This in Texas? We should spam Abbott with this until he responds.
Maybe it's been discussed before, and I missed it, but I think the Great Awakening is a 2 parter. Perhaps Putin knows things and has the proof, but obviously must wait for a person to come to power who would actually be willing to listen, who could actually do something about it and make it all known.. like Trump.
I wish Putin had mentioned Victoria Nuland handing out cookies in Kiev.
Yes, after going and talking to his people. Which would definitely include a CIA director.
Also seems to be making the case that some of the agency heads dictated negotiations and policy towards Russia, not Clinton/Bush, when it came to Russia joining NATO, working together along with Europe on a missile defense shield, etc.
Exactly. This is the farmers union's victory. A real victory is staying until Macron is driven out out of office
He understands why the sanctions against Russia didn't work. ;)
That would be crazy if true lol.
Orban kind of had no choice here. Brussels was prepared to go economically nuclear on Hungary (again). But in doing so, the rest of the EU countries got to see what positions they would be in, with tensions already high in some areas due to the influx of cheap Ukrainian grain starting to erode many eastern European economies.
As Chippewa falls, so falls Chippewa Falls.
The transitory narrative came from Yelen. Powell had to play politics to get reconfirmed.
If you dive deep into what Powell has done, he's put us back on track towards an actual free and fair market. The issue now is congress playing ball and curbing spending.
Trump picked Powell for a reason, and the swamp tried to not reconfirm him. They wanted Brainard, and couldnt make it happen. And, if lineage means anything, Powell is decended from patriots of the original 13 colonies.
Either he's getting the greenlight from the Q team/Trump, for something in the future, or patriots are not in full control.
You decide.
When it becomes a clear threat, not perceived "comms" and statements/topics still protected under the 1A.
Someone I watch pointed out the following: Why is this small piece of land in Texas such a huge deal to both sides, while the rest of the border is being ignored?
That's been my hang-up with a lot of this.
I mean we're talking about people with access to supercomputers. They could analyze every drop multiple times for every possible meaning and cross reference that with all these tweets.
Things are happening, but Q did say most of it wouldn't be public.
The Rubicon is within spitting distance for somebody, the question is who.
Ah, so BoJo and his wing of the cabal are hoping to get more war under Trump.
A poster on X asked the right question, which is why are people opposed to the WEF agenda allowed to speak. Part of this regaining trust? There a couple people I follow that suggest being on guard for the WEF to delay their plans by supporting more right leaning people to further ingratiate themselves.
At this point, I wish some lost money found its way to me.
If that's the case then the uniparty must think Trump will win.
Oh good, and then it'll be declared a Russian coup and that we need to further aid Ukraine to prevent Russia from taking Ukraine entirely.
Could it be that this is a "collapse" to further destabilize the world which relies on China, and China will be fine.
The tears that would flow from this would be delicious.
Probably because they feel she's starting to affect the team.
Right, Gorbachev wanted to rescue the USSR economy, but he did not intend to abandon the centrally planned economy entirely.
Price controls remained in place, and they still controlled the means of production. By 1990, the government had virtually lost control over economic conditions. Government spending increased sharply as more unprofitable enterprises required state support and consumer price subsidies continued. Tax revenues declined because local governments withheld tax revenues from the central government in a climate of growing regional autonomy. The elimination of central control over production decisions, especially in the consumer goods sector, led to the breakdown in traditional supply-demand relationships without contributing to the formation of new ones. Thus, instead of streamlining the system, Gorbachev’s decentralization caused new production bottlenecks.
It's a good interview, but heading over to the normie haunts, it's about as I expected, no change in the zeitgeist. However, it has been less than 24hrs.
ETA: After the usual comments have gotten out of the way, I'm starting to see people bring up some of the points Putin made. I'm helping with articles I've saved like Merkel admitting what the Minsk agreement was really about.