushed. There's preferential hiring of women, preferential acceptance into colleges. Boys are under attack in schools and in the culture. They're portrayed as rapists. "Women need men, like a fish needs a bicycle." What has this done to the psyche of boys?

Because illegal aliens are given drivers licenses. You can use your passport.

I call BS on suicide. Here's how his "suicide" was reported: "Former U.S. Navy SEAL Mike Day committed suicide. After hanging himself, he was discovered dead, leaving behind a family and a community that held him in the highest regard."

He hung himself? A man knew how to use guns, and no doubt had at least one, hung himself? Nope. I don't buy it.

In the early days of the leftist screaming projection, they loudly objected to Christians "shoving their religion down peoples' throats."

I came here to say that.

Well thought out, but there is a big point you missed. The word "sin" means, "missed the mark." What is the mark? "You shall be holy as I am holy (Lev. 11:44 & 1 Pet. 1:16)." How can we be holy "as" God is holy? We "partake of His holiness (Heb. 12:10)." How do we partake of His holiness? "Eat Me, and you will live because of Me (Jn. 6:57)." How do we eat Him? He is the Word, and He is God (Jn. 1:1), and His "words are spirit and are life (Jn. 6:63)." Then "the God of peace Himself will sanctify (make holy) your whole spirit and soul and body...(1 Thessalonians 5:23)."

I would assume mental illness.

So, who was it written by, and what did it say?

"beyond physics as we know them."

He points out that Biden is not the same, he looks different & acts different. He's saying that Biden has been replaced.

Is that what AI did when tasked with creating a poem of Trump v Biden (or was it Obama?)? That wasn't AI, that was a bias programmer.