2
ThinkItThrough 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember the dems threatened that if Trump won, it would be the last election held in the US? That gives a hint at what they are planning. 🤔

0
ThinkItThrough 0 points ago +0 / -0

Don’t ascribe to them rational, non-narcissistic thought processes. They define “good” and “evil” differently. “Good” is anything that gets them what they want (e.g., Harry Reid questioned about lying about Romney’s tax return, and replying, “Well, he wasn’t elected, was he?”). “Evil” is anything that blocks them getting what they want. Karma is irrelevant, because no natter how harmful their actions, if it gets them what they want, it is by definition “good” and cannot result in negative consequences.

2
ThinkItThrough 2 points ago +2 / -0

Witnesses I saw said shots came from “multiple directions.” So more than one shooter? Which makes him the “patsy” in more than one way.

9
ThinkItThrough 9 points ago +9 / -0

If “they” tell you not to eat meat and especially not beef, then obviously meat is good for you, and beef is especially good for you.

5
ThinkItThrough 5 points ago +5 / -0

🤔🤔

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) Argued: March 5, 1897 Decided: March 28, 1898

Long opinion, here is the bottom line:

[Holding:] The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/169/649/

3
ThinkItThrough 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s not the ones in “their right minds” that they’re after.

1
ThinkItThrough 1 point ago +1 / -0

If something is not posted because it might be too long, we are “denied access” because we never see it.

6
ThinkItThrough 6 points ago +6 / -0

Does Merchan get to keep the close to $100 million he was paid through his daughter? 🤔

8
ThinkItThrough 8 points ago +8 / -0

They are mad because, while democrats have had immunity for everything they do because they actually are “above the law,” (unless they go against the cabal and must be disciplined), now some of that immunity is extended to conservatives.

1
ThinkItThrough 1 point ago +1 / -0

When “since the nation’s 18th century founding” has a former President been criminally charged? (rhetorical question)

https://time.com/6264880/president-arrested-indicted-history-trump/?

2
ThinkItThrough 2 points ago +2 / -0

I haven’t seen anyone anywhere mention China. They paid an awful lot of money to the Bidens and I would imagine had a lot to do with election fraud in 2020, to have someone in the White House who would help them take advantage of, and also destroy, the US. My guess is they have a say in the decision as well, and with all they invested in the Bidens, I doubt they want to see him out to pasture.

2
ThinkItThrough 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you so much - I’ve never heard of him and wanted to find more of what he has to say.

4
ThinkItThrough 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why should people who don’t mind lengthy posts be denied access to them just because some people don’t want to be bothered? If a post is too long for them they can just skip it. Please let the rest of us see it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›