Considering boogeyman-viruses don't exist, bacteria are not contagious/pathogenic organisms and the entirety of germ theory is a hoax, I'd say your mistrust of the establishment medical system is well-founded.
They're only effective at emergency/trauma care. Everything else is literally a sham. They're not right about a single cause of any dis-ease (germs, genes, toxins, carcinogens, diets, etc.). The only reason there is even an appearance of the establishment system being correct in certain areas is because their drugs provide symptom suppression and pain relief.
The psyche/body creates the dis-ease to assist with a conflicting life situation and then heals the dis-ease after the conflict is resolved. Roughly 80% of all named dis-eases are actually in the "healing phase" when symptoms are first noticed. And this is why there are a kajillion different "remedies" people tout for all number of dis-eases as their psyche/body was already in the process of healing.
The more you know!
Women archaeologists wins the day. Thanks as always Uncle Fester!
This is not possible. The establishment narrative about DNA and genes is mostly a lie. Genes are a BLUEPRINT for creating a protein, nothing more.
In 2006, the world's top geneticists gathered at Cal Berkley for a weekend symposium. At the end of it, they couldn't even agree on WHAT A GENE WAS!!
Allergies are not what we've been led to believe either. An allergy is an unconscious association related to a past negative life event.
Don't BELIEVE the hype! They're just trying to scare you as usual...
I'll DM you when it's available. I don't want to be accused of "selling yourself paytriotism" by the mods.
I've saved your post and will let you know if a few months. Thanks for your interest!
The confederate states didn't want to take on the debt to the crown, unknown and undisclosed to them at the time they joined the union. When the debt came due and Lincoln informed them of this "minor detail", which he was HIRED & SELECTED to do as a BAR attorney, with massive compound interest as compared to the original 6 million francs during the revolutionary war, 70-years later as per international bankruptcy rules (1789 -> 1859), they wanted no part of it and seceded. And BTW, the crown purchased the US debt originally owed to the French government. In an attempt to gain the "moral high ground", the British infiltrators (crown) then played the slavery card.
Also, 99% of southerners didn't own slaves. Only the "elite" 1% did. Funny how some things never change, eh?
There's a great archived audio at the library of Congress of a man who fought in the Civil War as a teenager. The recording was made in the 1930s I believe. He said nobody thought they were fighting to keep slavery in the south, but instead he was under the impression they were fighting for "states rights" as the federal interlopers were trying to impose their "rules", mistakenly referred to as "laws" by the brainwashed masses, on the states, precisely as the founding-fathers had warned.
Any way you slice it, it's quite obvious southerners weren't sacrificing their families to protect something they had no vested interest in...in the first place.
Believe it or not, I'll actually have just such a newsletter soon, just pointing to my podcast. If you want, I'll ping you when it's up and running a few months.
Thanks for the kudos!
They've lied to us about virtually everything that we cannot easily verify for ourselves that gives the cabal an advantage over its serfs.
History, law, health, economics, science have all been massively perverted. My guess is that about 20% of what we've been taught in these areas is demonstrably true. There's usually a soft-middle of perhaps another 20% that contains half-truths, leaving the remaining 60% as blatant lies.
I often use anatomy and physiology as a good example. Gross anatomy/physiology is obviously true and accurate. Attempting to lie about any of this would be generally impossible as we can all easily verify that our arms are here, our stomach is there, bigger muscles are stronger, etc. etc.
Venturing into the half-truths realm, we get into ideas like "the heart is a pump" and pumps our blood. This is loosely true in one sense, as obviously no other organ can be doing this, but in the other, with a bit of thinking outside the box, you can begin to recognize that there's no way your heart is beating hard enough to PUMP blood all throughout the body. And this is because the heart is NOT a pump, but rather facilitates a very specialized and sophisticated type of vortex.
