Also, here's something that would get these liberal pentium cpu's to go bonkers. Ask them this. If this world is to be inherited by the younger generation, why don't we elect them? When they invariably default to the sensible position of "they're still not mature enough to know what's good for the country", ask them how the children even younger than them be mature enough to make Iife altering decisions and dictate whether they should be on hormones?
Too Iong have we expected the police to police when the power is with the people. To think the foundingfathers would have had it any other way is to be ignorant of the founding tenets that America was built upon.
What the people need now is to set the precedent with a great example of an infringement on the rights of a public servant's constituents or dereliction of duty. Sounds awfully like a certain event that happened at the capital. Rhymes with Ban You Carry Tricks.
Criminal negligence at the least. Hold them accountable. This is a breach in a citizen's rights. If they can't handle the responsibility of handling peoples' votes, the responsible thing to do is not to handle them at all and let another company do it. Since they agreed to those responsibilities, they've implicitly agreed to the consequences of criminalities pertaining to irresponsibilities.
Nothing democratic about that if their intention is to siIence opposition. Democracy, constitutional republic or otherwise, necessitates an informed populace. Concealing opinion in any way shape or form, that is to say to lie to potential constituents, is to deprive them of all necessary information required to vote responsibly. Transparency can only strengthen a democracy/republic - don't let tyrants tell you otherwise.
The question should be why should a politician Ieave richer? If ppI gain riches from politics, is it from the saIary? If it's from anywhere else, that's a ConfIict of lnterest. It means the decisions they make are not made with their constituents iin mind. Meaning, they are disenfranchising their voters and their voters' rights.
They're supposed to be public servants, not PRlVATE servants. So the question now is whose? Only an AUDlT can say. And now that they've set the precedent to check a PRlVATE ClTlZEN'S records, let's see what these servants don't want us to see.
Don't mind the account - l've been here a while. Winsanon was a reguIar when I was still frequenting. These guys aren't here to know what's right. They're here to be right. It's why they're coy... Until much of what's been said is just undeniable.
I'm glad they're realizing we're not their enemies. It's politics that had them believing so.