5
WhoReallyRunsThis 5 points ago +5 / -0

About two years ago, I searched far and wide, dark and deep, and was unable to find anything that resembled frazzledrip. I decoded kappy files, worked on WL insurance 1, 2, and 3; went to the darkest places on the net in search of something. Found a bunch of ugly stuff, but nothing.

Whenever I hear someone say, don’t go searching, I’ve seen it… I have to call bs.

7
WhoReallyRunsThis 7 points ago +7 / -0

You're getting downvoted, but it's okay for me to think Trump is the best president in my lifetime, but ALSO not agree with his push of the vax.

I can recall many times watching his speeches where he would actively encourage to go out and get vaccinated... so when I saw this post (and him going after desanctimonious for the vax), it doesn't seem like a good strategy.

Sorry that you're getting downvoted, but I agree with you - I see a lot of confirmation bias in the thread here, dismissing or kind of covering for Trump on this topic... We are allowed to disagree with Trump or any other elected official on topics - anything else is sheepish and no better than the left's blind-eye of justice (not that I'm calling for justice against trump here - I think there is a meaningful argument to be made about fraud from the vax companies and/or DOJ in the creation of this mess).

4
WhoReallyRunsThis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tom Fitton better watch his back...

Supply and demand on schmediums is going to hit him hard.

4
WhoReallyRunsThis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who's this guy? Mister Balloons... Mister Balloon Hands!

No waaaaay. Get real.

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based on edit: "A site with a bazillion Gifs is where its from."

I would recommend deleting then. Read my quick 5 minute analysis up above that indicates that it's not a legit attempt at anything other than a honeypot.

edit: In case it wasn't clear - this is in regards to the link DIA.WIKI that is in the gif itself.

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

land·ing page noun the section of a website accessed by clicking a hyperlink on another web page, typically the website's home page.

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

OP, where did you find this link? You've been here for a bit, and I don't see you blasting it before, so where did you stumble upon it from?

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

BTW - the link that takes you to mvpstud.io on the bottom of the Collab page is attached to a graphic: TRUST BUT VERIFY, which is used below all of the typeform pages, but not linked... so I'm assuming that someone fucked up and forgot to remove that mvpstud.io link when they were haphazardly making this steaming pile of honey.

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sorry, but what is this honeypot bullshit?

Forgive me for being skeptical of anything other than...

The landing page is a half-baked pile of garbage; for instance, the alt text on the main logo is simply "dia logo high res"... not deal breaking, but sloppy. Then you click on the first menu link: Collab.

Takes you to some bullshit social media circle jerk with people hawking their websites, and a link at the bottom that takes you to mvpstud.io - a marketing agency.

Then you go to freebird, and you're presented with a WHOLE OTHER menu, which clicking on most of the links brings you to a typeform (kek), and the first question is your WhatsApp phone number (double meta kek).

Maybe the best part, on the main page, they have a link to GLOBAL INITIATIVES, except, they misspelled the graphic: Global Initiatvies. Dumb cunts.

This should be avoided at all costs, true anons.

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like he’s going to run, if you ask me.

“I’ve been muzzled since 2009. “ retiring soon, about to get more vocal. Seems like he’s going to do it. Won’t hold a candle to djt.

6
WhoReallyRunsThis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Careful. You might get him sent upstate…to the hole.

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fellow GA Pede here, and astounded that people would put dirty kemp back in.

He stonewalled any attempts at an investigation, a hit was put out on his family (killed his daughters bf in a mysterious way) and I figured he would exit public office and never run again… fuck me.

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Research Wanted" tag is an understatement of the century.

How about, who the f is Lonna Bauer. Clearly not American... no one writes Mon. 2 May and Thurs. 5 May.

GTFO with that backwards (everywhere else) bs. :D Imperialism.

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Came here to say the same thing. I found it interesting because he mentioned it at least 2x that "France just had an election... paper ballots, and everything went flawlessly..." (paraphrasing).

But it seemed kinda fishy to me. So I was wondering if Trump was writing that one off as a lost cause, use it as leverage to get to paper ballots under a much-more controlled system.

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think Trump rejoins Twitter during the runup to 2024. He's saying he's not going to Twitter so he can maximize signups on Truth Social...

Once the signups slow down, and there is a diminishing return on that tactic, he will rejoin Twitter and post to both. 80+M reach, that's probably more valuable than anything... even if 20M are bots...

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only issue that I see with the data is this: The data SHOULD be larger for the vaccinated group as more people get vaccinated. AKA, if 10% of people are vaccinated, then the case rate amongst all groups would probably be proportionally small for vaccinated.

As the vaccine has been swindled into people's lives, the number of folks that remain unvaxxed entirely is shrinking. Still a large number, but I think it's safe to say that we're in the minority. So I would expect that the percent of the case-rate to be proportionally smaller.

Now, with that said, I also believe that VAIDS is becoming more and more likely, so it would be interesting to see this data as time goes on... if anything, it shows that the vaccine doesn't do shit for prevention, but we've known that for a while. Now onto showing the number of adverse deaths between vax and unvaxxed.

7
WhoReallyRunsThis 7 points ago +8 / -1

I'm not going to hold my breath. Seems like another datefag. And unfortunately, it seems like he's propping himself up with publicity - not totally sure what he gets out of it.

Sure, maybe he is trying to protect himself... make sure he's got the word out so people leave him alone, but we've also seen so many fake outs that it's difficult to get excited until I see the goods.

At least if I'm not running on hopeium, then it's going to feel glorious to watch if it comes true...

6
WhoReallyRunsThis 6 points ago +6 / -0

True, but I'm not sure that it matters. Elon's stake is large enough that the hostile takeover is still in play - he can destroy the value in a dump, instill fear in other investors with the THREAT of dumping, and buy up more at a discount... all sorts of things. And we know that he's willing to bend the rules on manipulating stock price and pay the penalty with the SEC - he's had to do that a couple of times, I believe.

So he's really in the drivers seat here, from what I can tell. It will be interesting to see if we get a decision from the board today on whether they will accept the offer or go against the above-price offer.

4
WhoReallyRunsThis 4 points ago +5 / -1

OK. Brand new account. Shilling for a platform that most of us can't even get on.

Two top execs out, Trump reportedly won't even touch it right now because the rollout has been completely botched.

Literally, it sounds like they are having massive scaling issues, and surprise, their Mastadon implementation (supposed) isn't very robust at scale. Check latest No Agenda.

Anyhow, "get on there ASAP" is not happenin, bud.

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem with forensic recovery, like the type you’re speaking about with regards to previous memory states, is I think everyone is working off of copies and copies of copies. Do we know if Maxey has the original drive still?

A copy will only preserve the present bit, as far as I’m aware, not the underlying “previous states”.

Would be interested in some other opinions on this, though. The 450gb raised my eyebrow too.

6
WhoReallyRunsThis 6 points ago +7 / -1

URGENT BREAKING HYPOTHESIS!

And therefore:

IS THIS HYPOTHESIS TOO GOO TO BE TRUE?

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was a long time ago... They've probably moved on to the even more effective Ivermectin....

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can confirm. Correcting a DNS entry, even with many many security layers, can be done fairly quickly. Propagation has been less than 20 minutes or so for the last few years.

This is odd.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›