Jesus did say he did not come to abolish the old law but to fulfill it (Matthew 5:16). We are fully under both laws but the new covenant that Jesus outlines in the Sermon on the Mount concerns your heart and not just your actions. Still not sure what your point is, are you trying to say Paul writes contrary to what Jesus taught?
Literally though, the “Gospel of Thomas” was a forgery, same as the Gospel of Peter not even being written by Peter. The Book of Enoch is claiming to have been written by Enoch the grandfather of Noah - so pre flood? Doesn’t pass the sniff test for me.
We also have many of Paul’s writings authored in 50AD and Mark being written 60-65 AD so I’m not sure where you’re getting your information that it was all after 70 AD. Honestly it’s not that long after Jesus’s death and resurrection if we are to imagine that was around 30-35AD. The whole BC/AD thing gets a little confusing when you really look into it, I’ve seen some studies that point to Jesus being born as early as 5 BC but alas..
Finally we have many New Testament books found in the DSS so at this point I don’t agree with basically anything you’ve said here
Paul was raised as a Pharisee and so yes, of course he talks about the old law, but it was fulfilled. That’s the whole point of acts 26. Paul also went out of his way to appease both Gentiles and Jews. Not sure what you’re trying to prove here?
The original 66 books were the only books until the early Catholic Church started to meet and need justification for their doctrines. If you actually look at the early church in Acts they only reference the original writings from Luke, John, Matthew, Mark, James, and Paul.
The 66 books of the Bible are the ones without historical inaccuracies and don’t contradict doctrine from known biblical writers. Also, the authors of many of the apocryphal books are known to be liars or frauds. Some of the books do contain useful information but it is NOT to be counted as the inspired Word of God.
The catholic Bible uses many of these apocryphal books to justify pergatory, praying to saints, and almsgiving. None of these things are mentioned by Jesus. Also, the members of the early church did not rely on the apocryphal books, and we don’t have the same breadth of copies to attest that what is being produced is what was written. With the 66 books, they have all undergone extensive authentication and are consistently confirmed by historical discoveries, such as the Dead Sea scrolls and other papyrus found in jars in the region.
I don’t know about you, but I trust the things Jesus said directly and don’t need anything else.
“If anyone preaches any other gospel… let him be accursed.” — Galatians 1:8
Underrated comment of the day.
YOU are GHEY! 😂😂
Honestly it seems like this is true. Unless they have some sort of legal justification, they might be required to submit Elon through the congressional approval process as a long term employee.
It happens to Christians too. The brainwashing is very potent for young people.
Honestly, it seems more likely that advanced AI and/or quantum computing has been around than it seems plausible that a bunch of humans in the top echelon of the military would’ve been able to plan Q and keep it secret all this time. Not sure why a handshake is freaking out and insisting there’s no way this is AI.
Thank you for your perspective. I do hope academia returns to the golden age because we need schools to push innovation and not social justice or virtue signaling nonsense.
What did MSNBC censor? This post doesn’t corroborate the post title..
I don’t like this. We don’t need an oligarchy and we definitely don’t need a 3rd Obama term.
The Bible clearly says that women shouldn’t be pastors. I think this is why.
I think they went to sleep confused.. so when they woke up still confused, nothing had changed.
She’s truly crushing it. Although I was a little confused why this was called a “personal” announcement. Hoped for her to join this new version of the View.
Very true. Also worth noting that the names “Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego” are names of the gods of King Nebuchadnezzar. Their Hebrew names were different:
Daniel 1:5-7 [5] The king assigned them a daily portion of the food that the king ate, and of the wine that he drank. They were to be educated for three years, and at the end of that time they were to stand before the king. [6] Among these were Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah of the tribe of Judah. [7] And the chief of the eunuchs gave them names: Daniel he called Belteshazzar, Hananiah he called Shadrach, Mishael he called Meshach, and Azariah he called Abednego.
Calling her a viper is pretty extreme. And I’ve never seen her defend pornography, on the contrary, she is staunchly against it. However, she is a firm defendant of due process and freedom of speech, and sometimes that means defending people you don’t agree with. Don’t get it twisted.
I’m pretty sure it’s been confirmed
This guy has done more for the conservative movement than everyone else combined. Cool your jets.
That’s so crazy. How on God’s green earth can you have an election and not require an ID? Nothing stops kids or illegals from voting.
That was NOT the answer they were expecting lmao
I think it’s a little more obvious than the other answers.
Trump did himself a disservice by telling people only to vote on Election Day - even if it’s better to vote in person, there could be someone who doesn’t have the means to get to a polling center or maybe they can’t vote for another reason. Maybe they die! Or maybe they just forget or get sick or something.
By telling people to vote early, you don’t let the democrats get a head start that we then have to overcome on Election Day. It makes no sense to tell people “don’t vote early or by mail in ballot” as you’re literally turning away voters. It may not be ideal, but they all count.
This is wicked cool. Well cited, deep, and thorough.
That’s all fair assessment but I think the thing to take from this study is that, even if the % shown isn’t indicative of the total population, the trend seems accurate. There’s definitely a lot more younger people identifying as trans than older people - my theory is that it’s a social contagion and the younger people are more affected. But I agree, the states picked definitely skew the observed % higher. As long as the states are consistent then I think the trend we are seeing can be relied on.