The part that really gets me is "that's over."
Anyone else reporting this? I'm not gonna fall for another RealRawNews. This website, and specifically this story, seems a little too.. on the nose. 😎
Sometimes the communists are so over the top that this kind of news doesn't initially register as totalitarian as it does "cartoon bad guys" and I burst out laughing. Then again, while it's so over the top that I can't help but laugh, I have to remember that yes, the commies are deadly serious when they go this far over the top. Their idea that they can get away with the absurdity is in itself a show of power.
Who'd have thought that the Scooby Doo styled unmasking of bad guys would one day be a real life thing?
I can tell you meant this as a well-intentioned joke, but you should put something like (joke) in the image itself, because it can be taken both ways. The "Research Wanted" tag doesn't help. Still, I thought it was funny!
This, I want to hope that this is just accelerating, like turning the sub into the torpedo before it could arm itself like in Hunt for Red October. You take the absurdity to 11 and everyone realizes how the current insanity will end if allowed to get that far anywhere else.
TIL the skin masks from Mission Impossible 2 were not only real but they weren't even as good as what was available at the time!
Wow!
Here's a Business Insider article from 2013 featuring an image of Joe and Bill. https://www.businessinsider.com/democrats-who-voted-for-doma-2013-3
Here's a direct link to the image (from their image server) https://i.insider.com/5152f87f69bedd131800001b
Any body language experts want to chime in? Is Joe the dominant one or is he just always a little too.. up close and personal (we know how he is with women and kids, yuck)
then they introduce general charles Q brown
This was the cherry on top!
This. Pink-pillers are necessary because they aren't as "extreme" (not in actuality) to the centrists. Then once the centrists can handle the pink-pill, they can tolerate full on red pills.
FYI this was during a government shutdown in 2017, Murphy was governor at the time of Covid
It's not that E Team convinced me that there were no planes on 9/11, it's that it was the missing piece of the puzzle that would explain the explosion and corresponding damage to the "impact zone" that was visible to everybody after the "plane" struck.
It's that E Team had unprecedented access to the buildings in the months leading up to 9/11.
It's that their "diary" was filled with all sorts of weird imagery, including people falling from the sky with a down arrow and saying something to the effect of "hundreds of feet of pure pleasure."
Then Nose Out gave the explanation for how the second plane appeared in live footage on the broadcast, because it was composited over live footage.
Pieces of the puzzle that go from "schizo-town" to "there just may be something here."
A child only sees truth.
Aye. All the adults have been conditioned over many years to think in terms that are away from that base state of understanding, thus missing the truth that's right in front of them. Also, I'll add that the child just comes right out and says it, because the child doesn't know why it is not to be pointed out! Seeing truth and pointing it out without fear, because why should one be afraid to ask a question in a free society? <--- FACT CHECK: This claim is made by someone who spreads false claims without evidence. Verdict: Mostly False
E Team and Nose Out were the two situations that gave me the "well okay maybe I'll consider it" to the notion that there were no planes.
Add a little mass formation psychosis and then you have to ask yourself, did YOU see a plane? Do you know anyone who saw a plane? At the individual level, everyone just assumes that everyone else saw the plane. But if everyone assumes that everyone else saw it, what then if nobody saw it? Then surely everyone saw it, and thus it would be absolutely insane to question something that everyone saw? You can hide something in plain sight if the very idea of questioning it would be preposterous. If you're going to cook up a nefarious scheme, why not build that preposterousness (and thus plausible deniability) directly into the scheme? Helps you cover it up later.
"into every batch of Bud Light"
..but they do for some batches? 😆
This same thing happened to me years ago.I watched a Trump rally in August 2015 fully expecting a trainwreck with Trump prancing around the stage cracking jokes demeaning minorities. I mean, he'd have to, right? He apparently had no problem calling all Mexican immigrants rapists. (That's what I was told he said!) Anyway, I watch the rally and was blown away by how pragmatic and down to earth he actually is. I tune into MSNBC expecting them to say "Wow, Trump was actually in top form tonight" because the Trump they had previously described was NOTHING like what I saw with my own eyes. .........needless to say they covered it like it was a literal neo-Nazi rally. The rubber band immediately broke on my trust of the media, which was already quite low due to the war in Iraq, but this was so blatant that it just, like I said, broke the rubber band instantly.
Disinformation is necessary. We get our hopes up at false news. The enemy panics at false news. I don't mind getting my hopes up if it means the enemy panics.
I hope so. I mean, barring some major fake out, Elon remains my #1 suspect for being the anti-Christ due to Neuro Link and what not.
I'd probably buy it just to have people investigate it privately to find anything left, then go scorched earth and rebuild
Maybe this is precisely what the guy is doing!
Personally, I think "too far" is more like "too close to the truth" instead of "unnecessarily cruel." I think you should keep it.
When the Musk set in
I can't 😂
Gonna play devil's advocate here.. Fauci didn't necessarily lie when he said he doesn't know how to use Twitter. When he "takes over someone's account" it probably means he's got some tech-savvy intern doing it for him, and he's telling them what to say. .............hold on a moment, maybe that's the loophole for him saying he doesn't know how to use Twitter, because if he is speaking through someone, that is technically him communicating on Twitter. So wow, even when attempting to play devil's advocate, I wound up realizing that Fauci was being deceitful in his side-stepping "answers."
What if Alan flipped and joined the team? post 1132
If PJMedia is saying it, then it's at least a lot more credible. Never heard of "BNN". Thanks