Likewise in the "half-truth" arena, we have the idea of a "heart attack" which everybody recognizes when the heart stops beating. This is quite true, but the fact that the heart stops beating has nothing to do with the heart itself. Conventional medicine largely blames heart attacks on "clogged arteries", yet even their gross anatomy textbooks demonstrate the heart is like an estuary with dozens of streams (veins/arteries) feeding it. This is quite purposeful and ensures that even if several arteries are currently under repair, others will always be able to pick up the slack to ensure blood keeps flowing. Furthermore, these instances of so-called "clogged arteries" in post-heart-attack patients are actually the exception, not the rule. Most of their large studies indicate more than half of these patients had zero "dangerously clogged arteries", or only "minor arterial buildup".
The truth is, a "heart attack" is the result of a temporary occlusion of the portion of the brain that controls the heart due to a temporarily bursting brain edema. Thus, we could more accurately call it a "brain attack". It has absolutely nothing to do with "clogged arteries", cholesterol, etc. All pure nonsense.
The greater 60% of lies come within the realm of fine/microscopic anatomy. For example, the cells organelles. A microbiologist in the 1970s/1980s showed how most of what the alleged cellular organelles were nothing more than air bubbles and staining artifacts. He was of course ridiculed by his peers, lost his grants and had his reputation smeared into oblivion. His findings were never refuted however. One particular organelle he showed was not real was the "endoplasmic reticulum (ER)", supposedly responsible for the highly complex DNA/RNA transcription process. Proof of the non-existence of the ER would throw all DNA and genetic research back into the stone ages. Further, the "MRNA vaccine" would then quickly be shown to be a complete fabrication on its face.
Anyway, hopefully you can see how the middle "half-truth" percentage would be difficult for the average person to verify and the 60%+ straight up lies part of the equation would be all but impossible to verify for anybody other than a highly trained specialist. And there's evidence galore out there that when one of these "highly trained specialists" strays from the plantation, they pay a heavy price.
It's human nature to "go along to get along" and "look the other way" when survival and the survival of their loved ones is on the line. And this is why there are only a rare few who speak out and hold their position after discovering these many half-truths and lies. Often in any particular field, you can count them on one hand.
History is actually much easier to whitewash. They simply buy up all the books that say anything other than the approved narrative, and/or discredit and ostracize anybody speaking against it.
Thus, if you want the truth, you'll have to go looking for it above and beyond the approved establishment "experts" and sources. It's out there and more available than ever before. Ask and you shall receive; seek and ye shall find!
My words normally fall on deaf ears here, but I'll share nonetheless.
Pancreatic cancer is caused by a fight over money/property/inheritance/etc. with someone we are close to (not with strangers). In the lingo of the modality I study, it's phrased as "a fight over the morsel".
I just listened to a case study a few weeks ago about a man who overcame pancreatic cancer. In effect, he "let go of the fight". Simple, but not always easy.
If you feel she might be responsive and open to this idea, I'm happy to share more.
If not, prayers sent your aunt's way. Blessing and Godspeed to her.
He lied about a lot more than just that! -> https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=hellstorm&kind=video
It's perfectly LEGAL as this is the system of the dead invented by the LIEGE LORDS to subjugate the peasants. They can do anything they want under the system they invented -> He who creates controls.
However, it's entirely UNLAWFUL to restrict free speech, both from a Constitutional and universal LAW standpoint.
Until we-the-people learn to distinguish between the fictional LEGAL system, which is an ever-changing hodge-podge of deprivation of rights (under COLOR of law) via their wholly invented **Acts, Statutes & Codes", and a truly lawful system, where LAWS are immutable and unchangeable, as the definition of LAW implies, the cabal will continue to hold dominion over its peasants.
David Straight is a mixed bag. I've listened to quite a bit of his stuff and also heard many criticisms from his former students.
Let's just say the guy is quite likely a pathological liar, especially when it comes to his own achievements and accomplishments in particular.
I don't trust him, even though he is sharing many truths about the legal-lawful clusterfork he's learned over the years.
One guy I know has been researching all these gurus for the past 4 years and brings forth a fairly objective look at who is on the up-and-up, versus those that are questionable. I'm not particularly impressed with him in general, but he's interacted with the vast majority of people out there in this space --- more than anybody else I'm aware of. It's worth considering his position. Here are some recent videos where he covers this. You'll have to fast-forward through all the opening BS to get to the meat of both of these videos. They're long and winding but the analysis is in there.
https://odysee.com/@ricecrypto:2/YouCantHandleMy-Part-2:6
I've arrived at similar conclusions. David Straight and Anna Von Reitz are two of the more popular figures in the US. They have a lot of valuable information to share, but ultimately they have also failed many of their followers. This idea of "status correction" isn't what it's cracked up to be. And in many cases, gets people into more trouble than they were originally in.
No human/system/medicine/quackcine has ever "provided a cure" for any dis-ease. The best any "medicine" could ever do is suppress symptoms or relieve pain, neither of which are a "cure", and in fact, more often then not, they are ultimately detrimental to one's long-term health.
Your psyche/body creates the "dis-ease" to help you resolve a conflicting life situation and likewise, "cures" it following the conflict resolution --- all without the help of any medicine/diet/treatment/tincture/herb/etc.
Such is the magnificence and intelligence of our amazing body/mind! Never once does it mutate, malfunction or break. It is only when we entertain thoughts of fear and judgment for years on end, without releasing them, that brings severe illness and ultimately death.
Just breathe. Sit and notice your breath. No thinking. No analysis. No trying. No efforting. No changing your breath rhythm.
Sure, thoughts and emotions will come up. Just watch them like you're watching the breath. Watch them and then return to the breath.
Just sit and notice your breath. Can you do it for 30 seconds? A minute? 5 minutes? 10 minutes? Once a day? Twice a day? Five times per day? Ten times per day? One hundred times per day?
The more you do, the faster the magic happens.
There's nothing to "figure out".
Prayers sent your way and wishing you the very best!
Right, like summer/fall 2021.
As long as people willfully choose to continue BELIEVING in boogeyman-viruses, the medical cabal will keep playing the same fear card which has been working for them for over 150 years.
The entirety of germ theory is an easily demonstrable hoax.
"There's nothing to fear, but fear itself." -FDR - even high level cabal operatives tell us the truth sometimes....
Emotions pass quickly when allowed. Dwelling upon the past is the error. But believe as you will!
You're most welcome, and kudos to you for your self-awareness. That's the hard part for most people. You can't correct it until you first notice it.
Here's a simple practice for rapid resolution - literally - although your thinking monkey-mind will rebel violently against it. The hard part is ignoring and transcending it, because it's sure its right and can justify its position until the cows come home.
What if? What if you could just allow everything to be as it is? The good, the bad and the ugly? This is an "advanced metaphysical practice", even though there's really nothing advanced about it. Th hard part is seeing thee monkey-mind running amok. Once you see it, you'll never let it get the best of you ever again. Until you see it, this practice appears ludicrous and impossible.
The monkey-mind. aka "The Matrix" wishes you to remain in fear and judgment, aka "anger". As long as you stay in this space, "The matrix has you".
The larger part of you is beyond this matrix. And this is where you really want to be. As Rumi said: "Out beyond the field of right-doing and wrong-doing there is a field: I'll meet you there", aka "The peace that passeth all understanding".
Good luck to you!
Indeed, good analysis. I've been an "outlaw", as you define it here, literally my whole life, but able to "play the game" on the surface enough to blend in and not be ostracized from society.
It's my general thesis that "sticking with the herd" is ultimately going to lead you to the slaughterhouse, as we've apparently been seeing to some degree in the past few years. What the world needs is more Josey Wales' types!
Happens on rare occasions... ;)
Presearch is the best one I've found, not controlled by outside interests.
https://presearch.com/